Predictors of preparedness for recovery following colorectal cancer surgery: a latent class trajectory analysis

References

• Taylor C, Richardson A, Cowley S. Restoring embodied control following surgical treatment for colorectal cancer: a longitudinal qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010; 47(8):946–956. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.12.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson J, Kumlien C. Everyday challenges following hospital discharge. A multi‐method study identifying and describing areas of concern for patients during the first month after colorectal cancer surgery. Nurs Open. 2023;10(4):2172–2181. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster C, Haviland J, Winter J, et al. Pre-surgery depression and confidence to manage problems predict recovery trajectories of health and wellbeing in the first two years following colorectal cancer: results from the CREW cohort study. PLOS One. 2016;11(5):e0155434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winterling J, Wasteson E, Glimelius B, et al. Substantial changes in life: perceptions in patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer and their spouses. Cancer Nurs. 2004;27(5):381–388. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200409000-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allvin R, Berg K, Idvall E, et al. Postoperative recovery: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2007;57(5):552–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04156.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson J, Idvall E, Kumlien C. Patient characteristics and surgery-related factors associated with patient-reported recovery at 1 and 6 months after colorectal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017; 26(6):e12715. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlyk A, Harder I. Recovering at home: participating in a fast-track colon cancer surgery programme. Nurs Inq. 2011; 18(2):165–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00519.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson J, Idvall E, Kumlien C. The lived experience of recovery during the first 6 months after colorectal cancer surgery. J Clin Nurs. 2017; 26(23–24):4498–4505. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekhael M, Larsen HM, Lauritzen MB, et al. Bowel dysfunction following pelvic organ cancer: a prospective study on the treatment effect in nurse-led late sequelae clinics. Acta Oncol. 2023;62(1):70–79. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2168214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith F, Öhlén J, Persson LO, et al. Daily assessment of stressful events and coping in early post-operative recovery after colorectal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer Care. 2018;27(2):e12829. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friberg F, Andersson EP, Bengtsson J. Pedagogical encounters between nurses and patients in a medical ward—a field study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(4):534–544. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert RS, Prigerson HG, Schulz R, et al. Preparing caregivers for the death of a loved one: a theoretical framework and suggestions for future research. J Palliat Med. 2006;9(5):1164–1171. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lithner M, Klefsgard R, Johansson J, et al. The significance of information after discharge for colorectal cancer surgery–a qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2015;14(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12912-015-0086-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlsson E, Pettersson M, Öhlén J, et al. Development and validation of the preparedness for colorectal cancer surgery questionnaire: PCSQ-pre 24. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016;25:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer S, Jansen L, Boakye D, et al. Changes in health-related outcomes among colorectal cancer patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation therapy: a systematic review of observational and interventional studies. Acta Oncol. 2021;60(1):124–134. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1828620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walming S, Asplund D, Block M, et al. Patients with rectal cancer are satisfied with in-hospital communication despite insufficient information regarding treatment alternatives and potential side-effects. Acta Oncol. 2018;57(10):1311–1317. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1484158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson E, Berndtsson I, Hallén A-M, et al. Concerns and quality of life before surgery and during the recovery period in patients with rectal cancer and an ostomy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2010;37(6):654–661. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3181f90f0c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008; 248(2):189–198. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv L, Shao YF, Zhou YB. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: an update of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012; 27(12):1549–1554. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1577-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friberg F, Wallengren C, Håkanson C, et al. Exploration of dynamics in a complex person-centred intervention process based on health professionals’ perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3218-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ishino FAM, Odame EA, Villalobos K, et al. A national study of colorectal cancer survivorship disparities: a latent class analysis using SEER (surveillance, epidemiology, and end results) registries. Front Public Health. 2021;9:111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong C, Ji CS, Liang W, et al. Heterogeneous demographic and cultural profiles of non-adherent Chinese-American patients to colorectal cancer screening: a latent class analysis. Cancer Nurs. 2014;37(2):106–113. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182888b5b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishino FAM, Odame EA, Villalobos K, et al. Applying latent class analysis on cancer registry data to identify and compare health disparity profiles in colorectal cancer surgical treatment delay. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(2):E487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clouth FJ, Moncada‐Torres A, Geleijnse G, et al. Heterogeneity in quality of life of long‐term colon cancer survivors: a latent class analysis of the population‐based PROFILES registry. Oncologist. 2021;26(3):e492–e499. doi: 10.1002/onco.13655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenzik KM, Martin MY, Fouad MN, et al. Health‐related quality of life in lung cancer survivors: latent class and latent transition analysis. Cancer. 2015;121(9):1520–1528. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén B, Muthén LK. Integrating person‐centered and variable‐centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcohol: clin Exp Res. 2000;24(6):882–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhlén J, Sawatzky R, Pettersson M, et al. Preparedness for colorectal cancer surgery and recovery through a person-centred information and communication intervention–A quasi-experimental longitudinal design. PLOS One. 2019;14(12):e0225816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawatzky R, Russell L, Friberg F, et al. Longitudinal person-centered measurement: a psychometric evaluation of the preparedness for colorectal cancer surgery questionnaire (PCSQ). Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(5):827–835. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.11.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–376. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogar M, van der Schaaf M, Lagergren P. Reference values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire in a random sample of the Swedish population. Acta Oncol. 2012; 51(1):10–16. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.614636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan KA, Grassi L, McGinty HL, et al. Validation of the distress thermometer worldwide: state of the science. Psychooncology. 2014;23(3):241–250. doi: 10.1002/pon.3430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarenmalm EK, Nasic S, Håkanson C, et al. Swedish version of the distress thermometer: validity evidence in patients With colorectal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16(8):959–966. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson M, Lindström B. Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005; 59(6):460–466. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.018085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anestesiologists APSCSMSo. www.asahq.org. Accessed June 30, 2023. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• statistics NCoSPNHW. www.nhwstat.org. Accessed June 30. 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Control TCoMTUfIC. www.uicc.org. Accessed. June 30. 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Ram N, Grimm KJ. Growth mixture modeling: a method for identifying differences in longitudinal change among unobserved groups. Int J Behav Dev. 2009;33(6):565–576. doi: 10.1177/0165025409343765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck RH, Thomas SL. An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches using mplus. Third edition. ed. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a monte carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Modeling: A Multidiscipli J. 2007;14(4):535–569. doi: 10.1080/10705510701575396.s
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: three-step approaches using M plus. Mplus Web Notes No 15. 2014:http://www.statmodel.com Assessed. June 30. 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Lanza ST, Tan X, Bray BC. Latent class analysis with distal outcomes: a flexible model-based approach. Struct Equ Modeling. 2013;20(1):1–26. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2013.742377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakk Z, Kuha J. Relating latent class membership to external variables: an overview. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2021;74(2):340–362. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW, JrLemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Jr. Model‐building strategies and methods for logistic regression. In: Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX, editors. Applied logistic regression (Vol. 398). Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2013. p. 89–151.
   Google Scholar
• Öhlén J, Friberg F. Person‐centred conversations in nursing and health: a theoretical analysis based on perspectives on communication. Nurs Philos. 2023;24(3):e12432. doi: 10.1111/nup.12432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar CJ, van Rooijen SJ, Fokkenrood HJ, et al. Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;5(5):Cd013259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013259.pub2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutsunbuloglu E, Vural F, Altintas SB, et al. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of The Preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire (PCSQ-TR). J Perianesth Nurs. 2022;37(5):640–645. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2021.10.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard MC, Hoffman ME. Variable-centered, person-centered, and person-specific approaches: where theory meets the Method. Organ Res Meth. 2018;21(4):846–876. doi: 10.1177/1094428117744021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack B, Dulmen Sv, Eide H, et al Person-centred healthcare research. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer GR, Churchill SM, Mahendran M, et al. Intersectionality in quantitative research: a systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM Popul Health. 2021;14:100798. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar