Privileged or ordinary carrier: strategic choice in a competitive environment

References

• Balliauw, Matteo, Hilde Meersman, Eddy Van de Voorde, and Thierry Vanelslander. 2019. “Towards Improved Port Capacity Investment Decisions Under Uncertainty: A Real Options Approach.” Transport Reviews 39 (4): 531–552. doi:10.1080/01441647.2018.1556228.
   Google Scholar
• Balliauw, M., H. Meersman, E. Van de Voorde, and T. Vanelslander. 2018. “Towards Improved Port Capacity Investment Decisions under Uncertainty: A Real Options Approach.” Transport Reviews 39 (4): 531–552. doi:10.1080/01441647.2018.1556228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canonaco, P., P. Legato, R. M. Mazza, and M. Roberto. 2008. “A Queuing Network Model for the Management of Berth Crane Operations.” Computers & Operations Research 35 (8): 2432–2446. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2006.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.-C., and S.-M. Liu. 2016. “Should Ports Expand Their Facilities under Congestion and Uncertainty?” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 85: 109–131. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2015.12.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, G. 2018. “Optimization of the Pricing Strategies between Container Terminals under Deregulation.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2018: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, G., R. Huang, and P. Ng. 2016. “Tacit Collusion between Two Terminals of a Port.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 93: 199–211. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2016.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Y., Q. Chen, X. Quan, L. Long, and R. Y. K. Fung. 2011. “Berth Allocation considering Fuel Consumption and Vessel Emissions.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 47 (6): 1021–1037. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulebenets, M. A., M. M. Golias, and S. Mishra. 2018. “A Collaborative Agreement for Berth Allocation under Excessive Demand.” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 69: 76–92. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2017.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaver, T., H. Meersman, F. Moglia, and E. Van De Voorde. 2010. “Do Mergers and Alliances Influence European Shipping and Port Competition?” Maritime Policy & Management 27 (4): 363–373. doi:10.1080/030888300416559.
   Google Scholar
• Imai, A., K. Nagaiwa, and W. Chan. 1997. “Efficient Planning of Berthing Allocation for Container Terminals in Asia.” J. Adv. Transp 31 (1): 75–94. doi:10.1002/atr.5670310107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, A., E. Nishimura, and S. Papadimitriou. 2003. “Berth Allocation with Service Priority.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 37 (5): 437–457. doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00023-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, A., X. Sun, E. Nishimura, and S. Papadimitriou. 2005. “Berth Allocation in a Container Port: Using a Continuous Location Space Approach.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 39 (3): 199–221. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2004.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., and K. C. Moon. 2003. “Berth Scheduling by Simulated Annealing.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 37 (6): 541–560. doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00027-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, D. M., and J. A. Scheinkman. 1983. “Quantity Precommitment and Bertrand Competition Yield Cournot Outcomes.” The Bell Journal of Economics 14 (2): 326. doi:10.2307/3003636.
   Google Scholar
• Lagoudis, Ioannis N., James B. Rice Jr, and Jason B. Salminen. 2014. “Port Investment Strategies Under Uncertainty: The Case of a Southeast Asian Multipurpose Port1.” the Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 30 (3): 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2014.12.003.
   Google Scholar
• Moorthy, R., and C.-P. Teo. 2006. “Berth Management in Container Terminal: The Template Design Problem.” OR Spectrum 28 (4): 495–518. doi:10.1007/s00291-006-0036-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petering, M. E. H., and K. G. Murty. 2009. “Effect of Block Length and Yard Crane Deployment Systems on Overall Performance at a Seaport Container Transshipment Terminal.” Computers & Operations Research 36 (5): 1711–1725. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2008.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng, D., Z.-C. Li, X. Fu, and D. Gillen. 2017. “Modeling the Effects of Unilateral and Uniform Emission Regulations under Shipping Company and Port Competition.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 101: 99–114. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2017.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Journal of Commerce, 2014. Maritime News. https://www.joc.com/maritime-news ( accessed 26.10.2016).
   Google Scholar
• Wan, Y., L. J. Basso, and A. Zhang. 2016. “Strategic Investments in Accessibility under Port Competition and inter-regional Coordination.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 93: 102–125. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2016.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, F., C. Wang, and L. Xu. 2021. “Whether to Invest in Terminal Efficiency: A Perspective considering Customer Preference and Capital Constraint in Competitive Environment?” Ocean & Coastal Management 205: 105563. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar