Increase in Linguistic Complexity in Older Adults During COVID-19

References

• Aitchison, J. (2012). Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Hoboken, NJ, US: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2001). Word frequency distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (2014). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. London, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, D., & Rai, M. (2020). Social isolation in covid-19: The impact of loneliness. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 66(6), 525–527. doi:10.1177/0020764020922269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaman, K. (1984). Coordination and subordination revisited: Syntactic complexity in spoken and written narrative discourse. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 45–80). Norwood, NJ, US: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? an executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 309. doi:10.1037/a0029171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon-Itt, S., & Skunkan, Y. (2020). Public perception of the COVID-19 pandemic on twitter: Sentiment analysis and topic modeling study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(4), e21978. doi:10.2196/21978
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyd, R. L., & Schwartz, H. A. (2021). Natural language analysis and the psychology of verbal behavior: The past, present, and future states of the field. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1), 21–41. doi:10.1177/0261927X20967028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227), 912–920. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1973). Development of the first language in the human species. The American Psychologist, 28(2), 97–106. doi:10.1037/h0034209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. A. (2008). Language and aging. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 373–443). London, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L.-K. (2020). Older adults and COVID-19 pandemic: Resilience matters. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 89, 104124. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2020.104124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, E., Lerman, K., Ferrara, E. (2020). Tracking social media discourse about the COVID-19 pandemic: Development of a public coronavirus twitter data set. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(2), e19273. doi:10.2196/19273
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohn, M. A., Mehl, M. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2004). Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15(10), 687–693. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00741.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. (2020). Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview. Journal of Writing Research, 11(vol. 11 issue 3), 415–443. doi:10.17239/JOWR-2020.11.03.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695(5), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• De Pue, S., Gillebert, C., Dierckx, E., Vanderhasselt, M.-A., De Raedt, R., & Van den Bussche, E. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on wellbeing and cognitive functioning of older adults. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–11. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84127-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichstaedt, J. C., Smith, R. J., Merchant, R. M., Ungar, L. H., Crutchley, P., Preoţiuc-Pietro, D. … Schwartz, H. A. (2018). Facebook language predicts depression in medical records. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 11203–11208. doi:10.1073/pnas.1802331115
   Google Scholar
• Esmaeelpour, E., & Sasani, F. (2018). Linguistic complexity of mixed episode in sadegh hedayat’s letters: The effect of bipolar mood disorder. Social Science Research Network Electronic Journal. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1570939
   Google Scholar
• Eyigoz, E., Mathur, S., Santamaria, M., Cecchi, G., & Naylor, M. (2020). Linguistic markers predict onset of Alzheimer’s disease. EClinicalMedicine, 28, 100583. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100583
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ezeizabarrena, M.-J., & Garcia Fernandez, I. (2018). Length of utterance, in morphemes or in words?: Mlu3-w, a reliable measure of language development in early basque. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2265. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., & Wright, H. H. (2011). Lexical diversity for adults with and without aphasia across discourse elicitation tasks. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1414–1430. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.603898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2018). An r companion to applied regression. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Futrell, R., Mahowald, K., & Gibson, E. (2015). Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(33), 10336–10341. doi:10.1073/pnas.1502134112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium (pp. 95–126). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, T. (1991). Markedness in grammar: Distributional, communicative and cognitive correlates of syntactic structure. Studies in Language, 15(2), 335–370. doi:10.1075/sl.15.2.05giv
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). Boston diagnostic Aphasia examination–third edition (bdae-3). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2011). Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40(5), 223–234. doi:10.3102/0013189X11413260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarmann, H. J., & Kolk, H. H. (1994). On-line sensitivity to subject-verb agreement violations in broca’s aphasics: The role of syntactic complexity and time. Brain and Language, 46(4), 493–516. doi:10.1006/brln.1994.1028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, E. A., O’Connor, R. C., Perry, V. H., Tracey, I., Wessely, S., Arseneault, L., Ballard, C., Christensen, H., Cohen Silver, R., Everall, I., Ford, T., John, A., Kabir, T., King, K., Madan, I., Michie, S., Przybylski, A. K., Shafran, R., Sweeney, A., Worthman, C. M. … et al. (2020). Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for action for mental health science. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(6), 547–560. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, F. K., Petermann-Rocha, F., Gray, S. R., Jani, B. D., Katikireddi, S. V., Niedzwiedz, C. L., Foster, H., Hastie, C. E., Mackay, D. F., Gill, J. M., O'Donnell, C., Welsh, P., Mair, F., Sattar, N., Celis-Morales, C. A., Pell, J. P. (2020). Is older age associated with COVID-19 mortality in the absence of other risk factors? General population cohort study of 470,034 participants. PLoS One, 15(11), e0241824. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655–672. doi:10.1177/0164027504268574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagaiah, T., Olinghouse, N. G., & Kearns, D. M. (2020). Syntactic complexity measures: Variation by genre, grade-level, students’ writing abilities, and writing quality. Reading and Writing, 33(10), 2577–2638. doi:10.1007/s11145-020-10057-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S. (2013). Capturing the diversity in lexical diversity. Language Learning, 63, 87–106. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00739.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, W. (1944). Studies in language behavior: I. A program of research. Psychological Monographs, 56(2), 1–15. doi:10.1037/h0093508
   Google Scholar
• Karwowski, M., Zielińska, A., Jankowska, D. M., Strutyńska, E., Omelańczuk, I., & Lebuda, I. (2021). Creative lockdown? a daily diary study of creative activity during pandemics. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 23. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.600076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempler, D., & Zelinski, E. M. (1994). Language and dementia in normal aging. Dementia and Normal Aging, 1st edition, Cambridge University Press, pp. 331–365.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. K., Sung, J. E., & Jeong, J. H. (2012). Effects of syntactic complexity on sentence comprehension in persons with mild cognitive impairment and dementia of alzheimer’s type. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 17(2), 338–355.
   Google Scholar
• Kouzuki, M., Furukawa, S., Mitani, K., & Urakami, K. (2021). Examination of the cognitive function of Japanese community-dwelling older adults in a class for preventing cognitive decline during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One, 16(12), e0248446. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0248446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle, K. (2019). Measuring lexical richness. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 454–475). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kyröläinen, A.-J., Gillett, J., Karabin, M., Sonnadara, R., & Kuperman, V. (2022). Cognitive and social well-being in older adulthood: The CoSowell corpus of written life stories. United States: Behavior Research Methods.
   Google Scholar
• Kyröläinen, A.-J., Keuleers, E., Mandera, P., Brysbaert, M., & Kuperman, V. (2021). Affect across adulthood: Evidence from English, Dutch, and Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 150(4), 792–812. doi:10.1037/xge0000950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyröläinen, A.-J., Luke, J., Libben, G., & Kuperman, V. (2021). Valence norms for 3,600 English words collected during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effects of age and the pandemic. Behavior Research Methods, 54(5), 1–12. doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01740-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, X., Lancashire, I., Hirst, G., & Jokel, R. (2011). Longitudinal detection of dementia through lexical and syntactic changes in writing: A case study of three British novelists. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 26(4), 435–461. doi:10.1093/llc/fqr013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Persem, A., Bieth, T., Guiet, S., Ovando-Tellez, M., & Volle, E. (2021). Through thick and thin: Changes in creativity during the first lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic.
   Google Scholar
• Love, T., & Oster, E. (2002). On the categorization of aphasic typologies: The soap (a test of syntactic complexity). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(5), 503–529. doi:10.1023/A:1021208903394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lwin, M. O., Lu, J., Sheldenkar, A., Schulz, P. J., Shin, W., Gupta, R., & Yang, Y. (2020). Global sentiments surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic on twitter: Analysis of twitter trends. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(2), e19447. doi:10.2196/19447
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N., & Durán, P. (2004). Lexical diversity and language development. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). Mtld, vocd-d, and hd-d: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381–392. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, M., Vinchon, F., Pichot, N., Bonetto, E., Bonnardel, N., Girandola, F., & Lubart, T. (2021). Covid-19: A boon or a bane for creativity? Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3916. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.601150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naseem, U., Razzak, I., Khushi, M., Eklund, P. W., & Kim, J. (2021). Covidsenti: A large-scale benchmark twitter data set for COVID-19 sentiment analysis. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 8(4), 1003–1015. doi:10.1109/TCSS.2021.3051189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nippold, M. A., Cramond, P. M., & Hayward-Mayhew, C. (2014). Spoken language production in adults: Examining age-related differences in syntactic complexity. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 28(3), 195–207. doi:10.3109/02699206.2013.841292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguchi, T., Kubo, Y., Hayashi, T., Tomiyama, N., Ochi, A., & Hayashi, H. (2021). Social isolation and self-reported cognitive decline among older adults in japan: A longitudinal study in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 22(7), 1352–1356. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olinghouse, N. G., & Wilson, J. (2013). The relationship between vocabulary and writing quality in three genres. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 45–65. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9392-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oya, M. (2011). Syntactic dependency distance as sentence complexity measure. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 313–316.
   Google Scholar
• Pakhomov, S., Chacon, D., Wicklund, M., & Gundel, J. (2011). Computerized assessment of syntactic complexity in alzheimer’s disease: A case study of iris murdoch’s writing. Behavior Research Methods, 43(1), 136–144. doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0037-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis, M. (1987). Bilingual aphasia test. NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale.
   Google Scholar
• Pauly, T., Chu, L., Zambrano, E., Gerstorf, D., & Hoppmann, C. A. (2021). Covid-19, time to oneself, and loneliness: Creativity as a resource. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Series B, 77(4), e95. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbab196
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., & Francis, M. E. (1999). Linguistic inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): A computer-based text analysis program. Mahwah, NJ, US: Erlbaum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J., & Bates, D. (2006). Mixed-effects models in s and s-plus. NY, US: Springer science & business media.
   Google Scholar
• Ravid, D. (2005). Emergence of linguistic complexity in later language development: Evidence from expository text construction Ravid, D., Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot, H. In Perspectives on language and language development (NY, US: Springer New York) (pp. 337–356).
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, M. L., Smolik, F., Perpich, D., Thompson, T., Rytting, N., & Blossom, M. (2010). Mean length of utterance levels in 6-month intervals for children 3 to 9 years with and without language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 53(2), 333–349. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0183)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roark, B., Mitchell, M., Hosom, J.-P., Hollingshead, K., & Kaye, J. (2011). Spoken language derived measures for detecting mild cognitive impairment. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 19(7), 2081–2090. doi:10.1109/TASL.2011.2112351
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation Norwood.
   Google Scholar
• Satici, B., Saricali, M., Satici, S. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020). Intolerance of uncertainty and mental wellbeing: Serial mediation by rumination and fear of covid-19. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(5), 1–12. doi:10.1007/s11469-020-00305-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scontras, G., Badecker, W., Shank, L., Lim, E., & Fedorenko, E. (2015). Syntactic complexity effects in sentence production. Cognitive science, 39(3), 559–583. doi:10.1111/cogs.12168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahid, Z., Kalayanamitra, R., McClafferty, B., Kepko, D., Ramgobin, D., Patel, R., Aggarwal, C. S., Vunnam, R., Sahu, N., Bhatt, D., Jones, K., Golamari, R., Jain, R. (2020). COVID-19 and older adults: What we know. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 68(5), 926–929. doi:10.1111/jgs.16472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shigemoto, Y. (2021). Association between daily rumination and posttraumatic growth during the COVID-19 pandemic: An experience sampling method. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 14(2), 229–236. doi:10.1037/tra0001061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., & Kelly, C. (2002). Stylistic constancy and change across literary corpora: Using measures of lexical richness to date works. Computers and the Humanities, 36(4), 411–430. doi:10.1023/A:1020201615753
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L., Steinman, L. E., & Casey, E. (2020). Combatting social isolation among older adults in a time of physical distancing: The COVID-19 social connectivity paradox. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 403. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 77–110.
   Google Scholar
• Ströbel, M., Kerz, E., Wiechmann, D., & Qiao, Y. (2018). Text genre classification based on linguistic complexity contours using a recurrent neural network. Tenth international workshop modelling and reasoning in context. Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Szmrecsanyi, B. (2004). On operationalizing syntactic complexity. Le poids des mots. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on textual data statistical analysis. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 2, 1032–1039.
   Google Scholar
• Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: Liwc and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. doi:10.1177/0261927X09351676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temperley, D. (2007). Minimization of dependency length in written English. Cognition, 105(2), 300–333. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeer, A. (2000). Coming to grips with lexical richness in spontaneous speech data. Language Testing, 17(1), 65–83. doi:10.1177/026553220001700103
   Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 407–426. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, J., Finn, K., Templeton, E., Wheatley, T., & Vosoughi, S. (2021). Linguistic complexity loss in text-based therapy. Proceedings of the 2021 conference of the north american chapter of the association for computational linguistics: Human language technologies. Online. (pp. 4450–4459).
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2011). Ggplot2. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics, 3(2), 180–185. doi:10.1002/wics.147
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, H., Husain, S., & Futrell, R. (2019). Are formal restrictions on crossing dependencies epiphenomenal? Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories, 2–12. doi:10.18653/v1/W19-7802
   Google Scholar
• Yang, W., Lu, X., & Weigle, S. C. (2015). Different topics, different discourse: Relationships among writing topic, measures of syntactic complexity, and judgments of writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 53–67. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T. (2010). Personality in 100,000 words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(3), 363–373. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying, D., Yang, Y., Xie, C., Wang, X., Liu, C., Hu, W., & Li, Y. (2020). A positive role of negative mood on creativity: The opportunity in the crisis of the COVID-19 epidemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3853. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.600837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, G. (2010). Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 236–259. doi:10.1093/applin/amp024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorkina, Y., Syunyakov, T., Abramova, O., Andryushchenko, A., Andreuyk, D., Abbazova, E., Goncharov, D., Rakova, A., Andriushchenko, N., Gryadunov, D., Ikonnikova, A., Fedoseeva, E., Emelyanova, M., Soloveva, K., Pavlov, K., Karpenko, O., Savilov, V., Kurmishev, M., Gurina, O., Chekhonin, V., Kostyuk, G., et al. (2022). Positive effect of cognitive training in older adults with different apoe genotypes and COVID-19 history: A 1-year follow-up cohort study. Diagnostics, 12(10), 2312. doi:10.3390/diagnostics12102312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar