Testing political knowledge as a mediator of the relationship between news use and affective polarization

References

• Baum, M. A., & Groeling, T. (2008). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25(4), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802426965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1993). Activation, attention, and short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 21(2), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreese, C. H., & Boomgaarden, H. (2006). News, political knowledge and participation: The differential effects of news media exposure on political knowledge and participation. Acta Politica, 41(4), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1993). Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 1179–1206. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, C. J. (2015). Ideological social identity: Psychological attachment to ideological in-groups as a political phenomenon and a behavioral influence. Political Behavior, 37(3), 509–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9280-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, D. V., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Nord, L. W. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211426004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J., & Levendusky, M. S. (2019). What do we measure when we measure affective polarization? Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P. (2001). The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and presidential election contexts. Communication Research, 28(5), 571–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P. (2002). News information processing as mediator of the relationship between motivations and political knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Hutchens, M. J., & Shen, F. (2009). Exposure, attention, or “use” of news? Assessing aspects of the reliability and validity of a central concept in political communication research. Communication Methods and Measures, 3(4), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450903378925
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30(4), 359–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., & Thomson, T. (2006). Is it talking, thinking, or both? A lagged dependent variable model of discussion effects on political knowledge. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00299.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 563–588. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S. D., Johnson, B. K., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. (2014). Implications of pro and counterattitudinal information exposure for affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 40(3), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, Jung, H. N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, Veenstra, H., Vraga, A., & Shah, D. (2010). Digital democracy: Re‐imagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680903316742
   Google Scholar
• Groshek, J., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2017). Helping populism win? Social media use, filter bubbles, and support for populist presidential candidates in the 2016 US election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1389–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. M., & Kosiara-Pedersen, K. (2017). How campaigns polarize the electorate: Political polarization as an effect of the minimal effect theory within a multi-party system. Party Politics, 23(3), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815593453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J., Long, M. T., & Rudolph, T. J. (2016). Revisiting the myth: New evidence of a polarized electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 321–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw003
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2015). Why Washington won’t work: Polarization, political trust, and the governing crisis. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hindman, D. B. (2012). Knowledge gaps, belief gaps, and public opinion about health care reform. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(4), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012456021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmielowski, J. D., Beam, M. A., & Hutchens, M. J. (2015). Structural changes in media and attitude polarization: examining the contributions of TV news before and after the telecommunications act of 1996. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edv012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchens, M. J., Hmielowski, J. D., Pinkleton, B. E., & Beam, M. A. (2016). A spiral of skepticism? The relationship between citizens’ involvement with campaign information to their skepticism and political knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(4), 1073–1090. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2011). Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 765–789. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, N., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúniga, H. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), 407–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.496135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufhold, K., Valenzuela, S., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2010). Citizen journalism and democracy: How user-generated news use relates to political knowledge and participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(3–4), 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901008700305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang, K., & Wilson, S. R. (2016). A meta‐analysis of uncertainty and information management in illness contexts. Journal of Communication, 67(3), 378–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasorsa, D. L. (2009). Political interest, political knowledge, and evaluations of political news sources: Their interplay in producing context effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(3), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., Andersen, D. J., Ditonto, T. M., Kleinberg, M. S., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2017). Effect of media environment diversity and advertising tone on information search, selective exposure, and affective polarization. Political Behavior, 39(1), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9354-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., Bos, L., & Vliegenthart, R. (2015). The mediating role of emotions: News framing effects on opinions about immigration. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(4), 812–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015596338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelkes, Y. (2016). Mass polarization: Manifestations and measurements. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelkes, Y., Sood, G., & Iyengar, S. (2017). The hostile audience: The effect of access to broadband internet on partisan affect. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelkes, Y., & Westwood, S. J. (2017). The limits of partisan prejudice. The Journal of Politics, 79(2), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1086/688223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. (2013). Partisan media exposure and attitudes toward the opposition. Political Communication, 30(4), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M., & Malhotra, N. (2016). Does media coverage of partisan polarization affect political attitudes? Political Communication, 33(2), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1038455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.-I., & Eveland, W. P. (2005). Education, need for cognition, and campaign interest as moderators of news effects on political knowledge: An analysis of the knowledge gap. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(4), 910–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900508200410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.-I., Shen, F., Eveland, W. P., & Dylko, I. (2013). The impact of news use and news content characteristics on political knowledge and participation. Mass Communication and Society, 16(5), 713–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.778285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, M., & Holbach, T. (2016). Taking online search queries as an indicator of the public agenda: The role of public uncertainty. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(3), 572–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015610072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. R., & Conover, P. J. (2015). Red and blue states of mind: Partisan hostility and voting in the United States. Political Research Quarterly, 68(2), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915577208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, J., & de Vreese, C. (2015). Spiral of political learning: The reciprocal relationship of news media use and political knowledge among adolescents. Communication Research, 46(8), 1078–1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215605148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perse, E. M. (1990). Media involvement and local news effects. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159009386723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogowski, J. C., & Sutherland, J. L. (2016). How ideology fuels affective polarization. Political Behavior, 38(2), 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9323-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, H. (2010). “Corrective” actions in the public sphere: How perceptions of media and media effects shape political behaviors. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(3), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V. (1998). Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use: An individual‐level assessment of social capital. Political Psychology, 19(3), 469–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., Cho, H., Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205279209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., & Holbert, R. L. (2001). “Connecting” and “disconnecting” with civic life: Patterns of internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846001750322952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., Schmierbach, M., & Zubric, J. (2004). The interplay of news frames on cognitive complexity. Human Communication Research, 30(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00726.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J., Schooler, C., & Danielson, W. A. (1989). Involvement with the media: Recall versus recognition of election information. Communication Research, 16(1), 78–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365089016001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickler, R. (2017). Deliberate with the enemy? Polarization, social identity, and attitudes toward disagreement. Political Research Quarterly, 71(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917721371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2017). Silencing fellow citizens: Conceptualization, measurement, and validation of a scale for measuring the belief in the importance of actively silencing others. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(3), 391–419. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw038
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Nir, L. (2017). Frames and reasoning: Two pathways from selective exposure to affective polarization. International Journal of Communication, 11(22), 22. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5793
   Google Scholar
• Tully, M., & Vraga, E. K. (2017). Who experiences growth in news media literacy and why does it matter? Examining education, individual differences, and democratic outcomes. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 73(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695817706572
   Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., & Williams, D. (2004). The impact of political advertising on knowledge, Internet information seeking, and candidate preference. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02632.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Tully, M., & Rojas, H. (2009). Media literacy training reduces perceptions of bias. Newspaper Research Journal, 30(4), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290903000406
   Google Scholar
• Warner, B. R. (2017). Modeling partisan media effects in the 2014 US midterm elections. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(3), 647–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017712991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, S. W., & Abramowitz, A. I. (2017). The ideological foundations of affective polarization in the US electorate. American Politics Research, 45(4), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17703132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar