Examining the role of perceived risk and benefit, shared concern for nuclear stigmatization, and trust in governments in shaping citizen risk acceptability of a nuclear power plant

References

• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., & Konisky, D. M. (2009). Public attitudes toward construction of new power plants. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(3), 566–577. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Baldassare, M. (1985). Trust in local government. Social Science Quarterly, 66(3), 704–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1995). Ecological politics in an age of risk. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (2005). EQS 6 Structural equations program manual. Multivariate Software.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfman, N. C., Jiménez, R. B., Arévalo, P. C., & Cifuentes, L. A. (2012). Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources. Energy policy, 46(2012), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.057
   Google Scholar
• Burns, W. J., Slovic, P., Kasperson, R. E., Kasperson, J. X., Renn, O., & Emani, S. (1993). Incorporating structural models into research on the social amplification of risk: Implications for theory construction and decision making. Risk Analysis, 13(6), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01323.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castel, R. 1991. From dangerousness to risk. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller, (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 281–298). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, J. B., & Kim, H. K. (2009). Competition, economic benefits, trust, and risk perception in siting a potentially hazardous facility. Landscape & Urban Planning, 91(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlan, T. J. (1993). Federal, state, or local? Trends in the public’s judgment. The Public Perspective, 4(2), 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., Kraft, M. E., & Rosa, E. A. (Eds.). (1993). Public reactions to nuclear waste: Citizens’ views of repository siting. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Easterling, D. (2001). Fear and loathing of Las Vegas: Will a nuclear waste repository contaminate the imagery of nearby places. In J. Flynn, P. Slovic, & H. Kunreuther (Eds.), Risk, media and stigma: Understanding public challenges to modern science and technology (pp. 133–156). Earthscan Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Edelstein, M. R. (1988). Contaminated communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ewald, F. (1993). Two infinities of risk. In B. Massmi (Ed.), The politics of everyday fear (pp. 221–228). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, X. (2014). Local people’s understanding of risk from civil nuclear power in the Chinese context. Public Understanding of Science, 23(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512471288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. (2003). Nuclear stigma. In N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson, & P. Slovic (Eds.), The social amplification of risk (pp. 326–354). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J., Burns, W., Martz, C. K., & Slovic, P. (1992). Trust as a determinant of opposition to a high-level radioactive waste repository: Analysis of a structural model. Risk Analysis, 12(3), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00694.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, J., Peters, E., Mertz, C. K., & Slovid, P. (1998). Risk, media, and stigma at Rocky Flats. Risk Analysis, 18(6), 715–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb01115.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (1997). The spirit of public administration. Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, G. T., Tiemann, A. R., Gould, L. C., DeLuca, D. R., Doob, L. W., & Stolwijk, J. A. (1982). Risk and benefit perceptions, acceptability judgments, and self-reported actions toward nuclear power. The Journal of Social Psychology, 116(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1982.9922770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawande, K., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (2001). Nuclear waste transport and residential property values: Estimating the effects of perceived risks. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 42(2), 207–233. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2000.1155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, A. (2012). From Brokdorf to Fukushima: The long journey to nuclear phase-out. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 68(6), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340212464357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Spectrum.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M. (2009). Energy sources, public policy, and public preferences: Analysis of US national and site-specific data. Energy Policy, 37(8), 3242–3249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R., Flynn, J., & Slovic., P. (1995). Technological stigma. American Scientist, 83(3), 220–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. S., & Satterfield, T. A. (2002). Beyond perception: The experience of risk and stigma in community contexts. Risk Analysis, 22(2), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., & Ren, T. (2017). When it is unfamiliar to me: Local acceptance of planned nuclear power plants in China in the post-Fukushima era. Energy Policy, 100(2017), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsperger, W. (2001). The effects of the Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant on neighboring property values. In J. Flynn, P. Slovic, & H. Kunreuther (Eds.), Risk, media, and stigma: Understanding public challenges to modern science and technology (pp.157–171). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315071695
   Google Scholar
• Ibitayo, O. O., & Pijawka, K. D. (1999). Reversing NIMBY: An assessment of state strategies for siting hazardous-waste facilities. Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy, 17(4), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1068/c170379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, E. L. (1981). Response to earthquake hazard: The west coast of North America. Environment & Behavior, 13(4), 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581134001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S. H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jean, R. J., Kim, D., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2012). Drivers and performance outcomes of supplier innovation generation in customer supplier relationships: The role of power dependence. Decision Sciences, 43(6), 1003–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2012.00380.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. (2001). Modeling stigma: An empirical analysis of nuclear waste images of Nevada. In P. Slovic (Ed.), Risk, media, and stigma: Understanding public challenges to modern science and technology (pp. 107–132). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1994). Stigma models: Testing hypotheses of how images of Nevada are acquired and values are attached to them (No. ANL/DIS/TM-17). Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Decision and Information Sciences Div.; New Mexico Univ., Albuquerque, NM (United States). https://doi.org/10.2172/60827
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, H. (2003). Risk: From perception to social representation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603763276126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen, R. E., & Ford, D. (2008). Exploring the concept of asymmetry: A typology for analysing customer supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(4), 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, K., Lee, D. G., & Su, H. H. (2011). Exploring factors that influence trust in local government in South Korea. Korean Public Administration Review, 45(4), 181–202 (In Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, J. X., & Kasperson, R. E. (2005). The social contours of risk: Publics, risk communication and the social amplification of risk. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., Pidgeon, N., & Slovic, P. (2003). The social amplification of risk: Assessing fifteen years of research and theory in N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson, & P. Slovic (eds.), The social amplification of risk, 13–46. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550461.002
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E. (2012). The social amplification of risk and low-level radiation. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 68(3), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340212444871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, I. (2014). Stigma: A social psychological analysis. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, S. W. (2013). Nuclear power economics and public acceptance. Energy Strategy Reviews, 1(4), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2013.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C. K., & Cho, S. I. (2004). The structure and dynamics of social conflict around nuclear waste facility: Focusing on buan struggle. Economy and society, 63(1), 12–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, G. A., & Kim, D. (2009). International business competence and the contemporary firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, S., Bonfadelli, H., & Kovic, M. (2016). Risk perception of nuclear energy after Fukushima: Stability and change in public opinion in Switzerland. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(1), 24–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B., & Mayraz, G. (2017). Infrastructure spending in China increases trust in local government. Social Indicators Research, 132(1), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1223-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., & Brandt, C. J. (2000). Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2000). Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption. Risk analysis, 20(1), 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Zhang, Z., & Kidd, S. (2008). Establishing an objective system for the assessment of public acceptance of nuclear power in China. Nuclear Engineering & Design, 238(10), 2834–2838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (Ed.). (1999). Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951–972. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S. (2001). Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, J. (2017). Political trust and multilevel government. In S. Zmerli & T. W. Van der Meer (Eds.), Handbook on political trust (pp. 69–88). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide: Eighth edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/MplusUserGuideVer_8.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Otsuka, Y. (2015). Relationships among risk assessment, risk perception and acceptance model of the residents near nuclear power plants in Japan. Open Journal of Safety Science & Technology, 5(2), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojsst.2015.52005
   Google Scholar
• Palfreman, J. (2006). A tale of two fears: Exploring media depictions of nuclear power and global warming. Review of Policy Research, 23(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00184.x
   Google Scholar
• Park, E., & Ohm, J. Y. (2014). Factors influencing the public intention to use renewable energy technologies in South Korea: Effects of the Fukushima nuclear accident. Energy Policy, 65(2014), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.037
   Google Scholar
• Paton, D., Smith, L., & Johnston, D. M. (2000). Volcanic hazards: Risk perception and preparedness. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 29(2), 84–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2013, April 15). State governments viewed favorably as federal rating hits new low. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/legacy-pdf/4-15-2013-Government-Release.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F., Kasperson, R. E., & Slovic, P. (Eds.). (2003). The social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F., Lorenzoni, I., & Poortinga, W. (2008). Climate change or nuclear power—No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijawka, K. D., & Mushkatel, A. H. (1991). Public opposition to the siting of the high-level nuclear waste repository: The importance of trust. Review of Policy Research, 10(4), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1991.tb00289.x
   Google Scholar
• Rahn, W. M., & Rudolph., T. J. (2005). A tale of political trust in American cities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(4), 530–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, S. G. (1996). Claims to expert knowledge and the subversion of democracy: The triumph of risk over uncertainty. Economy & Society, 25(2), 222–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149600000011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterfield, T. A. (2000). Risk, remediation and the stigma of a technological accident in an African American community. Human Ecology Review, 7(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20(5), 713–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.205064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Layman, M., Kraus, N., Flynn, J., Chalmers, J., & Gesell, G. (1991). Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Risk Analysis, 11(4), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00658.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2004). Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster (4th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Song, H. R., & Kim, W. J. (2013). Effects of trust, stigma, optimistic bias on risk perception of nuclear power plants. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 13(3), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.03.162
   Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–107. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, Y. (2004). Major psychological factors determining public acceptance of the siting of nuclear facilities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(6), 1147–1165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02000.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, D., Pidgeon, N. F., Parkhill, K. A., Henwood, K. L., & Simmons, P. (2012). Living with nuclear power: Sense of place, proximity, and risk perceptions in local host communities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers, V. H., Keller, C., & Siegrist, M. (2011). Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3621–3629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers, V. H., & Siegrist, M. (2012). Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants. Energy policy, 46(2012), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.062
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi Cioldi, F., Marková, I., & Rose, D. (1999). Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 95–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00028
   Google Scholar
• Weart, S. R. (1988). Nuclear fear: A history of images. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weart, S. R. (1991). Images of nuclear energy: Why people feel the way they do. IAEA Bulletin, 33(3), 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Whitfield, S. C., Rosa, E. A., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. (2009). The future of nuclear power: Value orientations and risk perception. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 29(3), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01155.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolak, J., & Palus, C. K. (2010). The dynamics of public confidence in US state and local government. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 10(4), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244001001000407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, S. J. (2006). Looking at the selection process of low and medium level radioactive waste disposal site from an environmental justice perspective. ECO, 10(1), 7–42.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, T. A. (1983). Local news exposure and local government alienation. Social Science Quarterly, 64(3), 634–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar