Effect of different methods of inoculation and co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense on soybean agronomic performance in fields with a history of inoculation

References

• Balboa GR, Sadras VO, Ciampitti IA. 2018. Shifts in soybean yield, nutrient uptake, and nutrient stoichiometry: a historical synthesis-analysis. Crop Sci. 58(1):43–54. doi:10.2135/cropsci2017.06.0349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baral B, da Silva Ja T, Izaguirre-Mayoral ML. 2016. Early signaling, synthesis, transport and metabolism of ureides. J Plant Physiol. 193:97–109. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2016.01.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa JZ, Hungria M, da S SJ, Poggere G, dos Reis AR, Corrêa RS. 2021. Meta-analysis reveals benefits of co-inoculation of soybean with Azospirillum brasilense and Bradyrhizobium spp. in Brazil. Appl Soil Ecol. 163:103913. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa MA, Bmar C, Esper Neto M, Minato EA, de O CR, Inoue TT, Batista MA. 2021. Nitrogen fertilization in soybean: influence on nutritional status, yield components and yield. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 52(21):2715–2723. doi:10.1080/00103624.2021.1956518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezerra ARG, Sediyama T, Borém A, Soares MM. 2015. Importância econômica. Soja: do plantio à colheita [Economic importance. Soybean: From Planting to Harvest]. Viçosa: Editora UFV. 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Braccini A, Mariucci GE, Suzukawa A, da Silva Lima L, Guillen Piccinin G. 2016. Co-inoculação e Modos de Aplicação de Bradyrhizobium japonicum e Azospirillum brasilense e Adubação Nitrogenada na Nodulação das Plantas e Rendimento da Cultura da Soja [Co-inoculation and modes of application of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Azospirillum brasilense and nitrogen fertilization on plant nodulation and soybean crop yield]. Sci Agrar Parana. 15:27–35. doi:10.18188/1983-1471/sap.v15n1p27-35.
   Google Scholar
• Bulegon L, Guimarães V, Klein J, Battistus A, Inagaki A, Offemann L, Souza A. 2017. Enzymatic activity, gas exchange and production of soybean co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Azospirillum brasilense. Aust J Crop Sci. 11:888–896. doi:10.21475/ajcs.17.11.07.pne575.
   Google Scholar
• Campo RJ, Araujo RS, Hungria M. 2009. Nitrogen fixation with the soybean crop in Brazil: compatibility between seed treatment with fungicides and bradyrhizobial inoculants. Symbiosis. 48(1–3):154–163. doi:10.1007/BF03179994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campo RJ, Araujo RS, Mostasso FL, Hungria M. 2010. In-furrow inoculation of soybean as alternative to fungicide and micronutrient seed treatment. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo. 34(4):1103–1112. doi:10.1590/S0100-06832010000400010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera FP, Noceda C, Maridueña-Zavala MG, Cevallos-Cevallos JM. 2021. Metabolomics, a powerful tool for understanding plant abiotic stress. Agronomy. 11(5):824. doi:10.3390/agronomy11050824.
   Google Scholar
• Chibeba AM, de F GM, Brito OR, Nogueira MA, Araujo RS, Hungria M. 2015. Co-Inoculation of soybean with Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum promotes early nodulation. Am J Plant Sci. 6(10):1641–1649. doi:10.4236/ajps.2015.610164.
   Google Scholar
• Ciampitti IA, Salvagiotti F. 2018. New insights into soybean biological nitrogen fixation. Agron J. 110(4):1185–1196. doi:10.2134/agronj2017.06.0348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONAB - Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. 2022. Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de grãos safra 2021/22 [Monitoring the Brazilian grain harvest 2021/22]. Brasil: Brasília.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz CD. 2013. GENES - a software package for analysis in experimental statistics and quantitative genetics. Acta Sci Agron. 35(3):271–276. doi:10.4025/actasciagron.v35i3.21251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Mendes IC, Reis FD Junior, Hungria M, de Sousa DMG, Rj C. 2008. Adubação nitrogenada suplementar tardia em soja cultivada em latossolos do Cerrado [Late supplemental nitrogen fertilization in soybean grown on Cerrado latosols]. Pesqui Agropecuária Bras. 43(8):1053–1060. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2008000800015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Naoe AL, Peluzio JM, Campos LJM, Naoe LK, Silva RE. 2020. Co-inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense in soybean cultivars subjected to water déficit. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental. 24(2):89–94. doi:10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v24n2p89-94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deretti AFH, Sangoi L, Junior MCM, Gularte PS, Castagneti V, Leolato LS, Kuneski HF, Scherer RL, Berkenbrock J, Duarte L, et al. 2022. Resposta de cultivares de soja à redução na densidade de plantas no planalto norte catarinense [Response of soybean cultivars to plant density reduction in the northern Santa Catarina Plateau]. Rev Ciênc Agroveterinárias. 21(2):123–136. doi:10.5965/223811712122022123.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr WR, Caviness CE. 1977. Stages of soybean development. Ames: Iowa State University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri GC, Alessandro LB, Fernanda BGA, Lucas CP. 2017. Effects of associated co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium japonicum with Azospirillum brasilense on soybean yield and growth. Afr J Agric Res. 12(1):6–11. doi:10.5897/AJAR2016.11711.
   Google Scholar
• Filippi D, de O DL, Ambrosini VG, Alves LA, Flores JPM, Martins AP, de C PO, Tiecher T. 2021. Concentration and removal of macronutrients by soybean seeds over 45 years in Brazil: a meta-analysis. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo. 45. doi:10.36783/18069657rbcs20200186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukami J, Nogueira MA, Araujo RS, Hungria M. 2016. Accessing inoculation methods of maize and wheat with Azospirillum brasilense. AMB Express. 6(1):3. doi:10.1186/s13568-015-0171-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hungria M, Campo RJ, Mendes IC. 2007. A importância do processo de fixação biológica do nitrogênio para a cultura da soja: componente essencial para a competitividade do produto brasileiro [The importance of the biological nitrogen fixation process for soybean cultivation: an essential component for the competitiveness of the Brazilian product]. Londrina: Embrapa Soja-Documentos (INFOTECA-E).
   Google Scholar
• Hungria M, Nogueira MA, Araujo RS. 2013. Co-inoculation of soybeans and common beans with rhizobia and azospirilla: strategies to improve sustainability. Biol Fertil Soils. 49(7):791–801. doi:10.1007/s00374-012-0771-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hungria M, Nogueira MA, Araujo RS. 2015. Soybean seed co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense: a new biotechnological tool to improve yield and sustainability. Am J Plant Sci. 6(6):811–817. doi:10.4236/ajps.2015.66087.
   Google Scholar
• Malavolta E, Vitti GC, Oliveira SA. 1997. Avaliação Do Estado Nutricional Das Plantas Princípios e Aplicações [Plant Nutritional Status Assessment Principles and Applications]. Piracicaba: Associação Brasileira para Pesquisa da Potassa e do Fosfato.
   Google Scholar
• Meert L, Muller MML, Genú AM, de S EJ, Aragão GN, Figueiredo AST. 2020. Diferentes inoculantes, formas de inoculação e seus efeitos sobre as características agronômicas da cultura da soja [Different inoculants, inoculation forms and their effects on the agronomic characteristics of soybean crop]. Res Soc Dev. 9(10):e2969108499. doi:10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8499.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno G, Albrecht A, Albrecht L, Junior C, Pivetta L, Tessele A, Lorenzetti J, Furtado R. 2018. Application of nitrogen fertilizer in high-demand stages of soybean and its effects on yield performance. Aust J Crop Sci. 12(1):16–21. doi:10.21475/ajcs.18.12.01.pne507.
   Google Scholar
• Mumbach GL, Kotowski IE, Schneider FJA, Mallmann MS, Bonfada EB, Portela VO, Éb B, Kaiser DR. 2017. Resposta da inoculação com Azospirillum brasilense nas culturas de trigo e de milho safrinha [Response of inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense in wheat and soybean crops]. Sci Agrar. 18(2):97. doi:10.5380/rsa.v18i2.51475.
   Google Scholar
• Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA. 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 11(5):1633–1644. doi:10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picoli MM, Pasquetto JVG, Muraoka CY, Milani KML, Marin FBB, Souchie EL, Braccini AL, Lazarini E, Torneli IMB, Cato SC, et al. 2022. Combination of Azospirillum and Bradyrhizobium on inoculant formulation improve nitrogen biological fixation in soybean. J Agric Sci. 14(4):145. doi:10.5539/jas.v14n4p145.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel-Gomes F, Garcia CH. 2002. Estatística Aplicada a Experimentos Agronômicos e Florestais [Applied Statistics in Agricultural and Forestry Experiments]. 11th ed. FealqBrazil: Piracicaba.
   Google Scholar
• Rego CHQ, Cardoso FB, Silva Cândido AC, Teodoro PE, Alves CZ. 2018. Co‐inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum increases yield and quality of soybean seeds. Agron J. 110(6):2302–2309. doi:10.2134/agronj2018.04.0278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sairam RK, Kumutha D, Ezhilmathi K, Deshmukh PS, Srivastava GC. 2008. Physiology and biochemistry of waterlogging tolerance in plants. Biol Plant. 52(3):401–412. doi:10.1007/s10535-008-0084-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvagiotti F, Cassman KG, Specht JE, Walters DT, Weiss A, Dobermann A. 2008. Nitrogen uptake, fixation and response to fertilizer N in soybeans: a review. Field Crops Res. 108(1):1–13. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2008.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos HG, Jacomine PKT, Lhcd A, Oliveira VAD, Lumbreras JF, Coelho MR, Almeida JAD, Filho JCA, Oliveira JBD, Cunha TJF. 2018. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. 5th ed. Brasília: Embrapa Solos.
   Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Keys to soil taxonomy. 12th. 12. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service.
   Google Scholar
• Tamagno S, Sadras VO, Haegele JW, Armstrong PR, Ciampitti IA. 2018. Interplay between nitrogen fertilizer and biological nitrogen fixation in soybean: implications on seed yield and biomass allocation. Sci Rep. 8(1):17502. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35672-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vieira Neto SA, Pires FR, de MC, Menezes JFS, da SA, Silva GP, de AR. 2008. Formas de aplicação de inoculante e seus efeitos sobre a nodulação da soja [Forms of inoculant application and their effects on soybean nodulation]. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 32(2):861–870. doi:10.1590/S0100-06832008000200040.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira Neto SA, Pires FR, Madalão JC, Viana DG, de Menezes CCE, de Assis RL. 2017. Growth and yield performance of soybean with the application of Bradyrhyzobium inoculant via furrow and seed. Semina Ciênc Agrár. 38(4Supl1):2387. doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4SUPLp2387.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel GF, Martinkoski L, Jadoski SO, Fey R. 2015. Effects to the combination of Azospirillum brasilense with fungicides in wheat development. Appl Res Agrotechnology. 8(3):73–80. doi:10.5935/PAeT.V8.N2.04.
   Google Scholar
• Zahedi H, Abbasi S. 2015. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and water stress on phytohormones and polyamines of soybean. Indian J Agric Res. 49(5). [accessed 2023 Feb 20. Internet doi:10.18805/ijare.v49i5.5805.
   Google Scholar
• Zilli JÉ, Gianluppi V, Campo RJ, Rouws JRC, Hungria M. 2010. Inoculação da soja com Bradyrhizobium no sulco de semeadura alternativamente à inoculação de sementes [Soybean inoculation with Bradyrhizobium in the sowing furrow as an alternative to seed inoculation]. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 34(6):1875–1881. doi:10.1590/S0100-06832010000600011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuffo AM, Adriano TB, de R PM, Mariane CB, Everton VZ, Igor OS, Augusto BMR, Guilherme LDV. 2016. Morphoagronomic and productive traits of RR soybean due to inoculation via Azospirillum brasilense groove. Afr J Microbiol Res. 10(13):438–444. doi:10.5897/AJMR2015.7682.
   Google Scholar
• Zuffo AM, Steiner F, Busch A, Zoz T. 2018. Response of early soybean cultivars to nitrogen fertilization associated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum inoculation. Pesqui Agropecuária Trop. 48(4):436–446. doi:10.1590/1983-40632018v4852637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar