Effect of controlled traffic on maintaining physical soil quality in sugarcane fields under different crop management systems

References

• Abd-Elwahed MS. 2019. Effect of long-term wastewater irrigation on the quality of alluvial soil for agricultural sustainability. Ann Agric Sci. 64(2):151–160. doi:10.1016/j.aoas.2019.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Hamdeh NH. 2003. Soil compaction and root distribution for okra as affected by tillage and vehicle parameters. Soil Tillage Res. 74(1):25–35. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00122-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali SE, Yuan Q, Wang S, Farag MA. 2021. More than sweet: a phytochemical and pharmacological review of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Food Biosci. 44: 101–431. doi:10.1016/j.fbio.2021.101431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida BG 2008. Métodos alternativos de determinação de parâmetros físicos do solo e uso de condicionadores químicos no estudo da qualidade do solo. [Alternative methods for determining soil physical parameters and the use of chemical conditioners in the study of soil quality] [ dissertation]. São Paulo: ESALQ- USP. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Gonçalves JDM, Sparovek G. 2013. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Z. 22(6):711–728. doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez MF, Osterrieth M, Cooper M. 2018. Changes in the porosity induced by tillage in typical Argiudolls of southeastern buenos aires province, Argentina, and its relationship with the living space of the mesofauna: a preliminary study. Environ Earth Sci. 77: 134. doi:10.1007/s12665-018-7313-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball BC, Batey T, Munkholm LJ. 2007. Field assessment of soil structural quality – a development of the peerlkamp test. Soil Use Manage. 23(4):329–337. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00102.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball BC, Douglas JT. 2003. A simple procedure for assessing soil structural, rooting and surface conditions. Soil Use Manage. 19(1):50–56. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2003.tb00279.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball BC, Guimarães RML, Cloy JM, Hargreaves PR, Shepherd TG, McKenzie BM. 2017. Visual soil evaluation: a summary of some applications and potential developments for agriculture: visual soil evaluation and soil compaction research. Soil Tillage Res. 173: 114–124. doi:10.1016/j.still.2016.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball BC, Hargreaves PR, Watson CA. 2018. A framework of connections between soil and people can help improve sustainability of the food system and soil functions. Ambio. 47: 269–283. doi:10.1007/s13280-017-0965-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa LC, Magalhães PSG, Bordonal RO, Cherubin MR, Castioni GAF, Tenelli S, Franco HCJ, Carvalho JLN. 2019. Soil physical quality associated with tillage practices during sugarcane planting in south-central Brazil. Soil Tillage Res. 195: 104–383. doi:10.1016/j.still.2019.104383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottinelli N, Jouquet P, Capowiez Y, Podwojewski P, Grimaldi M, Peng X. 2015. Why is the influence of soil macrofauna on soil structure only considered by soil ecologists? Soil Tillage Res. 146: 118–124. doi:10.1016/j.still.2014.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briliawan BD, Wijayanto N, Wasis B. 2022. Visual soil structure quality and its correlation to quantitative soil physical properties of upland rice site in Falcataria moluccana agroforestry system. Biodivers J Biol Divers. 23(4). doi:10.13057/biodiv/d230423.
   Google Scholar
• Castioni GAF, de Lima RP, Cherubin MR, Bordonal RO, Rolim MM, Carvalho JLN. 2021. Machinery traffic in sugarcane straw removal operation: stress transmitted and soil compaction. Soil Tillage Res. 213: 105–122. doi:10.1016/j.still.2021.105122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalcanti RQ, Rolim MM, de Lima RP, Tavares UE, Pedrosa EMR, Cherubin MR. 2020. Soil physical changes induced by sugarcane cultivation in the Atlantic forest biome, northeastern Brazil. Geoderma. 370: 114–353. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelik İ, Günal H, Acar M, Acir N, Bereket Barut Z, Budak M, Aitkenhead M. 2020. Evaluating the long-term effects of tillage systems on soil structural quality using visual assessment and classical methods. Soil Use Manag. 36(2):223–239. doi:10.1111/sum.12554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherubin MR, Franco ALC, Guimarães RML, Tormena CA, Cerri CEP, Karlen DL, Cerri CC. 2017. Assessing soil structural quality under Brazilian sugarcane expansion areas using Visual Evaluation of Soil Structure (VESS). Soil Tillage Res. 173: 64–74. doi:10.1016/j.still.2016.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherubin MR, Karlen DL, Franco ALC, Tormena CA, Cerri CEP, Davies CA, Cerri CC. 2016. Soil physical quality response to sugarcane expansion in Brazil. Geoderma. 267:156–168. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho MPM, Correia JE, Vasques LI, de C MA, de A GT, Soto MA, Basso JB, Kiang C, Fontanetti CS. 2018. Toxicity evaluation of leached of sugarcane vinasse: histopathology and immunostaining of cellular stress protein. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 165: 367–375. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.08.099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombi T, Torres LC, Walter A, Keller T. 2018. Feedbacks between soil penetration resistance, root architecture and water uptake limit water accessibility and crop growth – a vicious circle. Sci Total Environ. 626: 1026–1035. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conab - Boletim da Safra de Cana-de-Açúcar. [ accessed 2022 Aug 30]. [https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/cana/boletim-da-safra-de-cana-de-acucar].
   Google Scholar
• Costa CS, Pedrosa EMR, Rolim MM, Santos HRB, Cordeiro Neto AT. 2013. Effects of vinasse application under the physical attributes of soil covered with sugarcane straw. Eng Agríc. 33(4):636–646. doi:10.1590/S0100-69162013000400005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa MS, Rolim MM, da SG, Simões Neto DE, Santos Júnior JA, de F SE. 2021. Biometric responses of sugarcane under high doses of vinasse. Rev bras eng agríc ambient. 25(9):641–647. doi:10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v25n9p641-647.
   Google Scholar
• Dahwa E, Mudzengi CP, Mubvuma M, Maravanyika T, Chapungu L, Chikodza E. 2022. “Optimizing productivity in semi-arid dryland agriculture for developing countries: insights from zimbabwe”. In: In: Poshiwa X Ravindra Chary G, editors. Climate Change adaptations in dryland agriculture in semi-arid areas. Singapore: Springer Nature; pp. 233–249. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7861-5_16.
   Google Scholar
• Da Luz FB, Carvalho ML, Castioni GAF, de Oliveira Bordonal, de Oliveira BR M, Carvalho JLN, Cherubin MR, de Oliveira Bordonal R. 2022. Soil structure changes induced by tillage and reduction of machinery traffic on sugarcane – a diversity of assessment scales. Soil Tillage Res. 223:105–469. doi:10.1016/j.still.2022.105469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da VT, S PE, Rolim MM, Oliveira VS, Oliveira AKS, AMPL S. 2012. Relações de atributos do solo e estabilidade de agregados em canaviais com e sem vinhaça. Rev bras eng agríc ambient. 16(11):1215–1222. doi:10.1590/S1415-43662012001100010.
   Google Scholar
• De Melo TR, Ferreira RRM, Navroski D, Feltran CTM, Filho JT. 2018. Physico-chemical attributes of a cambisol under pasture managed with annual burns after sugarcane vinasse application. null. 7: 75–81. doi:10.1007/s40093-018-0193-y.
   Google Scholar
• Demetrio W, Guimarães RML, Cavalieri-Polizeli KMV, Cavalieri-Polizeli KMV, Guimarães RML, Ferreira SA, Parron LM, Brown GG, Dickinson N, Demetrio W, et al. 2022. Macrofauna communities and their relationship with soil structural quality in different land use systems. Soil Res. 60(7):648–660. doi:10.1071/SR21157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira AF, de Moraes Sá JC, Lal R, Tivet F, Briedis C, Inagaki TM, Gonçalves DRP, Romaniw J, de Moraes Sá JC. 2018. Macroaggregation and soil organic carbon restoration in a highly weathered Brazilian oxisol after two decades under no-till. Sci Total Environ. 621:1559–1567. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sousa ACM, Farhate CVV, de Souza ZM, Torres JLR, da Silva RB, de Souza ZM, da Silva RB. 2019. Soil load-bearing capacity and development of root system in area under sugarcane with traffic control in brazil. Sugar Tech. 21(1):153–161. doi:10.1007/s12355-018-0636-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embrapa. 2018. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. In: Embrapa, Rio de Janeiro. 5th ed. p. 306.
   Google Scholar
• Ercole TM, Gomes JBV, Motta ACV, Ferreira MM, Inda AV, Mancini M, Curi N. 2023. Aggregation stability and carbon pools in extremely kaolinitic soils from the east coast of brazil as affected by land use changes. sustainability. 15: 1204. doi:10.3390/su15021204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteban DAA, de Souza ZM, da Silva RB, de Souza LE, Lovera LH, de Oliveira IN. 2020. Impact of permanent traffic lanes on the soil physical and mechanical properties in mechanized sugarcane fields with the use of automatic steering. Geoderma. 362:114097. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etana A, Holm L, Rydberg T, Keller T. 2020. Soil and crop responses to controlled traffic farming in reduced tillage and no-till: some experiences from field experiments and on-farm studies in Sweden. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science. 70(4):333–340. doi:10.1080/09064710.2020.1728372.
   Google Scholar
• Franco HHS, Guimarães RML, Tormena CA, Cherubin MR, Favilla HS. 2019. Global applications of the Visual Evaluation of Soil Structure method: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soil Tillage Res. 190: 61–69. doi:10.1016/j.still.2019.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee GW, Or D.2002.2Vol. 4 “Particle‐size analysis. Methods of soil analysis: part 4 physical methods”5thpp. 255–293.10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c12
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves ADMA, Libardi PL. 2013. Análise da determinação da condutividade hidráulica do solo pelo método do perfil instantâneo. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo. 37(5):1174–1184. doi:10.1590/S0100-06832013000500007.
   Google Scholar
• Guenette KG, Hernandez-Ramirez G, Gamache P, Andreiuk R, Fausak L, Lupwayi N. 2019. Soil structure dynamics in annual croplands under controlled traffic management. Can J Soil Sci. 99(2):146–160. doi:10.1139/cjss-2018-0117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães RML, Ball BC, Tormena C. 2011. Improvements in the visual evaluation of soil structure. Soil Use Manag. 27: 395–403. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00354.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães RML, Ball BC, Tormena CA, Giarola NFB, da Silva ÁP. 2013. Relating visual evaluation of soil structure to other physical properties in soils of contrasting texture and management. Soil Tillage Res Special. 127(127):92–99. doi:10.1016/j.still.2012.01.020.
   Google Scholar
• Guimarães Júnnyor WS, Diserens E, De Maria IC, Araujo-Junior CF, Farhate CVV, de Souza ZM. 2019. Prediction of soil stresses and compaction due to agricultural machines in sugarcane cultivation systems with and without crop rotation. Sci Total Environ. 681: 424–434. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães RML, Lamandé M, Munkholm LJ, Ball BC, Keller T. 2017. Opportunities and future directions for visual soil evaluation methods in soil structure research. Soil Tillage Res. 173: 104–113. doi:10.1016/j.still.2017.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunkel G, Kosmol J, Sobral M, Rohn H, Montenegro S, Aureliano J. 2007. Sugar cane industry as a source of water pollution – Case Study on the situation in Ipojuca River, Pernambuco, Brazil. Wat Air Soil Poll. 180(1):261–269. doi:10.1007/s11270-006-9268-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haruna SI, Anderson SH, Nkongolo NV, Zaibon S. 2018. Soil hydraulic properties: influence of tillage and cover crops. Pedosphere. 28: 430–442. doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60387-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUSS Working Group WRB. 2015. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. In: World Soil Resources Reports No. Vol. 106. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Z-P, Li Y-R, Wei G-P, Liao Q, Su T-M, Meng Y-C, Zhang H-Y, Lu C-Y. 2012. Effect of long-term vinasse application on physico-chemical properties of sugarcane field soils. Sugar Tech. 14(4):412–417. doi:10.1007/s12355-012-0174-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Júnnyor WSG, Maria ICD, Araujo-Junior CF, Lima CC, Vitti AC, Figueiredo GC, Dechen SCF. 2019. Soil compaction on traffic lane due to soil tillage and sugarcane mechanical harvesting operations. Sci Agric. 76(6):509–517. doi:10.1590/1678-992X-2018-0052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlen DL, Veum KS, Sudduth KA, Obrycki JF, Nunes MR. 2019. Soil health assessment: past accomplishments, current activities, and future opportunities. Soil Tillage Res195. 195:104365. doi:10.1016/j.still.2019.104365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp SG, Burgos WJM, Vandenberghe LPS, Diestra KV, Torres LAZ, Woiciechowski AL, Letti LAJ, Pereira GVM, Thomaz-Soccol V, Rodrigues C, et al. 2022. Sugarcane: a promising source of green carbon in the circular bioeconomy. Sugar Tech. 24(4):1230–1245. doi:10.1007/s12355-022-01161-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Basnayake J, Jackson PA, Chen X, Zhao J, Zhao P, Yang L, Bai Y, Xia H, Zan F, et al. Growth and yield of sugarcane genotypes are strongly correlated across irrigated and rainfed environments. Field Crops Res. 2016;196:418–425. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas M, Schlüter S, Vogel HJ, Vetterlein D. 2019. Soil structure formation along an agricultural chronosequence. Geoderma. 350:61–72. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.04.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinelli LA, Filoso S. 2008. Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: environmental and social challenges. Ecol Appl. 18(4):885–898. doi:10.1890/07-1813.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martíni AF, Valani GP, Boschi RS, Bovi RC, Simões LF, Cooper M. 2020. Is soil quality a concern in sugarcane cultivation? A bibliometric review. Soil Tillage Res. 204: 104751. doi:10.1016/j.still.2020.104751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meded VD Landbouwhogeschool en Opzoekingsstations van de
   Google Scholar
• Mello K, Taniwak RH, Paula FR, Valente RA, Randhir TO, Macedo DR, Leal CG, Rodrigues CB, Hughes RM. 2020. Multiscale land use impacts on water quality: assessment, planning, and future perspectives in Brazil. null. 270: 110–879. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110879.
   Google Scholar
• Moradi-Choghamarani F, Moosavi AA, Baghernejad M. 2019. Determining organo-chemical composition of sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar as a function of pyrolysis temperature using proximate and Fourier transform infrared analyses. J Therm Anal Calorim. 138(1):331–342. doi:10.1007/s10973-019-08186-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi-Choghamarani F, Moosavi AA, Sepaskhah AR, Baghernejad M. 2019. Physico-hydraulic properties of sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar: the role of pyrolysis temperature. Cellulose. 26(12):7125–7143. doi:10.1007/s10570-019-02607-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozaffari H, Akbar Moosavi A, Ostovari Y, Cornelis W. 2022. Comparing visible-near-infrared spectroscopy with classical regression pedotransfer functions for predicting near-saturated and saturated hydraulic conductivity of calcareous soils. J Hydrol. 613: 128–412. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller L, Kay BD, Hu C, Li Y, Schindler U, Behrendt A, Shepherd TG, Ball BC. 2009. Visual assessment of soil structure: evaluation of methodologies on sites in Canada, China and Germany: part I: comparing visual methods and linking them with soil physical data and grain yield of cereals. Soil Tillage Res. 103(1):178–187. doi:10.1016/j.still.2008.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Rojas M. 2018. Soil quality indicators: critical tools in ecosystem restoration. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health. 5: 47–52. doi:10.1016/j.coesh.2018.04.007.
   Google Scholar
• Mutuku EA, Vanlauwe B, Roobroeck D, Boeckx P, Cornelis WM. 2021. Visual soil examination and evaluation in the sub-humid and semi-arid regions of Kenya. Soil Tillage Res. 213: 105–135. doi:10.1016/j.still.2021.105135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikseresht F, Landi A, Sayyad G, Ghezelbash GR, Schulin R. 2020. Sugarcane molasse and vinasse added as microbial growth substrates increase calcium carbonate content, surface stability and resistance against wind erosion of desert soils. J Environ Manag. 268: 110639. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimmo JR, Perkings KS. 2002. Agreggate stability and size distribution. In: Dane J, and Topp G, editors Methods of soil analysis. part 4: physical methods. 5th ed. Madison, Wiscosin, USA: Soil Science Society of American Book Series; pp. 812–815.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes NSP, de Almeida JMO, Fonseca GG, de Carvalho EM. 2022. Clarification of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) vinasse for microalgae cultivation. Bioresour Technol. 19: 101125. doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira Filho JS, dos SO, Rossi CQ, de FG DY, de S FH, da SR PL, Pereira W, Pereira MG. 2021. Assessing the effects of harvesting with and without burning and vinasse application in sugarcane crops: evaluation of soil fertility and phosphorus pools in different ethanol production systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 307: 107233. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2020.107233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz PFS, Rolim MM, de Lima JLP, Pedrosa EMR, Dantas MSM, Tavares UE. 2017. Physical qualities of an ultisol under sugarcane and Atlantic forest in Brazil. 11:62–70. Geoderma 10.1016/j.geodrs.2017.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Otto R, Silva AP, Franco HCJ, Oliveira ECA, Trivelin PCO. 2011. High soil penetration resistance reduces sugarcane root system development. Soil Tillage Res. 117: 201–210. doi:10.1016/j.still.2011.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios-Bereche MC, Palacios-Bereche R, Ensinas AV, Gallego AG, Modesto M, Nebra SA. 2022. Brazilian sugar cane industry – a survey on future improvements in the process energy management. Energy. 259:124903. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.124903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto TJS, Moreira RA, Freitas JS, Silva LCM, Yoshii MPC, Lopes LF, Ogura AP, Mello GV, Rosa LMT, Schiesari L, et al. 2023. Responses of Chironomus sancticaroli to the simulation of environmental contamination by sugarcane management practices: water and sediment toxicity. Sci Total Environ. 857: 159643. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powlson DS, Poulton PR, Glendining MJ, Macdonald AJ, Goulding KWT. 2022. Is it possible to attain the same soil organic matter content in arable agricultural soils as under natural vegetation? Outlook Agric. 51: 91–104. doi:10.1177/00307270221082113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado RM, Caione G, Campos CNS. 2013. FilteR cake and vinasse as fertilizers contributing to conservation agriculture. Applied Environ Soil Sci. 2013:1–8. doi:10.1155/2013/581984.
   Google Scholar
• Prevedello CL, Armindo RA. 2015. [Soil physics with problems solved]. In: UFPR editors. Física do solo com problemas resolvidos. 2nd ed. Curitiba: Prevedello; p. 474.
   Google Scholar
• Rabot E, Wiesmeier M, Schlüter S, Vogel HJ. 2018. Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: a review. Geoderma. 314:122–137. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos MF, Almeida WRS, Do Amaral RL, Suzuki S, LEAS RDL. 2022. Degree of compactness and soil quality of peach orchards with different production ages. Soil Tillage Res. 219:105324. doi:10.1016/j.still.2022.105324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichert JM, da Rosa VT, Vogelmann ES, da Rosa DP, Horn R, Reinert DJ, Sattler A, Denardin JE, da Rosa VT, da Rosa DP. 2016. Conceptual framework for capacity and intensity physical soil properties affected by short and long-term (14 years) continuous no-tillage and controlled traffic. Soil Tillage Res. 158:123–136. doi:10.1016/j.still.2015.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaee L, Moosavi AA, Davatgar N, Sepaskhah AR. 2020. Soil quality indices of paddy soils in Guilan province of northern Iran: spatial variability and their influential parameters. Ecolog Indicat. 117: 106566. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro BT, de LJ, Curi N, de OG. 2013. Aggregate breakdown and dispersion of soil samples amended with sugarcane vinasse. Sci Agric. 70(6):435–441. doi:10.1590/S0103-90162013000600009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues RCE, Hu B. 2017. Vinasse from sugarcane ethanol production: better treatment Or better utilization? Front Energy Res. 5: 7. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2017.00007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roque AAO, Souza ZM, Barbosa RS, Souza GS. 2010. Controle de tráfego agrícola e atributos físicos do solo em área cultivada com cana-de-açúcar. Pesq Agropec Bras. 45(7):744–750. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2010000700016.
   Google Scholar
• Rulli MM, Villegas LB, Colin VL. 2020. Treatment of sugarcane vinasse using an autochthonous fungus from the northwest of Argentina and its potential application in fertigation practices. J Environ Chem Eng. 8(5):104371. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2020.104371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos HG, Jacomine PKT, Anjos LHC, Oliveira VA, Lumbreras JF, Coelho MR, Almeida JA, Araújo Filho JC, Oliveira JB, Cunha TJF 2018. Sistema 1044 Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. 5 ed. Brasilia: Embrapap. 356 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Santos HV, Scotti MR. 2018. Riparian reforestation with a single exotic species restores soil aggregation and porosity but not humic substances. Soil Use Manag. 34(1):124–133. doi:10.1111/sum.12405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattolo TMS, Pereira LM, Otto R, Francisco E, Duarte AP, Kappes C, Prochnow LI, Cherubin MR. 2021. Effects of land use, tillage management, and crop diversification on soil physical quality in cerrado agricultural systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 85(5):1799–1813. doi:10.1002/saj2.20306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpare FV, Hernandes TAD, Ruiz-Corrêa ST, Picoli MCA, Scanlon BR, Chagas MF, Duft DG, Cardoso TF. 2016. Sugarcane land use and water resources assessment in the expansion area in Brazil. J Clean Prod. 133: 1318–1327. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira PC, Donagemma GK, Fontana A, Teixeira WG. Manual de métodos de análise de solo. [Manual of soil analysis methods]. 3. ed. Brasília: Embrapa. Portuguese; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Tivet F, de Moraes Sá JC, Lal R, Briedis C, Borszowskei PR, dos Santos JB, Farias A, Eurich G, Hartman DC, Nadolny Junior M, et al. Aggregate C depletion by plowing and its restoration by diverse biomass-C inputs under no-till in sub-tropical and tropical regions of Brazil. Soil Tillage Res. 2013;126:203–218. doi:10.1016/j.still.2012.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo MPS, Rolim MM, de Lima RP, Cavalcanti RQ, Ortiz PFS, Cherubin MR. 2021. Strength, swelling and compressibility of unsaturated sugarcane soils. Soil Tillage Res. 212: 105072. doi:10.1016/j.still.2021.105072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vischi FOJ, Souza, Souza, Silva, de SZM JLR, Lima, de SGS ZMD, da SRB GSD, Silva RBD, de LME MED, et al. 2017. Physical attributes and limiting water range as soil quality indicators after mechanical harvesting of sugarcane. Aust J Crop Sci. 11(2):169–176. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.821637944361523.
   Google Scholar
• Ward M, McDonnell K, Metzger K, Forristal PD. 2021. The effect of machine traffic zones associated with field headlands on soil structure in a survey of 41 tilled fields in a temperate maritime climate. Soil Tillage Res. 210: 104938. doi:10.1016/j.still.2021.104938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi CS, Ramos NP, Carvalho CS, Pires AMM, de AC. 2017. Sugarcane straw decomposition and carbon balance as a function of initial biomass and vinasse addition to soil surface. Bragantia. 76(1):135–144. doi:10.1590/1678-4499.580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder RE. 1936. A direct method of aggregate analysis of soil and a study of the physical nature erosion losses. Agron J. 28(5):337–358. doi:10.2134/agronj1936.00021962002800050001x.
   Google Scholar
• Zahedifar M. 2023. Assessing alteration of soil quality, degradation, and resistance indices under different land uses through network and factor analysis. Catena. 222:106807. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2022.106807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar