Artificial neural network (ANN) in forecasting of poverty line and economic-energetic efficiencies into the maize-based agroecosystems

References

• Ahmad Z, Mat Noor R, Zhang J. 2009. Multiple neural networks modeling techniques in process control: a review. Asia-Pacific J Chem Eng. 4(4):403–419. doi: 10.1002/apj.213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam F, Salman A, Jan I. 2019. Predicting wheat production in Pakistan by using an artificial neural network approach. SJA. 35(4):1054–1062. doi: 10.17582/journal.sja/2019/35.4.1054.1062
   Google Scholar
• Boltvinik J. 2012. Treinta años de medición de la pobreza en México: Una mirada desde Coplamar. Estudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de México. 30:83–110. https://estudiossociologicos.colmex.mx/index.php/es
   Google Scholar
• Boltvinik JMA. 2003. La canasta normativa de satisfactores esenciales de la Coplamar. Génesis y desarrollos recientes. Comercio Exterior. 53(5):473–484. http://revistas.bancomext.gob.mx/rce/magazines/20/9/RCE9.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Borrego EM, Román JV. 2019. Pluriactividad, consumo y persistencia del maíz en dos municipios del noroeste del Estado de México. Revista Euroamericana de Antropología. (7):41. doi: 10.14201/rea201974153
   Google Scholar
• Chhagan B-R, Sharma M-P, Sharma K-R, Samanta A, Wani O-A, Kachroo D, Kumar M, Razdan VK, Sharma V, Mondal A-K, et al. 2019. Effect of organic, inorganic and bio fertilizers on soil physicochemical properties in rainfed maize-wheat cropping system of jammu. Int J Curr mMicrobiol App Sci. 8(4):2539–2545. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.804.296
   Google Scholar
• CONAPO. 2020. Índices de marginacion. Gobierno de México. https://datos.gob.mx/busca/organization/conapo
   Google Scholar
• Coplamar CG, Del Pndzd. 2003. In: Veintiuno CS, editor. Macroeconomía de las necesidades esenciales en México, situación actual y perspectivas al año 2000. Mexico: Coordinación General del Plan Nacional e Zonas Deprimidas.
   Google Scholar
• Davim J-P. 2012. Statistical and computational techniques in manufacturing. Springer Science & Business Media. https://books.google.com.mx/books?hl=es&lr=&id=aKlhXtgw_uwC&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&ots=7QgcIsGbPT&sig=iRgWoS4tDHrpArUp0nI_Jv5pvEc&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
   Google Scholar
• Del Pozo Rodriguez P, De Melo VC, Rodriguez O. 2014. El análisis emergético como herramienta para evaluar la sustentabilidad en dos sistemas productivos. Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias. 23(4):59–63. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-00542014000400010.
   Google Scholar
• Dominguez-Hernandez ME, Zepeda-Bautista R, Dominguez-Hernandez E, Valderrama-Bravo M, Del C, Hernández-Simón LM. 2020. Effect of lime water–manure organic fertilizers on the productivity, energy efficiency and profitability of rainfed maize production. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 66(3):370–385. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2019.1616287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorofki M, Elshafie A-H, Jaafar O, Karim O-A, Mastura S. 2012. Comparison of artificial neural network transfer functions abilities to simulate extreme runoff data, 2012 International Conference on Environment, Energy and Biotechnology. 33:39–44. www.ipcbee.com/vol33/008-ICEEB2012-B021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Rakshit S, Chatterjee D. 2020. Use of artificial intelligence in IPM. Food And Scientific Reports. 1(4):65–72. doi: 10.5958/0974-8172.2020.00183.2
   Google Scholar
• Elbeltagi A, Deng J, Wang K, Hong Y. 2020. Crop water footprint estimation and modeling using an artificial neural network approach in the Nile Delta, Egypt. Agric Water Manag. 235:106080. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estévez V, Ayala J, Vespa C, Araya M. 2016. The gluten-free basic food basket: a problem of availability, cost and nutritional composition. Eur J Clin Nutr. 70(10):1215–1217. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FIRA FI, En R, Con la A. 2019. Panorama Agroalimentario, Tendencias en el entorno nacional e internacional de las principales redes de valor agroalimentarias. Dirección de Investigación y Evaluación Económica y Sectorial. 98–99. https://www.gob.mx/fira/documentos/panorama-agroalimentario.
   Google Scholar
• García M J-A. 2002. La Gestion Participativa En Las Grandes Empresas Industriales Españolas: Grado de Uso, Resultados Obtenidos y Comparación Internacional. https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/5845
   Google Scholar
• Haarhoff S-J, Kotzé T-N, Swanepoel P-A. 2020. A prospectus for sustainability of rainfed maize production systems in South Africa. Crop Science. 60(1):14–28. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Z 2021. Poverty prediction through machine learning. 2021 2nd International Conference on E-Commerce and Internet Technology (ECIT). 10.1109/ecit52743.2021.00073
   Google Scholar
• Karsoliya S. 2012. Approximating number of hidden layer neurons in multiple hidden layer BPNN architecture. IJETT. 3(6):714–717. http://www.ijettjournal.org/volume-3/issue-6/IJETT-V3I6P206.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Khanali M, Mobli H, Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha H. 2017. Modeling of yield and environmental impact categories in tea processing units based on artificial neural networks. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 24(34):26324–26340. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0234-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linares P, Labandeira X. 2010. Energy efficiency: economics and policy. J Econ Surv. 24(3):573–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00609.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maozhun S, Ji L. 2017. Improved Garson algorithm based on neural network model. Proceedings of the 29th Chinese Control and Decision Conference, CCDC. 4307–4312. 10.1109/CCDC.2017.7979255
   Google Scholar
• Meza-Palacios R, Aguilar-Lasserre A-A, Morales-Mendoza L-F, Rico-Contreras J-O, Sánchez-Medel L-H, Fernández-Lambert G. 2020. Decision support system for NPK fertilization: a solution method for minimizing the impact on human health, climate change, ecosystem quality and resources. J Environ Sci Health - Toxic/Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 55(11):1267–1282. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2020.1787012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nabavi-Pelesaraei A, Abdi R, Rafiee S, Shamshirband S, Yousefinejad-Ostadkelayeh M. 2016. Resource management in cropping systems using artificial intelligence techniques: a case study of orange orchards in north of Iran. Stochastic Environ Res Risk Assessment. 30(1):413–427. doi: 10.1007/s00477-015-1152-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabavi-Pelesaraei A, Rafiee S, Hosseini-Fashami F, Chau K-W. 2021. Artificial neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system in energy modeling of agricultural products. Predictive Mod For Energy Manage Power Sys Engineering Chapter. 11:299–334. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817772-3.00011-2.
   Google Scholar
• Noor R-A, Ahmad M, Don M-M Z, M-H U. 2010. Modelling and control of different types of polymerization processes using neural networks technique: a review. Can J Chem Eng. 88(6):1065–1084. doi: 10.1002/cjce.20364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odum H-T. 1995. Environmental accounting, emergy and decision making. John Wiley and Sons; p. 384. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Environmental+Accounting%3A+Emergy+and+Environmental+Decision+Making-p-9780471114420
   Google Scholar
• Okaidat A, Melhem S, Alenezi H, Duwairi R (2021). Using convolutional neural networks on satellite images to predict poverty. (2021b, mayo 24). IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9464598
   Google Scholar
• Papada L, Kaliampakos D (2022). Exploring energy poverty indicators through artificial neural networks. In Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Computing: Proceedings of ICSISCET 2021 (pp. 231–242). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez R-A, Flores J-C-B. 2003. Balance energetic en dos sistemas de producción de maíz en las condiciones de Cuba. Cent. Agrícola. Vol. 30. Gale Academic OneFile; pp. 84–87. link.gale.com/apps/doc/A146742398/AONE?u=anon~b590045d&sid=googleScholar&xid=efd1a912
   Google Scholar
• Piao L, Li M, Xiao J, Gu W, Zhan M, Cao C, Zhao M, Li C. 2019. Effects of soil tillage and canopy optimization on grain yield, root growth, and water use efficiency of rainfed maize in Northeast China. Agronomy. 9(336):1–14. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9060336
   Google Scholar
• Pino‐Mejías R, Pérez-Fargallo A, Rubio-Bellido C, Pulido-Arcas J-A. 2018. Artificial neural networks and linear regression prediction models for social housing allocation: fuel poverty potential risk index. Energy. 164:627–641. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan A, Idol T, Roul P-K. 2016. Conservation agriculture practices in rainfed uplands of India improve maize-based system productivity and profitability. Front Plant Sci. 7:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purroy-Vásquez R, Gallardo-López F, Díaz-Rivera P, Ortega-Jiménez E, López-Ortiz S, Torres-Hernández G. 2015. Contribución de las actividades productivas del agroecosistema a la superación de la pobreza de la familia rural, en el centro del estado de Veracruz, México. Revista de La Facultad de Agronomia. 32(4): 495–514.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez RS, Figueroa Rodríguez A, Hernández Rosas F. 2013. Relación entre la producción agrícola y marginación a nivel municipal para el Estado de Veracruz, México. Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios. 17(33): 528–538.
   Google Scholar
• Sengul S, Tuncer İ. 2005. Poverty levels and food demand of the poor in Turkey. Agribusiness. 21(3):289–311. doi: 10.1002/agr.20049
   Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Kamble S-S, Gunasekaran A, Kumar V, Kumar A. 2020. A systematic literature review on machine learning applications for sustainable agriculture supply chain performance. Comput Oper Res. 119:104926. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2020.104926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma N, Singh R-J, Mandal D, Kumar A, Alam N, Keesstra S. 2017. Increasing farmer’s income and reducing soil erosion using intercropping in rainfed maize-wheat rotation of Himalaya, India. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 247:43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R-J, Ghosh B-N, Sharma N-K, Patra S, Dadhwal K-S, Mishra P-K. 2016. Energy budgeting and emergy synthesis of rainfed maize-wheat rotation system with different soil amendment applications. Ecol Indic. 61:753–765. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobasura I, Moreno F-A, Aya S, Mora J. 2012. Productividad energética y financiera en fincas campesinas del departamento de Caldas: Tres estudios de caso. Luna Azul ISSN 1909-2474. 34:101–112. http://190.15.17.25/lunazul/downloads/Lunazul34_7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ugbaje SU, Odeh IO, Bishop TF. 2019. Fuzzy measure-based multicriteria land assessment for rainfed maize in West Africa for the current and a range of plausible future climates. Comput Electron Agric. 158:51–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ureta C, González E-J, Espinosa A, Trueba A, Piñeyro-Nelson A, Álvarez-Buylla E-R. 2020. Maize yield in Mexico under climate change. Agric Syst. 177:102697. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdés N, Pérez D, Márquez M, Angarica L, Vargas D. 2009. Funcionamiento y balance energético en agroecosistemas diversos. Cultivos Tropicales. 30(2): 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Yan X 2021. Predicting poverty through machine learning and satellite images. (2021, 3 diciembre). IEEE Conference Publication IEEE Xplore. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9670555
   Google Scholar