The European Commission on Sustainable Development. A New Normative Power in Its Making?

References

• Armstrong, K. A. (2012). The Lisbon Strategy and Europe 2020: From the governance of co-ordination to the co-ordination of governance. In P. Copeland (Ed.), The EU’s Lisbon strategy: evaluating success, understanding failure. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Arnull, A., & Chalmers, D. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of European Union Law. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, J. C. (2011). Changes in political discourse from the Lisbon strategy to Europe 2020: Tracing the fate of ‘social policy’. European Trade Union Institute (ETUI).
   Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 1), 893–921. https://doi.org/10.1086/261712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., & Leech, B. L. (2009). Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsworth, R. (2020). Climate science, the politics of climate change and futures of IR. International Relations, 34(3), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117820946365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S., Bauer, M. W., Connolly, S., & Kassim, H. (2016). The Commission: Boxed in and constrained, but still an engine of integration. West European Politics, 39(5), 1011–1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1181870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, I. (2007). Lisbon II, two years on: An assessment of the partnership for growth and jobs. Centre for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Borghetto, E., & Franchino, F. (2010). The role of subnational authorities in the implementation of EU directives. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(6), 759–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2010.486972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickerton, C. J. (2015). ’The new intergovernmentalism: European integration in the post-Maastricht Era. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 703–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd, L. (2013). EUROPE 2020: A strategy in search of a regional policy rationale? Policy Studies, 34(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2013.771056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, H. (1982). Civilian power Europe: A contradiction in terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 21(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1982.tb00866.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., & Elgström, O. (2013). The EU’s role in climate change negotiations: From leader to leadiator. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10), 1369–1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. J. (2017). Failure is an option: The entrepreneurial governance framework. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 6(1), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-04-2016-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T. (2002). A maturing bureaucracy? The role of the Commission in the policy process. In J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union – Power and policy-making. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, P., & James, S. (2014). Policy windows, ambiguity and Commission entrepreneurship: explaining the relaunch of the European Union's economic reform agenda. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.800789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, D. M. K. (2017). The politics of crisis in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dinan, D. (2016). Governance and institutions: A more political commission. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchêne, F. (1973). The European community and the uncertainties of interdependence. In M. Kohnstamm & W. Hager (Eds.), A nation writ large? Foreign policy problems before the European community (pp. 17–45). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Duchêne, F. (1972). Europés role in world peace. In R. Mayne (Ed.), Europe tomorrow: Sixteen European look ahead (pp. 32–47). Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• EUR-Lex: Distribution of Competences. (2018). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/summary/glossary/competences.html?locale=en.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (December 11, 2019). The European Green deal set out how to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050, boosting the economy, improving peoplés health and quality of life, caring for nature, and leaving no one behind. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/president/announcements/european-green-deal-sets-out-how-make-europe-first-climate-neutral-continent-2050-boosting-economy_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). Europe in May 2019 Preparing for a more united, stronger and more democratic Union in an increasingly uncertain world—The European Commission's contribution to the informal EU27 leaders' meeting in Sibiu (Romania) on 9 May 2019. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Press Release. (November 28, 2018). The Commission calls for a climate neutral Europe by 2050. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_6543
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (November 28, 2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank – A clean planet for all: A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. Brussels, 28.11.2018 COM(2018) 773 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). Next steps for a sustainable European future: European action for sustainability. https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/commission-communication-next-steps-sustainable-european-future_en.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010). Communication from the Commission: Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2018). Smarter, greener, more inclusive? – Indicators to support the Europe 2020 strategy. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2017). Smarter, greener, more inclusive? Indicators to support the Europe 2020 strategy: 2017 Edn. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Government. (December 13, 2019). European Council agreed: EU to become climate neutral by 2050. https://valtioneuvosto.fi/en/article/-/asset_publisher/10616/eurooppa-neuvosto-sopi-eu-sta-ilmastoneutraali-vuoteen-2050-mennessa
   Google Scholar
• Galadari, A. (2019). Sustainable economics: Understanding market and government roles. Forum for Social Economics, 48(2), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2017.1356345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros, D., & Roth, F. (2012). The Europe 2020 strategy – Can it maintain the EU’s competitiveness in the world? Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS).
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. (1993). The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europés international role. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(3), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00466.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcombe, R. G. (2002). Political entrepreneurship and the democratic allocation of economic resources. The Review of Austrian Economics, 15(2/3), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015758419984
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E., Daniel Kelemen, R., & Meunier, S. (2021). Failing forward? Crises and patterns of European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(10), 1519–1536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1954068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. (2003). Paradise and power: America and Europe in the new world order. Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1991/1795). Perpetual peace: A philosophical sketch. In H. Reiss (Ed.), Kant: Political Writings (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Lisbon Treaty. (2007). http://www.lisbon-treaty.org/wcm/the-lisbon-treaty.html.
   Google Scholar
• Manners, I. (2006). Normative power Europe reconsidered: beyond the crossroads. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500451600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, I. (2002). Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarovič, M., Šušteršič, J., & Rončević, B. (2014). Is Europe 2020 set to fail? The cultural political economy of the EU grand strategies. European Planning Studies, 22(3), 610–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.782387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (2019). So you want to be a policy entrepreneur? Policy Design and Practice, 2(4), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2019.1675989
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Thomas, M. (2018). Policy entrepreneurs and collaborative action: Pursuit of the sustainable development goals. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.092710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organizations. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P. (2019). Trasformismo or transformation? The global political economy of energy transitions. Review of International Political Economy, 26(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1511448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, N., & Rhinard, M. (2019). The ‘political’ roles of the European Commission. Journal of European Integration, 41(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1572135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent, N., & Rhinard, M. (2016). Is the European commission really in decline? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(5), 1199–1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1965). Public entrepreneurship: A case study in ground water basin management. University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Pagliacci, F. (2017). Regional paths towards Europe 2020 targets: A spatial approach. European Planning Studies, 25(4), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1280002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, C. F., & Karlsson, C. (2010). Climate change and the European Union’s leadership moment: An inconvenient truth? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 923–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02080.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. (2017). Juncker’s political European Commission and an EU in crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (2003). The open method of coordination: A new governance architecture for the European Union?. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Regent, S. (2003). The open method of coordination: A new supranational form of governance? European Law Journal, 9(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00175
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. C., & King, P. J. (1991). Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(2), 147–175.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., Leach, M., & Newell, P. (Eds.). (2015). The politics of green transformations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scheingate, A. D. (2003). Political entrepreneurship, institutional change and American political development. Studies in American Political Development, 17(2), 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., & Teske, P. (1992). Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: Evidence from local government. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silander, D. (2020). The European Commission on agenda 2030. In C. Karlsson & D. Silander (Eds.), Implementing sustainable development goals in Europe – The role of political entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Silander, D. (2019). The European Commission and Europe 2020: Smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. In C. Karlsson, D. Silander, & B. Pircher (Eds.), Smart, sustainable and inclusive growth – political entrepreneurship for a prosperous Europe (pp. 36–53). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Sjursen, H. (2006). What kind of power? Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500451584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöstedt, G. (1977). The external role of the European community. Saxon House.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2000). The end of civilian power EU: A welcome demise or cause or concern? The International Spectator, 35(2), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932720008458123
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. (2019). The European semester: A literature review. University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• The Treaty of the European Union. (1992). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM%3Axy0026
   Google Scholar
• Tusińska, M. (2016). Competitiveness of the European Union – Expectations, reality and challenges towards 2020. Horizons of Politics, 7(21), 185–204.
   Google Scholar
• Vollard, H. (2018). European disintegration: A search for explanations. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wandel, J. (2016). The role of government and markets in the strategy ‘Europe 2020’ of the European Union: A robust political economy analysis. International Journal of Management and Economics, 49(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijme-2016-0002
   Google Scholar
• Walburn, D. (2010). Europe 2020. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 25(8), 699–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/02690942.2010.533420
   Google Scholar
• Webber, D. (2018). European disintegration? – The politics of crisis in the European Union. Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R. (1998). From civilian power to superpower? The international identity of the European Union. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J., Komornicki, T., Böhme, K., Świątek, D., & Żuber, P. (2014). Territorial keys for bringing closer the territorial agenda of the EU and Europe 2020. European Planning Studies, 22(2), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar