Examining the Differential Effectiveness of Fear Appeals in Information Security Management Using Two-Stage Meta-Analysis

References

• Aguinis, H; Beaty, J.C.; Boik, R.J.; and Pierce, C.A. Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1 (2005), 94–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H; Dalton, D.R.; Bosco, F.A.; Pierce, C.A.; and Dalton, C.M. Meta-analytic choices and judgment calls: Implications for theory building and testing, obtained effect sizes, and scholarly impact. Journal of Management, 37, 1 (2012), 5–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H; Pierce, C.A.; Bosco, F.A.; Dalton, D.R.; and Dalton, C.M. Debunking myths and urban legends about meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 2 (2011), 306–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aigbefo, Q.A.; Blount, Y.; and Marrone, M. The influence of hardiness and habit on security behaviour intention. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41, 6 (2022), 1151–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. Maximum likelihood identification of Gaussian autoregressive moving average models. Biometrika, 60, 2 (1973), 255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M.P. Understanding Regression Analysis. New York: Plenum Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Baroudi, JJ and Orlikowski, WJ. The problem of statistical power in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 13, 1 (1989), 87–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M.R.; and Mount, M.K. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1 (1991), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bax, S.; McGill, T.; and Hobbs, V. Maladaptive behaviour in response to email phishing threats: The roles of rewards and response costs. Computers & Security, 106 (2021), Article: 102278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, C.B.; and Mazumdar, M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50, 4 (1994), 1088–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh, D.D.; Aguinis, H.; Heavey, C.; Ketchen, D.J.; Boyd, B.K.; Su, P.; Lau, C.L.; and Joo, H. Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 3 (2016), 477–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehmer, J.; LaRose, R.; Rifon, N.; Alhabash, S.; and Cotten, S. Determinants of online safety behaviour: Towards an intervention strategy for college students. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34, 10 (2015), 1022–1035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M; Cooper, H; Hedges, L; and Valentine, J. Effect sizes for continuous data. In L.V. Hedges, H. Cooper, and J.C. Valentine (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis, end ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2009, pp. 221–235.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M.; Hedges, L.V.; Higgins, J.P.; and Rothstein, H.R. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Boss, S.R.; Galletta, D.F.; Lowry, P.B.; Moody, G.D.; and Polak, P. What do users have to fear? Using fear appeals to engender threats and fear that motivate protective security behaviors. MIS Quarterly, 39, 4 (2015), 837–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozdogan, H. Model selection and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 3 (1987), 345–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, K.; and Anderson, D. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, A.J.; Roberts, T.L.; Posey, C.; Bennett, R.J.; and Courtney, J.F. Intentions to comply versus intentions to protect: A VIE theory approach to understanding the influence of insiders’ awareness of organizational SETA efforts. Decision Sciences, 49, 6 (2018), 1187–1228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, A.J.; Roberts, T.L.; Posey, C.; and Lowry, P.B. Examining the influence of organisational insiders’ psychological capital on information security threat and coping appraisals. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, March (2017), 190–209.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, A.J.; Roberts, T.L.; Posey, C.; and Lowry, P.B. The adaptive roles of positive and negative emotions in organizational insiders’ engagement in security-based precaution taking. Information Systems Research, 30, 4 (2019), 1228–1247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, A.J.; Roberts, T.L.; Posey, C.; Lowry, P.B., and Fuller, B. Going beyond deterrence: A middle-range theory of motives and controls for insider computer abuse. Information Systems Research 34, 1 (2023), 342–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, N.A. Applied Meta-Analysis for Social Science Research. New York: Guilford Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Champely, S. pwr: Basic functions for power analysis. R package version 1.3-0. (2020), Date last accessed:October 1, 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. Security risk tolerance in mobile payment: A tradeoff framework. Ann Arbor: Old Dominion University, 2018, p. 145.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.; Galletta, D.F.; Lowry, P.B.; Luo, X.; Moody, G.D.; and Willison, R. Understanding inconsistent employee compliance with information security policies through the lens of the extended parallel process model. Information Systems Research, 32, 3 (2021), 1043–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Benitez, J.; Luo, X.; and Li, D. Does techno-invasion lead to employees’ deviant behaviors? Journal of Management Information Systems, 39, 2 (2022), 454–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L. A model for integrating fixed-, random-, and mixed-effects meta-analyses into structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 13, 3 (2008), 182–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L. Fixed-effects meta-analyses as multiple-group structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 3 (2010), 481–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L. Multivariate meta-analysis as structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20, 3 (2013), 429–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L. Fixed- and random-effects meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Examples and analyses in R. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 2014 (2014), 29–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L. Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychological Methods, 19, 2 (2014), 211–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L. Meta-Analysis, A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L. {metaSEM}: An R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, January (2015), Article 1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L. Computing multivariate effect sizes and their sampling covariance matrices with structural equation modeling: Theory, examples, and computer simulations. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, August (2018), Article: 1387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L. Issues in solving the problem of effect size heterogeneity in meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A commentary and simulation study on Yu, Downes, Carter, and O’Boyle. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 7 (2018), 787–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L. metaSEM: An R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. (2018), Date last accessed: October 17, 2022, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/metaSEM/vignettes/metaSEM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L. Some reflections on combining meta-analysis and structural equation modeling. Research Synthesis Methods, 10, 1 (2019), 15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L.; and Chan, W. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10, 1 (2005), 40–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L.; and Chan, W. A two-stage approach to synthesizing covariance matrices in meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 1 (2009), 28–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L.; and Cheung, S.-F. Random effects models for meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Review, issues, and illustrations. Research Synthesis Methods, 7, 2 (2016), 140–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.W.-L.; and Hong, R.Y. Applications of meta-analytic structural equation modelling in health psychology: Examples, issues, and recommendations. Health Psychology Review, 11, 3 (2017), 265–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, H.L.; and Sun, J.C.Y. The moderating roles of gender and social norms on the relationship between protection motivation and risky online behavior among in-service teachers. Computers & Education, 112, (2017), 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Corley, K.G.; and Gioia, D.A. Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36, 1 (2011), 12–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cram, W.A.; D’Arcy, J.; and Proudfoot, J.G. Seeing the forest and the trees: A meta-analysis of the antecedents to information security policy compliance. MIS Quarterly, 43, 2 (2019), 525–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cram, W.A.; Proudfoot, J.G.; and D’Arcy, J. Organizational information security policies: A review and research framework. European Journal of Information Systems, 26, 6 (2017), 605–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranney, A.; Guyatt, G.; Krolicki, N.; Welch, V.; Griffith, L.; Adachi, J.; Shea, B.; Tugwell, P.; and Wells, G. A meta-analysis of etidronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporosis International, 12, 2 (2001), 140–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromer, C. Understanding Web 2.0’s influences on public e-services: A protection motivation perspective. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 12, 2 (2010), 192–205.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, T.; Ketchen, D.; Combs, J.; and Todd, S. Strategic resources and performance: A meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 11 (2008), 1141–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R. Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 2 (1989), 317–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Arcy, J.; Herath, T.; and Shoss, M.K. Understanding employee responses to stressful information security requirements: A coping perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 2 (2014), 285–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Arcy, J.; and Lowry, P.B. Cognitive-affective drivers of employees’ daily compliance with information security policies: A multilevel, longitudinal study. Information Systems Journal, 29, 1 (2019), 43–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debb, S.M.; and McClellan, M.K. Perceived vulnerability as a determinant of increased risk for cybersecurity risk behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24, 9 (2021), 605–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debray, T.P.A.; Moons, K.G.M.; and Riley, R.D. Detecting small-study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis of survival data: A comparison of new and existing tests. Research Synthesis Methods, 9, 1 (2018), 41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duriau, V.J.; Reger, R.K.; and Pfarrer, M.D. A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 1 (2007), 5–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval, S.; and Tweedie, R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 2 (2000), 455–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, M. Explaining digital piracy: A meta-analysis. Information Systems Research, 30, 2 (2019), 636–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, D.L.; Prentice-Dunn, S.; and Rogers, R.W. A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2 (2000), 407–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerow, J.E.; Ayyagari, R.; Thatcher, J.B.; and Roth, P.L. Can we have fun @ work? The role of intrinsic motivation for utilitarian systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 22, 3 (2013), 360–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, G.; McGaw, B.; and Smith, M. Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Guhr, N.; Lebek, B.; and Breitner, M.H. The impact of leadership on employees’ intended information security behaviour: An examination of the full-range leadership theory. Information Systems Journal, 29, 2 (2019), 340–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagger, M.S.; Cheung, M.W.-L.; Ajzen, I.; and Hamilton, K. Perceived behavioral control moderating effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 41, 2 (2022), 155–167.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J., and Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective (7th ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• He, J.; and King, W.R. The role of user participation in information systems development: Implications from a meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 1 (2008), 301–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L.V.; and Vevea, J.L. Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 4 (1998), 486–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedström, K.; Kolkowska, E.; Karlsson, F.; and Allen, J.P. Value conflicts for information security management. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20, 4 (2011), 373–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herath, T.; Chen, R.; Wang, J.; Banjara, K.; Wilbur, J.; and Rao, H.R. Security services as coping mechanisms: An investigation into user intention to adopt an email authentication service. Information Systems Journal, 24, 1 (2012), 61–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herath, T.; and Rao, H. Protection motivation and deterrence: A framework for security policy compliance in organisations. European Journal of Information Systems, 18, 2 (2009), 106–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, T.; Luo, X.; Ke, D.; and Cheng, X. Exploring different appraisals in deviant sharing behaviors: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Business Research, 139, February (2022), 496–509.
   Google Scholar
• House, D.; and Raja, M.K. Phishing: Message appraisal and the exploration of fear and self-confidence. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39, 11 (2020), 1204–1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C.I.; Janis, I.L.; and Kelley, H.H. Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.; and Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1 (1999), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Q.; Dinev, T.; Hart, P.; and Cooke, D. Managing employee compliance with information security policies: The critical role of top management and organizational culture. Decision Sciences, 43, 4 (2012), 615–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Q.; Hart, P.; and Cooke, D. The role of external and internal influences on information systems security: A neo-institutional perspective. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16, 2 (2007), 153–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J.E.; and Schmidt, F.L. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Jak, S. Heterogeneity. In M. Bosnjak, M.W.L. Cheung, and W. Viechtbauer (eds.), Meta-analytic Structural Equation Modelling. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2015, pp. 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Jak, S.; and Cheung, M.W.-L. Accounting for missing correlation coefficients in fixed-effects MASEM. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 1 (2018), 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jak, S.;. and Cheung, MW.-L. Testing moderator hypotheses in meta-analytic structural equation modeling using subgroup analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 4 (2018), 1359–1373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jak, S.; and Cheung, M.W.-L. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters. Psychological Methods, 25, 4 (2020), 430–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I.L. Effects of fear arousal on attitude change: Recent developments in theory and experimental research. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 3. New York: Academic Press, 1967, pp. 166–224.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, S.; Son, I.; and Han, J. Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation in ISSP compliance: Enterprise digital rights management system case. Information Technology & People, 34, 2 (2021), 599–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, A.C.; and Warkentin, M. Fear appeals and information security behaviors: An empirical study. MIS Quarterly, 34, 1 (2010), 549–566.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, A.C.; Warkentin, M.; and Siponen, M.T. An enhanced fear appeal rhetorical framework: Leveraging threats to the human asset through sanctioning rhetoric. MIS Quarterly, 39, 1 (2015), 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, D.; Ng, K.-Y; Koh, C.; and Ang, S. Turnover of information technology professionals: A narrative review, meta-analytic structural equation modeling, and model development. MIS Quarterly, 31, 3 (2007), 547–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajtazi, M.; Holmberg, N.; Sarker, S.; Keller, C.; Johansson, B.; and Tona, O. Toward a unified model of information security policy compliance: A conceptual replication study. AIS Transactions on Replication Research, 7, 1 (2021), Article: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, M.; Sarker, S.; and Siponen, M. Toward a theory of information systems security behaviors of organizational employees: A dialectical process perspective. Information Systems Research, 30, 2 (2019), 687–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, W.R.; and Jun, H. Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 1 (2005), 665–686.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R.B. Global fit testing. In R.B. Kline (ed.), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2016, pp. 262–299.
   Google Scholar
• Knapova, L.; Kruzikova, A.; Dedkova, L.; and Smahel, D. Who Is smart with their smartphones? Determinants of smartphone security behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24, 9 (2021), 584–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolkowska, E.; and Dhillon, G. Organizational power and information security rule compliance. Computers & Security, 33, (2013), 3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolkowska, E.; Karlsson, F.; and Hedström, K. Towards analysing the rationale of information security non-compliance: Devising a value-based compliance analysis method. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26, 1 (2017), 39–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.; and Larsen, K.R. Threat or coping appraisal: Determinants of SMB executives’ decision to adopt anti-malware software. European Journal of Information Systems, 18, 2 (2009), 177–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, H. Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 5. New York: Academic Press, 1970, pp. 119–186.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, H.; and Xue, Y. Understanding security behaviors in personal computer usage: A threat avoidance perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11, 7 (2010), 394–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, H.; Xue, Y.; Pinsonneault, A.; and Wu, Y. What users do besides problem-focused coping when facing IT security threats: An emotion-focused coping perspective. MIS Quarterly, 43, 2 (2019), 373–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M.W.; and Wilson, D.B. Practical Meta-Analysis. 49. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, P.B.; Dinev, T.; and Willison, R. Why security and privacy research lies at the centre of the information systems (IS) artefact: Proposing a bold research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 26, 6 (2017), 546–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P.B.; Zhang, J.; and Wu, T. Nature or nurture? A meta-analysis of the factors that maximize the prediction of digital piracy by using social cognitive theory as a framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, March (2017), 104–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddux, J.E.; and Rogers, R.W. Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 5 (1983), 469–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marett, K.; McNab, A.L.; and Harris, R.B. Social networking websites and posting personal information: An evaluation of protection motivation theory. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 3 (2011), 170–188.
   Google Scholar
• McElreath, R. Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• McGill, T.; and Thompson, N. Exploring potential gender differences in information security and privacy. Information & Computer Security, 29, 5 (2021), 850–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, P.; Jebarajakirthy, C.; Maseeh, H.I.; Anubha, A.; Saha, R.; and Dhanda, K. Artificial intelligence in marketing: A meta-analytic review. Psychology & Marketing, 39, August (2022), 2013–2038.
   Google Scholar
• Menard, P.; Bott, G.J.; and Crossler, R.E. User motivations in protecting information security: Protection motivation theory versus self-determination theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34, 4 (2017), 1203–1230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, A.; and Sahi, N. An empirical study of home user intentions towards computer security. Presented at Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2019), Maui, HI, 2019, pp. 4834–4840.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, G.R.; Labrecque, L.I.; and Cromer, C. Toward an understanding of the online consumer’s risky behavior and protection practices. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 43, 3 (2009), 449–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazemi, A.R.; Pittaway, J.J.; Saremi, H.Q.; and Wei, Y. Factors of stickiness in transfers of know-how between MNC units. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21, 1 (2012), 31–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazemi, A.R.; and Qahri-Saremi, H. Factors affecting adoption of online banking: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study. Information & Management, 52, 2 (2015), 210–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, G.D.; Siponen, M.; and Pahnila, S. Toward a unified model of information security policy compliance. MIS Quarterly, 42, 1 (2018), 285–A22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mou, J.; Cohen, J.F.; Bhattacherjee, A; and Kim, J. A test of protection motivation theory in the information security literature: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23, 1 (2022), 196–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung, J.I.; and Pitt, M.A. Model comparison methods. In L. Brand, and M.L. Johnson (eds.), Methods in Enzymology, Numerical Computer Methods, Part D, 383. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 2004, pp. 351–366.
   Google Scholar
• Nehme, A.; and George, J.F. Approaching IT security & avoiding threats in the smart home context. Journal of Management Information Systems, 39, 4 (2022), 1184–1214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, B.-Y.; Kankanhalli, A.; and Xu, Y. Studying users’ computer security behavior: A health belief perspective. Decision Support Systems, 46, 4 (2009), 815–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbanufe, O.; and Pavur, R. Going through the emotions of regret and fear: Revisiting protection motivation for identity theft protection. International Journal of Information Management, 62, February (2022), Article: 102432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orwin, R.G. A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8, 2 (1983), 157–159.
   Google Scholar
• Popova, L. The extended parallel process model: Illuminating the gaps in research. Health Education & Behavior, 39, 4 (2012), 455–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posey, C.; Roberts, T.L.; and Lowry, P.B. The impact of organizational commitment on insiders’ motivation to protect organizational information assets. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32, 4 (2015), 179–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posey, C.; Roberts, T.L.; Lowry, P.B.; Bennett, R.J.; and Courtney, J. Insiders’ protection of organizational information assets: Development of a systematics-based taxonomy and theory of diversity for protection-motivated behaviors. MIS Quarterly, 37, 4 (2013), 1189–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice-Dunn, S.; and Rogers, RW. Protection motivation theory and preventive health: Beyond the health belief model. Health Education Research, 1, 3 (1986), 153–161.
   Google Scholar
• Purssell, E. Meta-analysis in R using metafor, meta and MAd. London: King’s College London, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Qahri-Saremi, H.; and Montazemi, A.R. Factors affecting the adoption of an electronic word of mouth message: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 3 (2019), 969–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raftery, A.E. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 1995 (1995), 111–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (2021). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychVersion=2.1.9 ( accessed March 1, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R.W. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91, 1 (1975), 93–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R.W. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J.T. Cacioppo, and R.E. Petty (eds.), Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook. New York: Guilford, 1983, pp. 153–176.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R.W.; and Prentice-Dunn, S. Protection motivation theory. In D.S. Gochman (ed.), Handbook of Health Behavior Research I: Personal and Social Determinants. New York: Plenum Press, 1997, pp. 113–132.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 3 (1979), 638–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salleh, N.; Hussein, R.; Mohamed, N.; Abdul Karim, N.S.; Ahlan, A.R.; and Aditiawarman, U. Examining information disclosure behavior on social network sites using protection motivation theory, trust and risk. Journal of Internet Social Networking & Virtual Communities, 2012, 2012 (2012), Article: 281869.
   Google Scholar
• Samtani, S.; Zhu, H.; and Yu, S. Fear appeals and information security behaviors: An empirical study on Mechanical Turk. AIS Transactions on Replication Research, 5, Paper 5 (2019), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, R.; Siddiq, F.; and Tondeur, J. The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, January (2019), 13–35.
   Google Scholar
• Schuetz, S.W.; Lowry, P.B.; Pienta, D.A.; and Thatcher, J.B. The effectiveness of abstract versus concrete fear appeals in information security. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 3 (2020), 723–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuetz, S.W.; Lowry, P.B.; Pienta, D.A.; and Thatcher, J.B. Improving the design of information security messages by leveraging the effects of temporal distance and argument nature. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 5 (2021), 1376–1428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, R.; and Yetton, P. The contingent effects of training, technical complexity, and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MIS Quarterly, 31, 2 (2007), 219–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, R.; and Yetton, P. Top management support and IS implementation: Further support for the moderating role of task interdependence. European Journal of Information Systems, 20, 6 (2011), 703–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silic, M.; and Lowry, P.B. Using design-science based gamification to improve organizational security training and compliance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 1 (2020), 129–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siponen, M.; Pahnila, S.; and Mahmood, M.A. Compliance with information security policies: An empirical investigation. IEEE Computer, 43, 2 (2010), 64–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, T.; and Kumar, N. Examining privacy settings on online social networks: A protection motivation perspective. International Journal of Electronic Business, 13, 2–3 (2017), 244–272.
   Google Scholar
• Sterne, J.A.; and Egger, M. Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. In H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, and M. Borenstein (eds.), Publication Bias in Meta-analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. West Sussex, UK: Wiley, 2005, pp. 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Sterne, J.A.C.; and Egger, M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 10 (2001), 1046–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolwijk, I.; Jak, S.; Eichelsheim, V.; and Hoeve, M. Dealing with dependent effect sizes in MASEM: A comparison of different approaches using empirical data. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 230, 1 (2022), 16–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taddy, M. Business Data Science: Combining Machine Learning and Economics to Optimize, Automate, and Accelerate Business Decisions. New York: McGraw Hill Professional, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, R.W.; and Cheung, M.W.-L. Testing IB theories with meta-analytic structural equation modeling: The TSSEM approach and the univariate-r approach. Review of International Business and Strategy, 26, 4 (2016), 472–492.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, J.C.; Cheung, M.W.-L.; Smith, E.J.; Alexander, O.; Hatton, J.M.; Hong, R.Y.; Huckaby, L.T.; Patton, S.C.; Pössel, P.; and Seely, H.D. A primer on meta-analytic structural equation modeling: The case of depression. Prevention Science, 23, 3 (2022), 346–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 3 (2010), 1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visinescu, L.L; Azogu, O.; Ryan, S.D.; Wu, Y.; and Kim, D.J. Better safe than sorry: A study of investigating individuals’ protection of privacy in the use of storage as a cloud computing service. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32, 11 (2016), 885–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran, C.; and Ones, D.S. Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48, 4 (1995), 865–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, J.D.; and Buche, M.W. To fear or not to fear? A critical review and analysis of fear appeals in the information security context. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 41, 1 (2017), Article: 13.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J.; Li, Y.; and Rao, H.R. Coping responses in phishing detection: An investigation of antecedents and consequences. Information Systems Research, 28, 2 (2017), 378–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warkentin, M.; Johnston, A.C.; Walden, E.; and Straub, D.W. Neural correlates of protection motivation for secure IT behaviors: An fMRI examination. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17, 3 (2016), 194–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S.G.; Taylor, A.B.; and Wu, W. Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R.H. Hoyle (ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, 1. New York: Guilford Press, 2012, pp. 209–231.
   Google Scholar
• Willison, R.; and Lowry, P.B. Disentangling the motivations for organizational insider computer abuse through the rational choice and life course perspectives. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information System, 49, April (2018), 81–102.
   Google Scholar
• Wit, E.; Heuvel, Evd; and Romeijn, J.W. “All models are wrong … ”: An introduction to model uncertainty. Statistica Neerlandica, 66, 3 (2012), 217–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 4 (1992), 329–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 2 (1994), 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K.; and Allen, M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 5 (2000), 591–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K.K.; Cameron, A.; McKeon, J.K.; and Berkowitz, J.M. Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of Health Communication, 1, 4 (1996), 317–342.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Witte, K.; and Morrison, K. The use of scare tactics in AIDS prevention: The case of juvenile detention and high school youth. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 2 (1995), 128–142.
   Google Scholar
• Woon, I.; Tan, G.-W.; and Low, R. A protection motivation theory approach to home wireless security. Presented at International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2005), Las Vegas, NV, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Wothke, W. Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. In K.A. Bollen, and J.S. Long (eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1993, pp. 256–293.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J.; and Lederer, A. A meta-analysis of the role of environment-based voluntariness in information technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 33, 2 (2009), 419–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J.; and Lu, X. Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivators on using utilitarian, hedonic, and dual-purposed information systems: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 3 (2013), 153–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z.; and Guo, K. It ain’t my business: A coping perspective on employee effortful security behavior. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32, 5 (2019), 824–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L.; and McDowell, W.C. Am I really at risk? Determinants of online users’ intentions to use strong passwords. Journal of Internet Commerce, 8, 3–4 (2009), 180–197.
   Google Scholar