954
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Governance and Longevity of Architecturally Embedded Applications

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Agarwal, R. and Tiwana, A. Evolvable systems: Through the looking glass of IS. Information Systems Research, 26, 3 (2015), 473–479.
  • Agresti, A. Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2013.
  • Aral, S., Muchnik, L., and Sundararajan, A. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 51 (2009), 21544–21549.
  • Aral, S., Muchnik, L., and Sundararajan, A. Engineering social contagions: Optimal network seeding in the presence of homophily. Network Science, 1, 2 (2013), 125–153.
  • Aral, S. and Weill, P. IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organization Science, 18, 5 (2007), 763–780.
  • Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., and Lefebvre, E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10 (2008), P10008.
  • Boh, W.F. and Yellin, D. Using enterprise architecture standards in managing information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 3 (2006), 163–207.
  • Brown, C. V. Examining the emergence of hybrid IS governance solutions: Evidence from a single case site. Information Systems Research, 8, 1 (1997), 69–94.
  • Brown, C. V. and Magill, S.L. Alignment of the IS functions with the enterprise: Toward a model of antecedents. MIS Quarterly, 18, 4 (1994), 371–395.
  • Burbidge, J.B., Magee, L., and Robb, A.L. Alternative transformations to handle extreme values of the dependent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 401 (1988), 123–127.
  • Bygstad, B. Generative innovation: A comparison of lightweight and heavyweight IT. Journal of Information Technology, 32, 2 (2017), 180–193.
  • Chua, C.E.H. and Storey, V.C. Bottom-up enterprise information systems: Rethinking the roles of central IT departments. Communications of the ACM, 60, 1 (2017), 66–72.
  • Cox, D.R. Regression models and life‐tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34, 2 (1972), 187–202.
  • Criscuolo, P., Salter, A., and ter Wal, A.L.J. Going underground: Bootlegging and individual innovative performance. Organization Science, 25, 5 (2014), 1287–1305.
  • David, P.A. Path Dependence: A Foundational Concept for Historical Social Science. In P. Zumbansen and G.-P. Calliess, eds., Law, Economics and Evolutionary Theory. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.
  • Dong, J.Q., Karhade, P.P., Rai, A., and Xu, S.X. How firms make information technology investment decisions: Toward a behavioral agency theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38, 1 (2021), 29–58.
  • Dreyfus, D. and Iyer, B. Managing architectural emergence: A conceptual model and simulation. Decision Support Systems, 46, 1 (2008), 115–127.
  • Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J., and Blake, C.R. Survivorship bias and mutual fund performance. Review of Financial Studies, 9, 4 (1996), 1097–1120.
  • Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C. Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26, 2 (1983), 301–325.
  • Fortunato, S. Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports, 486, 3–5 (2010), 75–174.
  • Furneaux, B. and Wade, M. The end of the information system life: A model of IS discontinuance. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 41, 2 (2010), 45–69.
  • Furneaux, B. and Wade, M. An exploration of organizational level information systems discontinuance intentions. MIS Quarterly, 35, 3 (2011), 573–598.
  • Furneaux, B. and Wade, M. Impediments to information systems replacement: A calculus of discontinuance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34, 3 (2017), 902–932.
  • Fürstenau, D., Baiyere, A., and Kliewer, N. A dynamic model of embeddedness in digital infrastructures. Information Systems Research, 30, 4 (2019), 1319–1342.
  • Fürstenau, D., Rothe, H., and Sandner, M. Shadow systems, risk, and shifting power relations in organizations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 41, (2017), 43–61.
  • Fürstenau, D., Rothe, H., and Sandner, M. Leaving the shadow: A configurational approach to explain post-identification outcomes of shadow IT systems. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63, 2 (2021), 97–111.
  • Gregory, R.W., Beck, R., and Keil, M. Control balancing in information systems development offshoring projects. MIS Quarterly, 37, 4 (2013), 1211–1232.
  • Gregory, R.W., Kaganer, E., Henfridsson, O., and Ruch, T.J. It consumerization and the transformation of it governance. MIS Quarterly, 42, 4 (2018), 1225–1253.
  • Gu, B., Konana, P., Raghunathan, R., and Chen, H.M. The allure of homophily in social media: Evidence from investor responses on virtual communities. Information Systems Research, 25, 3 (2014), 604–617.
  • Gu, B., Xue, L., and Ray, G. IT governance and IT investment performance: An empirical analysis. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). 2008, pp. 30.
  • Haag, S. and Eckhardt, A. Shadow IT. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 59, 6 (2017), 469–473.
  • Hair, J., Anderson, R., Babin, B., and Black, W. Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage Learning, Andover, England, 2018.
  • Haki, K., Beese, J., Aier, S., and Winter, R. The evolution of information systems architecture: An agent-based simulation model. MIS Quarterly, 44, 1 (2020), 155–184.
  • Hanseth, O. and Lyytinen, K. Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25, 1 (2010), 1–19.
  • Hanseth, O. and Rodon Modol, J. The dynamics of architecture-governance configurations: An assemblage theory approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 1 (2021), 130–155.
  • Heinze, G. and Schemper, M. A solution to the problem of monotone likelihood in Cox regression. Biometrics, 57, 1 (2001), 114–119.
  • Heinze, G. and Schemper, M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 16 (2002), 2409–2419.
  • Henfridsson, O. and Bygstad, B. The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 37, 3 (2013), 907–931.
  • Iyer, S., Killingback, T., Sundaram, B., and Wang, Z. Attack robustness and centrality of complex networks. PLoS ONE, 8, 4 (2013), e59613.
  • Jacobides, M.G., Cennamo, C., and Gawer, A. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 8 (2018), 2255–2276.
  • Kopper, A., Fürstenau, D., Zimmermann, S., et al. Shadow IT and business-managed IT. International Journal of IT/Business Alignment and Governance, 9, 2 (2018), 53–71.
  • Kyte, A. The executive guide to application management. Gartner Report. Stamford, Connecticut, 2011.
  • Lagerström, R., Baldwin, C., MacCormack, A., and Aier, S. Visualizing and measuring enterprise application architecture: An exploratory telecom case. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2014, pp. 3847–3856.
  • Liu, D., Tan, Y., and Mookerjee, V. When ignorance can be bliss: Organizational structure and coordination in electronic retailing. Information Systems Research, 29, 1 (2018), 70–83.
  • MacCormack, A. and Lagerstrom, R. Designing an agile software portfolio architecture: The impact of coupling on performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017, 1 (2017), 17511.
  • Mata, F.J., Fuerst, W.L., and Barney, J.B. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19, 4 (1995), 487–504.
  • McKelvey, B. Avoiding complexity catastrophe in coevolutionary pockets: Strategies for rugged landscapes. Organization Science, 10, 3 (1999), 294–321.
  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Cook, J.M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 1 (2001), 415–444.
  • Misztal, B. Informality: Social Theory and Contemporary Practice. Routledge, London, England, 2002.
  • Nan, N. Capturing bottom-up information technology use processes: A complex adaptive systems model. MIS Quarterly, 35, 2 (2011), 505–532.
  • Newman, M.E.J. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 23 (2006), 8577–8582.
  • Recker, J. Reasoning about discontinuance of information system use. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 17, 1 (2016), 41–66.
  • Rezazade Mehrizi, M.H., Rodon Modol, J., and Zafar Nezhad, M. Intensifying to cease: Unpacking the process of information systems discontinuance. MIS Quarterly, 43, 1 (2019), 141–165.
  • Rinta-Kahila, T., Penttinen, E., and Lyytinen, K. Getting trapped in technical debt: Sociotechnical analysis of a legacy system’s replacement. MIS Quarterly, 47, 1 (2023), 1–32.
  • Sambamurthy, V. and Zmud, R.W. Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quarterly, 23, 2 (1999), 261–290.
  • Schelling, T.C. Dynamic models of segregation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 2 (1971), 143–186.
  • Shollo, A., Constantiou, I., and Kreiner, K. The interplay between evidence and judgment in the IT project prioritization process. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24, 3 (2015), 171–188.
  • Simon, H.A. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 6 (1962), 467–482.
  • Simon, H.A. Near decomposability and the speed of evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 3 (2002), 587–599.
  • Soliman, W. and Rinta-Kahila, T. Toward a refined conceptualization of IS discontinuance: Reflection on the past and a way forward. Information and Management, 57, 2 (2020), 103167.
  • Subramanyam, R., Ramasubbu, N., and Krishnan, M.S. In search of efficient flexibility: Effects of software component granularity on development effort, defects, and customization effort. Information Systems Research, 23, 3–part–1 (2012), 787–803.
  • Swanson, E.B. and Dans, E. System life expectancy and the maintenance effort: Exploring their equilibration. MIS Quarterly, 24, 2 (2000), 277–297.
  • Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., and Sørensen, C. Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21, 4 (2010), 748–759.
  • Tiwana, A. Governance-knowledge fit in systems development projects. Information Systems Research, 20, 2 (2009), 180–197.
  • Tiwana, A. Platform synergy: Architectural origins and competitive consequences. Information Systems Research, 29, 4 (2018), 829–848.
  • Tiwana, A. and Kim, S.K. Discriminating IT governance. Information Systems Research, 26, 4 (2015), 656–674.
  • Tiwana, A. and Konsynski, B. Complementarities between organizational IT architecture and governance structure. Information Systems Research, 21, 2 (2010), 288–304.
  • Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., and Venkatraman, N. Information technology and organizational governance: The IT governance cube. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 3 (2013), 7–12.
  • Tiwana, A. and Safadi, H. Atrophy in aging systems: Evidence, dynamics, and antidote. Information Systems Research, June (2023), 0–21.
  • Venkatraman, N. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14, 3 (1989), 423–444.
  • Warkentin, M., Johnston, A.C., Shropshire, J., and Barnett, W.D. Continuance of protective security behavior: A longitudinal study. Decision Support Systems, 92, (2016), 25–35.
  • Weill, P. and Ross, J. IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Harvard Business School Press, USA, 2010.
  • Widjaja, T. and Gregory, R.W. Monitoring the complexity of it architectures: Design principles and an it artifact. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21, 3 (2020), 664–694.
  • Winkler, T. and Brown, C. V. Organizing and configuring the IT function. In A. Tucker, T. Gonzalez, H. Topi and J. Diaz-Herrera, eds., Computing Handbook : Information Systems and Information Technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2014, pp. 1–14.
  • Winkler, T.J. and Benlian, A. The dual role of IS specificity in governing software as a service. In F.G. Joey, ed., Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), Atlanta, GA, 2012.
  • Winkler, T.J. and Brown, C. V. Horizontal allocation of decision rights for on-premise applications and software-as-a-service. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 3 (2013), 13–48.
  • Winkler, T.J., Goebel, C., Benlian, A., Bidault, F., and Günther, O. The impact of software as a service on IS authority - a contingency perspective. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). 2011, pp. 4052–4068.
  • Winkler, T.J. and Wessel, M. A primer on decision rights in information systems: Review and recommendations. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2018.
  • Xue, L., Ray, G., and Gu, B. Environmental uncertainty and IT infrastructure governance: A curvilinear relationship. Information Systems Research, 22, 2 (2011), 389–399.
  • Xue, Y., Liang, H., and Boulton, W.R. Information technology governance in information technology investment decision processes: The impact of investment characteristics, external environment, and internal context. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 32, 1 (2008), 67–96.
  • Yin, R.K. Case study research and applications. Sage Publications, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2017.