338
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Bureaucratizing the Clan: Impact of Technology Affordances on Control

, , &

References

  • Anteby, M.; Chan, C.K. A self-fulfilling circle of coercive surveillance: Workers’ invisibility practices and managerial justification. Organization Science, 99, 2 (2018), 247–263.
  • Barker, J.R. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (1993), 408–437.
  • Benjamin, R. Race after Technology: Abololitionist Tools for the new Jim Code. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2019.
  • Braga, A. A.; Baral, L.M.; Zimmerman, G.M.; Douglas, S.; and Sheppard, K. Measuring the direct and spillover effects of body-worn cameras on the civility of police-citizen encounters and police work activities. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, (2019), doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09434-9
  • Braga, A.A.; Sousa, W.H.; Coldren, J.R.; and Rodriguez, D. The effects of body-worn cameras on police activity and police-civilian encounters: A randomized control trial. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 108 (2018), 511–538.
  • Brayne, S. Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021.
  • Cameron, L.D.; Rahman, H. Expanding the locus of resistance: Understanding the co-constitution of control and resistance in the gig economy. Organization Science, 33,1 (2022), 38–58
  • Cardinal, L.B. Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organization Science, 12, 1 (2001), 19–36.
  • Cardinal, L.B.; Kreutzer, M.; and Miller, C. An aspirational view of organizational control research: Re-invigorating empirical work to better meet the challenges of 21st century organizations. Academy of Management Annals. 11, 2 (2017), 559–592.
  • Cardinal, L.B.; Sitkin, S.B.; and Long, C.P. Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organization Science, 15, 4 (2004), 411–431.
  • Chown, J. The Unfolding of control mechanisms inside organizations: Pathways of customization and transmutation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66, 3 (2021), 711–752.
  • Chua, C.E.H.; Lim, W-K.; Soh, C.; and Sia, S.K. Enacting clan control in complex IT projects: A social capital perspective. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36, 2 (2012), 577–600.
  • Cram, W.A.; Wiener, M. Technology-mediated control: Case examples and research directions for the future of organizational control. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 46, 4 (2020), 70–91.
  • Cram, W.A.; Wiener, M.; Tarafdar, M.; and Benlian, A. Examining the impact of algorithmic control on Uber drivers’ technostress. Journal of Management Information Systems, 39, 2 (2022), 426–453.
  • Eisenhardt, K. Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 1, 2 (1985), 134–149.
  • Eisenhardt, K. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14, 4 (1989), 532–550.
  • Edwards, R. Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workforce in the Twentieth Century, US: Basic Books, 1979.
  • Farrell, R. G; Kellogg, W; and Thomas, J. C. The participatory web and the socially resilient enterprise. In What to expect from Enterprise 3.0: Adapting Web 2.0 to Corporate Reality workshop at the 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, San Diego, CA.
  • Ferguson, A.G. The Rise of Big Data Policing: Surveillance, Race, and the Future of Law Enforcement. New York: New York University Press, 2017.
  • Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin, 1977.
  • Gibson, J. The Ecological Approach to Perception. London: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
  • Glaser, V.L. Design performances: How organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 6 (2017), 2126–2154.
  • Goulding, C. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business, and Market Researchers. London: Sage, 2002.
  • Guzik, K.; Sesay, A.; Oh, O.; Ramirez, R.; and Tong, T. Making the material routine: A sociomaterial study of the relationship between police body worn cameras (BWCs) and organizational routines,” Policing and Society, (2019).
  • Harvard Law Review. Considering police body cameras: Developments in the Law. Harvard Law Review. 128 (2015), 1794–1834.
  • Henfridsson, O.; Bygstad, B. The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37, 3 (2013), 907–931.
  • Hyland, S.S. Body-Worn Cameras in Law Enforcement Agencies, 2016. Report, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin, NCJ 251775. (2018)
  • Jones, M. Governance, integrity, and the police organization, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 32, 2 (2009), 338–350.
  • Karahanna, E.; Xu, S.X.; Xu, Y.; and Zhang, N. The needs-affordances-features perspective for the use of social media. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 42, 3 (2018), 737–756
  • Kellogg, K.E.; Valentine, M.A.; and Christin, A. Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14, 1 (2020), 366–410.
  • Kirsch, L.J.; Ko, D-G.; and Haney, M.H. Investigating the antecedents of team-based clan control: Adding social capital as a predictor. Organization Science, 21, 2 (2010), 469–489.
  • Klein, H.K.; Myers, M.D. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 23, 1 (1999), 69–94.
  • Kohli, R.; Kettinger, W.J. Informating the Clan: Controlling physicians’ costs and outcomes. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28, 3 (2004), 363–394.
  • Krancher, O.; Luther, P.; and Jost, M. Key affordances of Platform-as-a-Service: Self-organization and continuous feedback. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 3 (2018), 776–812
  • Kreutzer, M.; Cardinal, L.B.; Walter, J.; Lechner, C. Formal and informal control as complement or substitute? The role of the task environment. Strategy Science, 1 (2016), 235–255
  • Kreutzer, M.; Walter, J.; and Cardinal, L.B. Organizational control as antidote to politics in the pursuit of strategic initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 36 (2015), 1317–1337
  • Lee, A.S. Integrating positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research. Organization Science, 2, 4 (1991), 342–365.
  • Leidner, D.E.; Gonzalez, E.; Koch, H. An affordance perspective of enterprise social media and organizational socialization. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27 (2018), 117–138.
  • Leonard-Barton, D. A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science, 1, 3 (1990), 248–266.
  • Leonardi, P.M. When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35, 1 (2011), 147–167.
  • Leonardi, P.M. When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37, 3 (2013), 749–775.
  • Lincoln, Y.; Guba, E. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1985.
  • Majchrzak, A.; Faraj, S.; Kane, G.C.; and Azad, B. The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19 (2013), 38–55
  • Malhotra, A.; Majchrzak, A.; and Lyytinen, K. Socio-technical affordances for large-scale collaborations: Introduction to a virtual special issue. Organization Science 32, 5 (2021), 1371–1390.
  • Manley, A.; Williams, S. ‘We’re not run on numbers, we’re people, we’re emotional people’: Exploring the experiences and lived consequences of emerging technologies, organizational surveillance and control among elite professionals, Organization, 29, 4, (2022), 692–713.
  • Manning, P.K. Information technologies and the police, Crime and Justice, 15 (1992), 349–398.
  • Manning, P.K. Information technology in the police context: The “Sailor” phone,” Information Systems Research, 7, 1 (1996), 52–62.
  • Manning, P.K. Police Work: The Social Organization of Policing. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press, 1997.
  • Manning, P.K. The Technology of Policing: Crime Mapping, Information Technology, and the Rationality of Crime Control. New York: New York University Press, 2008.
  • Mazmanian, M.; Beckman C.M. ‘Making’ your numbers: Engendering organizational control through a ritual of quantification. Organization Science, 29 (2018), 357–379.
  • Möhlmanm, M.; Zalmanson, L.; Henfridsson, O.; Gregory, R.W. Algorithmic management of work on online labor platforms: When matching meets control. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 45, 4 (2021), 1999–2022.
  • Nevo, S.; Nevo, D.; and Pinsonneault, A. Personal achievement goals, learning strategies, and perceived IT affordances. Information Systems Research, Online articles in advance (2021).
  • Ouchi, W. G.; Price, R. L. Hierarchies, clans, and theory Z: A New perspective on organization development. Organizational Dynamics, 7, 2 (1978), 24–44.
  • Ouchi, W. G. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25, 9 (1979), 833–848.
  • Ouchi, W. G. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 1 (1980), 129–141.
  • Pierce, L.; Snow, D.C.; and McAfee, A. Cleaning house: The impact of information technology monitoring on employee theft and productivity. Management Sciience, 61, 13 (2015), 2299–2319.
  • President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Final Report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. (2015).
  • Rahman, H.A. The invisible cage: Workers’ reactivity to opaque algorithmic evaluations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66, 4 (2021), 945–988.
  • Ravid, D.M.; Tomczak, D.L.; White, J.C.; and Behrend, T.S. EPM 20/20: A review, framework, and research agenda for electronic performance monitoring. Journal of Management, 26, 1 (2020), 100–126.
  • Rowe, M.; Pearson, G.; and Turner, E. Body-worn cameras and the laws of unintended consequences: Some questions arising from emergent practices. Policing, 12, 1 (2017), 83–90.
  • Sarker, S.; Xiao, X.; and Beaulieu, T. Qualitative studies in information systems: A critical review and some guiding principles, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37, 4 (2013), iii–xviii.
  • Schafheitle, S.; Weibel, A.; Ebert, I.; Kasper, G.; Schank, C.; and Leicht-Deobald, U. No stone left unturned? Toward a framework for the impact of datafication technologies on organizational control. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6, 3 (2020), 455–487.
  • Sesay, A.; Ramirez, R.; and Oh, O. Technological innovation in police work: A sociomaterial perspective on police body-worn cameras. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2017, 4266–4275.
  • Staats, B.R.; Dai, H.; Hofmann, D.; and Milkman, K.L. Motivating process compliance through individual electronic monitoring: An empirical examination of hand hygiene in healthcare. Management Science, 63, 5 (2017), 1563–1585.
  • Steffen, J.H.; Gaskin, J.E.; Meservy, T.O.; Jenkins, J.L.; and Wolman, I. Framework of affordances for virtual reality and augmented reality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 3 (2019), 683–729.
  • Strauss, A.; Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London: Sage, 1990.
  • Strong, D.M.; Volkoff, O.; Johnson, S.A.; Pelletler, L.T.; Tulu, B.; Bar-On, I.; Trudel, J.; and Garber, L. A theory of organizational EHR affordances actualization. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15, (2014), 53–85.
  • Stroud, M. Thin Blue Lie: The Failure of High-Tech Policing. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2019.
  • Tiwana, A. Systems development ambidexterity: Explaining the complementary and substitutive roles of formal and informal controls. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 2 (2010), 87–126
  • Treem, J.W.; Leonardi, P.M. Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association, Annals of the International Communication Association, 36, 1 (2013), 143–189.
  • Vaast, E.; Safadi, H.; Lapointe, L.; and Negoita, B. Social media affordances for connective action: An examination of microblogging use during the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 41, 4 (2017), 1179–1205.
  • Van Maanen, J. Police socialization: A longitudinal examination of job attitudes in an urban police department. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20 (1975), 207–228.
  • Van Maanen, J. Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: A preface, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (1979), 520–526.
  • Volkoff, O.; Strong, D.M. Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37, 3 (2013), 819–834.
  • White, M. Police officer Body-Worn Cameras: Assessing the Evidence. Report, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services/Office of Justice Programs, Washington DC. (2014)
  • Wiener, M.; Cram, W.A.; and Benlian, A. Algorithmic control and gig workers: A legitimacy perspective of Uber drivers. European Journal of Information Systems, (2021) DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2021.1977729.
  • Wiener, M.; Mähring, M.; Remus, U.; Saunders, C.; and Cram, W.A. Moving IS project control research into the digital era: The “Why” of control and the concept of control purpose. Information Systems Research, 30, 4 (2019), 1387–1401.
  • Zammuto, R.F.; Griffith, T.L.; Majchrzak, A.; Dougherty, D.J.; and Faraj, S. Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18, 5 (2007), 749–762.
  • Zorina, A.; Bélanger, F.; Kumar, N.; and Clegg, S. Watchers, watched, and watching in the digital age: Reconceptualization of information technology monitoring as complex action nets. Organization Science, 32, 6 (2021), 1571–1596.
  • Zuboff, S.The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Profile books, 2019.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.