366
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Discovery of Technological Innovation Systems: Implications for Predicting Future Innovation

, &

References

  • Acemoglu, D.; Akcigit, U.; and Kerr, W. R. Innovation network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 41, (2016), 11483–11488.
  • Adomavicius, G.; Bockstedt, J.; Gupta, A.; and Kauffman, R. J. Understanding evolution in technology ecosystems. Communications of the ACM, 51, 10, (2008), 117–122.
  • Adomavicius, G.; Bockstedt, J. C.; Gupta, A.; and Kauffman, R. J. Technology roles and paths of influence in an ecosystem model of technology evolution. Information Technology and Management, 8, 2, (2007), 185–202.
  • Adomavicius, G.; Bockstedt, J. C.; Gupta, A.; and Kauffman, R. J. Making sense of technology trends in the information technology landscape: A design science approach. MIS Quarterly, 32, 4, (2008), 779–809.
  • Ahuja, G. and Morris Lampert, C. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 6–7, (2001), 521–543.
  • Arts, S.; Hou, J.; and Gomez, J. C. Natural language processing to identify the creation and impact of new technologies in patent text: Code, data, and new measures. Research Policy, 50, 2, (2021), 104–144.
  • Baldwin, C. Y. and Clark, K. B. Design rules: The power of modularity, volume 1, MIT press (2000).
  • Bergek, A.; Jacobsson, S.; Carlsson, B.; Lindmark, S.; and Rickne, A. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37, 3, (2008), 407–429.
  • Brief, R. P. and Owen, J. A note on earnings risk and the coefficient of variation. The Journal of Finance, 24, 5, (1969), 901–904.
  • Carlsson, B.; Jacobsson, S.; Holm´en, M.; and Rickne, A. Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31, 2, (2002), 233–245.
  • Catal´an, P.; Navarrete, C.; and Figueroa, F. The scientific and technological cross-space: is technological diversification driven by scientific endogenous capacity? Research Policy, 51, 8, (2022), 104016.
  • Chung, S.; Animesh, A.; Han, K.; and Pinsonneault, A. Software Patents and Firm Value: A Real Options Perspective on the Role of Innovation Orientation and Environmental Uncertainty. Information Systems Research, 30, 3, (2019), 1073–1097.
  • Cook, J. R. and Stefanski, L. A. Simulation-extrapolation estimation in parametric measurement error models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 428, (1994), 1314–1328.
  • Corradini, C. and De Propris, L. Beyond local search: Bridging platforms and inter-sectoral technological integration. Research Policy, 46, 1, (2017), 196–206.
  • Cummings, J. N. and Kiesler, S. Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35, 5, (2005), 703–722.
  • De Rassenfosse, G.; Griffiths, W. E.; Jaffe, A. B.; and Webster, E. Low-quality patents in the eye of the beholder: Evidence from multiple examiners. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 37, 3, (2021), 607–636.
  • Ethiraj, S. K. and Levinthal, D. Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Science, 50, 2, (2004), 159–173.
  • Fleming, L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47, 1, (2001), 117–132.
  • Gatkowski, M.; Dietl, M.; Skrok, L- .; Whalen, R.; and Rockett, K. Semantically-based patent thicket identification. Research Policy, 49, 2, (2020), 103925.
  • Goldfarb, A.; Taska, B.; and Teodoridis, F. Could machine learning be a general purpose technology? a comparison of emerging technologies using data from online job postings. Research Policy, 52, 1, (2023), 104653.
  • Grootendorst, M. BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05794.
  • Guggenberger, T.; Schweizer, A.; and Urbach, N. Improving interorganizational information sharing for vendor managed inventory: Toward a decentralized information hub using blockchain technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67, 4, (2020), 1074–1085.
  • Hall, B. H.; Jaffe, A.; and Trajtenberg, M. Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36, 1, (2005), 16–38.
  • Hall, B. H.; Jaffe, A. B.; and Trajtenberg, M. The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research (2001).
  • Hevner, A. R.; March, S. T.; Park, J.; and Ram, S. Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 28, 1, (2004), 75–105. ISSN 0276-7783.
  • Jacobs, J. A. and Frickel, S. Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, (2009), 43–65.
  • Jacobsson, S. and Bergek, A. Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 1, (2011), 41–57.
  • Jaffe, A. B. and Rassenfosse, D. Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68, 6, (2017), 1360–1374 .
  • Kaplan, S. and Vakili, K. The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 10, (2015), 1435–1457.
  • Kathuria, A.; Karhade, P. P.; Ning, X.; and Konsynski, B. R. Blood and Water: Information Technology Investment and Control in Family-owned Businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems, 40, 1, (2023), 208–238.
  • Klevorick, A. K.; Levin, R. C.; Nelson, R. R.; and Winter, S. G. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24, 2, (1995), 185–205.
  • Leahey, E.; Beckman, C. M.; and Stanko, T. L. Prominent but less productive: The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists’ research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62, 1, (2017), 105–139.
  • Li, S.; Hu, J.; Cui, Y.; and Hu, J. DeepPatent: patent classification with convolutional neural networks and word embedding. Scientometrics, 117, 2, (2018), 721–744.
  • Lin, B.-W.; Chen, C.-J.; and Wu, H.-L. Patent portfolio diversity, technology strategy, and firm value. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53, 1, (2006), 17–26.
  • Lin, J. Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 37, 1, (1991), 145–151.
  • Lobo, J. and Strumsky, D. Sources of inventive novelty: two patent classification schemas, same story. Scientometrics, 120, 1, (2019), 19–37.
  • Lubatkin, M. and Chatterjee, S. Extending modern portfolio theory into the domain of corporate diversification: does it apply? Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1, (1994), 109–136.
  • Markard, J. and Truffer, B. Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37, 4, (2008), 596–615.
  • Mousavi, R. and Gu, B. Resilience Messaging: The Effect of Governors’ Social Media Communications on Community Compliance During a Public Health Crisis. Information Systems Research, forthcoming.
  • Nadiri, M. I. Innovations and Technological Spillovers. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc (1993).
  • Peffers, K.; Tuunanen, T.; Rothenberger, M. A.; and Chatterjee, S. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 3, (2007), 45–77.
  • Petralia, S. Mapping general purpose technologies with patent data. Research Policy, 49, 7, (2020), 104013.
  • Pontikes, E. G. Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57, 1, (2012), 81–118.
  • Porter, A. L.; Roessner, J. D.; Cohen, A. S.; and Perreault, M. Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture. Research Evaluation, 15, 3, (2006), 187–195.
  • Prat, N.; Comyn-Wattiau, I.; and Akoka, J. A taxonomy of evaluation methods for information systems artifacts. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32, 3, (2015), 229–267.
  • Rahmati, P.; Tafti, A.; Mithas, S.; and Sachdev, V. How does the positioning of information technology firms in strategic alliances influence returns to R&D investments? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 2, (2021), 6.
  • Ravichandran, T.; Han, S.; and Mithas, S. Mitigating diminishing returns to R&D: The role of information technology in innovation. Information Systems Research, 28, 4, (2017), 812–827.
  • Rhoten, D. and Parker, A. Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science, 306, 5704, (2004), 2046–2046.
  • Rossi, M.; Mueller-Bloch, C.; Thatcher, J. B.; and Beck, R. Blockchain research in information systems: Current trends and an inclusive future research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 9, (2019), 14.
  • Saldanha, T. J.; John-Mariadoss, B.; Wu, M. X.; and Mithas, S. How Information and Communication Technology Shapes the Influence of Culture on Innovation: A Country-level Analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38, 1, (2021), 108–139.
  • Saldanha, T. J.; Mithas, S.; and Krishnan, M. S. Leveraging customer involvement for fueling innovation. MIS Quarterly, 41, 1, (2017), 267–286.
  • Saldanha, T. J.; Sahaym, A.; Mithas, S.; Andrade-Rojas, M. G.; Kathuria, A.; and Lee, H.-H. Turning liabilities of global operations into assets: IT-enabled social integration capacity and exploratory innovation. Information Systems Research, 31, 2, (2020), 361–382.
  • Samtani, S.; Zhu, H.; Padmanabhan, B.; Chai, Y.; Chen, H.; and Nunamaker Jr, J. F. Deep learning for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 40, 1, (2023), 271–301.
  • Schoormann, T.; Stadtl¨ander, M.; and Knackstedt, R. Act and Reflect: Integrating Reflection into Design Thinking. Journal of Management Information Systems, 40, 1, (2023), 7–37.
  • Shi, X.; Adamic, L. A.; Tseng, B. L.; and Clarkson, G. S. The impact of boundary spanning scholarly publications and patents. Plos One, 4, 8, (2009), e6547.
  • Shmueli, G. and Koppius, O. R. Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 35, 3, (2011), 553–572.
  • Silic, M. and Lowry, P. B. Using design-science based gamification to improve organizational security training and compliance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37, 1, (2020), 129–161.
  • Singh, A.; Triulzi, G.; and Magee, C. L. Technological improvement rate predictions for all technologies: Use of patent data and an extended domain description. Research Policy, 50, 9, (2021), 104294.
  • Singh, J. and Fleming, L. Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Science, 56, 1, (2010), 41–56.
  • Stephan, A.; Schmidt, T. S.; Bening, C. R.; and Hoffmann, V. H. The sectoral configuration of technological innovation systems: Patterns of knowledge development and diffusion in the lithium-ion battery technology in Japan. Research Policy, 46, 4, (2017), 709–723.
  • Stoffman, N.; Woeppel, M.; and Yavuz, M. D. Small innovators: No risk, no return. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 101492.
  • Tushman, M. L. and Scanlan, T. J. Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 2, (1981), 289–305.
  • Uzzi, B.; Mukherjee, S.; Stringer, M.; and Jones, B. Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 342, 6157, (2013), 468–472.
  • Uzzi, B. and Spiro, J. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 2, (2005), 447–504.
  • Verspagen, B. Measuring intersectoral technology spillovers: estimates from the European and US patent office databases. Economic Systems Research, 9, 1, (1997), 47–65.
  • Whalen, R. Boundary spanning innovation and the patent system: Interdisciplinary challenges for a specialized examination system. Research Policy, 47, 7, (2018), 1334–1343.
  • Woeppel, M. Using patent capital to estimate Tobin’s Q. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 57, 8, (2022), 2929–2967.
  • Yang, M.; Adomavicius, G.; Burtch, G.; and Ren, Y. Mind the gap: Accounting for measurement error and misclassification in variables generated via data mining. Information Systems Research, 29, 1, (2018), 4–24

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.