(Re)productive Dissent: Reproductive Justice in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

References

• Anderson, K. V. (2022). Rhetorics of reproductive justice and injustice in the aftermath of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 108(4), 418–420. doi:10.1080/00335630.2022.2131215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayefsky, R. (2023). Tangibility and tainted reliance in Dobbs. Harvard Law Review, 136(7), 384–403.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgens, G. M. (2021). Demystifying reliance interests in judicial review of regulatory change. George Mason Law Review, 29(1), 411–446.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, K. M. (2017). The poverty of privacy rights. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coker, C. R. (2017a). Murder, miscarriage, and women’s choice: Prudence in the Colorado personhood debate. Western Journal of Communication, 81(3), 300–319. doi:10.1080/10570314.2016.1245439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, C. R. (2017b). Recasting the founding fathers: The Tea Party movement, neoliberalism, and American myth. Speaker and Gavel, 54(1), 52–70.
   Google Scholar
• Coker, C. R. (2018). From exemptions to censorship: Religious liberty and victimhood in Obergefell v. Hodges. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 15(1), 35–52. doi:10.1080/14791420.2018.1424918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, C. R. (2020). Absurdity in the statehouse: Burlesque legislation and the politics of rejection. Communication Quarterly, 68(1), 94–113. doi:10.1080/01463373.2019.1681486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, C. R. (2023a). “Do you think this is not happening?” Rhetorical laundering and the federal hearings over Planned Parenthood. Women and Language, 46(1). doi:10.34036/WL.2023.009
   Google Scholar
• Coker, C. R. (2023b). Replacing notorious: Barrett, Ginsburg, and postfeminist positioning. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 26(1), 101–130. doi:10.14321/rhetpublaffa.26.1.0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, C. R., & Corso-Gonzales, R. (2021). “With Facebook, you have a voice”: Neoliberalism and activism in Mark Zuckerberg’s Georgetown address. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 11(1/2), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Coker, C. R., & Reed, J. L. (2021). “This is a patriotism check”: Political economy, corruption, and duty to America in the 2020 primary debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 57(3–4), 200–217. doi:10.1080/10511431.2021.1949544
   Google Scholar
• Coker, C. R., & Reed, J. L. (2023). A handmaid’s tale: Amy Coney Barrett, originalism, and the specter of religion. Communication and Democracy, 57(2), 153–177. doi:10.1080/2761127.2023.2228375 10.1080/27671127.2023.2228375
   Google Scholar
• Condit, C. (2022). Rhetorical strategies for retrieving abortion rights. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 108(4), 441–445.
   Google Scholar
• Condit, C. M. (1990). Decoding abortion rhetoric: Communicating social change. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Condit, C. M. (2018). Rhetoricians on human remaking and the project of genomics. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine, 1(1/2), 19–36. 10.5744/rhm.2018.1007
   Google Scholar
• De Onís, K. M. (2015). Lost in translation: Challenging (White, monolingual feminism’s) <choice > with Justicia Reproductiva. Women’s Studies in Communication, 38(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/07491409.2014.989462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 19-1392, 597 U.S. (2022). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Downing, S. G. (2023). Toward reproductive justice rhetorics of care: State Senator Jen Jordan’s dissent of Georgia’s heartbeat bill. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 109(4), 376–399. doi:10.1080/00335630.2023.2255640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubriwny, T. N. (2012). The vulnerable empowered woman: Feminism, postfeminism, and women’s health. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubriwny, T. N., & Siegfried, K. (2021). Justifying abortion: The limits of maternal idealist rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 107(2), 185–208. doi:10.1080/00335630.2021.1903538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J., & Pozen, D. E. (2018). Asymmetric constitutional hardball. Columbia Law Review, 118(3), 915–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fixmer-Oraiz, N. (2019). Homeland maternity: U.S. security culture and the new reproductive regime. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fixmer-Oraiz, N. (2022). No going back: The struggle for a post-Roe reproductive justice. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 108(4), 426–430. doi:10.1080/00335630.2022.2128204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fixmer-Oraiz, N., & Yam, S. Y. S. (2021). Queer(ing) reproductive justice. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://oxfordre.com/
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K. L. (2012). In defense of women’s rights: A rhetorical analysis of judicial dissent. Women’s Studies in Communication, 35(2), 123–137. doi:10.1080/07491409.2012.724526
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K. L. (2018). Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s legacy of dissent: Feminist rhetoric and the law. University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K. L. (2019). The women take over: Oral argument, rhetorical skepticism, and the performance of feminist jurisprudence in Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 105(3), 319–340. doi:10.1080/00335630.2019.1629002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Hasian, M. Jr., Condit, C. M., & Lucaites, J. L. (1996). The rhetorical boundaries of “the law”: A consideration of the rhetorical culture of legal practice and the case of the “separate but equal” doctrine. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 82(4), 323–342. doi:10.1080/00335639609384161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivie, R. L. (2015). Enabling democratic dissent. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101(1), 46–59. doi:10.1080/00335630.2015.994900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo, 591 U.S. 1101 (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Kimport, K., & McLemore, M. R. (2022). The problem with “justifying” abortion: Why real reproductive justice cannot be achieved by theorizing the legitimacy of abortion. Women’s Reproductive Health, 9(1), 27–31. doi:10.1080/03610926.2021.1999587
   Google Scholar
• Knight, S., et al. (2023, September 30). Here’s where abortions are now banned or severely restricted. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2022/06/24/1107126432/abortion-bans-supreme-court-roe-v-wade
   Google Scholar
• Koerth, M. & Thomson-Deveaux, A. (2023, April 11). Over 66,000 people couldn’t get an abortion in their home state after Dobbs. FiveThirtyEight. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/post-dobbs-abortion-access-66000/
   Google Scholar
• Laguardia, F. (2022). Pain that only she must bear: On the invisibility of women in judicial abortion rhetoric. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 9(1), lsac003. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsac003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langford, C. L. (2009). Toward a genre of judicial dissent: Lochner and Casey as exemplars. Communication Law Review, 9(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Luna, Z. (2020). Reproductive rights as human rights: Women of color and the fight for reproductive justice. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, C. R. (2017). Reproductively privileged: Critical White feminism and reproductive justice theory. In L. Ross, L. Roberts, E. Derkas, W. Peoples, & P. Bridgewater (Eds.), Radical reproductive justice: Foundation, theory, practice, critique, 241–250. Feminist Press at CUNY.
   Google Scholar
• Novotny, M., DeHertogh, L. B., Arduser, L., Hannah, M. A., Harper, K., Pigg, S., … Yam, S. Y. S. (2022). Amplifying rhetorics of reproductive justice within rhetorics of health and medicine. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine, 5(4), 374–402.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, J. C. (2013). How much jail time? Returning women to the abortion debate. Argumentation and Advocacy, 50(2), 89–103. doi:10.1080/00028533.2013.11821812
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2022, July 6). Majority of public disapproves of Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2022/07/06/majority-of-public-disapproves-of-supreme-courts-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/
   Google Scholar
• Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Rand, E. J. (2015). Fear the frill: Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the uncertain futurity of feminist judicial dissent. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101(1), 72–84. doi:10.1080/00335630.2015.994898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. (2015). Reproductive justice, not just rights. Dissent, 62(4), 79–82. doi:10.1353/dss.2015.0073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L., Roberts, L., Derkas, E., Peoples, W., & Bridgewater, P. (Eds.). (2017). Radical reproductive justice: Foundation, theory, practice, critique. Feminist Press at CUNY.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L., & Solinger, R. (2017). Reproductive justice: An introduction (Vol. 1). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stenberg, S. J. (2023). Feminist witnessing from the bench: A study of Judge Aquilina’s epideictic rhetoric in the Nassar sentencing hearing. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 53(1), 61–73. doi:10.1080/02773945.2022.2078871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. Y. (2017). Centering reproductive justice: Transitioning from abortion rights to social justice. In L. Ross, L. Roberts, E. Derkas, W. Peoples, & P. Bridgewater (Eds.), Radical reproductive justice: Foundation, theory, practice, critique, 251–271. Feminist Press at CUNY.
   Google Scholar
• Varsava, N. (2023). Precedent, reliance, and Dobbs. Harvard Law Review, 136(7), 1836–1912.
   Google Scholar
• Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 582 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Winderman, E., & Hallsby, A. (2022). The Dobbs leak and reproductive justice. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 108(4), 421–425. doi:10.1080/00335630.2022.2128205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winslow, L., Baker, A., & Goehring, C. (2018). The neoliberal conquest of the Supreme Court. Communication and the Public, 3(3), 205–217. 10.1177/2057047318794962
   Google Scholar
• Yam, S. Y. S. (2020). Visualizing birth stories from the margin: Toward a reproductive justice model of rhetorical analysis. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 50(1), 19–34. doi:10.1080/02773945.2019.1682182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M. (2020). Abortion and the law in America: Roe v. Wade to the present. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar