In situ conservation of plant species – an unattainable goal?

References

• Albrecht MA, Guerrant EO, Maschinski J, Kennedy KL. 2011. A long-term view of rare plant reintroduction. Biol Cons. 144:2557–2558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annapurna D, Srivastava A, Rathore, T. 2013. Impact of population structure, growth habit and seedling ecology on regeneration of Embelia ribes Burm. f. approaches toward a quasi in situ conservation strategy. Amer J Pl Sci. 4:28–35.:10.4236/ajps.2013.46A005
   Google Scholar
• Baillie JEM, Raffaelli D, Sillero-Zubiri C. 2013. Levels of approach. In: Macdonald DW, Willis KJ, editors. Key topics in conservation biology, Vol. 2. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; p. 23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes F. 2009. Community conserved area: policy issues in historic and contemporary context. Cons Letters. 2:19–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertzky B, Corrigan C, Kemsey J. Kenney S, Ravilious C, Besançon C, Burgess N. 2012. Protected Planet Report 2012: tracking progress towards global targets for protected areas. Gland: IUCN and Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.
   Google Scholar
• Betz C, Scheuerer M, Reisch C. 2013. Population reinforcement – a glimmer of hope for the conservation of the highly endangered Spring Pasque flower (Pulsatilla vernalis). Biol Cons. 168:161–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezaury-Creel JE. 2009. El valor de los bienes y servicios que las áreas naturales protegidas proveen a los mexicanos. The Nature Conservancy Programa México-Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas. México DF.
   Google Scholar
• Bezaury-Creel JE, Rojas-González de Castilla S, Makepeace JM. 2011. Brecha en el financiamiento de las Áreas Naturales Protegidas Federales de México. The Nature Conservancy and Fondo Mexicano para la Conservación de la Naturaleza.
   Google Scholar
• Boshier DH, Gordon JE, Barrance AJ. 2004. Prospects for circa situm tree conservation in Mesoamerican dry forest agro-ecosystems. In Frankie G, Mata-Jiménez A, Vinson SB, editors. Biodiversity conservation in Costa Rica, learning the lessons in a seasonal dry forest. Oxford and Berkeley; p. 210–226.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks TM, da Fonseca GAB, Rodrigues ASL. 2004. Protected areas and species. Cons Biol. 18:616–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burney DA, Burney LP. 2007. Paleoecology and “inter situ” restoration on Kaua'i, Hawai'i. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment. Ecol Soc America. 5:483–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butchart SHM, Clarke, M, Smith RJ, Sykes RE, Scharlemann JPW, Harfoot M, Buchanan GM, Angulo A, Balmford,  Bertzky B, et al. 2015. Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters. Published online 24 Feb 2015. doi: 10.1111/conl.12158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBD. 1994. Convention on Biological Diversity. Text and annexes. Geneva: Interim Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
   Google Scholar
• CBD. 2012. Convention on Biological Diversity. Global strategy for plant conservation: 2011–2020. Richmond, UK: Botanic Gardens Conservation International.
   Google Scholar
• Clark NE, Boakes EH, McGowan PJK, Mace GM, Fuller RA. 2013. Protected areas in South Asia have not prevented habitat loss: a study using historical models of land-use change. PLoS ONE 8(5):e65298. Published online 31 May 2013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coetzee BWT, Gaston KJ, Chown SL. 2014. Local scale comparisons of biodiversity as a test for global protected area ecological performance: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9(8):e105824. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105824
   Google Scholar
• CONABIO. 2009. Capital natural de México, vol. 2: estado de conservación y tendencias de cambio. CONABIO.
   Google Scholar
• Cowling RM, Knight AT, Faith DP, et al. 2004. Nature conservation requires more than a passion for species. Cons Biol. 18:1674–1676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPCIRR. 2009. CPC international reintroduction registry. Center for Plant Conservation. http://www.centerforplantconservation.org/reintroduction/MN_ReintroductionEntrance.asp
   Google Scholar
• CREW. 2008. Custodians of rare and endangered wildflowers operations manual. http://www.sanbi.org/sites/default/files/documents/documents/crew-operations-manual-february-09.pdf ( accessed 31 January 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Crofts R. 2014. The European Natura 2000 Protected Area approach: a practitioner's perspective. Parks J. 60.1:79–90.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson IK, Guariguata MR, Loo J, Weber JC, Lengkeek A, Bush D, Cornelius J, Guarino L, Kindt R, Orwa C, et al. 2013. What is the relevance of smallholders’ agroforestry systems for conserving tropical tree species and genetic diversity in circa situm, in situ and ex situ settings? A review. Biodiv Conserv. 22:301–324. doi:10.1007/s10531-012-0429-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopson SR, de Lange PJ, Ogle CC, Rance BD, Courtney SP, Molloy J. 1999. The conservation requirements of New Zealand's nationally threatened vascular plants. Threatened Species Occasional Publication No. 13. Wellington: New Zealand Biodiversity Recovery Unit Department of Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Falk DA, Millar CI, Olwell M, editors. 1996. Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants. Washington (DC): Island Press,
   Google Scholar
• FAO, DFSC, IPGRI. 2001. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), Danida Forest Seed Center (DFSC), International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI). Forest genetic resources conservation and management. Vol. 2. In Managed natural forests and protected areas (in situ). Rome: IPGRI.
   Google Scholar
• FAO, FLD, IPGRI. 2004. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Danida Forest Tree Seed Center (DFSC), International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI). Forest genetic resources conservation and management. Vol.1. Overview, concepts and some systematic approaches. Rome: IPGRI.
   Google Scholar
• FAO 2010. The second report on the state of the world's plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons JA. 2015. Private protected areas in Australia: current status and future directions. Nature Conservation. 10:1–23 (3 Feb 2015). doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.10.8739
   Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons JA, Carr CB. 2014. Conservation covenants on private land: issues with measuring and achieving biodiversity outcomes in Australia. Environmental Management. 54:606–616. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0329-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fos S, Laguna E, Jiménez J. 2014. Plant micro-reserves in the Valencian region (E of Spain): are we achieving the expected results? Passive conservation of relevant vascular plant species. Flora Mediterr. 24:153–162. doi: 10.7320/FlMedit24.153
   Google Scholar
• GBO 4. 2014. Global biodiversity outlook. a mid-term assessment of progress towards the implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020. Montréal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
   Google Scholar
• Geldmann J, Barnes M, Coad L, Craigie I, Hockings M, Burgess N. 2013. Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing biodiversity and habitat loss. CEE 10-007. Collaboration for Environmental Evidence: www.environmentalevidence.org/ SR10007
   Google Scholar
• Godefroid S, Piazza C, Rossi G, Buord S, Stevens A, Aguraiuja A, Cowell C, Weekley CW, Vogg G, Iriondo JM, et al. 2011. How successful are plant species reintroductions? Biol Conserv. 144:672–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godefroid S, Vanderborght T. 2011: Plant reintroductions: the need for a global database. Biodiv Conserv. 20:3683–3688. doi: 10.1007/s10531-011-0120-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, L. 2011. Chapter 15. Species management. In Hannah L. Climate change biology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 319–336.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood VH. 1993. Broadening the basis of plant resource conservation. In: Gustafson JP, Appels R, Raven P, editor. Gene conservation and exploitation. 20th Stadler Genetics Symposium. New York and London: Plenum Press; p. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood VH 1999. Is the conservation of vegetation fragments and their biodiversity worth the effort? In: Maltby E, Holdgate M, Acreman M, Weir AG, editors. Ecosystem management: questions for science and society. London; p. 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood VH. 2003. Conservation strategies, plant breeding, wild species and land races In: Ammann K, Jacot Y, Braun R, editors. Methods for risk assessment of transgenic plants IV. Biodiversity and biotechnology. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser Verlag; p.143–159.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood VH 2005. Master lesson: conserving species in situ – a review of the issues. 2003–4. Planta Europa IV Proceedings. http://www.nerium.net/plantaeuropa/proceedings.htm
   Google Scholar
• Heywood VH. 2008. Challenges of in situ conservation of crop wild relatives. Turkish J Botany 32:421–432.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood VH. 2012. Chapter III. The impacts of climate change on plant species in Europe. In: Biodiversity and climate change: reports and guidance developed under the Bern Convention – Volume II (Nature and Environment no.160). Strasbourg: Council of Europe; p. 95–144.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood VH. 2014. An overview of in situ conservation of plant species in the Mediterranean. Flora Medit. 24:5–24. Published online 14 Jul 2014. doi: 10.7320/FlMedit24.005
   Google Scholar
• Heywood VH, Dulloo ME. 2005. In situ conservation of wild plant species – a critical global review of good practices. IPGRI Technical Bulletin No. 11. FAO & IPGRI. Rome: IPGRI.
   Google Scholar
• Hochkirsch A, Schmitt T, Beninde J, Hiery M, Kinitz T., Kirschey J, Matenaar D, Rohde K, Stoefen A, Wagner N, Zink A, Lötters S, Veith M, Proelss A. 2013. Europe needs a new vision for a Natura 2020 network. Conserv Lett. 6:462–467. doi:10.1111/conl.12006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgkin T, Guarino L. 1997. Ecogeographical surveys: a review. Bocconea. 7:21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter D, Maxted N, Heywood V, Kell S, Borelli T. 2012. Protected areas and the challenge of conserving crop wild relatives. Parks. 18:87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter ML. 1991. Coping with ignorance: the coarse filter strategy for maintaining biodiversity. In: Kohm KA, editor. Balancing on the brink of extinction. Washington (DC): Island Press; p. 266–281.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter D, Heywood V, editors. 2011. Crop wild relatives. a manual of in situ conservation. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton JM, Leader-Williams N. 2003. Sustainable use and incentive-driven conservation: realigning human and conservation interests. Oryx. 37:215–226. doi:10.1017/S0030605303000395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iriondo JM, Dulloo E, Maxted N, editors. 2008. Conserving plant genetic diversity in protected areas: population management of crop wild relatives. Wallingford: CAB International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN/SSC 2013. Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations – version 1.0. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Species Survival Commission. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1609-1
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs DF, Dalgleish HJ, Nelson CD. 2013 A conceptual framework for restoration of threatened plants: the effective model of American chestnut (Castanea dentata) reintroduction. New Phytol. 197:378–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas HD, Barbuto V, Jonas HC, Kothari A, Nelson F. 2014. New steps of change: looking beyond Protected Area to consider other effective area-based conservation measures. Parks. 20(2):111–128.
   Google Scholar
• Joppa LN, Visconti P, Jenkins CN, Pimm SL. 2013. Achieving the Convention on Biological Diversity's goals for plant conservation. Science. Sep 6; 341(6150):1100–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1241706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadis C, Thanos, CA, Laguna Lumbreras E, editors. 2013: Plant micro-reserves: from theory to practice. experiences gained from eu life and other related projects. Athens.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesecker JM, Comendant T, Grandmason T, Gray E, Hall C, Hilsenbeck R, Kareiva P, Lozier L, Naehu P, Rissman A, et al. 2007. Conservation easements in context: a quantitative analysis of their use by The Nature Conservancy. Frontiers Ecol Environm. 5:125–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[125:CEICAQ]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laguna E. 2001. The micro-reserves as a tool for conservation of threatened plants in Europe. Nature & Environment series no. 121. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Laurance WF, Useche, DC, Rendeiro J, Kalka M, Bradshaw CJA, Sloan SP, Laurance SG, Campbell M, Abernethy K, Alvarez P, et al. 2012. Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature. 489:290–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton JH 1999. What to conserve – species or ecosystems? In: Maltby E, Holdgate M, Acreman M, Weir AG, editors. Ecosystem management: questions for science and society. London; p. 55—62.
   Google Scholar
• Leadley PW, Krug CB, Alkemade R, Pereira HM, Sumaila UR, Walpole M, Marques A, Newbold T, Teh LSL, van Kolck J, et al. 2014. Progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets: an assessment of biodiversity trends, policy scenarios and key actions. Technical Series 78. Montreal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
   Google Scholar
• Le Saout, S, Hoffmann M, Shi Y, Hughes A, Bernard C, Brooks TM, Bertzky B, Butchart SHM, Stuart SN, Badman T, et al. 2013. Protected areas and effective biodiversity conservation. Science. 342:803–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leverington F, Costa K L, Pavese H, Lisle A, Hockings, M. 2010. A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environm Managem. 46:685–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lleras E. 1991. Conservation of genetic resources in situ. Diversity 7:72–74.
   Google Scholar
• Luc Hoffmann Institute 2014. Systematic Protected Areas planning in response to climate change (SPARC). SPARC Fact Sheet 1. (accessed 21 March 2014). luchoffmanninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/…/SPARC-Factsheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Maschinsk J, Haskins K E, editors. 2012. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maschinski J, Albrecht MA, Monks L, Haskins K. 2012. Center for Plant Conservation best reintroduction practice guidelines. In: Maschinski J, Haskins K, editors. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Washington (DC): Island Press; p. 277–306.
   Google Scholar
• Mascia MB, Pailler S. 2011. Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications. Conserv. Lett. 4:9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascia MB, Pailler S, Krithivasan R et al. 2014. Protected Area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) in Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean, 1900–2010. Biol Conserv. 169:355–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Hawkes JG. 1997. Complementary conservation strategies. In: Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Hawkes JG, editors. Plant genetic conservation, the in situ approach. London: Chapman and Hall; p. 15–40.
   Google Scholar
• Maxted N, Avagyan A, Frese L, Iriondo JM, Magos Brehm J, Singer A, Kell SP. 2013. Preserving diversity: a concept for in situ conservation of crop wild relatives in Europe. Rome, Italy: In Situ and On-farm Conservation Network, European Cooperative Program for Plant Genetic Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Maxted, N, Iriondo JM, Dulloo ME, Lane A. 2008. Introduction: the integration of PGR conservation with protected area management. In: Iriondo JM, Maxted N, Dulloo E, editors. Conserving plant genetic diversity in protected areas. Wallingford: CAB International; p. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Maxted N, Dulloo ME, Ford-Lloyd BV, Frese L, Iriondo JM, Pinheiro de Carvalho MAA. editors. 2012. Agrobiodiversity conservation: securing the diversity of crop wild relatives and landraces. Wallingford: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy D, Butchart S, Symes A, Bennun L, Fishpool L, Buchanan G, Donald P, Morling P, Balmford A, Green J, et al. 2012. Resource requirements for achieving Aichi Targets 11 and 12. Montreal, Canada: Convention on Biological Diversity.
   Google Scholar
• McNeely JA. 2006. Systems or species? Approaches to conservation for the 21st century. Integr Zool. 2:86–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteferri B. 2009. Comparative analysis of private conservation in Amazonian countries. In: Monteferri B, Coll D, editors. Conservación privada y comunitaria en los países amazónicos. Lima: Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental; p. 303–342.
   Google Scholar
• Mora C, Sale PF. 2011. Ongoing global biodiversity loss and the need to move beyond protected areas: a review of the technical and practical shortcomings of protected areas on land and sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 434:251–266a. http://www.int-res.com/articles/theme/m434p251.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natcheva R, Bancheva S, Vladimirov V, Goranova V. 2013. A pilot network of small protected sites for plant species in Bulgaria using the plant micro-reserve model. In: Kadis C, Thanos CA, Laguna E editors, Plant micro-reserves: from theory to practice. Athens: Utopia; p. 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Neel MC, Leidner AK, Haines A, Goble DD, Scott, JM. 2012. By the numbers: how is recovery defined by the US Endangered Species Act? BioScience. 62:646–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noss RF 1987. From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: a look at The Nature Conservancy (USA). Biol Conserv. 41:11–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocampo-Peñuela, N. editor. 2010. Mecanismos de conservación privada: una opción viable en Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Grupo Colombiano Interinstitucional de Herramientas de Conservación Privada.
   Google Scholar
• Perrings C. 2014. Our uncommon heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Possiel W, Saunier RE, Meganck RA. 1995. Chapter 2 – in-situ conservation of biodiversity. In: Saunier RE, Meganck RA, editors. Conservation of biodiversity and the new regional planning. Organization of American States and the IUCN – The World Conservation Union. Department of Regional Development and Environment Executive Secretariat for Economic and Social Affairs General Secretariat, Organization of American States.
   Google Scholar
• Pouzols FM, Toivonen T, Di Minin E, Kukkala AS, Kullberg P, Kuusterä J, Lehtomäki J, Tenkanen H, Verburg PH, Moilanen A. 2014. Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516:383–386 (18 December 2014) doi:10.1038/nature14032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard HW, Moata JF, Ferraz JBS, Marksa TE, Camargoc JLC, Nadarajana J, Ferraz IDK. 2014. Innovative approaches to the preservation of forest trees. Forest Ecol Managem. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren H, Zhang Q, Lu H, Liu H, Guo Q, Wang J, Jian S, Bao H. 2012. Wild plant species with extremely small populations require conservation and reintroduction in China. Ambio; 41(8):913–917. Published online 5 May 2012. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0284-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren H, Jian SG, Liu, HX, Zhang QM, Lu HF. 2014. Advances in the reintroduction of rare and endangered wild plant species. Science China Life Sci. 57:603–609. doi: 10.1007/s11427-014-4658-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts TH, Dinerstein E, Boucher T, Brooks TM, Butchart SHM, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Morrison J, Parr M, Pilgrim JD, et al. 2005. Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 102:18497–18501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi G, Amosso C, Orsenigo S, Abeli T. 2013. Linee guida per la traslocazione di specie vegetali spontanee. Quaderni Conservazione della Natura no. 38. Istituto Superiore per la Protezione della Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA), Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Sandwith T, Enkerlin, E, MacKinnon K, Allen D, Andrade A, Badman T, Brooks T, Bueno P, Campbell K, Ervin J, et al. 2014. The promise of Sydney: an editorial essay. Parks J. 20.1: 7–18. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2014.PARKS-20-1.TS.en
   Google Scholar
• Sarukhán J, Dirzo R. 2012. Biodiversity-rich countries. In: Levin SA, editors. Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Academic Press; p. 419–436.
   Google Scholar
• Sarukhán J, Urquiza-Haas T, Koleff P, Carabias J, Dirzo R, Ezcurra E, Cerdeira-Estrada S, Soberón J. 2015. Strategic actions to value, conserve, and restore the natural capital of megadiversity countries: the case of Mexico. BioScience 65:164–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz MW. 2008. The performance of the Endangered Species Act. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 39:279–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott JM, Goble DD, Haines AM, Wiens JA, Nee MC. 2010. Conservation-reliant species and the future of conservation. Conserv Letters. 3: 91–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahabuddin G, Rao M. 2010. Do community-conserved areas effectively conserve biological diversity? Global insights and the Indian context. Biol Conserv. 143:2926–2936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanee N, Shanee S, Horwich RH. 2014. Effectiveness of locally run conservation initiatives in north-east Peru. Fauna & Flora International. Oryx 1–9. doi:10.1017/S0030605313001002
   Google Scholar
• Sharrock S, Oldfield S, Wilson O. 2014. Plant Conservation Report 2014: a review of progress in implementation of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011-2020. Montréal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity and Richmond, UK: Botanic Gardens Conservation International. Technical Series No. 81, 56p.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard V, Rangeley R, Laughren J. 2005. Multi-species recovery strategies and ecosystem-bases approaches. WWF-Canada. http://assets.wwf.ca/downloads/wwf_northwestatlantic_assessmentrecoverystrategies.pdf ( accessed 21 March 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Sieck M, Ibisch PL, Moloney KA, Jeltsch F. 2011. Current models broadly neglect specific needs of biodiversity conservation in protected areas under climate change. BMC Ecology 11:12. doi:10.1186/1472-6785-11-12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SPDA. 2012. Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental. Iniciativa para la conservación privada y comunal. Http://www.conservacionprivada.org/
   Google Scholar
• Stolton S, Redford KH, Dudley N. 2014. The futures of privately protected areas. Gland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor DA. 2008. Draft recovery plan for 15 nationally threatened plant species on Kangaroo Island, South Australia (2nd edn): 2003–2013. Department for Environment and Heritage, Government of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Tingley MW, Darling ES, Wilcove DS. 2014. Fine- and coarse-filter conservation strategies in a time of climate change. Annals New York Academy of Sciences 1322 (2014):92–109. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tittensor DP, Walpole M, Hill SLL, Boyce DG, Britten GL, Burgess ND, Butchart SHM, Leadley PW, Regan EC, Alkemade R, Baumung R, Bellard C, et al. 2014. A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science. 10 October 2014: 346(6206):241–244. Published online 2 Oct 2014. doi: 10.1126/science.1257484
   Google Scholar
• TNC. 1982. Natural Heritage Program operations manual. Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy.
   Google Scholar
• Valee L, Hogbin L, Monks L et al. 2004. Guidelines for the translocation of threatened plants in Australia, second edition. Canberra: Australian Network for Plant Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Venter O, Fuller RA, Segan DB, Carwardine J, Brooks T, Butchart, SHM, Di Marco MIwamura T, Joseph L, O'Grady D, Possingham HP, et al. 2014. Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity. PLoS Biol. Jun 2014; 12(6):e1001891. Published online 24 Jun 2014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vladimirov V, editor 2014. A pilot network of small protected sites for conservation of rare plants in Bulgaria. Sofia: IBER-BAS & MoEW.
   Google Scholar
• Volis, S., Blecher M, Sapir Y. 2010. Application of complex conservation strategy to Iris atrofusca of the Northern Negev, Israel. Biodiv Conserv. 19:3157–3169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volis S, Blecher M. 2010. Quasi in situ: a bridge between ex situ and in situ conservation of plants. Biodiv Conserv. 19 (9):2441–2454. doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9849-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volis S, Blecher M, Sapir Y. 2009. Complex ex situ – in situ approach for conservation of endangered plant species and its application to Iris atrofusca of the Northern Negev. In: Krupp F, Musselman LJ, Kotb MMA, Weidig I, editors. Environment, biodiversity and conservation in the Middle East. Proceedings of the First Middle Eastern Biodiversity Congress. Aqaba, Jordan, 20–23 October 2008. BioRisk 3: 137–160. doi: 10.3897/biorisk.3.5
   Google Scholar
• Watson JEM, Dudley N, Segan DB, Hockings M. 2014. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature. 515:67—73. 6 November 2014. doi:10.1038/nature13947
   Google Scholar
• Westwood A, Reuchlin-Hugenholtz E, Keith DM. 2014. Perspective. Re-defining recovery: a generalized framework for assessing species recovery. Biol Conserv. 172:155–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcove DS. 2010. Endangered species management: the US experience. In: Sodhi NS, Ehrlich PR, editors. Conservation biology for all. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 220–235. http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780199554249.do
   Google Scholar
• Wilcove DS, Master LL. 2005. How many endangered species are there in the United States? Frontiers Ecol Environ. 3:4414–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams PH, Araújo MB. 2000. Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservation. Proc Roy Soc London, Biological Series. 267:1959–1966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar