Species-targeted plant conservation: time for conceptual integration

References

• Adhikari D, Barik SK, Upadhaya K. 2012. Habitat distribution modelling for reintroduction of Ilex khasiana Purk., a critically endangered tree species of northeastern India. Ecol Eng. 40:37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken M, Roberts DW, Shultz LM. 2007. Modeling distributions of rare plants in the Great Basin, western North America. West N Am Naturalist. 67:26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akeroyd J, Wyse Jackson P. 1995. A handbook for botanic gardens on the reintroduction of plants to the wild. Richmond: BGCI.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht MA, Maschinski J. 2012. Influence of founder population size, propagule stages, and life history on the survival of reintroduced plant populations. In: Maschinski J, Haskins KE, editors. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 171–188.
   Google Scholar
• Allen WH. 1994. Reintroduction of endangered plants. BioScience. 44:65–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton PS. 1987. Biological considerations in in situ vs ex situ plant conservation. In: Bramwell D, Hamann O, Heywood VH, Synge H, editors. Botanic gardens and world conservation strategy. London: Academic Press; p. 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Attorre F, De Sanctis M, Farcomeni A, Guillet A, Scepi E, Vitale M, Pella F, Fasola M. 2013. The use of spatial ecological modelling as a tool for improving the assessment of geographic range size of threatened species. J Nat Conserv. 21:48–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett SC, Kohn JR. 1991. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Batllori E, Camarero JJ, Ninot JM, Gutierrez E. 2009. Seedling recruitment, survival and facilitation in alpine Pinus uncinata tree line ecotones. Implications and potential responses to climate warming. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 18:460–472.
   Google Scholar
• Bell TJ, Bowles ML, McEachern AK. 2003. Projecting the success of plant population restoration with viability analysis. In: Brigham CA, Schwartz MW, editors. Population viability in plants. Berlin: Springer; p. 313–348.
   Google Scholar
• Benson EE. 2008. Cryopreservation of phytodiversity: a critical appraisal of theory practice. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 27:141–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz C, Scheuerer M, Reisch C. 2013. Population reinforcement – a glimmer of hope for the conservation of the highly endangered Spring Pasque flower (Pulsatilla vernalis). Biol Conserv. 168:161–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles ML, McBride JL, Betz RF. 1998. Management and restoration ecology of the federally threatened Mead's milkweed, Asclepias meadii (Asclepiadaceae). Ann Mo Bot Gard. 85:110–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman G, Perret C, Hoehn S, Galeuchet DJ, Fischer M. 2008. Habitat fragmentation and adaptation: a reciprocal replant-transplant experiment among 15 populations of Lychnis flos-cuculi. J Ecol. 96:1056–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bried JT. 2013. Adaptive cluster sampling in the context of restoration. Restor Ecol. 5:585–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown ADH, Briggs JD. 1991. Sampling strategies for genetic variation in ex situ collections of endangered plant species. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 99–122.
   Google Scholar
• Brown ADH, Marshall DR. 1995. A basic sampling strategy: theory and practice. In: Guarino L, Ramantha Rao VR, editors. Collecting plant genetic diversity: technical guidelines. Wallington, UK: CAB International; p. 75–111.
   Google Scholar
• Burgman MA, Lamont BB. 1992. A stochastic model for the viability of Banksia cuneata populations: environmental, demographic and genetic effects. J Appl Ecol. 29:719–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgman MA, Possingham HP, Lynch AJJ, Keith DA, McCarthy MA, Hopper SD, Drury WL, Passioura JA, Devries RJ. 2001. A method for setting the size of plant conservation target area. Conserv Biol. 15:603–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camaclang AE, Maron M, Martin TG, Possingham HP. 2015. Current practices in the identification of critical habitat for threatened species. Conserv Biol. 29:482–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho SB, Brito JC, Pressey RL, Crespo E, Possingham HP. 2010. Simulating the effects of using different types of species distribution data in reserve selection. Biol Coserv. 143:426–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Plant Conservation. 1991. Genetic sampling guidelines for conservation collections of endangered plants. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 225–238.
   Google Scholar
• Christman MC. 2000. A review of quadrat-based sampling of rare, geographically clustered, populations. J Agr Biol Envir St. 5:168–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohrane A. 2004. Western Australia's ex situ program for for threatened species: a model integrated strategy for conservation. In: Guerrant EOJ, Havens K, Maunder M, editors. Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 40–66.
   Google Scholar
• Cohrane JA, Crawford AD, Monks LT. 2007. The significance of ex situ seed conservation to reintroduction of threatened plants. Aust J Bot. 55:356–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colas B, Kirchner F, Riba M, Olivieri I, Mignot A, Imbert E, Beltrame C, Carbonell D, Freville H. 2008. Restoration demography: a 10-year demographic comparison between introduced and natural populations of endemic Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). J Appl Ecol. 45:1468–1476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins SL, Good RE. 1987. The seedling regeneration niche: habitat structure of tree seedlings in an oak-pine forest. Oikos. 48:89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Mace GM, Wayne RK. 2000. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol. 15:290–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalrymple SA, Banks E, Stewart GB, Pullin AS. 2012. A meta-analysis of threatened plant reintroductions from across the globe. In: Maschinski J, Haskins EH, editors. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Dangremond EM, Pardini EA, Knight TM. 2010. Apparent competition with an invasive plant hastens the extinction of an endangered lupine. Ecology. 91:2261–2271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Mauro M. 1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conserv Biol. 7:542–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Queiroz TF, Baughman C, Baughman O, Gara M, Williams N. 2012. Species distribution modeling for conservation of rare, edaphic endemic plants in White River Valley, Nevada. Nat Area J. 32:149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dizon AE, Lockyer C, Perrin WF. 1992. Rethinking the stock concept: a phylogeographic approach. Conserv Biol. 6:24–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doak DF, Boor GKH, Bakker VJ, Morris WF, Louthan A, Morrison SA, Stanley A, Crowder LB. 2015. Recommendations for improving recovery criteria under the US Endangered Species Act. Bioscience. 65:189–199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper D, Rossello-Graell A, Garcia C, Gomes CT, Sergio C. 2003. Application of GIS in plant conservation programmes in Portugal. Biol Coserv. 113:337–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drechsler M, Lamont BB, Burgman MA, Akcakaya HR, Witkowski ETF, Supriyadi. 1999. Modelling the persistence of an apparently immortal Banksia species after fire and land clearing. Biol Conserv. 88:249–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards TC, Cutler DR, Zimmermann NE, Geiser L, Alegria J. 2005. Model-based stratifications for enhancing the detection of rare ecological events. Ecology. 86:1081–1090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudik M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, Overton JM, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson K, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberon J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. 29:129–151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elith J, Leathwick JR. 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 40:677–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmann F. 2011. Cryopreservation of embryos: an overview. Methods in Molecular Biology. 710:155–184
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engler R, Guisan A, Rechsteiner L. 2004. An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. J Appl Ecol. 41:263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escudero A, Iriondo JM, Olano JM, Rubio A, Somolinos RC. 2000. Factors affecting establishment of a gypsophyte: the case of Lepidium subulatum (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot. 87:861–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrig L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 34:487–515.
   Google Scholar
• Falk DA. 1990. Integrated strategies for conserving plant genetic diversity. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 77:38–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk DA, Millar CI, Olwell ME. 1996. Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenster CB, Dudash MR. 1994. Genetic considerations for plant population restoration and conservation. In: Bowles ML, Whelan CJ, editors. Restoration of endangered species: conceptual issues, planning, and implementation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 34–63.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler PL, Laven RD. 1996. Selecting reintroduction sites. In: Falk DA, Millar CI, Olwell M, editors. Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 157–170.
   Google Scholar
• Frankham R. 2010. Where are we in conservation genetics and where do we need to go? Conserv Genet. 11:661–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankham R, Ballou JD, Eldridge MDB, Lacy RC, Ralls K, Dudash MR, Fenster CB. 2011. Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conserv Biol. 25:465–475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankham R, Bradshaw CJA, Brook BW. 2014. Genetics in conservation management: revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses. Biol Conserv. 170:56–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin IR. 1980. Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Soulé ME, Wilcox BA, editors. Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer; p. 135–149.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser DJ, Bernatchez L. 2001. Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Mol Ecol. 10:2741–2752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friar EA, Ladoux T, Roalson EH, Robichaux RH. 2000. Microsatellite analysis of a population crash and bottleneck in the Mauna Kea silversword, Argyroxiphium sandwicense ssp sandwicense (Asteraceae), and its implications for reintroduction. Mol Ecol. 9:2027–2034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs KE, Currie DJ. 2012. Protecting endangered species: Do the main legislative tools work? Plos One. 7:e35730.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert B, Levine JM. 2013. Plant invasions and extinction debts. P Natl Acad Sci. 110:1744–1749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillson L, Dawson TP, Jack S, McGeoch MA. 2013. Accommodating climate change contingencies in conservation strategy. Trends Ecol Evol. 28:135–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godefroid S, Piazza C, Rossi G, Buord S, Stevens A-D, Aguraiuja R, Cowell C, Weekley CW, Vogg G, Iriondo JM, Johnson I, Dixon B, Gordon DR, Magnanon S, Valentin B, Bjureke K, Koopman R, Vicens M, Virevaire M, Vanderborght T. 2011. How successful are plant species reintroductions? Biol Coserv. 144:672–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Aparicio L, Gуmez JM, Zamora R, Boettinger JL. 2005. Canopy vs. soil effects of shrubs facilitating tree seedlings in Mediterranean montane ecosystems. J Veg Sci. 16:191–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon DR. 1994. Translocation of species into conservation areas: a key for natural resource managers. Nat Area J. 14:31–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith B, Scott JM, Carpenter JW, Reed C. 1989. Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science. 245:477–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrant EOJ. 2012. Characterizing two decades of rare plant reintroductions. In: Maschinski J, Haskins KE, editors. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrant EOJ. 1996. Designing populations: demographic, genetic and horticultural dimensions. In: Falk DA, Millar CI, Olwell M, editor. Restoring diversity. Strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 171–207.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrant EOJ. 1992. Genetic and demographic considerations in the sampling and reintroduction of rare plants. In: Fiedler PL, Jain SK, editor. Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation and management. New York: Chapman & Hall; p. 321–344.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrant EOJ, Fiedler PL. 2004. Accounting for sample decline during ex situ storage and reintroduction. In: Guerrant EOJ, Havens K, Maunder M, editors. Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 365–386
   Google Scholar
• Guerrant EOJ, Havens K, Maunder M. 2004. Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Washington, DC: Island Press
   Google Scholar
• Guerrant EOJ, Havens K, Vitt P. 2014. Sampling for effective ex situ plant conservation. Int J Plant Sci. 175:11–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrant EOJ, Havens K, Vitt P, Fiedler PL, Falk DA, Dixon K. 2015. Population structure integral to seed collection guidelines: a response to Hoban and Schlarbaum (2014). Biol Conserv. 184:465–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrant EOJ, Kaye TN. 2007. Reintroduction of rare and endangered plants: common factors, questions and approaches. Aust J Bot. 55:362–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrant EOJ, Pavlik BM. 1997. Reintroduction of rare plants: genetics, demography and the role of ex situ conservation methods. In: Fiedler PL, Kareiva PM, editors. Conservation biology for the coming decade. New York: Chapman & Hall; p. 80–108.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrant EOJ, Raven A. 2003. Supporting in situ conservation: the Berry Botanic Garden, an ex situ regional resource in an integrated conservation community. In: Smith RD, Dickie JB, Linington SH, Pritchard HW, Probert RJ, editors. Seed conservation: turning science into practice. London: The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; p. 879–896.
   Google Scholar
• Guisan A, Broennimann O, Engler R, Vust M, Yoccoz NG, Lehmann A, Zimmermann NE. 2006. Using niche-based models to improve the sampling of rare species. Conserv Biol. 20:501–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisan A, Zimmermann NE. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model. 135:147–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall LS, Krausman PR, Morrison ML. 1997. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife Soc B. 25:173–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton A, Hamilton P. 2006. Plant conservation: an ecosystem review. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton MB. 1994. Ex situ conservation of wild plant species: time to reassess the genetic assumptions and implications of seed banks. Conserv Biol. 8:39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah L, Midgley GF, Millar D. 2002. Climate change-integrated conservation strategies. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 11:485–495.
   Google Scholar
• Havens K, Guerrant EOJ, Maunder M, Vitt P. 2004. Guidelines for ex situ conservation collection management: minimizing risks. In: Guerrant EOJ, Havens K, Maunder M, editors. Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 454–473.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward MW. 2011. Using the IUCN Red List to determine effective conservation strategies. Biodivers Conserv. 20:2563–2573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebblewhite M, Miquelle DG, Murzin AA, Aramilev VV, Pikunov DG. 2011. Predicting potential habitat and population size for reintroduction of the Far Eastern leopards in the Russian Far East. Biol Coserv. 144:2403–2413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood VH. 2016. In situ conservation of plant species - an unattainable goal? Isr J Plant Sci. 63:211–231. doi:10.1080/07929978.2015.1035605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood VH. 2014. An overview of in situ conservation of plant species in the Mediterranean. Flora Mediterr. 24:5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood VH, Dulloo ME. 2006. In situ conservation of wild plant species – a critical global review of good practices. IPGRI Technical Bulletin No. 11. Rome: IPGRI.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood VH, Iriondo JM. 2003. Plant conservation: old problems, new perspectives. Biol Conserv. 113:321–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins K, Lynch M. 2001. Metapopulation extinction caused by mutation accumulation. P Natl Acad Sci. 98:2928–2933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirzel AH, Hausser J, Chessel D, Perrin N. 2002. Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data? Ecology. 83:2027–2036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirzel AH, Le Lay G. 2008. Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. J Appl Ecol. 45:1372–1381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoban S, Schlarbaum S. 2014. Optimal sampling of seeds from plant populations for ex-situ conservation of genetic biodiversity, considering realistic population structure. Biol Conserv. 177:90–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegh-Guldberg O, Hughes L, McIntyre S, Lindenmayer DB, Parmesan C, Possingham HP, Thomas CD. 2008. Assisted colonization and rapid climate change. Science. 321:345–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsinger KE, Vitt P. 1997. The future of conservation biology: what's a geneticist to do? In: Pickett STA, Ostfeld RS, Shachak M, Likens GE, editors. Enhancing the ecological basis of conservation: heterogenetiy, ecosystem function, and biodiversity. New York: Chapman and Hall; p. 206–216.
   Google Scholar
• Hufford KM, Mazer SJ. 2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends Ecol Evol. 18:147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt LP. 2001. Heterogeneous grazing causes local extinction of edible perennial shrubs: a matrix analysis. J Appl Ecol. 38:238–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurka H. 1994. Conservation genetics and the role of botanical gardens. In: Sandlund OT, Hindar K, Brown AHD, editors. Conservation genetics. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag; p. 371–380.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 1998. Guidelines for re-introductions. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2001. UCN Red List categories and criteria: version 3.1. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN Species Survival Commission.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List categories and criteria: version 3.1. Gland, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Jusaitis M. 2005. Translocation trials confirm specific factors affecting the establishment of three endangered plant species. Ecol Manage Restor. 6:61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Jusaitis M, Polomka L, Sorensen B. 2004. Habitat specificity, seed germination and experimental translocation of the endangered herb Brachycome muelleri (Asteraceae). Biol Conserv. 116:251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller M, Kollmann J, Edwards PJ. 2000. Genetic introgression from distant provenances reduces fitness in local weed populations. J Appl Ecol. 37:647–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkvliet J, Lanypap C. 2007. Learning from endangered and threatened species recovery programs: a case study using US Endangered Species Act recovery scores. Ecol Econ. 63:499–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchner F, Robert A, Colas B. 2006. Modelling the dynamics of introduced populations in the narrow-endemic Centaurea corymbosa: a demo-genetic integration. J Appl Ecol. 43:1011–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuemmerle T, Hickler T, Olofsson J, Schurgers G, Radeloff VC. 2012. Refugee species: which historic baseline should inform conservation planning? Divers Distrib. 18:1258–1261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lande R. 1993. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am Nat. 142:911–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lande R. 1994. Risk of population extinction from new deleterious mutations. Evolution. 48:1460–1469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lande R, Barrowclough GF. 1987. Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management. In: Soule ME, editor. Viable populations for management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 87–124.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence MJ, Marshall DF, Davies P. 1995. Genetics of genetic conservation. I. Sample size when collecting germplasm. Euphytica. 84:89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Lay G, Engler R, Franc E, Guisan A. 2010. Prospective sampling based on model ensembles improves the detection of rare species. Ecography. 33:1015–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesica P, Allendorf FW. 1995. When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation. Conserv Biol. 9:753–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D-Z, Pritchard HW. 2009. The science and economics of ex situ plant conservation. Trends Plant Sci. 14:614–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loss SR, Terwilliger LA, Peterson AC. 2011. Assisted colonization: integrating conservation strategies in the face of climate change. Biol Conserv. 144:92–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louda SM. 1982. Distribution ecology: variation in plant recruitment over a gradient in relation to insect seed predation. Ecol Monogr. 52:25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Male TD, Bean MJ. 2005. Measuring progress in US endangered species conservation. Ecology Letters. 8:986–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margules CR, Pressey RL. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature. 405:243–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsico TD, Hellmann JJ. 2009. Dispersal limitation inferred from an experimental translocation of Lomatium (Apiaceae) species outside their geographic ranges. Oikos. 118:1783–1792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maschinski J, Baggs JE, Sacchi CF. 2004. Seedling recruitment and survival of an endangered limestone endemic in its natural habitat and experimental reintroduction sites. Am J Bot. 91:689–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maschinski J, Duquesnel J. 2006. Successful reintroductions of the endangered long-lived Sargent's cherry palm, Pseudophoenix sargentii, in the Florida Keys. Biol Conserv. 134:122–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maschinski J, Falk DA, Wright SJ, Possley J, Roncal J, Wendelberger KS. 2012. Optimal locations for plant reintroductions in a changing world. In: Maschinski J, Haskins KE, editors. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: Promises and perils. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 109–130.
   Google Scholar
• Maschinski J, Wright SJ. 2006. Using ecological theory to plan restorations of the endangered Beach jacquemontia (Convolvulaceae) in fragmented habitats. J Nat Conserv. 14:180–189
   Google Scholar
• Maschinski J, Wright SJ, Koptur S, Pinto-Torres EC. 2013. When is local the best paradigm? Breeding history influences conservation reintroduction survival and population trajectories in times of extreme climate events. Biol Conserv. 159:277–284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maunder M. 1992. Plant reintroduction – an overview. Biodivers Conserv. 1:51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maunder M, Higgens S, Culham A. 2001. The effectiveness of botanic garden collections in supporting plant conservation: a European case study. Biodivers Conserv. 10:383–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maunder M, Hughes C, Hawkins JA, Culham A. 2004. Hybridization in ex situ plant collections: conservation concerns, liabilities, and opportunities. In: Guerrant EOJ, Havens K, Maunder M, editors. Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 325–364.
   Google Scholar
• Mawdsley JR, O'Malley R, Ojima DS. 2009. A review of climate-change adaptation strategies for wildlife management and biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol. 23:1080–1089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Hawkes JG. 1997. Complementary conservation strategies. In: Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Hawkes JG, editors. Plant genetic conservation, The in situ approach. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton SJ. 1989. Ecosystems and conservation in the twenty-first century. In: Western D, Pearl M, editors. Conservation for the twenty-first century. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy MA, Possingham HP, Gill AM. 2001. Using stochastic dynamic programming to determine optimal fire management for Banksia ornata. J Appl Ecol. 38:585–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan JS, Hellmann JJ, Schwartz MW. 2007. A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change. Conserv Biol. 21:297–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menges ES. 2008. Restoration demography and genetics of plants: when is a translocation successful? Aust J Bot. 56:187–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menges ES. 1992. Stochastic modeling of extinction in plant populations. In: Fiedler PL, Jain SK, editors. Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation and management. New York: Chapman and Hall; p. 253–275.
   Google Scholar
• Menges ES. 1991a. The application of minimum viable population theory to plants. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE, editor. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menges ES. 1991b. Seed germination percentage increases with population size in a fragmented prairie species. Conserv Biol. 5:158–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menges ES, Guerrant E, Hamze S. 2004. Effects of seed collection on the extinction risk of perennial plants. In: Guerrant EOJ, Havens K, Maunder M, editors. Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 305–324.
   Google Scholar
• Millar CI, Libby WJ. 1991. Strategies for conserving clinal, ecotypic, and disjunct population diversity in widespread species. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 149–170.
   Google Scholar
• Monks LT, Coates D. 2002. The translocation of two critically endangered Acacia species. Conserv Sci Western Australia. 4:54–61.
   Google Scholar
• Moritz C. 1999. A molecular perspective of biodiversity. In: Kato S, editor. The biology of biodiversity. Tokyo: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan JW. 1999. Have tubestock plantings successfully established populations of rare grassland species into reintroduction sites in western Victoria? Biol Conserv. 89:235–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munzbergova Z, Milden M, Ehrlen J, Herben T. 2005. Population viability and reintroduction strategies: a spatially explicit landscape-level approach. Ecol Appl. 15:1377–1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale JR. 2012. Genetic considerations in rare plant reintroduction: practical applications (or How are we doing?). In: Maschinski J, Haskins KE, Raven PH, editors. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate. Washington, DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics; p. 71–88.
   Google Scholar
• Neel MC, Cummings MP. 2003a. Effectiveness of conservation targets in capturing genetic diversity. Conserv Biol. 17:219–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neel MC, Cummings MP. 2003b. Genetic consequences of ecological reserve design guidelines: an empirical investigation. Conserv Genet. 4:427–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noël F, Prati D, van Kleunen M, Gygax A, Moser D, Fischer M. 2011. Establishment success of 25 rare wetland species introduced into restored habitats is best predicted by ecological distance to source habitats. Biol Conserv. 144:602–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normah MN, Chin HF, Hor YL. 1986. Desiccation and cryopreservation of embryonic axes of Hevea brasiliensis Muell. - Arg. Pertanika. 9:299–303.
   Google Scholar
• Noss RF, O'Connell MA, Murphy D. 1997. The science of conservation planning: habitat conservation under the endangered species act. California, USA: Covelo.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson O, Rogers DJ. 2009. Predicting the distribution of a suitable habitat for the white stork in Southern Sweden: identifying priority areas for reintroduction and habitat restoration. Anim Conserv. 12:62–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omernik JM. 1995. Ecoregions: a spatial framework for environmental management. In: Davis WS, Simon TP, editors. Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Omernik JM. 2004. Perspectives on the nature and definition of ecological regions. Environ Manage. 34:S27–S38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostermeijer JGB. 2000. Population viability analysis of the rare Gentiana pneumonanthe: the importance of genetics, demography and reproductive biology. In: Young AG, Clarke GM, editors. Genetics, demography and viability of fragmented populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 313–334
   Google Scholar
• Pavlik BM, Nickrent DL, Howald AM. 1993. The recovery of an endangered Plant. I. creating a new population of Amsinckia grandiflora. Conserv Biol. 7:510–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippi T. 2005. Adaptive cluster sampling for estimation of abundances within local populations of low-abundance plants. Ecology. 86:1091–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model. 190:231–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pico FX, Quintana-Ascencio PF, Milden M, Ehrlen J, Pfingsten I. 2009. Modelling the effects of genetics and habitat on the demography of a grassland herb. Basic Appl Ecol. 10:122–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poschlod P, Bakker FT, Kahmen S. 2005. Changing land use and its impact on biodiversity. Basic Appl Ecol. 6:93–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH. 1999. The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conserv Biol. 13:484–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulliam HR, Babbitt B. 1997. Ecology – science and the protection of endangered species. Science. 275:499–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana-Ascencio PF, Menges ES, Weekley CW. 2003. A fire-explicit population viability analysis of Hypericum cumulicola in Florida rosemary scrub. Conserv Biol. 17:433–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckinger C, Colling G, Matthies D. 2010. Restoring populations of the endangered plant Scorzonera humilis: influence of site conditions, seed source, and plant stage. Restor Ecol. 18:904–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed DH, Frankham R. 2003. Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol. 17:230–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed JM, Akçakaya HR, Burgman M, Bender D, Beissinger SR, Scott JM. 2006. Critical habitat. In: Scott JM, Goble DD, Davis FW, editors. The endangered species act at thirty: conserving biodiversity in human-dominated landscapes. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 164–177
   Google Scholar
• Ricciardi A, Simberloff D. 2008. Assisted colonization is not a viable conservation strategy. Trends Ecol Evol. 24:248–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts EH. 1991. Genetic conservation in seed banks. Biol J Linnean Soc. 43:23–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robichaux RH, Friar EA, Mount DW. 1997. Molecular genetic consequences of a population bottleneck associated with reintroduction of the Mauna Kea silversword (Argyroxiphium sandwicense ssp. sandwicense Asteraceae). Conserv Biol. 11:1140–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez PJ, Brotons L, Bustamante J, Seoane J. 2007. The application of predictive modelling of species distribution to biodiversity conservation. Divers Distrib. 13:243–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roncal J, Maschinski J, Schaffer B, Gutierrez SM, Walters D. 2012. Testing appropriate habitat outside of historic range: the case of Amorpha herbacea var. crenulata (Fabaceae). J Nat Conserv. 20:109–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland EL, Davison JE, Graumlich LJ. 2011. Approaches to evaluating climate change impacts on species: a guide to initiating the adaptation planning process. Environ Manage. 47:322–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rünk K, Pihkva K, Zobel K. 2014. Desirable site conditions for introduction sites for a locally rare and threatened fern species Asplenium septentrionale (L.) Hoffm. J Nat Conserv. 22:272–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder OA. 1986. Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends Ecol Evol. 1:9–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saura M, Perez-Figueroa A, Fernandez JF, Toro MA, Caballero A. 2008. Preserving population allele frequencies in ex situ conservation programs. Conserv Biol. 22:1277–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schemske DW, Husband BC, Ruckelshaus MH, Goodwillie C, Parker I, Bishop JG. 1994. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology. 75:584–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen DJ, Brown ADH. 2001. The conservation of wild plant species in seed banks. BioScience. 51:960–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon PJ. 2010. From reintroduction to assisted colonization: moving along the conservation translocation spectrum. Restor Ecol. 18:796–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon PJ, Armstrong DP, Maloney RF. 2007. Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conserv Biol. 21:303–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer M. 1987. Minimum viable populations: coping with uncertainty. In: Shaffer M, editor. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 69–86.
   Google Scholar
• Shimshi D. 1979/80. Two ecotypes of Iris atrofusca Bak. and their relations to man-modified habitats. Isr J Bot. 28:80–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simberloff D. 1988. The contribution of population and community biology to conservation science. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 19:473–511.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair A, Catling PM. 2003. Restoration of Hydrastis canadensis by transplanting with disturbance simulation: results of one growing season. Restor Ecol. 11:217–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DR, Brown JA, Lo NCH. 2004. Application of adaptive sampling to biological populations. In: Thompson, WL, editor. Sampling rare or elusive species: concepts, designs, and techniques for estimating population parameters. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 77–122.
   Google Scholar
• Soule M. 1980. Thresholds for survival: maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential. In: Soule M, editor. Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates; p. 151–169
   Google Scholar
• Soule M, Simberloff D. 1986. What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of nature reserves? Biol Coserv. 35:18–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey PB, Taper M. 1992. Environmental variation and the persistence of small populations. Ecol Appl. 2:18–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockwell DRB, Peters D. 1999. The GARP modeling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 13:143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallmon DA, Luikart G, Waples RS. 2004. The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends Ecol Evol. 19:489–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JN. 1996. Evolutionary ecology and the conservation of biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol. 11:300–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson SK, Seber GAF. 1996. Adaptive sampling. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Tilman D. 2004. Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. P Natl Acad Sci. 101:10854–10861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde T, Silvertown J. 1997. A metapopulation model for Primula vulgaris, a temperate forest understorey herb. J Ecol. 85:193–210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Veken S, De Frenne P, Baeten L, Van Beek E, Verheyen K, Hermy M. 2012. Experimental assessment of the survival and performance of forest herbs transplanted beyond their range limit. Basic Appl Ecol. 13:10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Veken S, Rogister J, Verheyen K, Hermy M, Nathan R. 2007. Over the (range) edge: a 45-year transplant experiment with the perennial forest herb Hyacinthoides non-scripta. J Ecol. 95:343–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Manen FT, Young JA, Thatcher CA, Cass WB, Ulrey C. 2005. Habitat models to assist plant protection efforts in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia, USA. Nat Area J. 25:339–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer P, Sonderen E, Ouborg NJ. 2004. Introduction strategies put to the test: local adaptation versus heterosis. Conserv Biol. 18:812–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer P, Van Den Berg LJL, Roelofs JG, Ouborg NJ. 2005. Single-family versus multi-family introduction. Plant Biol. 7:509–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilas C, San Miguel E, Amaro R, Garcia C. 2006. Relative contribution of inbreeding depression and eroded adaptive diversify to extinction risk in small populations of shore campion. Conserv Biol. 20:229–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogler AP, Desalle R. 1994. Diagnistic units of conservation management. Conserv Biol. 8:354–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volis S. 2011. Adaptive genetic differentiation in a predominantly self-pollinating species analyzed by transplanting into natural environment, crossbreeding and QST–FST test. New Phytol. 192:237–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volis S, Blecher M. 2010. Quasi in situ – a bridge between ex situ and in situ conservation of plants. Biodivers Conserv. 19:2441–2454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volis S, Blecher M, Sapir Y. 2010. Application of complex conservation strategy to Iris atrofusca of the Northern Negev, Israel. Biodivers Conserv. 19:3157–3169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volis S, Bohrer G, Oostermeijer G, van Tienderen P. 2005. Regional consequences of local population demography and genetics in relation to habitat management in Gentiana pneumonanthe. Conserv Biol. 19:357–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volis S, Dorman M, Blecher M, Sapir Y, Burdeniy L. 2011. Variation partitioning in canonical ordination reveals no effect of soil but an effect of co-occurring species on translocation success in Iris atrofusca. J Appl Ecol. 48:265–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volis S, Ormanbekova D, Yermekbayev K, Song M, Shulgina I. 2015. Multi-approaches analysis reveals local adaptation in the emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccoides) at macro- but not micro-geographical scale. Plos One. 10:e0121153.
   Google Scholar
• Volis S, Zhang Y-H, Dorman M, Blecher M. 2016. Iris atrofusca genetic and phenotypic variation, the role of habitat-specific selection in this variation structuring, and conservation implications using quasi in situ guidelines. Isr J Plant Sci. .63:347–354. doi:10.1080/07929978.2015.1042308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vucetich JA, Waite TA. 2003. Spatial patterns of demography and genetic processes across the species' range: null hypotheses for landscape conservation genetics. Conserv Genet. 4:639–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters C, Berjak P, Pammenter N, Kennedy K, Raven P. 2013. Preservation of recalcitrant seeds. Science. 339:915–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters C, Wesley-Smith J, Crane J, Hill LM, Chmielarz P, Pammenter NW, Berjak P. 2008. Cryopreservation of recalcitrant (i.e. desiccation-sensitive) seeds. In: Reed BM, editor. Plant cryopreservation: a practical guide. New York: Springer; p. 465–484.
   Google Scholar
• Waples RS. 1995. Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the Endangered Species Act. In: Waples RS, editor. Evolution and the aquatic ecosystem: defining unique units in population conservation. symposium 17. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society; p. 8–27.
   Google Scholar
• Williams JN, Seo C, Thorne J, Nelson JK, Erwin S, O'Brien JM, Schwartz MW. 2009. Using species distribution models to predict new occurrences for rare plants. Divers Distrib. 15:565–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young AG, Brown AHD, Murray BG, Thrall PH, Miller CH. 2000. Genetic erosion, restricted mating and reduced viability in fragmented populations of the endangered grassland herb Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides. In: Young AG, Clarke GM, editors. Genetics, demography and viability of fragmented populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar