Conservation-oriented restoration – how to make it a success?

References

• Abeli T, Cauzzi P, Rossi G, Adorni M, Vagge I, Parolo G, Orsenigo S. 2016. Restoring population structure and dynamics in translocated species: learning from wild populations. Plant Ecol. 217:183–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agren J. 1996. Population size, pollinator limitation, and seed set in the self-incompatible herb Lythrum salicaria. Ecology. 77:1779–1790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguraiuja R. 2011. Reintroduction of the endangered fern species Woodsia ilvensis to Estonia: a long-term pilot study. Biodivers Conserv. 20:391–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aizen MA, Feinsinger P. 1994. Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a Chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology. 75:330–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albornoz FE, Gaxiola A, Seaman BJ, Pugnaire FI, Armesto JJ. 2013. Nucleation-driven regeneration promotes post-fire recovery in a Chilean temperate forest. Plant Ecol. 214:765–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allee WC. 1931. Animal aggregation: a study in general sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allison TD. 1990 Pollen production and plant density affect pollination and seed production on Taxus canadensis. Ecology. 71:516–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson TM, Schuetz M, Risch AC. 2014. Endozoochorous seed dispersal and germination strategies of Serengeti plants. J Veg Sci. 25:636–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Pineda E, Escobar F, Benítez-Malvido J. 2009. Value of small patches in the conservation of plant-species diversity in highly fragmented rainforest. Conserv Biol. 23:729–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaguer L, Escudero A, Martín-Duque JF, Mola I, Aronson J. 2014. The historical reference in restoration ecology: re-defining a cornerstone concept. Biol Conserv. 176:12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldeck CA, Harms KE, Yavitt JB, John R, Turner BL, Valencia R, Navarrete H, Bunyavejchewin S, Kiratiprayoon S, Yaacob A, et al. 2013. Habitat filtering across tree life stages in tropical forest communities. P Roy Soc B–Biol Sci. 280:20130548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baraloto C, Goldberg DE. 2004. Microhabitat associations and seedling bank dynamics in a neotropical forest. Oecologia. 141:701–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barroetavena C, Gisler SD, Luoma DL, Meinke RJ. 1998. Mycorrhizal status of the endangered species Astragalus applegatei Peck as determined from a soil bioassay. Mycorrhiza. 8:117–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazzaz FA. 1975. Plant species diversity in old-field successional ecosystems in southern Illinois. Ecology. 56:485–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaune D, Bretagnolle F, Bollache L, Hohmann G, Surbeck M, Fruth B. 2013. Seed dispersal strategies and the threat of defaunation in a Congo forest. Biodivers Conserv. 22:225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckage B, Clark JS. 2003. Seedling survival and growth of three forest tree species: the role of spatial heterogeneity. Ecology. 84:1849–1861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckage B, Clark JS, Clinton BD, Haines BL. 2000. A long-term study of tree seedling recruitment in southern Appalachian forests: the effects of canopy gaps and shrub understories. Can J Forest Res. 30:1617–1631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beisner BE, Haydon DT, Cuddington K. 2003. Alternative stable states in ecology. Front Ecol Environ. 1:376–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benayas JMR, Bullock JM, Newton AC. 2008. Creating woodland islets to reconcile ecological restoration, conservation, and agricultural land use. Front Ecol Environ. 6:329–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell G. 2001. Ecology – neutral macroecology. Science. 293:2413–2418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell TJ, Bowles ML, McEachern AK. 2003. Projecting the success of plant population restoration with viability analysis. In: Bell TJ, Bowles ML, McEachern AK, editors. Population viability in plants. Berlin: Springer; p. 313–348.
   Google Scholar
• Berjak P, Pammenter NW. 2013. Implications of the lack of desiccation tolerance in recalcitrant seeds. Front Plant Sci. 4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer HL, Merrill EH, Varley N, Boyce MS. 2007. Willow on yellowstone's northern range: evidence for a trophic cascade? Ecol Appl. 17:1563–1571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birks HJB. 1996. Contributions of Quaternary palaeoecology to nature conservation. J Veg Sci. 7:89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blois JL, Zarnetske PL, Fitzpatrick MC, Finnegan S. 2013. Climate change and the past, present, and future of biotic interactions. Science. 341:499–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond W, Slingsby P. 1984. Collapse of an ant–plant mutualism: the Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) and myrmecochorous Proteaceae. Ecology. 65:1031–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontrager M, Webster KL, Elvin M, Parker IM. 2014. The effects of habitat and competitive/facilitative interactions on reintroduction success of the endangered wetland herb, Arenaria paludicola. Plant Ecol. 215:467–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch M, Waser NM. 2001. Experimental manipulation of plant density and its effect on pollination and reproduction of two confamilial montane herbs. Oecologia. 126:76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boshier DH, Chase MR, Bawa KS. 1995. Population genetics of Cordia alliodora (Boraginaceae), a neotropical tree. 2. Mating system. Am J Bot. 82:476–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box EO. 1996. Plant functional types and climate at the global scale. J Veg Sci. 7:309–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle T, Liengsiri C, Piewluang C. 1991. Genetic studies in a tropical pine – Pinus kesiya. III. The mating system in four populations from northern Thailand. J Trop Forest Sci. 4:37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst LM, Lowe A, Coates DJ, Cunningham SA, McDonald M, Vesk PA, Yates C. 2008. Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evol Appl. 1:587–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie JF, Aslan CE. 2012. Halting regime shifts in floristically intact tropical forests deprived of their frugivores. Restor Ecol. 20:153–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie JF, Helmy OE, Brockelman WY, Maron JL. 2009. Bushmeat poaching reduces the seed dispersal and population growth rate of a mammal-dispersed tree. Ecol Appl. 19:854–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JH, Heske EJ. 1990. Control of a desert-grassland transition by a keystone rodent guild. Science. 250:1705–1707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudvig LA, Mabry CM. 2008. Trait-based filtering of the regional species pool to guide understory plant reintroductions in Midwestern oak savannas, USA. Restor Ecol. 16:290–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burney DA, Burney LP. 2016. Monitoring results from a decade of native plant translocations at Makauwahi Cave Reserve, Kaua'i. Plant Ecol. 217:139–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterfield BJ, Copeland SM, Munson SM, Roybal CM, Wood TE. 2016. Prestoration: using species in restoration that will persist now and into the future. Restor Ecol. DOI: 10.1111/rec.12381
   Google Scholar
• Carrière SM, Andre M, Letourmy P, Olivier I, McKey DB. 2002a. Seed rain beneath remnant trees in a slash-and-burn agricultural system in southern Cameroon. J Trop Ecol. 18:353–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrière SM, Letourmy P, McKey DB. 2002b. Effects of remnant trees in fallows on diversity and structure of forest regrowth in a slash-and-burn agricultural system in southern Cameroon. J Trop Ecol. 18:375–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro J, Zamora R, Hódar JA, Gómez JM. 2002. Use of shrubs as nurse plants: a new technique for reforestation in Mediterranean mountains. Restor Ecol. 10:297–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro J, Zamora R, Hódar JA, Gómez JM, Gómez-Aparicio L. 2004. Benefits of using shrubs as nurse plants for reforestation in Mediterranean mountains: a 4-year study. Restor Ecol. 12:352–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavieres LA, Chacón P, Penaloza A, Molina-Montenegro MA, Arroyo MTK. 2007. Leaf litter of Kageneckia angustifolia D. Don (Rosaceae) inhibits seed germination in sclerophyllous montane woodlands of central Chile. Plant Ecol. 190:13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers FM, Mauquoy D, Todd PA. 1999. Recent rise to dominance of Molinia caerulea in environmentally sensitive areas: new perspectives from palaeoecological data. J Appl Ecol. 36:719–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman CA, Onderdonk DA. 1998. Forests without primates: primate/plant codependency. Am J Primatol. 45:127–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase JM. 2003. Community assembly: when should history matter? Oecologia. 136:489–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase JM, Leibold MA. 2003. Ecological niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm RA, Muller-Landau HC, Abdul Rahman K, Bebber DP, Bin Y et al. 2013. Scale-dependent relationships between tree species richness and ecosystem function in forests. J Ecol. 101:1214–1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen NL, Bartuska AM, Brown JH, Carpenter S, Dantonio C, Francis R, Franklin JF, MacMahon JA, Noss RF, Parsons DJ, Peterson CH, Turner MG, Woodmansee RG. 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management. Ecol Appl. 6:665–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark JS, Macklin E, Wood L. 1998. Stages and spatial scales of recruitment limitation in southern Appalachian forests. Ecol Monogr. 68:213–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clewell A, Rieger JP. 1997. What practitioners need from restoration ecologists. Rest Ecol. 5:350–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colas B, Kirchner F, Riba M, Olivieri I, Mignot A, Imbert E, Beltrame C, Carbonell D, Fréville H. 2008. Restoration demography: a 10-year demographic comparison between introduced and natural populations of endemic Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). J Appl Ecol. 45:1468–1476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colas B, Olivieri I, Riba M. 2001. Spatio-temporal variation of reproductive success and conservation of the narrow-endemic Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). Biol Conserv. 99:375–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole RJ, Holl KD, Keene CL, Zahawi RA. 2011. Direct seeding of late-successional trees to restore tropical montane forest. Forest Ecol Manag. 261:1590–1597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole RJ, Holl KD, Zahawi RA. 2010. Seed rain under tree islands planted to restore degraded lands in a tropical agricultural landscape. Ecol Appl. 20:1255–1269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comita LS, Hubbell SP. 2009. Local neighborhood and species' shade tolerance influence survival in a diverse seedling bank. Ecology 90:328–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comita LS, Muller-Landau HC, Aguilar S, Hubbell SP. 2010. Asymmetric density dependence shapes species abundances in a tropical tree community. Science. 329:330–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condit R, Pitman N, Leigh EG, Chave J, Terborgh J, Foster RB, Núñez P, Aguilar S, Valencia R, Villa G, Muller-Landau HC, Losos E, Hubbell SP. 2002. Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science. 295:666–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell JH, Slatyer RO. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat. 111:1119–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coomes DA, Grubb PJ. 2000. Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecol Monogr. 70:171–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin JD, Holl KD. 2012. Applied nucleation as a forest restoration strategy. Forest Ecol Manag. 265:37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin JD, Robinson GR, Hafkemeyer LM, Handel SN. 2016. A long-term evaluation of applied nucleation as a strategy to facilitate forest restoration. Ecol Appl. 26:104–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordeiro NJ, Howe HF. 2003. Forest fragmentation severs mutualism between seed dispersers and an endemic African tree. P Natl Acad Sci. 100:14052–14056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corlett RT. 1998. Frugivory and seed dispersal by vertebrates in the Oriental (Indomalayan) Region. Biol Rev. 73:413–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox PA. 1983. Extinction of the Hawaiian aviafauna resulted in a change of pollinators for the ieie, Freycinetia arborea. Oikos. 41:195–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran LM, Webb CO. 2000. Experimental tests of the spatiotemporal scale of seed predation in mast-fruiting Dipterocarpaceae. Ecol Monogr. 70:129–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalrymple SE, Banks E, Stewart GB, Pullin AS. 2012. A meta-analysis of threatened plant reintroductions from across the globe. In: Dalrymple SE, Banks E, Stewart GB, Pullin AS, editors. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Dalrymple SE, Stewart GB, Pullin AS. 2011. Are re-introductions an effective way of mitigating against plant extinctions? CEE Review 07-008 (SR32). Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. Available from: http://www.environmentalevidence.org/SR32.html.
   Google Scholar
• Dauber J, Biesmeijer JC, Gabriel D, Kunin WE, Lamborn E et al. 2010. Effects of patch size and density on flower visitation and seed set of wild plants: a pan-European approach. J Ecol. 98:188–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Peña-Domene M, Martínez-Garza C, Palmas-Pérez S, Rivas-Alonso E, Howe HF. 2014. Roles of birds and bats in early tropical-forest restoration. PLoS One. 9:e104656.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H. 2003. Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos. 102:417–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denslow JS. 1987. Tropical rainforest gaps and tree species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 18:431–451.
   Google Scholar
• Denslow JS, Ellison AM, Sanford RE. 1998. Treefall gap size effects on above- and below-ground processes in a tropical wet forest. J Ecol. 86:597–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deredec A, Courchamp F. 2007. Importance of the Allee effect for reintroductions. Ecoscience. 14:440–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz S, Cabido M. 1997. Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change. J Veg Sci. 8:463–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon KW. 2009. Pollination and restoration. Science 325:571–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donatti CI, Guimaraes PR, Galetti M, Pizo MA, Marquitti FMD, Dirzo R. 2011. Analysis of a hyper-diverse seed dispersal network: modularity and underlying mechanisms. Ecol Lett. 14:773–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dos Santos K, Kinoshita LS, dos Santos FAM. 2007. Tree species composition and similarity in semideciduous forest fragments of southeastern Brazil. Biol Conserv. 135:268–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drayton B, Primack RB. 2000. Rates of success in the reintroduction by four methods of several perennial plant species in eastern Massachusetts. Rhodora. 102:299–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley N editor 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Effiom EO, Nuñez-Iturri G, Smith HG, Ottosson U, Olsson O. 2013. Bushmeat hunting changes regeneration of African rainforests. Proc R Soc B. 280:20130246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan D, Howell EA editors. 2001. The historical ecology handbook: a restorationist's guide to reference ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht BMJ, Comita LS, Condit R, Kursar TA, Tyree MT, Turner BL, Hubbell SP. 2007. Drought sensitivity shapes species distribution patterns in tropical forests. Nature. 447:80–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson O. 1993. The species-pool hypothesis and plant community diversity. Oikos. 68:371–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facelli JM. 1994. Multiple indirect effects of plant litter affect the establishment of woody seedlings in old fields. Ecology. 75:1727–1735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahselt D. 2007. Is transplanting an effective means of preserving vegetation? Can J Bot. 85:1007–1017.
   Google Scholar
• Fajardo L, Caceres A, Arrindell P. 2014. Arbuscular mycorrhizae, a tool to enhance the recovery and re-introduction of Juglans venezuelensis Manning, an endemic tree on the brink of extinction. Symbiosis 64:63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedriani JM, Zywiec M, Delibes M. 2012. Thieves or mutualists? Pulp feeders enhance endozoochore local recruitment. Ecology. 93:575–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinsinger P, Tiebout HM, Young BE. 1991. Do tropical bird-pollinated plants exhibit density-dependent interactions? Field experiments. Ecology. 72:1953–1963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenu G, Cogoni D, Bacchetta G. 2016. The role of fencing in the success of threatened plant species translocation. Plant Ecol. 217:207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrando-Pardo I, Ferrer-Gallego P, Laguna-Lumbreras E. 2016. Assessing the conservation value of ex situ seed bank collections of endangered wild plants. Isr J Plant Sci. 63:333–346. DOI: 10.1080/07929978.2015.1125676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrazzano S, Williamson PS. 2013. Benefits of mycorrhizal inoculation in reintroduction of endangered plant species under drought conditions. J Arid Environ. 98:123–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferson S, Burgman MA. 1990. The dangers of being few: demographic risk analysis for rare species extinction. New York State Museum Bulletin. 471:129–132.
   Google Scholar
• Feurdean A, Willis KJ. 2008. The usefulness of a long-term perspective in assessing current forest conservation management in the Apuseni Natural Park, Romania. Forest Ecol Manag. 256:421–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine PVA, Mesones I, Coley PD. 2004. Herbivores promote habitat specialization by trees in amazonian forests. Science. 305:663–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher JB, Jayachandran K. 2002. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance seedling growth in two endangered plant species from South Florida. Int J Plant Sci. 163:559–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth SA. 2003. Density-dependent seed set in the Haleakala silversword: evidence for an Allee effect. Oecologia. 136:551–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FORRU. 2005. How to plant a forest: the principles and practice of restoring tropical forests. Biology Department, Science Faculty, Chiang Mai.
   Google Scholar
• Foster BL, Tilman D. 2003. Seed limitation and the regulation of community structure in oak savanna grassland. J Ecol. 91:999–1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks AJ, Yates CJ, Hobbs RJ. 2009. Defining plant functional groups to guide rare plant management. Plant Ecol. 204:207–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser LH, Harrower WL, Garris HW, Davidson S, Hebert PDN, Howie R, Moody A, Polster D, Schmitz OJ, Sinclair ARE, Starzomski BM, Sullivan TP, Turkington R, Wilson DS. 2015. A call for applying trophic structure in ecological restoration. Restor Ecol. 23:503–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukami T. 2015. Historical contingency in community assembly: integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 46:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Fukami T, Bezemer TM, Mortimer SR, van der Putten WH. 2005. Species divergence and trait convergence in experimental plant community assembly. Ecol Lett. 8:1283–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamfeldt L, Snäll T, Bagchi R, Jonsson M, Gustafsson L, Kjellander P, Ruiz-Jaen MC, Froberg M, Stendahl J, Philipson CD, et al. 2013. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nat Commun. 4:1340 (2013). DOI:10.1038/ncomms2328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García D, Obeso JR. 2003. Facilitation by herbivore-mediated nurse plants in a threatened tree, Taxus baccata: local effects and landscape level consistency. Ecography. 26:739–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García del Barrio JM, Auñón F, Sánchez de Ron D, Alía R. 2013. Assessing regional species pools for restoration programs in Spain. New Forests. 44:559–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia LC, Cianciaruso MV, Ribeiro DB, Maës dos Santos FA, Rodrigues RR. 2015. Flower functional trait responses to restoration time. Appl Veg Sci. 18:402–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia LC, Hobbs RJ, Mäes dos Santos FA, Rodrigues RR. 2014. Flower and fruit availability along a forest restoration gradient. Biotropica. 46:114–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido JL, Rey PJ, Herrera CM. 2007. Regional and local variation in seedling emergence, mortality and recruitment of a perennial herb in Mediterranean mountain habitats. Plant Ecol. 190:109–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathmann A, Tscharntke T. 2002. Foraging ranges of solitary bees. J Anim Ecol. 71:757–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemma JN, Koske RE, Habte M. 2002. Mycorrhizal dependency of some endemic and endangered Hawaiian plant species. Am J Bot. 89:337–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazoul J, Liston KA, Boyle TJB. 1998. Disturbance-induced density-dependent seed set in Shorea siamensis (Dipterocarpaceae), a tropical forest tree. J Ecol. 86:462–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs JP, Marquez C, Sterling EJ. 2008. The role of endangered species reintroduction in ecosystem restoration: tortoise-cactus interactions on Espanola island, Galapagos. Restor Ecol. 16:88–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson DJ, Baer SG, Klopf RP, Reed LK, Wodika BR, Willand JE. 2013. Limited effects of dominant species population source on community composition during community assembly. J Veg Sci. 24:429–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert GS, Harms KE, Hamill DN, Hubbell SP. 2001. Effects of seedling size, El Nino drought, seedling density, and distance to nearest conspecific adult on 6-year survival of Ocotea whitei seedlings in Panama. Oecologia. 127:509–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert GS, Hubbell SP, Foster RB. 1994. Density and distance-to-adult effects of a canker disease of trees in a moist tropical forest. Oecologia. 98:100–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitay H, Noble IR. 1997. What are functional types and how should we seek them? In: Gitay H, Noble IR, editors. Plant functional types. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; p. 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Godefroid S, Piazza C, Rossi G, Buord S, Stevens AD, Aguraiuja R, Cowell C, Weekley CW, Vogg G, Iriondo JM, et al. 2011. How successful are plant species reintroductions? Biol Conserv. 144:672–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godefroid S, Van de Vyver A, Vanderborght T. 2010. Germination capacity and viability of threatened species collections in seed banks. Biodivers Conserv. 19:1365–1383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Aparicio L, Zamora R, Gómez JM. 2005. The regeneration status of the endangered Acer opalus subsp granatense throughout its geographical distribution in the Iberian Peninsula. Biol Conserv. 121:195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gondard H, Sandrine J, Aronson J, Lavorel S. 2003. Plant functional types: a promising tool for management and restoration of degraded lands. Appl Veg Sci. 6:223–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths CJ, Hansen DM, Jones CG, Zuel N, Harris S. 2011. Resurrecting extinct interactions with extant substitutes. Curr Biol. 21:762–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groom MJ. 1998. Allee effects limit population viability of an annual plant. Am Nat 151:487–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb PJ. 1977. Maintenance of species-richness in plant communities – importance of regeneration niche. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 52:107–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrant EOJ. 2012. Characterizing two decades of rare plant reintroductions. In: Guerrant EOJ, editor Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrant EOJ, Kaye TN. 2007. Reintroduction of rare and endangered plants: common factors, questions and approaches. Aust J Bot. 55:362–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guevara S, Purata SE, Vandermaarel E. 1986. The role of forest trees in tropical secondary succession. Vegetatio. 66:77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney EE, McGraw JB. 2001. Experimental demonstration of an Allee effect in American ginseng. Conserv Biol. 15:129–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall P, Orrell LC, Bawa KS. 1994. Genetic diversity and mating system in a tropical tree Carapa guianensis (Meliaceae). Am J Bot. 81:1104–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halme P, Monkkonen M, Kotiaho JS, Ylisirnio A-L, Markkanen A. 2009. Quantifying the indicator power of an indicator species. Conserv Biol. 23:1008–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms KE, Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB. 2001. Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50-ha neotropical forest plot. J Ecol. 89:947–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms KE, Wright SJ, Calderón O, Hernández A, Herre EA. 2000. Pervasive density-dependent recruitment enhances seedling diversity in a tropical forest. Nature. 404:493–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper JL. 1977. Population biology of plants. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris JA, Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Aronson J. 2006. Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restor Ecol. 14:170–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison RD, Tan S, Plotkin JB, Slik F, Detto M, Brenes T, Itoh A, Davies SJ. 2013. Consequences of defaunation for a tropical tree community. Ecol Lett. 16:687–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselwandter K. 1997. Soil micro-organisms, mycorrhiza, and restoration ecology. In: Haselwandter K, editor Restoration ecology and sustainable development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 65–80.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, et al. 2006. Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 15:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs RJ, Harris JA. 2001. Restoration ecology: repairing the Earth's ecosystems in the new millennium. Restor Ecol. 9, 239–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Harris JA. 2009. Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol Evol. 24:599–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs RJ, Higgs ES, Hall CM editors. 2013. Novel ecosystems: intervening in the new ecological world order. Oxford, UK: Wiley–Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs RJ, Norton DA. 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor Ecol. 4:93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann PM, Blum CT, Velazco SJE, Gill DJC, Borgo M. 2015. Identifying target species and seed sources for the restoration of threatened trees in southern Brazil. Oryx. 49:425–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holl KD, Cairns J. 2002. Monitoring and appraisal. In: Holl KD, Cairns J, editors. Handbook of ecological restoration. Principles of restoration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; p. 409–432.
   Google Scholar
• Holl KD, Zahawi RA, Cole RJ, Ostertag R, Cordell S. 2011. Planting seedlings in tree islands versus plantations as a large-scale tropical forest restoration strategy. Restor Ecol. 19:470–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, et al. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr. 75:3–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House SM. 1992. Population density and fruit set in three dioecious tree species in Australian tropical rain forest. J Ecol. 80:57–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe HF, Martinez-Garza C. 2014. Restoration as experiment. Botanical Sciences. 92:459–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe HF, Swallowed J. 1982. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 13:201–228.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbell SP. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science. 203:1299–1309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbell SP. 2013. Tropical rain forest conservation and the twin challenges of diversity and rarity. Ecol Evol. 3:3263–3274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbell SP. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbell SP, Foster RB, O'Brien ST, Harms KE, Condit R, Wechsler B, Wright SJ, de Lao SL. 1999. Light-gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest. Science. 283:554–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huston M. 1994. Biological diversity: the coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ibáñez I, Schupp EW. 2002. Effects of litter, soil surface conditions, and microhabitat on Cercocarpus ledifolius Nutt. Seedling emergence and establishment. J Arid Environ. 52:209–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabot F, Etienne RS, Chave J. 2008. Reconciling neutral community models and environmental filtering: theory and an empirical test. Oikos. 117:1308–1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James JJ, Sheley RL, Erickson T, Rollins KS, Taylor MH, Dixon KW. 2013. A systems approach to restoring degraded drylands. J Appl Ecol. 50:730–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson D, Beaulieu WT, Bever JD, Clay K. 2012. Conspecific negative density dependence and forest diversity. Science. 336:904–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordano P, García C, Godoy JA, García-Castano JL. 2007. Differential contribution of frugivores to complex seed dispersal patterns. P Natl Acad Sci. 104:3278–3282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusaitis M, Polomka L, Sorensen B. 2004. Habitat specificity, seed germination and experimental translocation of the endangered herb Brachycome muelleri (Asteraceae). Biol Conserv. 116:251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Traveset A, Hansen DM. 2010. Conservation and restoration of plant-animal mutualisms on oceanic islands. Perspect Plant Ecol. 12:131–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann MR, Russell TG, Boyce DAJ, Moir WH, Perry L, Reynolds RT, Bassett RL, Mehlhop P, Edminster CB, Block WM, Corn PS. 1994. An ecological basis for ecosystem management. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-246. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Keddy PA. 1992. Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. J Veg Sci. 3:157–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchner F, Robert A, Colas B. 2006. Modelling the dynamics of introduced populations in the narrow-endemic Centaurea corymbosa: a demo-genetic integration. J Appl Ecol. 43:1011–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura S, Yumoto T, Poonswad P, Chuailua P, Plongmai K, Maruhashi T, Noma N. 2002. Interactions between fleshy fruits and frugivores in a tropical seasonal forest in Thailand. Oecologia. 133:559–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles OH, Parrotta JA. 1995. Amazonian forest restoration: an innovative system for native species selection based on phonological data and field performance indices. Commonwealth Forestry Review. 74:230–243.
   Google Scholar
• Kobe RK. 1999. Light gradient partitioning among tropical tree species through differential seedling mortality and growth. Ecology. 80:187–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer AT, Ison JL, Ashley MV, Howe HF. 2008. The paradox of forest fragmentation genetics. Conserv Biol. 22:878–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunin WE. 1992. Density and reproductive success in wild populations of Diplotaxis erucoidis (Brassicaceae). Oecologia. 91:129–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunin WE. 1997. Population size and density effects in pollination: pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. J Ecol. 85:225–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunin WE. 1993. Sex and single mustard: population density and pollinator behaviour effects on seed-set. Ecology. 74:2145–2160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunstler G, Curt T, Bouchaud M, Lepart J. 2006. Indirect facilitation and competition in tree species colonization of sub-Mediterranean grasslands. J Veg Sci. 17:379–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte E, Paquette A, Legendre P, Bouchard A. 2009. Assessing the scale-specific importance of niches and other spatial processes on beta diversity: a case study from a temperate forest. Oecologia. 159:377–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb D. 2011. Regreening the bare hills: tropical forest conservation in the Asia-Pacific region. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb D, Parrotta J, Keenan R, Tucker N. 1997. Rejoining habitat fragments: restoring degraded rainforest lands. In: Lamb D, Parrotta J, Keenan R, Tucker N, editors. Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; p. 366–385.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont BB, Klinkhamer PGL, Witkowski ETF. 1993. Population fragmentation may reduce fertility to zero in Banksia goodii – a demonstration of the Allee effect. Oecologia. 94:446–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavorel S, Garnier E. 2002. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol. 16:545–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Cadre S, Tully T, Mazer SJ, Ferdy J-B, Moret J, Machon N. 2008. Allee effects within small populations of Aconitum napellus ssp lusitanicum, a protected subspecies in northern France. New Phytol. 179:1171–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold MA, McPeek MA. 2006. Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in community ecology. Ecology. 87:1399–1410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li JQ, Romane FJ. 1997. Effects of germination inhibition on the dynamics of Quercus ilex stands. J Veg Sci. 8:287–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen MD, Davies KW, Mummey DL, Svejcar TJ. 2014. Improving restoration of exotic annual grass-invaded rangelands through activated carbon seed enhancement technologies. Rangeland Ecol Manag. 67:61–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen MD, Davies KW, Williams CJ, Svejcar TJ. 2012. Agglomerating seeds to enhance native seedling emergence and growth. J Appl Ecol. 49:431–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maina GG, Howe HF. 2000. Inherent rarity in community restoration. Conserv Biol. 14:1335–1340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangan SA, Schnitzer SA, Herre EA, Mack KML, Valencia MC, Sanchez EI, Bever JD. 2010. Negative plant-soil feedback predicts tree-species relative abundance in a tropical forest. Nature. 466:752–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsico TD, Hellmann JJ. 2009. Dispersal limitation inferred from an experimental translocation of Lomatium (Apiaceae) species outside their geographic ranges. Oikos 118:1783–1792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Garza C, Howe HF. 2003. Restoring tropical diversity: beating the time tax on species loss. J Appl Ecol. 40:423–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maschinski J, Baggs JE, Sacchi CF. 2004. Seedling recruitment and survival of an endangered limestone endemic in its natural habitat and experimental reintroduction sites. Am J Bot. 91:689–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maschinski J, Duquesnel J. 2006. Successful reintroductions of the endangered long-lived Sargent's cherry palm, Pseudophoenix sargentii, in the Florida Keys. Biol Conserv. 134:122–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maschinski J, Falk DA, Wright SJ, Possley J, Roncal J, Wendelberger KS. 2012. Optimal locations for plant reintroductions in a changing world. In: Maschinski J, Falk DA, Wright SJ, Possley J, Roncal J, Wendelberger KS, editors. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maschinski J, Wright SJ. 2006. Using ecological theory to plan restorations of the endangered Beach jacquemontia (Convolvulaceae) in fragmented habitats. J Nat Conserv. 14:180–189.
   Google Scholar
• Maunder M. 1992. Plant reintroduction – an overview. Biodivers Conserv. 1:51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarroll J, Chambers FM, Webb JC, Thom T. 2016. Using palaeoecology to advise peatland conservation: an example from West Arkengarthdale, Yorkshire, UK. J Nat Conserv. 30:90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColley SD, Tyers DB, Sowell BF. 2012. Aspen and willow restoration using beaver on the Northern Yellowstone winter range. Restor Ecol. 20:450–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey KR, Prasad S, Corlett RT, Campos-Arceiz A, Brodie JF, Rogers H, Santamaria L. 2012. Seed dispersal in changing landscapes. Biol Conserv. 146:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEuen AB, Curran LM. 2004. Seed dispersal and recruitment limitation across spatial scales in temperate forest fragments. Ecology. 85:507–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGill BJ, Etienne RS, Gray JS, Alonso D, Anderson MJ et al. 2007. Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol Lett. 10:995–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menges ES. 2008. Restoration demography and genetics of plants: when is a translocation successful? Aust J Bot. 56:187–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menz MHM, Phillips RD, Winfree R, Kremen C, Aizen MA, Johnson SD, Dixon KW. 2011. Reconnecting plants and pollinators: challenges in the restoration of pollination mutualisms. Trends Plant Sci. 16:4–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt DJ, Dixon KW. 2011. Restoration seed banks – a matter of scale. Science. 332:424–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt DJ, Dixon KW. 2014. Seed availability for restoration. In: Merritt DJ, Dixon KW, editors. Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species. State of the world's forest genetic resources – thematic study. Rome, Italy: FAO and Bioversity International; p. 97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Millar CI. 1998. Reconsidering the conservation of Monterey pine. Fremontia. 26:12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Millar CI, Brubaker LB. 2006. Climate change and paleoecology: new contexts for restoration ecology. In: Millar CI, Brubaker LB, editors. Foundations of restoration ecology. Washington, DC: Society for Ecological, Restoration, International, Island Press; p. 315–340.
   Google Scholar
• Miller KA, Bell TP, Germano JM. 2014. Understanding publication bias in reintroduction biology by assessing translocations of New Zealand's herpetofauna. Conserv Biol 28:1045–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyawaki A. 1999. Creative ecology: restoration of native forests by native trees. Plant Biotechnol. 16:15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Molofsky J, Augspurger CK. 1992. The effect of leaf litter on early seedling establishment in a tropical forest. Ecology. 73:68–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalvo AM, Williams SL, Rice KJ, Buchmann SL, Cory C, Handel SN, Nabhan GP, Primack R, Robichaux RH. 1997. Restoration biology: a population biology perspective. Restor Ecol. 5:277–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya D, Zavala MA, Rodríguez MA, Purves DW. 2008. Animal versus wind dispersal and the robustness of tree species to deforestation. Science. 320:1502–1504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller SD, Miramont C, Bruneton H, Carré M, Sottocornola M, Court–Picon M, de Beaulieu JL, Nakagawa T, Schevin P. 2012. A palaeoecological perspective for the conservation and restoration of wetland plant communities in the central French Alps, with particular emphasis on alder carr vegetation. Rev Palaeobot Palyno. 171:124–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munt DD, Marques I, Iriondo JM. 2016. Acquiring baseline information for successful plant translocations when there is no time to lose: the case of the neglected Critically Endangered Narcissus cavanillesii (Amaryllidaceae). Plant Ecol. 217:193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murawski DA, Hamrick JL. 1991. The effect of the density of flowering individuals on the mating systems of nine tropical tree species. Heredity. 67:167–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers JA, Chase JM, Jiménez I, Jorgensen PM, Araujo-Murakami A, Paniagua-Zambrana N, Seidel R. 2013. Beta-diversity in temperate and tropical forests reflects dissimilar mechanisms of community assembly. Ecol Lett. 16:151–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natlandsmyr B, Hjelle KL. 2016. Long-term vegetation dynamics and land-use history: providing a baseline for conservation strategies in protected Alnus glutinosa swamp woodlands. Forest Ecol Manag. 372:78–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunez-Iturri G, Olsson O, Howe HF. 2008. Hunting reduces recruitment of primate-dispersed trees in Amazonian Peru. Biol Conserv. 141:1536–1546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packer A, Clay K. 2000. Soil pathogens and spatial patterns of seedling mortality in a temperate tree. Nature. 404:278–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pammenter NW, Berjak P. 1999. A review of recalcitrant seed physiology in relation to desiccation-tolerance mechanisms. Seed Sci Res. 9:13–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette A, Messier C. 2011. The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 20:170–180.
   Google Scholar
• Partel M, Szava-Kovats R, Zobel M. 2011. Dark diversity: shedding light on absent species. Trends Ecol Evol. 26:124–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partel M, Zobel M, Zobel K, van der Maarel E. 1996. The species pool and its relation to species richness: evidence from Estonian plant communities. Oikos. 75:111–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedrono M, Griffiths OL, Clausen A, Smith LL, Griffiths CJ, Wilmé L, Burney DA. 2013. Using a surviving lineage of Madagascar's vanished megafauna for ecological restoration. Biol Conserv. 159:501–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peres CA, Palacios E. 2007. Basin-wide effects of game harvest on vertebrate population densities in Amazonian forests: implications for animal-mediated seed dispersal. Biotropica. 39:304–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Méndez N, Jordano P, Valido A. 2015. Downsized mutualisms: consequences of seed dispersers’ body-size reduction for early plant recruitment. Perspect Plant Ecol. 17 151–159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry DJ, Knowles P. 1990. Evidence of high self-fertilization in natural populations of eastern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis). Can J Bot. 68:663–668.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson CJ, Dosch JJ, Carson WP. 2014. Pasture succession in the Neotropics: extending the nucleation hypothesis into a matrix discontinuity hypothesis. Oecologia. 175:1325–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picó FX, Quintana-Ascencio PF, Milden M, Ehrlen J, Pfingsten I. 2009. Modelling the effects of genetics and habitat on the demography of a grassland herb. Basic Appl Ecol. 10:122–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piiroinen T, Nyeko P, Roininen H. 2015. Natural establishment of indigenous trees under planted nuclei: a study from a clear-felled pine plantation in an afrotropical rain forest. Forest Ecol Manag. 345:21–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian S, Yang Y, Tang CQ, Momohara A, Yi S, Ohsawa M. 2016. Effective conservation measures are needed for wild Cathaya argyrophylla populations in China: insights from the population structure and regeneration characteristics. Forest Ecol Manag. 361 358–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao X, Jabot F, Tang Z, Jiang M, Fang J. 2015. A latitudinal gradient in tree community assembly processes evidenced in Chinese forests. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 24:314–323.
   Google Scholar
• Rathcke BJ. 1983. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. In: Rathcke BJ, editor Pollination biology. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reckinger C, Colling G, Matthies D. 2010. Restoring populations of the endangered plant Scorzonera humilis: influence of site conditions, seed source, and plant stage. Restor Ecol. 18:904–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redford KH. 1992. The empty forest. Bioscience 42:412–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees M, Condit R, Crawley M, Pacala S, Tilman D. 2001. Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics. Science. 293:650–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson AW, Trass A, Ladley JJ, Kelly D. 2006. Assessing the benefits of frugivory for seed germination: the importance of deinhibition effect. Functl Ecol. 20:58–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll JR, Mitchell J, Cabin RJ, Marshall CR. 1997. Reproductive success increases with local density of conspecifics in a desert mustard (Lesquerella fendleri). Conserv Biol. 11:738–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roncal J, Maschinski J, Schaffer B, Gutierrez SM, Walters D. 2012. Testing appropriate habitat outside of historic range: the case of Amorpha herbacea var. crenulata (Fabaceae). J Nat Conserv. 20:109–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Jaen MC, Aide TM. 2005. Restoration success: how is it being measured? Restor Ecol. 13:569–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusch GM, Pausas JG, Leps J. 2003. Plant functional types in relation to disturbance and land use: Introduction. J Veg Sci. 14:307–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos SLD, Válio IFM. 2002. Litter accumulation and its effect on seedling recruitment in a Southeast Brazilian tropical forest. Brazil J Bot. 25:89–92.
   Google Scholar
• Schemske DW, Husband BC, Ruckelshaus MH, Goodwillie C, Parker I, Bishop JG. 1994. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology. 75:584–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlawin J, Zahawi RA. 2008. ‘Nucleating’ succession in recovering neotropical wet forests: the legacy of remnant trees. J Veg Sci. 19:485–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder A, Persson L, De Roos AM. 2005. Direct experimental evidence for alternative stable states: a review. Oikos. 110:3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schupp EW. 1988. Factors affecting post-dispersal seed survival in a tropical forest. Oecologia. 76:525–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz MW, Brigham CA, Hoeksema JD, Lyons KG, Mills MH, van Mantgem PJ. 2000. Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia. 122 297–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon PJ, Armstrong DP, Maloney RF. 2007. Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conserv Biol. 21:303–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon PJ, Griffiths CJ, Soorae PS, Armstrong DP. 2014. Reversing defaunation: restoring species in a changing world. Science. 345:406–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi P, Howe HF. 2009. Recruitment of hornbill dispersed trees in hunted and logged forests of the Indian eastern Himalaya. Conserv Biol. 23:710–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer M. 1987. Minimum viable populations: coping with uncertainty. In: Shaffer M, editor. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; p. 69–86.
   Google Scholar
• Shen S-K, Wang Y-H. 2011. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) status and seedling growth response to indigenous AM colonisation of Euryodendron excelsum in China: implications for restoring an endemic and critically endangered tree. Aus J Bot. 59:460–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siles G, Alcántara JM, Rey PJ, Bastida JM. 2010. Defining a target map of native species assemblages for restoration. Restor Ecol. 18:439–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slocum MG. 2001. How tree species differ as recruitment foci in a tropical pasture. Ecology 82:2547–2559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanturf JA, Palik BJ, Dumroese RK. 2014. Contemporary forest restoration: a review emphasizing function. Forest Ecol Manag. 331:292–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffan-Dewenter I, Schiele S. 2008. Do resources or natural enemies drive bee population dynamics in fragmented habitats? Ecology. 89:1375–1387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suding KN. 2011. Toward an era of restoration in ecology: successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 42:465–487.
   Google Scholar
• Taillefer AG, Wheeler TA. 2013. Animal colonization of restored peatlands: inoculation of plant material as a source of insects. Restor Ecol. 21:140–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang CQ, Ohsawa M. 2002. Coexistence mechanisms of evergreen, deciduous and coniferous trees in a mid-montane mixed forest on Mt. Emei, Sichuan, China. Plant Ecol. 161:215–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temperton VM, Hobbs RJ, Nuttle T, Halle S editors. 2004. Assembly rules and restoration ecology. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terborgh J, Nuñez-Iturri G, Pitman NCA, Valverde FHC, Alvarez P, Swamy V, Pringle EG, Paine CET. 2008. Tree recruitment in an empty forest. Ecology. 89:1757–1768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature. 371:65–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toh I, Gillespie M, Lamb D. 1999. The role of isolated trees in facilitating tree seedling recruitment at a degraded sub-tropical rainforest site. Restor Ecol. 7:288–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tones RC, Renison D. 2016. Indirect facilitation becomes stronger with seedling age in a degraded seasonally dry forest. Acta Oecologica. 70:138–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torroba-Balmori P, Zaldívar P, Alday JG, Fernández-Santos B, Martínez-Ruiz C. 2015. Recovering Quercus species on reclaimed coal wastes using native shrubs as restoration nurse plants. Ecol Eng. 77:146–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozer MG, Mackenzie BDE, Simpson CC. 2012. An application of plant functional types for predicting restoration outcomes. Restor Ecol. 20:730–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traveset A. 1998. Effect of seed passage through vertebrate frugivores’ guts on germination: a review. Perspect Plant Ecol. 1/2:151–190.
   Google Scholar
• Traveset A, González-Varo JP, Valido A. 2012. Long-term demographic consequences of a seed dispersal disruption. P Roy Soc B–Biol Sci. 279:3298–3303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traveset A, Riera N. 2005. Disruption of a plant-lizard seed dispersal system and its ecological effects on a threatened endemic plant in the Balearic Islands. Conserv Biol. 19:421–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traveset A, Verdú M. 2002. A meta-analysis of gut treatment on seed germination. In: Traveset A, Verdú M, editors Seed dispersal and frugivory: ecology, evolution and conservation. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing; p. 339–350.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker NIJ, Murphy TM. 1997. The effects of ecological rehabilitation on vegetation recruitment: some observations from the wet tropics of North Queensland. Forest Ecol Manag. 99:133–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnau K, Haselwandter K. 2002. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, an essential component of soil microflora in ecosystem restoration. In: Turnau K, Haselwandter K, editors. Mycorrhizal technology in agriculture: from genes to bioproducts. Basel: Birkhäuser; p. 137–149.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull LA, Crawley MJ, Rees M. 2000. Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos. 88:225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner IM, Corlett RT. 1996. The conservation value of small, isolated fragments of lowland tropical rain forest. Trends Ecol Evol. 11:330–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner SR, Steadman KJ, Vlahos S, Koch JM, Dixon KW. 2013. Seed treatment optimizes benefits of seed bank storage for restoration-ready seeds: the feasibility of prestorage dormancy alleviation for mine-site revegetation. Restor Ecol. 21:186–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallauri DR, Aronson J, Barbero M. 2002. An analysis of forest restoration 120 years after reforestation on badlands in the Southwestern Alps. Rest Ecol. 10:16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Veken S, De Frenne P, Baeten L, Van Beek E, Verheyen K, Hermy M. 2012. Experimental assessment of the survival and performance of forest herbs transplanted beyond their range limit. Basic Appl Ecol. 13:10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Veken S, Rogister J, Verheyen K, Hermy M, Nathan R. 2007. Over the (range) edge: a 45-year transplant experiment with the perennial forest herb Hyacinthoides non-scripta. J Ecol 95:343–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Wall SB. 1994. Seed fate pathways of antelope bitterbrush: dispersal by seed-caching yellow pine chipmunks. Ecology. 75:1911–1926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilà M, Vayreda J, Comas L, Josep Ibáñez J, Mata T, Obón B. 2007. Species richness and wood production: a positive association in Mediterranean forests. Ecol Lett. 10:241–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volis S. 2016a. Species-targeted plant conservation: time for conceptual integration. Isr J Plant Sci. 63:232–249. DOI: 10.1080/07929978.2015.1085203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volis S. 2016b. Conservation meets restoration – rescuing threatened plant species by restoring their environments and restoring environments using threatened plant species. Isr J Plant Sci. 63:262–275. DOI: 10.1080/07929978.2016.1255021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volis S, Blecher M. 2010. Quasi in situ – a bridge between ex situ and in situ conservation of plants. Biodivers Conserv. 19:2441–2454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker BH. 1992. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv Biol. 6:18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters C, Berjak P, Pammenter N, Kennedy K, Raven P. 2013. Preservation of recalcitrant seeds. Science. 339:915–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb CO, Peart DR. 2000. Habitat associations of trees and seedlings in a Bornean rain forest. J Ecol. 88:464–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiher E, Keddy PA. 1999. Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiher E, van der Werf A, Thompson K, Roderick M, Garnier E, Eriksson O. 1999. Challenging Theophrastus: a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. J Veg Sci. 10:609–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendelberger KS, Fellows MQN, Maschinski J. 2008. Rescue and restoration: experimental translocation of Amorpha herbacea Walter var. crenulata (Rybd.) Isley into a novel urban habitat. Restor Ecol. 16:542–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White PS, Walker JL. 1997. Approximating nature's variation: selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Restor Ecol. 5:338–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker RH. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities: numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution. Science. 147:250–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong M, Wright SJ, Hubbell SP, Foster RB. 1990. The spatial pattern and reproductive consequences of outbreak defoliation in Quararibea asterolepis, a tropical tree. J Ecol. 78:579–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortley L, Hero J-M, Howes M. 2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restor Ecol. 21:537–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wotton DM, Kelly D. 2011. Frugivore loss limits recruitment of large-seeded trees. P Roy Soc B–Biol Sci. 278:3345–3354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright SJ. 2002. Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia. 130:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright SJ, Hernández A, Condit R. 2007. The bushmeat harvest alters seedling banks by favoring lianas, large seeds, and seeds dispersed by bats, birds, and wind. Biotropica. 39:363–371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia J, Lu J, Wang ZX, Hao BB, Wang HB, Liu GH. 2013. Pollen limitation and Allee effect related to population size and sex ratio in the endangered Ottelia acuminata (Hydrocharitaceae): implications for conservation and reintroduction. Plant Biol. 15:376–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York RA, O'Hara KL, Battles JJ. 2013. Density effects on giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) growth through 22 Years: implications for restoration and plantation management. West J Appl For. 28:30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Zahawi RA, Augspurger CK. 2006. Tropical forest restoration: tree islands as recruitment foci in degraded lands of Honduras. Ecol Appl. 16:464–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahawi RA, Holl KD. 2014. Evaluation of different tree propagation methods in ecological restoration in the neotropics. In: Zahawi RA, Holl KD, editors. Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species. State of the world's forest genetic resources – thematic study. Rome: FAO and Bioversity International; p. 85–96.
   Google Scholar
• Zahawi RA, Holl KD, Cole RJ, Reid JL. 2013. Testing applied nucleation as a strategy to facilitate tropical forest recovery. J Appl Ecol. 50:88–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandavalli RB, Dillenburg LR, de Souza PVD. 2004. Growth responses of Araucaria angustifolia (Araucariaceae) to inoculation with the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus clarum. Appl Soil Ecol. 25:245–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Shi F, Yang W, Xiang Z, Kang H, Duan Z. 2015. Autotoxicity as a cause for natural regeneration failure in Nyssa yunnanensis and its implications for conservation. Isr J Plant Sci. 62:187–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu YL, Comita LS, Hubbell SP, Ma K. 2015. Conspecific and phylogenetic density-dependent survival differs across life stages in a tropical forest. J Ecol. 103:957–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zobel M. 1997. The relative role of species pools in determining plant species richness. An alternative explanation of species coexistence? Trends Ecol Evol. 12:266–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zobel M, Otsus M, Liira J, Moora M, Mols T. 2000. Is small-scale species richness limited by seed availability or microsite availability? Ecology. 81:3274–3282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zobel M, van der Maarel E, Dupré C. 1998. Species pool: the concept, its determination and significance for community restoration. Appl Veg Sci. 1:55–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubek S, Turnau K, Tsimilli-Michael M, Strasser RJ. 2009. Response of endangered plant species to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil bacteria. Mycorrhiza 19:113–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyśk-Gorczyńska E, Jakubiec Z, Wuczyński A. 2015. Brown bears (Ursus arctos) as ecological engineers: the prospective role of trees damaged by bears in forest ecosystems. Can J Zool. 93:133–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar