Effects of climate change on threatened Spanish medicinal and aromatic species: predicting future trends and defining conservation guidelines

References

• Akçakaya HR, Butchart SHM, Mace GM, Stuart SN, Hilton-Taylor C. 2006. Use and misuse of the IUCN Red List criteria in projecting climate change impacts on biodiversity. Glob Chang Biol. 12:2037–2043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F. 2012. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol Lett. 15:365–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanca G. 2003. El ruedo ibérico y la manzanilla de Sierra Nevada. Cons Vegetal. 8:10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Draper D, Marques I. 2007. Taxus baccata en Portugal y sus perspectivas futuras frente al cambio global. Proceedings of El tejo en el Mediterráneo occidental: Jornadas Internacionales sobre el tejo y las tejeras en el Mediterráneo occidental; Conselleria de Territori i Habitatge. Generalitat Valenciana.
   Google Scholar
• Draper D, Rubio Teso ML, Marques I. 2011. Defining collecting protocols to improve genebank diversity of the genus Mentha L. in Spain. Adv Environ Biol. 5:2956–2959.
   Google Scholar
• Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib. 17:43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler R, Guisan A, Rechsteiner L. 2004. An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. J Appl Ecol. 41:263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felicísimo ÁM, editor. 2011. Impactos, vulnerabilidad y adaptación al cambio climático de la biodiversidad española. 2. Flora y vegetación. Madrid: Oficina Española de Cambio Climático, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino.
   Google Scholar
• Greaves RK, Sanderson RA, Rushton SP. 2006. Predicting species occurrence using information-theoretic approaches and significance testing: an example of dormouse distribution in Cumbria, UK. Biol Conserv. 130:239–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisan A, Broenimann O, Engler R, Vust M, Yoccoz NG, Lehmann A, Zimmermann NE. 2006. Using niche-based models to improve the sampling of rare species. Conserv Biol. 20:501–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanewinkel M, Cullmann DA, Schelhaas MJ, Nabuurs GJ, Zimmermann NE. 2012. Climate change may cause severe loss in economic value of European forestland. Nat Clim Change. 3:203–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25:1965–1978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang LQ, Guo LP, Cui GH, Xiao PG, Wang YY. 2005. Research on basic theory of sustainable utilization of traditional Chinese medicine. Res Info Trad Chinese Med. 7:4–6.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2007. Summary for policymakers in climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, editors]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isik K. 2011. Rare and endemic species: why are they prone to extinction? Turk J Bot. 35:411–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2001. IUCN Red List categories and criteria: version 3.1. Gland and Cambridge: IUCN Species Survival Commission.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2016. Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 12. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Alfaro B, Draper D, Nogués-Bravo D. 2012. Modeling the potential area of occupancy at fine resolution may reduce uncertainty in species range estimates. Biol Conserv. 147:190–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadis K, Thanos CA, Lumbreras EL. 2013. Plant micro-reserves: from theory to practice. Athens: Utopia Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Laguna E, Ballester G, Fabregat C, Olivares A, Serra L, Deltoro V, Pérez-Botella J, Pérez-Rovira P, Ranz J. 2001. Plant micro-reserves: a new model of micro protected areas, Spain. Re-Introduction News. 20:19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Laguna E, Fos S, Jiménez J, Volis S. 2016. Role of micro-reserves in conservation of endemic, rare and endangered plants of the Valencian region (Eastern Spain). Isr J Plant Sci. 63:320–332. DOI: 10.1080/07929978.2016.1256131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Zhang B, Xiao P, Qi Y, Zhang Z, Liu H, Li X, Wang G, Terwei A. 2016. Patterns and environmental determinants of medicinal plant: vascular plant ratios in Xinjiang, Northwest China. PLoS One. 11:e0158405.
   Google Scholar
• Mathe A. 2009. Medicinal and aromatic plants. In: Soils, plant growth and crop production. Oxford. UK: EOLSS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Milne DJ, Fisher A, Pavey CR. 2006. Models of the habitat associations and distributions of insectivorous bats of the Top End of the Northern Territory, Australia. Biol Conserv. 130:370–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Saiz JC, Saiz-Ollero H, Muñoz-Rodríguez P, López-Huerta R, Sánchez de Dios R, Domínguez F, Cabal C, Güemes J, Carrió E, Blasco MP, et al. 2013. Trabajos integrados de síntesis y análisis para la consecución de los objetivos 1, 2, 5 y 7 de la Estrategia Global de Conservación Vegetal (GSPC) en relación a la flora vascular en España. Informe de entrega final. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Rodríguez P, Draper Munt D, Moreno Saiz JC. 2016. Global strategy for plant conservation: inadequate in situ conservation of threatened flora in Spain. Isr J Plant Sci. 63:297–308. DOI: 10.1080/07929978.2016.1257105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT. 2008. Modeling ecological niches and predicting geographic distributions: a test of six presence-only methods. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 79:205–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo de Santayana M, Morales R, Aceituno-Mata L, Molina M. 2014. Inventario español de los conocimientos tradicionales relativos a la biodiversidad. Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Parra-Quijano M, Iriondo JM, Torres E. 2012. Review. Applications of ecogeography and geographic information systems in conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. Span J Agric Res. 10:419–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauls SU, Nowak C, Bálint M, Pfenninger M. 2013. The impact of global climate change on genetic diversity within populations and species. Mol Ecol. 22:925–946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson RG, Raxworthy CJ, Nakamura M, Peterson AT. 2007. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J Biogeogr.34:102–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model. 1/25/;190:231–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez J, Jarvis A. 2008. High resolution statistically downscaled future climate surfaces. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT); CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). Cali, Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• Rubio Teso ML, Iriondo JM, Parra M, Torres E. 2013. National strategy for the conservation of crop wild relatives of Spain. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.pgrsecure.bham.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/public/National_CWR_Conservation_Strategy_Spain.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Salick J, Fang Z, Byg A. 2009. Eastern Himalayan alpine plant ecology, Tibetan ethnobotany, and climate change. Glob Environ Change. 19:147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergio C, Figueira R, Draper D, Menezes R, Sousa A. 2007. Modelling bryophyte distribution based on ecological information for extent of occurrence assessment. Biol Conserv. 135:341–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suffling R. 1995. Can disturbance determine vegetation distribution during climate warming? A boreal test. J Biogeogr. 22:501–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syfert MM, Joppa L, Smith MJ, Coomes MA, Bachman SP, Brummitt NA. 2014. Using species distribution models to inform IUCN Red List assessments. Biol Conserv. 177:174–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorn JS. Nijman V, Smith D, Nekaris KAI. 2009. Ecological niche modelling as a technique for assessing threats and setting conservation priorities for Asian slow lorises (Primates: Nycticebus). Divers Distrib. 15:289–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araujo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice IC. 2005. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:8245–8250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trenberth KE, Dai A, Rasmussen RM, Parsons DB. 2003. The changing character of precipitation. B Am Meteorol Soc. 84:1205–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling JI, Romañach SS, Bucklin DN, Speroterra C, Brandt LA, Pearlstine LG, Mazzotti FJ. 2012. Do bioclimate variables improve performance of climate envelope models? Ecol Model. 11/10/;246:79–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams SE, Shoo LP, Isaac JL, Hoffmann AA, Langham G. 2008. Towards an integrated framework for assessing the vulnerability of species to climate change. PLoS Biol. 6(12):e325.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu K, Woodall CW, Ghosh S, Gelfand AE, Clark JS. 2014. Dual impacts of climate change: forest migration and turnover through life history. Glob Change Biol. 20:251–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweig MH, Campbell G. 1993. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 39:561–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar