Assisted migration as a climate change adaptation strategy: lessons from restoration and plant reintroductions

References

• Aitken SN, Whitlock MC. 2013. Assisted gene flow to facilitate local adaption to climate change. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 44:367–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht MA, Maschinski J. 2012. Influence of founder population size, propagule stages, and life history on the survival of reintroduced plant populations. In: Maschinski J, Haskins KE, editors. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate. Washington, DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics; p. 171–188.
   Google Scholar
• Basey AC, Fant JB, Kramer AT. 2013. Producing native plant materials for restoration: 10 rules to collect and maintain genetic diversity. Nat Plants J. 16:37–53.
   Google Scholar
• Berg KS. 1996. Rare plant mitigation: a policy perspective. In: Faulk DA, Miller CI, Olwell M, editors. Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 279–292.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn TM, Delean S, Pyšek P, Cassey P. 2016. On the island biogeography of aliens: a global analysis of the richness of plant and bird species on oceanic islands. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 25:859–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [BLM] Bureau of Land Management. 2000. The Great Basin: Healing the land. Boise, ID: US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Office of Fire and Aviation.
   Google Scholar
• Bower AD, Aitken SN. 2008. Ecological genetics and seed transfer guidelines for Pinus albicaulis (Pinaceae). Am J Bot. 95:66–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breed MF, Stead MG, Ottewell KM, Gardner MG, Lowe AJ. 2013. Which provenance and where? Seed sourcing strategies for revegetation in a changing environment. Conserv Genet. 14:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhurst LM, Lowe A, Coates DJ, Cunningham SA, McDonald M, Vesk PA, Yates C. 2008. Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evol Appl. 1:587–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucharova A, Durka W, Hermann JM, Hölzel N, Michalski S, Kollmann J, Bossdorf O. 2016. Plants adapted to warmer climate do not outperform regional plants during a natural heat wave. Ecol Evol. 6:4160–4165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterfield BJ, Copeland SM, Munson SM, Roybal CM, Wood TE. 2016. Prestoration: using species in restoration that will persist now and into the future. Restor Ecol. doi:10.1111/rec.1238.
   Google Scholar
• Camacho AE., Doremus H, McLachlan JS, Minteer BA. 2010. Reassessing conservation goals in a changing climate. Issues Sci Tech. 26:21–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellanos-Acuña D, Lindig-Cisneros R, Sáenz-Romero C. 2015. Altitudinal assisted migration of Mexican pines as an adaptation to climate change. Ecosphere. 6:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBD. 2012. The Global Strategy for Plant Conservation: 2011-2020. Richmond, UK: Botanic Gardens Conservation International.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin FS III, Starfield AM. 1997. Time lags and novel ecosystems in response to transient climatic change in arctic Alaska. Clim Change. 35:449–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corlett RT. 2016. Restoration, reintroduction, and rewilding in a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol. 3:453–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalrymple SE, Banks E, Stewart GB, Pullin AS. 2012. A meta-analysis of threatened plant reintroductions from across the globe. In: Maschinski J, Haskins KE, editors. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate. Washington, DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, p. 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Falk DA., Millar CI, Olwell M.1996. Guidelines for developing a rare plant reintroduction plan. In: Falk DA, Millar CI, Olwell M, editors. Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 453–490.
   Google Scholar
• Fant JB, Banai A, Havens K, Vitt P. 2010. Hybridization between the threatened plant, Lespedeza leptostachya Englem. and its co-occurring congener Lespedeza capitata Michx.: morphological and molecular evidence. Conserv Genet. 11:2195–2205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrando-Pardo I, Ferrer-Gallego P, Laguna-Lumbreras E. 2016. Assessing the conservation value of ex situ seed bank collections of endangered wild plants. Isr J Plant Sci. 63:333–346. DOI: 10.1080/07929978.2015.1125676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill C. 2010. The effects of temperature change and competition on the early growth rates of three north temperate grassland species. Master's Thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Godefroid S, Le Pajolec S, Van Rossum F. 2016. Pre-translocation considerations in rare plant reintroductions: implications for designing protocols. Plant Ecol. 217:169–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godefroid S, Piazza C, Rossi G, Buord S, Stevens A, Aguraiuja R, Cowell C, et al. 2011. How successful are plant species reintroductions? Biol Conserv. 144:672–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrant Jr EO, Havens K, Vitt P. 2014. Sampling for effective ex situ plant conservation. Int J Plant Sci. 175:11–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock N, Gallagher R. 2014. How ready are we to move species threatened from climate change? Insights into the assisted colonization debate from Australia. Austral Ecol. 39:830–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock N, Hughes L. 2010. How far is it to your local? A survey on local provenance use in New South Wales. Ecol Manag Restor. 13:259–266.
   Google Scholar
• Havens K, Vitt P, Still S, Kramer AT, Fant JB, Schatz K. 2015. Seed sourcing for restoration in an era of climate change. Nat Areas J. 35:122–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood VH. 2016. In situ conservation of plant species – an unattainable goal? Isr J Plant Sci. 63:211–231. DOI: 10.1080/07929978.2015.1035605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Harris JA. 2009. Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol Evol. 24:599–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegh-Guldberg O, Hughes L, McIntyre S, Lindenmayer DB, Parmesan C, Possingham HP, Thomas CD. 2008. Assisted colonization and rapid climate change. Science. 321:345–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). 1998. IUCN guidelines for re-introductions. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN/SSC (International Union for Conservation of Nature/Species Survival Commission). 2013 . Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations. Version 1.0. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/Species Survival Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen D. 2013. Reintroduction and de-extinction. Bio Sci. 63:719–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause C, Pennington D. 2012. Strategic decisions in conservation: using species distribution modeling to match ecological requirements to available habitat. In: Maschinski J, Haskins KE, editors. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate. Washington, DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics; p. 131–153.
   Google Scholar
• Leinonen I, Hanninen H. 2002. Adaptation of the timing of bud burst of Norway spruce to temperate and boreal climates. Silva Fenn. 36:695–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loope LL, Hughes RF, Meyer J. 2013. Plant invasions in protected areas of tropical Pacific Islands, with special reference to Hawaii. In: Foxcroft LC, Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Genovesi P, editors. Plant invasions in protected areas: patterns, problems and challenges. Invading Nature – Springer Series in Invasion Ecology 7. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; p. 313–348.
   Google Scholar
• Maschinski J, Falk DA, Wright SJ, Possley J, Roncal J, Wendelberger KS. 2012. Optimal locations for plant reintroductions in a changing climate. In: Maschinski J, Haskins KE, editors. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 109–129.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan JS, Hellmann JJ, Schwartz MW. 2007. A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change. Conserv Biol. 21:297–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menges E, Smith SA, Weekley CW. 2016. Adaptive introductions: how multiple experiments and comparisons to wild populations provide insights into requirements for long-term introduction success of an endangered shrub. Plant Divers. 38:235–246.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt DJ, Dixon KW. 2011. Restoration seed banks – a matter of scale. Science. 332:424–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt DJ, Dixon KW. 2014. Seed availability for restoration. In: Bozzano M, Jalonen R, Thomas E, Boshier D, Gallo L, Cavers S, editors. Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species. State of the world's forest genetic resources – thematic study. Rome: FAO and Biodiversity International.
   Google Scholar
• Millar CI, Brubaker LB. 2006. Climate change and paleoecology: new contexts for restoration ecology. In: Falk DA, Palmer MA, Zedler JB, editors. Foundations of restoration ecology. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 315–340.
   Google Scholar
• Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL. 2007. Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl. 17:2145–2151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minteer BA, Collins JP. 2012. Species conservation, rapid environmental change, and ecological ethics. Nat Edu Knowl. 3:14.
   Google Scholar
• Mortlock BW. 2000. Local seed for revegetation. Ecol Manag Restor. 1:93–101.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller JM, Hellmann JJ. 2008. An assessment of invasion risk from assisted migration. Conserv Biol. 22:562–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevill PG, Tomlinson S, Elliott CP, Espeland EK, Dixon KW, Merritt DJ. 2016. Seed production areas for the global restoration challenge. Ecol Evol. 6:7490–7497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [NPMDP] Native Plant Materials Development Program. 2009. Progress Report for FY 2001–2007. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management.
   Google Scholar
• [NOAA] National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration. 2016. Global analysis – August 2016. Available from: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201608
   Google Scholar
• Nogués-Bravo D, Simberloff D, Rahbek C, Sander NJ. 2016 . Rewilding is the new Pandora's box in conservation. Curr Biol. 26:R87–R91.
   Google Scholar
• Parmesan C, Hanley ME. 2015. Plants and climate change: complexities and surprises. Ann Bot. 116:849–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedlar JH, McKenney DW, Aubin I, Beardmore T, Beaulieu J, Iverson L, O'Neill GA, Winder RS, Ste-Marie C. 2012. Placing forestry in the assisted migration debate. Bio Sci. 62:835–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perring MP, Standish RJ, Price JN, Craig MD, Erickson TE, Ruthrof KX, Whiteley AS, Valentine LE, Hobbs RJ. 2015. Advances in restoration ecology: rising to the challenges of the coming decades. Ecosphere. 6:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prober SM, Byrne M, McLean EH, Steane DA, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE, Stock WD. 2015. Climate-adjusted provenancing: a strategy for climate-resilient ecological restoration. Front Ecol Evol. 3:65.
   Google Scholar
• Reichard SH, Liu H, Husby C. 2012. Is managed relocation of rare plants another pathway for biological invasions? In: Maschinski J, Haskins EH, editors. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 243–261.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter N, Whitfield J, Pollard G, Bedggood W, Argall M, Dixon KW, Davis B, Swarts N. 2016. Orchid re-introductions: an evaluation of success and ecological considerations using key comparative studies from Australia. Plant Ecol. 217:81–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricciardi A, Simberloff D. 2009a. Assisted colonization is not a viable conservation strategy. Trends Ecol Evol. 24:248–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricciardi A, Simberloff D. 2009b. Assisted colonization: good intentions and dubious risk assessment. Trends Ecol Evol. 24:476–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roncal J, Maschinski J, Schaffer B, Gutierrez SM, Walters D. 2012 . Testing appropriate habitat outside of historic range: the case of Amorpha herbacea var. crenulata (Fabaceae). J Nat Conserv. 20:109–116.
   Google Scholar
• SER (Society for Ecological Restoration Science & Policy Working Group). 2002 . The SER primer on ecological restoration. Available from: http://www.ser/org
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber SG, Ding C, Hamann A, Hacke UG, Thomas BR, Brouard JS. 2013. Frost hardiness vs. growth performance in trembling aspen: an experimental test of assisted migration. J Appl Ecol. 50:939–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz MW, Hellmann JJ, McLachlan JM, Sax DF, Borevitz JO, Brennan J, Camacho AE et al. 2012. Managed relocation: integrating the scientific, regulatory, and ethical challenges. BioScience. 62:732–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon PJ. 2010. From reintroduction to assisted colonization: moving along the conservation translocation spectrum. Restor Ecol. 18:796–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharrock SL. 2012. GSPC: Global Strategy for Plant Conservation – a guide to the GSPC: all the targets, objectives and facts. Richmond, UK: Botanic Gardens Conservation International.
   Google Scholar
• Sharrock SL, Oldfield S, Wilson O. 2014. Plant Conservation Report 2014: a review of progress and implementation of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011–2020. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal. Canada and Botanic Gardens Conservation International. Technical Series 81.
   Google Scholar
• Smith AB, Long QG, Albrecht MA. 2016. Shifting targets: spatial priorities for ex situ plant conservation depend on interactions between current threats, climate change, and uncertainty. Biodivers Conserv. 2:905–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J, Spector T, Determann R, Cruse-Sanders J, Pruner R, Friel M, O'Donnell K. 2014. To the brink of extinction: disease, population decline and conservation efforts of the Florida torreya (Torreya taxifolia). Phytopath. 104:S3.111.
   Google Scholar
• Steele WK. 2007. Propagation protocol for ram's head lady's slipper (Cypripedium arietinum). Native Plants J. 8:58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Swarts ND., Dixon KW. 2009. Terrestrial orchid conservation in the age of extinction. Ann Bot. 104:543–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas CD. 2011. Translocation of species, climate change, and the end of trying to recreate past ecological communities. Trends Ecol Evol. 26:216–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Essl F, Pergl J, Winter M, Weber E, Kreft H et al. 2015. Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature. 525:100–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitt P, Havens K, Kramer AT, Sollenberger D, Yates E. 2010. Assisted migration of plants: changes in latitudes, changes in attitudes. Biol Conserv. 143:18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitt P, Knight TM, Schutzenhofer M, Kleiman W, Havens K, Bittner TR. Forthcoming. Experimental and simulated grazing in a prairie ecosystem benefits rare forb. Nat Areas J.
   Google Scholar
• Volis S. 2016. Conservation meets restoration – rescuing threatened plant species by restoring their environments and restoring environments using threatened plant species. Isr J Plant Sci. 63:262–275. DOI: 10.1080/07929978.2016.1255021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendelberger KS, Maschinski J. 2016. Assessing microsite and regeneration niche preferences through experimental reintroduction of the rare plant Tephrosia angustissima var. corallicola. Plant Ecol. 217:155–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitlock R, Hipperson H, Thompson DBA, Butlin RK, Burke T. 2016. Consequences of in-situ strategies for the conservation of plant genetic diversity. Biol Conserv. 203:134–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JW, Jackson ST. 2007. Novel climates, no‐analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front Ecol Environ. 5:475–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar