Sandbox Innovation: Potentials and Impacts

References

• Adams, R. N. 1951. “Personnel in Culture Change: A Test of Hypothesis.” Social Forces 30 (2): 185–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/2571631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, H. G. 1941. “Personal Conflicts and Cultural Change.” Social Forces 20 (2): 160–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/2571335.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, F. 1963. The Role of the Entrepreneur in Social Change in Northern Norway. Bergen, Norway: Scandinavian University Books.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, M. 2020. “Entrepreneurship as Legacy Building: Reimagining the Economy in Post‐Apartheid South Africa.” Economic Anthropology 7 (1): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briody, E. K., and A. Stewart. 2019. “Entrepreneurship: A Challenging, Fruitful Domain for Ethnography.” Journal of Business Anthropology 8 (2): 141–166. https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v8i2.5846.
   Google Scholar
• Bröckling, U. 2015. The Entrepreneurial Self: Fabricating a New Type of Subject. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bührmann, A. D. 2005. “The Emerging of the Entrepreneurial Self and Its Current Hegemony. Some Basic Reflections on How to Analyze the Formation and Transformation of Modern Forms of Subjectivity.” Forum, Qualitative Social Research/Forum, Qualitative Sozialforschung 6 (1). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/518/1122.
   Google Scholar
• Corsín Jiménez, A. 2014. “Introduction: The Prototype: More than Many and Less than One.” Journal of Cultural Economy 7 (4): 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.858059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corsín Jiménez, A., and A. Estalella. 2017. “Ethnography: A Prototype.” Ethnos 82 (5): 846–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2015.1133688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estalella, A. 2016. “Prototyping Social Sciences: Emplacing Digital Methods.” In Digital Methods for Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Guide to Research Innovation, edited by H. Snee, C. Hine, Y. Morey, S. Roberts, and H. Watson, 127–142. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M., Z. Kish, and J. Guthman. 2022. “Pitching Agri-Food Tech: Performativity and Non-Disruptive Disruption in Silicon Valley.” Journal of Cultural Economy 15 (5): 652–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2022.2085142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores-Meiser, E. 1978. “The Human Being, the Entrepreneur, and Change: The Case of a Generalized Intermediary.” Papers in Anthropology 19 (2): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Fomina, V. 2020. ““How to Earn a Million in the Glory of God?”: Ethics and Spirituality among Orthodox Entrepreneurs in Contemporary Russia.” Anthropological Quarterly 93 (2): 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2020.0025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1960. “The Javanese Kijaji: The Changing Role of a Cultural Broker.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 2 (2): 228–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500000670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, I. 2020. “Investment, Value, and the Making of Entrepreneurship in India.” Economic Anthropology 7 (2): 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, E. 1960. “The Entrepreneur as Rebel against Traditional Society.” Human Organization 19 (4): 185–187. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.19.4.tl57064355861441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemment, J. 2015. Youth Politics in Putin’s Russia: Producing Patriots and Entrepreneurs. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, L. 2019. Chasing Innovation: Making Entrepreneurial Citizens in Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, S. 2018. “The Bumipreneur Dilemma and Malaysia’s Technology Start-Up Ecosystem.” Economic Anthropology 5 (1): 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koellner, T. 2022. “Family Firms and Business Families: A Field for Anthropological Research.” Anthropology Today 38 (6): 8–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koycheva, L. 2019. “Prototyping the Entrepreneurial Self: Ethnographic Insights Into Identity Transformation during Venture Creation in makerspace hackathons.” Paper presented at G-Forum Annual Conference, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Koycheva, L. 2022. “Of Sciences and Startups: An Anthropological Perspective on Academic Venturing.” In Anthropology and Entrepreneurship: The Current State of Research and Practice, edited by E. Liebow and J. C. McKenna, 13–24. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. 2001. ““The Birth of Bio-Politics”: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-Liberal Governmentality.” Economy and Society 30 (2): 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140120042271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindtner, S. M. 2020. Prototype Nation: China and the Contested Promise of Innovation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linton, R. 1936. The Study of Man: An Introduction. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Maass, M., A. Sales, B. Chung, and J. Sunshine. 2016. “A Systematic Analysis of the Science of Sandboxing.” PeerJ Computer Science 2: e43. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.43.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, H. J. 2018. ““Once You Support, You Are Supported”: Entrepreneurship and Reintegration among Ex-Prisoners in Gulu, Northern Uganda.” Economic Anthropology 5 (1): 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning, R. 2023. “Patch‐Work: The Economic and Moral Complementarity of Informal Entrepreneurs’ Multiple Projects in Congo‐Brazzaville.” Economic Anthropology 10 (1): 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1961. “Some Considerations on the Theory of Social Change.” Rural Sociology 26 (3): 219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, B. 2021. An ethnography of the pitch: Techno-entrepreneurial capitalist ethics at Y Combinator. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. https://doi.org/10.6082/UCHICAGO.2875.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeilstetter, R. 2021. The Anthropology of Entrepreneurship: Cultural History, Global Ethnographies, Theorizing Agency. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pozen, D. E. 2008. “We Are All Entrepreneurs Now.” Wake Forest Law Review 43: 283.
   Google Scholar
• Rakova, O., and O. Fedorenko. 2021. “Sticky Notes against Corporate Hierarchies in South Korea: An Ethnography of Workplace Collaboration and Design Co-Creation.” Design Studies 76: 101033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1976. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York, NY: Routledge (Original work published 1943).
   Google Scholar
• Sneath, D., M. Holbraad, and M. A. Pedersen. 2009. “Technologies of the Imagination: An Introduction.” Ethnos 74 (1): 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840902751147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, R. T. 2020. “Cultivating “Omani Ambitions”: Entrepreneurship, Distributive Labor, and the Temporalities of Diversification in the Arab Gulf.” Economic Anthropology 7 (1): 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. 1992. “A Prospectus on the Anthropology of Entrepreneurship.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 16 (2): 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879201600206.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. 2010. “Sources of Entrepreneurial Discretion in Kinship Systems.” In Entrepreneurship and Family Business, edited by A. Stewart, T. Lumpkin, and A. K. Jerome, Vol. 12, 291–313. Leeds, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 2011. “Anthropological Relocations and the Limits of Design.” Annual Review of Anthropology 40 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.041608.105640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandenBroek, Angela K. 2021. Disrupting SthlmTech: An Anthropological Guide to Stockholm’s Innovation Ecosystem (D. R. Holmes, Ed.) PhD, State University of New York at Binghamton.
   Google Scholar
• VandenBroek, Angela K. 2022. “Pitching Hype: Storytelling and Entrepreneurship.” In Anthropology and Entrepreneurship—The Current State of Research and Practice, edited by E. Liebow and J. Chiappa McKenna, 49–58. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, J. 2021. ““No trabajaré pa’ ellos”: Entrepreneurship as a Form of State Resistance in Havana, Cuba.” Economic Anthropology 8 (1): 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkov, V. 2016. Violent Entrepreneurs: The Use of Force in the Making of Russian Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilf, E. 2016. “The Post-It Note Economy: Understanding post-Fordist Business Innovation through One of Its Key Semiotic Technologies.” In Current Anthropology 57 (6): 732–760. https://doi.org/10.1086/688952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. R. 1956. “Aspects of Group Relations in a Complex Society: Mexico 1.” American Anthropologist 58 (6): 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1956.58.6.02a00070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, H.-W, and K. L.-F. Chau. 2019. Tradition and Transformation in a Chinese Family Business. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yanagisako, S. 2002. Producing Culture and Capital: Family Firms in Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yanagisako, S. 2019. “Family Firms as Kinship Enterprises.” No. 2019–12. Economics Discussion Papers. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/193175
   Google Scholar
• Yurchak, A. 2003. “Russian Neoliberal: The Entrepreneurial Ethic and the Spirit of “True Careerism”.” The Russian Review 62 (1): 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9434.00264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar