References
- Buocz, T., S. Pfotenhauer, and I. Eisenberger. 2023. “Regulatory Sandboxes in the AI Act: Reconciling Innovation and Safety?” Law, Innovation and Technology 15 (2): 357–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2023.2245678.
- Doezema, T., and N. Frahm. 2023. “All the King’s Horses.” The New Atlantis 73: 46–53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27244119
- Doganova, L., B. Laurent, and A. Violle. Forthcoming. “Innovation-Based Policy. Regulatory Sandboxes and the Transformation of the State.” In Handbook of Living Labs and Real-World Experiments, edited by B. Laurent and S. Pfotenhauer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Human Fertilisation Embryology Authority. 2022. “The Regulation of Scientific Developments.” https://www.hfea.gov.uk/media/sg4k244q/2022-06-27-hfea-the-regulation-of-scientific-developments-part-1.pdf.
- Hurlbut, B. 2015. “Limits of Responsibility: Genome Editing, Asilomar, and the Politics of Deliberation.” Hastings Center Report 45 (5): 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.484.
- Jenik, I., and K. Lauer. 2017. “Regulatory Sandboxes and Financial Inclusion.” CGAP https://www.cgap.org/sites/default/files/researches/documents/Working-Paper-Regulatory-Sandboxes-Oct-2017.pdf.
- Latour, B. 2011. “Love Your Monsters.” Breakthrough Journal, 2 (11): 21–28. https://thebreakthrough.org/journal/issue-2/love-your-monsters
- Law, J. (Ed.). 1991. A Sociology of Monsters. London: Routledge.
- Laurent, B. 2022. European Objects. The Troubled Dreams of Harmonization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Laurent, B., F. Muniesa, L. Doganova, and C. Gasull. 2021. “The Test Bed Island: Tech Business Experimentalism and Exception in Singapore.” Science as Culture 30 (3): 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2021.1888909.
- Mundubeltz-Gendron, S. 2017, May 10. “Emmanuel Macron: ‘la France doit devenir en 5 ans la nation des start-up. L’Usine Digitale.” https://www.usine-digitale.fr/editorial/emmanuel-macron-la-france-doit-devenir-en-5-ans-la-nation-des-start-up.N537789.
- Pfotenhauer, S., J. Juhl, and E. Aarden. 2019. “Challenging the “Deficit Model” of Innovation.” Research Policy 48 (4): 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.015.
- Pfotenhauer, S., and S. Jasanoff. 2017. “Panacea or Diagnosis? Imaginaries of Innovation and the ‘MIT Model’in Three Political Cultures.” Social Studies of Science 47 (6): 783–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717706110.
- Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology. 2023. “A Pro-Innovation Approach to AI Regulation.” https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1176103/a-pro-innovation-approach-to-ai-regulation-amended-web-ready.pdf.
- Shanks, P. 2022, September 21. “A Campaign to Legalize Heritable Genome Editing in the UK?” Biopolitical Times. https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/biopolitical-times/campaign-legalize-heritable-genome-editing-uk.