Political Speech: The Influence of Speaker Sex and Verbal Aggression on Message Perception

References

• Anderson-Nilsson, G., & Clayton, A. (2021). Gender and policy persuasion. Political Science Research and Methods, 9(4), 818–831. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleiweis, R., & Phadke, S. (2021, January 15). The state of women’s leadership–and how to continue changing the face of U.S. politics. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/state-womens-leadership-continue-changing-face-u-s-politics/
   Google Scholar
• Bligh, M. C., Schlehoffer, M. M., Casad, B. J., & Gaffney, A. M. (2012). Competent enough, but would you vote for her? Gender stereotypes and media influences on perceptions of women politicians. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(3), 560–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00781.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, J. H. (1983). Differential premises arising from differential socialization of the sexes: Some conjectures. Child Development, 54(6), 1335–1354. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carli, L. L. (2001). Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 725–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender effects on influence and emergent leadership. In G. H. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 203–222). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control. Psychometrika, 72(2), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1560-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmore, E. (2020, November 13). This is how women voters decided the 2020 election. MSNBC. https://www.msnbc.com/know-your-value/feature/how-women-voters-decided-2020-election-ncna1247746
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. J. (2011). Variability in citizens’ reactions to different types of negative campaigns. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, A. W., & Parker, K. (2018, March 15). For women’s history month, a look at gender gains–and gaps–in the U.S. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/15/for-womens-history-month-a-look-at-gender-gains-and-gaps-in-the-u-s/
   Google Scholar
• Graber, D. A., & Smith, J. M. (2005). Political communication faces the 21st century. Journal of Communication, 55(3), 479–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02682.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood, A. (2013). Politics. Palgave Macmillian. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-27244-7
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh, J., Kang, S., & Bodenhausen, G. (2012). Personalized persuasion: Tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychological Science, 23(6), 578–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611436349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. (1987). Aggressiveness. In J. C. McCroskey & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 157–192). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., Chandler, T. A., Rudd, J. E., & Shannon, E. A. (1990). Verbal aggression in violent and nonviolent marital disputes. Communication Quarterly, 38(4), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379009369773
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., & Rancer, A. S. (1996). Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness: A review of theory and research. In D. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (pp. 319–351). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kaid, L. L. (2004). Handbook of political communication research. Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610584
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. J., & Niederdeppe, J. (2014). Emotional expressions in antismoking television advertisements: Consequences of anger and sadness framing on pathways to persuasion. Journal of Health Communication, 19(6), 692–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.837550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Library of Congress. (2022). Congressional record. https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record
   Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D. G. (2006). Key concepts in political communication. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446212943
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H. (2004). Arguing, bargaining and all that: Communicative action, rationalist theory and the logic of appropriateness in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 10(3), 395–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104045542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nau, C., & Stewart, C. O. (2018). Effects of gender and verbal aggression on perceptions of U.S. political speakers. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 6(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00006.nau
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion: Theory and research (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Parry-Giles, S. J. (2021). The veeps audition-campaign 2020: Disciplining Kamala Harris. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 107(4), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2021.1985110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (2003). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century (2nd ed.). Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003290056-3
   Google Scholar
• Petricone, F. (2020). The importance of political credibility today. Church, Communication and Culture, 5(2), 288–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2020.1766364
   Google Scholar
• Riet, J. P., Schaap, G. J., Kleemans, M., Veling, H. P., & Lecheler, S. (2019). On different sides: Investigating the persuasive effects of anger expression in political news messages. Political Psychology, 40(4), 837–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M., Honeycutt, N., Prislin, R., & Sherman, R. A. (2016). More polarized but more independent: Political party identification and ideological self-categorization among U.S. adults, college students, and late adolescents, 1970–2015. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(10), 1364–1383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216660058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westmyer, S. A., DiCioccio, R. L., & Rubin, R. B. (1998). Appropriateness and effectiveness of communication channels in competent interpersonal communication. Journal of Communication, 48(3), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02758.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillman, C., & Hinchliffe, E. (2020, October 8). Kamala Harris says, ‘Mr. Vice President, I’m speaking’–and women can relate. Fortune. https://fortune.com/2020/10/08/kamala-harris-mike-pence-vp-debate-2020-im-speaking-interruption
   Google Scholar