Real-time characterization of chemical threat agent aerosols for improvement of inhalation studies

References

• CH Technologies (USA). “Collison.” http://chtechusa.com/products_tag_lg_collison-nebulizer.php.
   Google Scholar
• Armendariz AJ, Leith D. 2002. Concentration measurement and counting efficiency for the aerodynamic particle sizer 3320. J Aerosol Sci. 33(1):133–148. doi: 10.1016/S0021-8502(01)00152-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnewall RE, Benson EM, Brown MA, Fisher DA, Lindsay AS, Simmons AA, Anderson MS. 2015. Characterization of a large animal aerosol exposure system for aerosolizing four strains of Burkholderia pseudomallei. J Aerosol Sci. 84:21–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann C, Bodurtha P, Lecavalier B, Naqvi S, Duncan S. 2023. Application of an aerosol deposition model to whole body dermal exposure scenarios involving VX. J Aerosol Sci. 168:106098. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.106098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen LE, Bailey MM, Haupt BR, Anderson JB. 2017. Development and characterization of an oro-nasal inhalation plethysmography mask exposure system. Aerosol Sci Technol. 51(4):509–517. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2016.1274824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busker R, Hammer A, Kuijpers W, Poot C, Bergers W, Bruijnzeel P. 1999. Toxicity testing of combustion products of polyurethane and polyvinylchloride, TNO PML report”. The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Chaurasiya B, Zhao YY. 2020. Dry powder for pulmonary delivery: a comprehensive review. Pharmaceutics. 13(1):1–28. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13010031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das D, Alam El Din S-M, Pulczinski J, Mihalic JN, Chen R, Bressler J, Rule AM, Ramachandran G. 2022. Assessing variability of aerosols generated from e-cigarettes. Inhal Toxicol. 34(3–4):90–98. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2022.2044414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCarlo PF, Slowik JG, Worsnop DR, Davidovits P, Jimenez JL. 2004. Particle morphology and density characterization by combined mobility and aerodynamic diameter measurements. Part 1: theory. Aerosol Sci Technol. 38(12):1185–1205. doi: 10.1080/027868290903907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekati Ltd. 2016. User Manual ELPI. https://www.dekati.com.
   Google Scholar
• Europol. “European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend report,” 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration. 2018. Bioanalytical method validation guidance for industry. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. doi: 10.1201/9780203026427-15.
   Google Scholar
• Glover W, Chan HK. 2004. Electrostatic charge characterization of pharmaceutical aerosols using electrical low-pressure impaction (ELPI). J Aerosol Sci. 35(6):755–764. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICRP. 1994. ICRP Publication 66: Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. Ann ICRP. 24(1–3)
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger RJ, Shami SG, Tsenova L. 2006. Directed-flow aerosol inhalation exposure systems: application to pathogens and highly toxic agents. In Inhalation toxicology, Salem H and Katz SA, editors., 2nd ed.Boca Raton: CRC Press; p. 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kahen K, Jorabchi K, Gray C, Montaser A. 2004. Spatial mapping of droplet velocity and size for direct and indirect nebulization in plasma spectrometry. Anal Chem. 76(24):7194–7201. doi: 10.1021/ac048954l.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucci F, Tan WT, Krishnan S, Hoeng J, Vanscheeuwijck P, Jaeger R, Kuczaj A. 2020. Experimental and computational investigation of a nose-only exposure chamber. Aerosol Sci Technol. 54(3):277–290. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2019.1687843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjamäki M, Keskinen J, Chen DR, Pui DYH. 2000. Performance evaluation of the electrical low-pressure impactor (ELPI). J Aerosol Sci. 31(2):249–261. doi: 10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00052-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjamäki M, Lemmetty M, Keskinen J. 2005. ELPI response and data reduction I: response functions. Aerosol Sci Technol. 39(7):575–582. doi: 10.1080/027868291009189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckinney W, Chen B, Schwegler-Berry D, Frazer DG. 2013. Computer-automated silica aerosol generator and animal inhalation exposure system. Inhal Toxicol. 25(7):363–372. doi: 10.3109/08958378.2013.788105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melandri C, Tarroni G, Prodi V, De Zaiacomo T, Formignani M, Lombardi CC. 1983. Deposition of charged particles in the human airways. J Aerosol Sci. 14(5):657–669. doi: 10.1016/0021-8502(83)90070-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MesaLabs. “Collison nebulizer droplet number output.” 2022. https://bgi.mesalabs.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/35/2015/03/Collison-Nebulizer-Droplet-Number-Output.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell JP, Nagel MW, Suggett JA, Coppolo DP. 2017. Obscuring the message: a critical examination of laboratory test methods for orally inhaled products that could lead the user astray: part 1-aerody-namic particle size distribution (APSD). Inhalation. www.inhalationmag.com.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nepovimova E, Kuca K. 2018. Chemical warfare agent NOVICHOK - mini-review of available data. Food Chem Toxicol. 121:343–350. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.09.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouf FX, Sillon P. 2009. Charging efficiency of the electrical low pressure impactor’s corona charger: influence of the fractal morphology of nanoparticle aggregates and uncertainty analysis of experimental results. Aerosol Sci Technol. 43(7):685–698. doi: 10.1080/02786820902878245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagels J, Gudmundsson A, Gustavsson E, Asking L, Bohgard M. 2005. Evaluation of aerodynamic particle sizer and electrical low-pressure impactor for unimodal and bimodal mass-weighted size distributions. Aerosol Sci Technol. 39(9):871–887. doi: 10.1080/02786820500295677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phalen RF, Hoover MD, Oldham MJ, Jarabek AM. 2021. Inhaled aerosol dosimetry: research-related needs and recommendations. J Aerosol Sci. 155(105755):105755. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105755.
   Google Scholar
• Riches JR, Read RW, Black RM, Cooper NJ, Timperley CM. 2012. Analysis of clothing and urine from Moscow theatre siege casualties reveals carfentanil and remifentanil use. J Anal Toxicol. 36(9):647–656. doi: 10.1093/jat/bks078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shum SCK, Johnson SK, Pang H, Houk RS. 1993. Spatially resolved measurements of size and velocity distributions of aerosol droplets from a direct injection nebulizer. Appl Spectrosc. 47(5):575–583. doi: 10.1366/0003702934067108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen CM, Flagan RC, Baltensperger U, Pui DYH. 2019. Grand challenges for aerosol science and technology. Aerosol Sci Technol. 53(7):731–734. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2019.1611333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein SW, Gabrio BJ, Oberreit D, Hairston P, Myrdal PB, Beck TJ. 2002. An evaluation of mass-weighted size distribution measurements with the Model 3320 aerodynamic particle sizer. Aerosol Sci Technol. 36(7):845–854. doi: 10.1080/02786820290092087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein SW, Myrdal PB, Gabrio BJ, Obereit D, Beck TJ. 2003. Evaluation of a new aerodynamic particle sizer® spectrometer for size distribution measurements of solution metered dose inhalers. J Aerosol Med. 16(2):107–119. doi: 10.1089/089426803321919870.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TSI Incorporated. “Calibration certificatie APS model 3321,” TSI. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• TSI Incorporated. 2012. “Aerodynamic Particle Sizer ® Model 3321 Theory of Operation,” TSI. https://tsi.com/getmedia/26cd9e57-9050-4a57-a442-3ec3a4338808/3321%20Operation%20brochure%20A4-5001469_WEB?ext=.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vinchurkar S, Longest PW, Peart J. 2009. CFD simulations of the Andersen cascade impactor: model development and effects of aerosol charge. J Aerosol Sci. 40(9):807–822. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen A, Marjamaki M, Ristimaki J, Keskinen J. 2001. Fine particle losses in electrical low-pressure impactor. J Aerosol Sci. 32(3):389–401. doi: 10.1016/S0021-8502(00)00087-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, King SM, Freney E, Rosenoern T, Smith ML, Chen Q, Kuwata M, Lewis ER, Pöschl U, Wang W, et al. 2010. The dynamic shape factor of sodium chloride nanoparticles as regulated by drying rate. Aerosol Sci Technol. 44(11):939–953. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2010.503204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willeke K, Baron PA. 1993. Aerosol measurement: principles, techniques and applications. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Wright TP, Song C, Sears S, Petters MD. 2016. Thermodynamic and kinetic behavior of glycerol aerosol. Aerosol Sci Technol. 50(12):1385–1396. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2016.1245405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar