97
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Reviewing the Effects of Guaranteed and Purchasing Price Policies on Cultivation Pattern of Agronomic Crops in Qazvin Plain, Iran

, , , , &

References

  • Aayog, N. (2016). Evaluation study on efficacy of minimum support prices (MSP) on farmers. Retrieved from http://Niti.Gov.in/Writereaddata/Files/Writereaddata/Files/Document_publication/MSP-Report.Pdf
  • Aidam, P. W. (2015). The impact of water-pricing policy on the demand for water resources by farmers in Ghana. Agricultural Water Management, 158, 10–16. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.04.007
  • Alamdarlo, H. N., Pourmozafar, H., & Vakilpoor, M. H. (2019). Improving demand technology and internalizing external effects in groundwater market framework, case study: Qazvin plain in Iran. Agricultural Water Management, 213, 164–173. ‏ doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2018.10.005
  • Alavion, S. J., Allahyari, M. S., Al-Rimawi, A. S., & Surujlal, J. (2017). Adoption of agricultural E-marketing: Application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 29(1), 1–15. doi:10.1080/08974438.2016.1229242
  • Alipour, A., Mosavi, S. H. A., Khalilian, S., & Mortazavi, S. A. (2019). Assessing the effectiveness of guaranteed purchasing policy on stabilizing wheat production in Iran. Agricultural Economics, 13(2), 107–135.
  • Alqarni, M. H., Haq, N., Alam, P., Abdel-Kader, M. S., Foudah, A. I., & Shakeel, F. (2021). Solubility data, Hansen solubility parameters and thermodynamic behavior of pterostilbene in some pure solvents and different (PEG-400+ water) cosolvent compositions. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 331, 115700. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115700
  • Baez-Gonzalez, A. D., Kiniry, J. R., Meki, M. N., Williams, J. R., Alvarez Cilva, M., Ramos Gonzalez, J. L., & Magallanes Estala, A. (2018). Potential impact of future climate change on sugarcane under dryland conditions in Mexico. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 204(5), 515–528. doi:10.1111/jac.12278
  • Basse, E. M. (2020). Environmental law in Denmark. London: Kluwer Law International BV.
  • Bastani, P., Dinarvand, R., SamadBeik, M., & Pourmohammadi, K. (2016). Pharmaceutical strategic purchasing requirements in Iran: Price interventions and the related effective factors. Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice, 5(1), 35–42.
  • Beard, J. E., Bierkens, M. F., & Bartholomeus, R. P. (2019). Following the water: Characterising de facto wastewater reuse in agriculture in the Netherlands. Sustainability, 11(21), 5936. doi:10.3390/su11215936
  • Benninga, J., van Asseldonk, M. A. P. M., Hennen, W., & Bremmer, J. (2017). Insuring against phytosanitary risks in Dutch protected horticulture: A stochastic model to support policy makers. Crop Protection, 99, 144–150. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2017.05.018
  • Ben Zaied, Y., & Binet, M. E. (2015). Modelling seasonality in residential water demand: The case of Tunisia. Applied Economics, 47(19), 1983–1996. doi:10.1080/00036846.2014.1002896
  • Bjarnason, A., Marshall, D., & Eyjólfsson, E. B. (2015). Export barriers and problems associated with exporting Icelandic marine products under conditions of export or die. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 27(4), 290–310. doi:10.1080/08974438.2014.940121
  • Blaen, P. J., Jia, L., Peh, K. S. H., Field, R. H., Balmford, A., MacDonald, M. A., & Bradbury, R. B. (2015). Rapid assessment of ecosystem services provided by two mineral extraction sites restored for nature conservation in an agricultural landscape in Eastern England. PLoS One, 10(3), e0121010. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121010
  • Bougherara, D., Gassmann, X., Piet, L., & Reynaud, A. (2017). Corrigendum: Structural estimation of farmers’ risk and ambiguity preferences: A field experiment. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 44(5), 782–808.
  • Bouttes, M., San Cristobal, M., & Martin, G. (2018). Vulnerability to climatic and economic variability is mainly driven by farmers’ practices on French organic dairy farms. European Journal of Agronomy, 94, 89–97. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2018.01.013
  • Bozzola, M., & Finger, R. (2020). Stability of risk attitude, agricultural policies and production shocks: Evidence from Italy. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 48(3), 477–501. doi:10.1093/erae/jbaa021.
  • Camaioni, B., Esposti, R., Pagliacci, F., & Sotte, F. (2016). How does space affect the allocation of the EU rural development policy expenditure? A spatial econometric assessment. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 43(3), 433–473. doi:10.1093/erae/jbv024
  • Cipollina, M., & Salvatici, L. (2020). On the effects of EU trade policy: Agricultural tariffs still matter. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 47(4), 1367–1401. doi:10.1093/erae/jbz053
  • Cortignani, R., & Severini, S. (2009). Modeling farm-level adoption of deficit irrigation using positive mathematical programming. Agricultural Water Management, 96(12), 1785–1791. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2009.07.016
  • Dessart, F. J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., & van Bavel, R. (2019). Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: A policy-oriented review. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 417–471. doi:10.1093/erae/jbz019
  • Djanibekov, N., Sommer, R., & Djanibekov, U. (2013). Evaluation of effects of cotton policy changes on land and water use in Uzbekistan: Application of a bio-economic farm model at the level of a water users association. Agricultural Systems, 118, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2013.02.004
  • Dürr, J. (2016). The political economy of agriculture for development today: The “small versus large” scale debate revisited. Agricultural Economics, 47(6), 671–681. doi:10.1111/agec.12264
  • Expósito, A., & Berbel, J. (2017). Why is water pricing ineffective for deficit irrigation schemes? A case study in southern Spain. Water Resources Management, 31(3), 1047–1059. doi:10.1007/s11269-016-1563-8
  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2019). The Islamic Republic of Iran at a glance. Retrieved from www.fao.org
  • Feili, H., Besharat, R., Chitsaz, M., & Abbasi, S. (2018). Impact of policy of purchasing wheat on welfare of producers and consumers in Iran. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 11(1), 147–162.
  • Felicia, A. O., Titus, A. A., Bamire, A. S., Ousmane, C., & Asiedu, R. (2016). Effects of policies on yam production and consumption in Nigeria. Agribusiness, 32(3), 363–378. doi:10.1002/agr.21446
  • Folmer, C., Keyzer, M. A., Merbis, M. D., Stolwijk, H. J. J., & Veenendaal, P. J. J. (2013). The common agricultural policy beyond the MacSharry reform. North Holland: Elsevier.
  • Garrone, M., Emmers, D., Olper, A., & Swinnen, J. (2019). Jobs and agricultural policy: Impact of the common agricultural policy on EU agricultural employment. Food Policy, 87, 101744. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101744
  • Ghanian, M., Ghoochani, O. M., Dehghanpour, M., Taqipour, M., Taheri, F., & Cotton, M. (2020). Understanding farmers’ climate adaptation intention in Iran: A protection-motivation extended model. Land Use Policy, 94, 104553. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104553
  • Graddy-Lovelace, G. (2017). The coloniality of US agricultural policy: Articulating agrarian (in) justice. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(1), 78–99. doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1192133
  • Hagedorn, K. (2008). Particular requirements for institutional analysis in nature-related sectors. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 35(3), 357–384. doi:10.1093/erae/jbn019
  • Hamid, F., Yazdanpanah, M., Baradaran, M., Khalilimoghadam, B., & Azadi, H. (2020). Factors affecting farmers’ behavior in using nitrogen fertilizers: Society vs. farmers’ valuation in southwest Iran. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(10), 1886–1908.
  • Hofman-Caris, R., Bertelkamp, C., de Waal, L., van den Brand, T., Hofman, J., van der Aa, R., & van der Hoek, J. P. (2019). Rainwater harvesting for drinking water production: A sustainable and cost-effective solution in the Netherlands? Water, 11(3), 511. doi:10.3390/w11030511
  • Hoken, H., & Su, Q. (2018). Measuring the effect of agricultural cooperatives on household income: Case study of a rice-producing cooperative in China. Agribusiness, 34(4), 831–846. doi:10.1002/agr.21554
  • Howitt, R. E. (1995). Positive mathematical programming. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(2), 329–342. doi:10.2307/1243543
  • Howitt, R. E. (2005). Agricultural and environmental policy models: Calibration, estimation and optimization. Davis, CA: University of California, Davis. Retrieved from http://www.Agecon.Ucdavis.Edu/People/Faculty/Facultydocs/Howitt/Master.Pdf
  • Huang, K., Yan, W., & Huang, J. (2020). Agricultural subsidies retard urbanisation in China. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 64(4), 1308–1327.
  • Hudson, S., Pan, S., Mutic, M., Yates, S., & Ethridge, D. E. (2009). Crop subsidies in foreign countries: Different paths to common goals (No. 1417-2016-117575).
  • Iranian Parliamentary Research Center (IPRC). (2012). A study of agricultural policy process in Iran. Retrieved from https://rc.majlis.ir/en/
  • Lazzini, S., Occhipinti, Z., Parenti, A., & Verona, R. (2021). Disentangling economic crisis effects from environmental regulation effects: Implications for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2332–2353.
  • Lee, R., den Uyl, R., & Runhaar, H. (2019). Assessment of policy instruments for pesticide use reduction in Europe; Learning from a systematic literature review. Crop Protection, 126, 104929. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2019.104929
  • Lin, B., & Fei, R. (2015). Analyzing inter-factor substitution and technical progress in the Chinese agricultural sector. European Journal of Agronomy, 66, 54–61. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2015.02.005
  • Lopez, R. A., He, X., & De Falcis, E. (2017). What drives China’s new agricultural subsidies? World Development, 93, 279–292. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.015
  • Malesios, C., Skouloudis, A., Dey, P. K., Abdelaziz, F. B., Kantartzis, A., & Evangelinos, K. (2018). Impact of small‐and medium‐sized enterprises sustainability practices and performance on economic growth from a managerial perspective: Modeling considerations and empirical analysis results. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 960–972. doi:10.1002/bse.2045
  • Martin, W., & Anderson, K. (2008). Agricultural trade reform under the Doha Agenda: Some key issues. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 52(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2008.00404.x
  • Mirzaei Bafti, M., Rahmani, S., & Parhizkar, A. (2019). The economic value of irrigation water, cropping pattern, and farmer gross margin under drought conditions: The case of the Qazvin plain. Journal of Hydrosciences and Environment, 3(6), 32–42.
  • Moinoddini, Z. (2014). Impact of irrigation groundwater price and quota policies in changing cropping patterns in the Province Kerman in Iran. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research (IJABBR), 2(10), 2735–2742.
  • Moon, W., & Pino, G. (2018). Do U.S. citizens support government intervention in agriculture? Implications for the political economy of agricultural protection. Agricultural Economics, 49(1), 119–129. doi:10.1111/agec.12400
  • Morandini, N. P., Petroudi, E. R., Mobasser, H. R., & Dastan, S. (2020). Life cycle assessment of crop rotation systems on rice cultivars in Northern Iran. International Journal of Plant Production, 14(3), 531–548. doi:10.1007/s42106-020-00103-7
  • Nkang, N. M., Abang, S. O., Akpan, O. E., & Offem, K. J. (2007). Price and income elasticities of palm kernels export supply in Nigeria. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 19(4), 61–77. doi:10.1300/J047v19n04_05
  • Ohman Nielsen, M. B., & Seines, A. M. (2019). Poison to the beasts: Changing poisons and poisoning practices in campaigns to kill Norwegian birds and mammals, 1845-1967. Environment and History, 25(3), 321–364. doi:10.3197/096734018X15217309861595
  • Olwande, J. (2012, June 6–7). Small holder maize production efficiency in Kenya. Regional Workshop on an Integrated Policy Approach to Commercializing Smallholder Maize Production in Eastern Africa. Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). Agricultural policy monitoring and evaluation 2017. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
  • Paris, Q., & Howitt, R. E. (1998). An analysis of ill‐posed production problems using maximum entropy. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 124–138. doi:10.2307/3180275
  • Radmehr, R., & Shayanmehr, S. (2018). The determinants of sustainable irrigation water prices in Iran. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 24(6), 893–919.
  • Rezazadeh, F. (1979). Agricultural development in Iran: Evaluation of state planning and policies in relation to agriculture (Doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University.
  • Rouillard, J. (2020). Tracing the impact of agricultural policies on irrigation water demand and groundwater extraction in France. Sustainable Groundwater Management: A Comparative Analysis of French and Australian Policies and Implications to Other Countries (pp. 461–479). Cham: Springer.
  • Saghaian, S. H., Reed, M. R., & Marchant, M. A. (2002). Monetary impacts and overshooting of agricultural prices in an open economy. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(1), 90–103. doi:10.1111/1467-8276.00245
  • Salama, H. S. A., Khalil, H. E. S., & Nawar, A. I. (2020). Utilization of thinned sunflower and soybean intercrops as forage: A useful strategy for small scale farms in intensive agricultural systems. International Journal of Plant Production, 14(3), 487–499. doi:10.1007/s42106-020-00099-0
  • Savari, M., & Gharechaee, H. (2020). Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to predict Iranian farmers’ intention for safe use of chemical fertilizers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121512. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121512
  • Shabanzadeh, M., Peykanei, G., Hoseini, S. S., & Yazdanei, S. (2019). Change from the purchasing price policy to the guaranteed price policy and its effects on cropping pattern in Qazvin plain. Agricultural Economics Research, 11(41), 101–130.
  • Shen, D., & Wu, J. (2017). State of the art review: Water pricing reform in China. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 33(2), 198–232. doi:10.1080/07900627.2016.1171743
  • Shi, M., Wang, X., Yang, H., & Wang, T. (2014). Pricing or quota? A solution to water scarcity in oasis regions in China: A case study in the Heihe River Basin. Sustainability, 6(11), 7601–7620. doi:10.3390/su6117601
  • Stokman, A., & Pelger, D. (2020). Water commons: A critical cartography of the Bille River in Hamburg, Germany. Journal of Architectural Education, 74(1), 141–142. doi:10.1080/10464883.2020.1693844
  • Sui, B., Meng, H., Shen, Y., Ding, J., & Wang, J. (2018). Utilization of livestock manure in Denmark and its inspiration for planting-breeding combined circular agricultural development in China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 34(12), 1–7.
  • Tian, Q., Holland, J. H., & Brown, D. G. (2016). Social and economic impacts of subsidy policies on rural development in the Poyang Lake Region, China: Insights from an agent-based model. Agricultural Systems, 148, 12–27. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2016.06.005
  • Tserendorj, G., Marinova, E., Lechterbeck, J., Behling, H., Wick, L., Fischer, E., … Rösch, M. (2021). Intensification of agriculture in southwestern Germany between the Bronze Age and Medieval period, based on archaeobotanical data from Baden-Württemberg. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 30(1), 35–46. doi:10.1007/s00334-020-00814-x
  • Vollebergh, H., & Dijk, J. (2017). Taxes and fees of regional water authorities in the Netherlands. Capacity Building for Environmental Tax Reform, 1–12.
  • Vozarova, I. K., & Kotulic, R. (2016). Quantification of the effect of subsidies on the production performance of the Slovak agriculture. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 298–304. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30327-6
  • Vyse, S. A., Taie Semiromi, M., Lischeid, G., & Merz, C. (2020). Characterizing hydrological processes within kettle holes using stable water isotopes in the Uckermark of northern Brandenburg, Germany. Hydrological Processes, 34(8), 1868–1887. doi:10.1002/hyp.13699

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.