Appropriate inclusion of adult research participants with intellectual disability: an in-depth review of guidelines and policy statements

References

• AAIDD (American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities). 2022. “Defining Criteria for Intellectual Disability.” American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. https://www.aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition
   Google Scholar
• Andre-Barron, D., A. Strydom, and A. Hassiotis. 2008. “What to Tell and How to Tell: A Qualitative Study of Information Sharing in Research for Adults with Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (6): 501–506. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APA (American Psychiatric Association). 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fifth Edition. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, P. S., and T. Grisso. 2001. MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. B.,sJr., M. Raspa, A. Wheeler, A. Edwards, E. Bishop, C. Bann, D. Borasky, and P. S. Appelbaum. 2014. “Parent Ratings of Ability to Consent for Clinical Trials in Fragile X Syndrome.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 9 (3): 18–28. doi:10.1177/1556264614540591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielby, P. 2008. “Competence and Vulnerability in Biomedical Research.” In International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, Vol. 40. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8604-5.
   Google Scholar
• Black, B. S., P. V. Rabins, J. Sugarman, and J. H. Karlawish. 2010. “Seeking Assent and Respecting Dissent in Dementia Research.” American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 18 (1): 77–85. doi:10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181bd1de2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken-Roche, D., E. Bell, M. E. Macdonald, and E. Racine. 2017. “The Concept of ‘Vulnerability’ in Research Ethics: An In-Depth Analysis of Policies and Guidelines.” Health Research Policy and Systems 15 (1): 8. doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0164-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• British Medical Journal. “The Nuremberg Code (1947).” BMJ 313. 10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1448.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. 2018. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/documents/tcps2-2018-en-interactive-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carey, E., and R. Ryan. 2019. “Informed Consent.” In Handbook of Intellectual Disability, edited by J. L. Matson, 221–246. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, L. 2013. “Research Ethics and Intellectual Disability: Broadening the Debates.” The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 86 (3): 303–314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences). 2016. International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans. 4th ed. Geneva: CIOMS.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, C. H. 2009. “Vulnerability as a Regulatory Category in Human Subject Research.” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37 (1): 12–18. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00346.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 1997. “Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Or the Oviedo Convention).” European Treaty Series, 164. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/164
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2005. “Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Concerning Biomedical Research.” European Treaty Series, 195. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/195?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=195
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, A. J., and K. R. McVilly. 2004. “Ethics Guidelines for International, Multicenter Research Involving People with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 1 (2): 57–70. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2004.04010.x.
   Google Scholar
• de Haas, C., J. Grace, J. Hope, and M. Nind. 2022. “Doing Research Inclusively: Understanding What It Means to Do Research with and Alongside People with Profound Intellectual Disabilities.” Social Sciences 11 (4): 159. doi:10.3390/socsci11040159.
   Google Scholar
• Dresser, R. 1996. “Mentally Disabled Research Subjects: The Enduring Policy Issues.” Journal of the American Medical Association 276 (1): 67–72. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540010069034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel, E. J., D. Wendler, and C. Grady. 2008. “An Ethical Framework for Biomedical Research.” In The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics, edited by E. J. Emanuel, 123–135. New york: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emily, D., and N. Largent. June2021. ”Research in Adults with Diminished Capacity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Research Ethics, edited by A. S. Iltis and D. MacKay. Online. Original edition, September .
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, S., A. T. Höglund, and G. Helgesson. 2008. “Do Ethical Guidelines Give Guidance? A Critical Examination of Eight Ethics Regulations.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1): 15–29. doi:10.1017/s0963180108080031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. “Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on Clinical Trials on Medicinal Products for Human Use, and Repealing Directive 2001/20/EC.” Official Journal of the European Union L158 (57): 1–76. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/files/eudralex/vol1/reg_2014_536/reg_2014_536_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Feudtner, C., and J. P. Brosco. 2011. “Do People with Intellectual Disability Require Special Human Subjects Research Protections? the Interplay of History, Ethics, and Policy.” Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 17 (1): 52–56. doi:10.1002/ddrr.139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher, C. B. 2002. “A Goodness-Of-Fit Ethic for Informed Consent.”The Fordham Urban Law Journal 30 (1): 159–171. PMID: 15868667.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher, C. B. 2003. “Goodness-Of-Fit Ethic for Informed Consent to Research Involving Adults with Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities.” Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 9 (1): 27–31. doi:10.1002/mrdd.10052.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gavidia-Payne, S., and M. Jackson. 2019. “Research Priorities and Protections.” In Handbook of Intellectual Disability, edited by J. L. Matson, 247–262. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, T., and S. Balandin. 2004. “Ethical Research Involving People with Intellectual Disabilities.” In The International Handbook of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, edited by E. Emerson, et al., 61–82. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons .
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T. 2006. “Ethical Challenges and Complexities of Including People with Intellectual Disability as Participants in Research.” Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 31 (3): 173–179. doi:10.1080/13668250600876392. discussion 180-91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICH (International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use). 2016. Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(r1): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2). https://ichgcp.net/
   Google Scholar
• Indian Council of Medical Research. 2017. National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants. New Delhi: Director-General Indian Council of Medical Research. https://main.icmr.nic.in/sites/default/files/guidelines/ICMR_Ethical_Guidelines_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. E., S. Ben-David, and R. Hole. 2020. “Are Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Included in Research? A Review of the Literature.” Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 7 (2): 99–119. doi:10.1080/23297018.2019.1627571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipnis, K. 2001. “Vulnerability in Research Subjects: A Bioethical Taxonomy.” In Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants. Maryland: National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Krahn, G. L., and M. H. Fox. 2014. “Health Disparities of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: What Do We Know? What Do We Do?” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 27 (5): 431–446. doi:10.1111/jar.12067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, R., D. Elliott, and H. Ouellette-Kuntz. 2006. “Attitudes of Research Ethics Committee Members toward Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: The Need for More Research.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 3 (2): 114–118. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2006.00062.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lantos, J. D., D. Wendler, E. Septimus, S. Wahba, R. Madigan, and G. Bliss. 2015. “Considerations in the Evaluation and Determination of Minimal Risk in Pragmatic Clinical Trials.” Clinical Trials 12 (5): 485–493. doi:10.1177/1740774515597687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Largent, N., and E. Dickert. June 2021. “Research in Adults with Diminished Capacity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Research Ethics, edited by A. S. Iltis and D. MacKay Online. Original ed. September 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, C., R. Faden, C. Grady, D. Hammerschmidt, L. Eckenwiler, and J. Sugarman. 2004. “The Limitations of ‘Vulnerability’ as a Protection for Human Research Participants.” American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3): 44–49. doi:10.1080/15265160490497083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, D., and K. W. Saylor. 2020. “Four Faces of Fair Subject Selection.” The American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2): 5–19. doi:10.1080/15265161.2019.1701731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashalla, Y. J. S., J. K. Shija, A. Y. Kitua, E. Mwaikambo, Y. M. Kohi, G. D. Ndossi, M. Malecela, and L. E. G. Mboera. 2009. Guidelines of Ethics for Health Research in Tanzania. 2nd ed. Dar es Salaam: Tanzania National Health Research Forum.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, K. E. 2012. ““We Want Respect”: Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Address Respect in Research.” American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 117 (4): 263–274. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald, K. E., N. E. Conroy, C. I. Kim, E. J. LoBraico, E. M. Prather, and R. S. Olick. 2016. “Is Safety in the Eye of the Beholder? Safeguards in Research with Adults with Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 11 (5): 424–438. doi:10.1177/1556264616651182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, K. E., N. E. Conroy, and R. S. Olick. 2016. “Is It Worth It? Benefits in Research with Adults with Intellectual Disability.” Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 54 (6): 440–453. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-54.6.440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, K. E., C. A. Kidney, S. L. Nelms, M. R. Parker, A. Kimmel, and C. B. Keys. 2009. “Including Adults with Intellectual Disabilities in Research: Scientists’ Perceptions of Risks and Protections.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 6 (4): 244–252. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2009.00225.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1979. “The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research.” Bethesda. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html
   Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council and Universities Australia. 2018. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007 (Updated 2018). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Ethics Commission of Brazil. 2012. Resolution no. 466/12 of December 12, 2012. [Resolução n.466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012]. Brasilia: Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil. http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, A. September 2021. “People with Disabilities in Human Subjects Research: A History of Exploitation, A Problem of Exclusion.” In The Oxford Handbook of Research Ethics, edited by A. S. Iltis and D. MacKay, Original edition, September 2021. Online.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of South Africa Health Department. 2015. Ethics in Health Research: Principles, Processes and Structures. 2nd ed. Pretoria: Department of Health. https://www.sun.ac.za/english/research-innovation/ResearchDevelopment/Documents/Integrity%20and%20Ethics/DoH%202015%20Ethics%20in%20Health%20Research%20%20Principles,%20Processes%20and%20Structures%202nd%20Ed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sanchini, V., R. Sala, and C. Gastmans. 2022. “The Concept of Vulnerability in Aged Care: A Systematic Review of argument-based Ethics Literature.” BMC Medical Ethics 23 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1186/s12910-022-00819-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. J. 2008. “How Ethical Is Ethical Research? Recruiting Marginalized, Vulnerable Groups into Health Services Research.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (2): 248–257. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04567.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, S. R. 2013. “Protecting and Respecting the Vulnerable: Existing Regulations or Further Protections?” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (1): 17–28. doi:10.1007/s11017-013-9242-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Have, H. 2015. “Respect for Human Vulnerability: The Emergence of a New Principle in Bioethics.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (3): 395–408. doi:10.1007/s11673-015-9641-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, A., P. Roberts, and A. Bittles. 2014. “Navigating the Maze: Ethics Approval Pathways for Intellectual Disability Research.” Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (11): 782–786. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uganda National Council for Science and Technology. 2007. National Guidelines for Research Involving Humans as Research Participants. Kampala: UNCST. https://www.academia.edu/35380180/Uganda_National_Guidelines_for_Research_Involving_Human_Participants
   Google Scholar
• UK Department of Health. 2005. “Mental Capacity Act 2005.” UK Public General Acts. United Kingdom. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents
   Google Scholar
• UK Secretary of State. 2004. 2004 No. 1031: The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/1031/contents/made
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2005. Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Paris: UNES. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. 2007. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities : Resolution / Adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/61/106, available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health & Human Services. 2018. “Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46, or the Common Rule.” edited by Office for Human Research Protections. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/revised-common-rule-regulatory-text/index.html
   Google Scholar
• US Legal. “Third-Party Consent Law and Legal Definition.” Accessed 30 March 2021. https://definitions.uslegal.com/t/third-party-consent/
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, J., I. Strnadová, and K. Johnson. 2018. “The Added Value of Inclusive Research.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 31 (5): 751–759. doi:10.1111/jar.12431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijer, C. 1996. “Evolving Ethical Issues in Selection of Subjects for Clinical Research.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5 (3): 334–345. doi:10.1017/S0963180100007155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO (World Medical Association). 2018. International Classification of Diseases for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics (11th Revision). https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en
   Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. 2013. “WMA Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.” Journal of the American Medical Association 310 (20): 2191–2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, E. G., and K. M. Munir. 2004. “Regulatory and Ethical Principles in Research Involving Children and Individuals with Developmental Disabilities.” Ethics & Behavior 14 (1): 31–49. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1401_3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zion, D., L. Gillam, and B. Loff. 2000. “The Declaration of Helsinki, CIOMS and the Ethics of Research on Vulnerable Populations.” Nature Medicine 6 (6): 615–617. doi:10.1038/76174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar