Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 31, 2024 - Issue 4
107
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Scientific priorities and relational dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Abraham, J. 1995. Science, Politics, and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Controversy and Bias in Drug Regulation. London: University College Press.
  • Antes, A. 2018. “First Law of Leadership: Be Human First, Scientist Second.” Nature 563 (November): 601. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-07530-7.
  • Antes, A. L., A. Kuykendall, and J. M. DuBois. 2019. “Leading for Research Excellence and Integrity: A Qualitative Investigation of the Relationship-Building Practices of Exemplary Principal Investigators.” Accountability in Research 26 (3): 198–226. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/08989621.2019.1611429.
  • Antes, A. L., A. Mart, and J. M. DuBois. 2016. “Are Leadership and Management Essential for Good Research? an Interview Study of Genetic Researchers.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 11 (5): 408–423. doi:10.1177/1556264616668775.
  • Bishr, O. M., J. Eswaraka, S. D. Kimball, P. V. Moghe, R. A. Panettieri, and K. W. Scotto. 2020. “The COVID-19 Pandemic and Research Shutdown: Staying Safe and Productive.” The Journal of Clinical Investigation 130 (6): 2745–2748. American Society for Clinical Investigation. doi:10.1172/JCI138646.
  • Bozeman, B., and C. Boardman. 2014. “Assessing Research Collaboration Studies: A Framework for Analysis Bozeman, B., Boardman, C. eds. .” In Research Collaboration and Team Science, 1–11. SpringerBriefs in Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06468-0_1.
  • Bradley, E. H., L. A. Curry, and K. J. Devers. 2007. “Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory.” Health Services Research 42 (4): 1758–1772. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x.
  • Byrom, N. 2020. “The Challenges of Lockdown for Early-Career Researchers.” ELife 9 (June): e59634. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. doi:10.7554/eLife.59634.
  • Campbell, J. L., C. Quincy, J. Osserman, and O. K. Pedersen. 2013. “Coding In-Depth Semistructured Interviews: Problems of Unitization and Intercoder Reliability and Agreement.” Sociological Methods & Research 42 (3): 294–320. SAGE Publications Inc. doi:10.1177/0049124113500475.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022. “Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).” September 13. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm
  • Claxton, L. D. 2007. “A Review of Conflict of Interest, Competing Interest, and Bias for Toxicologists.” Toxicology and Industrial Health 23 (10): 557–571. SAGE Publications Ltd STM. doi:10.1177/0748233708089046.
  • Davies, S. W., H. M. Putnam, T. Ainsworth, J. K. Baum, C. B. Bove, S. C. Crosby, I. M. Côté, Duplouy, Anne, Fulweiler, Robinson W., Griffin, Alyssa J, et al. 2021. “Promoting Inclusive Metrics of Success and Impact to Dismantle a Discriminatory Reward System in Science.” PLOS Biology 19 (6): e3001282. Public Library of Science. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001282.
  • Egede, L. E., R. J. Walker, A. Z. Dawson, J. S. Williams, J. A. Campbell, M. N. Ozieh, and A. Palatnik. 2021. “Team Science, Population Health, and COVID-19: Lessons Learned Adapting a Population Health Research Team to COVID-19.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 36 (5): 1407–1410. doi:10.1007/s11606-020-06455-0.
  • Elliott, K. C. 2017. A Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • FDA. 2021. “FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine.” FDA. FDA. August 23. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine
  • Flaskerud, J. H. 2021. “Vaccine Hesitancy and Intransigence.” Issues in Mental Health Nursing 42 (12): 1147–1150. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/01612840.2021.1923971.
  • Friedman, P. 2002. “The Impact of Conflict of Interest on Trust in Science.” Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3): 413–420. doi:10.1007/s11948-002-0063-9.
  • Gonzalez, K. E., R. James, E. T. Bjorklund, and T. D. Hill. 2021. “Conservatism and Infrequent Mask Usage: A Study of US Counties during the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic.” Social Science Quarterly 102 (5): 2368–2382. doi:10.1111/ssqu.13025.
  • Harding, S. 1992. “After the Neutrality Ideal: Science, Politics, and ‘Strong Objectivity.’” Social Research 59 (3): 567–587. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40970706
  • Ioannidis, J. P. A., E. Bendavid, M. Salholz-Hillel, K. W. Boyack, and J. Baas. 2022. “Massive Covidization of Research Citations and the Citation Elite.” Preprint. Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS). doi:10.1101/2022.01.24.22269775.
  • Jeffrey, D. I. 2020. “Relational Ethical Approaches to the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (8): 495–498. Institute of Medical Ethics. doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106264.
  • King, M. M., and M. E. Frederickson. 2021. “The Pandemic Penalty: The Gendered Effects of COVID-19 on Scientific Productivity.” Socius 7 (January): 237802312110069. SAGE Publications: 23780231211006976. doi:10.1177/23780231211006977.
  • Korbel, J. O. 2020. “Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Life Scientists Genome Biology 21 .” 115.
  • Krammer, F. 2020. “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Development.” Nature 586 (7830): 516–527. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2798-3.
  • Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lacey, H. 2005. Is Science Value Free?: Values and Scientific Understanding. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203983195.
  • Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, A. Lauren Crain, and D. V. Raymond. 2006. “Scientists’ Perceptions of Organizational Justice and Self-Reported Misbehaviors.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: JERHRE 1 (1): 51–66. doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.51.
  • Merton, R. K. 1973 The Normative Structure of Science . “.” The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (Chicago: University of Chicago Press) 636.
  • Norton, A., J. Mphahlele, Y. Yazdanpanah, P. Piot, and M. T. Bayona. 2020. “Strengthening the Global Effort on COVID-19 Research.” The Lancet 396 (10248): 375. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31598-1.
  • Oh, S. S., J. Galanter, N. Thakur, M. Pino-Yanes, N. E. Barcelo, M. J. White, D. M. de Bruin, Greenblatt, Ruth M., Bibblins-Domingo, Kirsten, Wu, Alan, et al. 2015. “Diversity in Clinical and Biomedical Research: A Promise yet to Be Fulfilled.” PLOS Medicine 12 (12): e1001918. Public Library of Science. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001918.
  • Pai, M. 2020. “Covidization of Research: What are the Risks?” Nature Medicine 26 (8): 1159–1159. Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1015-0.
  • Petersen, A. M., I. Pavlidis, and I. Semendeferi. 2014. “A Quantitative Perspective on Ethics in Large Team Science.” Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (4): 923–945. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9562-8.
  • Pierson, L., and J. Millum. 2018. “Health Research Priority Setting: The Duties of Individual Funders.” The American Journal of Bioethics 18 (11): 6–17. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/15265161.2018.1523490.
  • Porcelli, A. J., and M. R. Delgado. 2017. “Stress and Decision Making: Effects on Valuation, Learning, and Risk-Taking.” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 14: 33–39. April (14). doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.11.015.
  • Prudêncio, M., and J. C. Costa. 2020. “Research Funding after COVID-19.” Nature Microbiology 5 (8): 986–986. doi:10.1038/s41564-020-0768-z.
  • Schreier, M. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Los Angeles: SAGE.
  • Smith, E. M. R., C. Rakestraw, and J. S. Farroni. 2022. “Research Integrity during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives of Health Science Researchers at an Academic Health Science Center.” Accountability in Research: 1–22. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/08989621.2022.2029704.
  • Starcke, K., O. T. Wolf, H. J. Markowitsch, and M. Brand. 2008. “Anticipatory Stress Influences Decision Making under Explicit Risk Conditions.” Behavioral Neuroscience 122 (6): 1352–1360. US: American Psychological Association: 1352–60. doi:10.1037/a0013281.
  • State of Texas, County of Galveston. 2022. “Order to Stay at Home.” Accessed September 13. https://www.ci.la-marque.tx.us/DocumentCenter/View/3165/ORDER-to-Stay-at-Home_Galveston-County-3232020
  • Termini, C. M., and D. Traver. 2020. “Impact of COVID-19 on Early Career Scientists: An Optimistic Guide for the Future.” BMC Biology 18 (1): 95. doi:10.1186/s12915-020-00821-4.
  • Texas Department of State Health Services. 2022. “Texas COVID-19 Data.” Accessed September 13. https://dshs.texas.gov/coronavirus/AdditionalData.aspx
  • “UTMB Galveston National Lab.” 2022. Galveston National Laboratory. Accessed September 13. https://www.utmb.edu/GNL
  • Utoft, E. H. 2020. “‘All the Single Ladies’ as the Ideal Academic during Times of COVID-19?” Gender, Work & Organization 27 (5): 778–787. doi:10.1111/gwao.12478.
  • Walker, J., C. Brewster, R. Fontinha, W. Haak-Saheem, S. Benigni, F. Lamperti, and D. Ribaudo. 2022. “The Unintended Consequences of the Pandemic on Non-Pandemic Research Activities.” Research Policy 51 (1): 104369. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104369.
  • “WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard.” 2022. Accessed September 13. https://covid19.who.int
  • Woitowich, N. C., S. Jain, V. M. Arora, and H. Joffe. 2021. “COVID-19 Threatens Progress Toward Gender Equity Within Academic Medicine.” Academic Medicine 96 (6): 813–816. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003782.
  • World Health Organization. 2020. “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) - Situation Report - 51.” May 11. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200311-sitrep-51-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=1ba62e57_10
  • Wuchty, S., B. F. Jones, and B. Uzzi. 2007. “The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge.” Science 316 (5827): 1036–1039. doi:10.1126/science.1136099.
  • Zhang, X., L. Xinyu, Z. Liao, M. Zhao, and Q. Zhuang. 2020. “Evaluation of Psychological Stress in Scientific Researchers during the 2019–2020 COVID-19 Outbreak in China.” PeerJ 8 (July): e9497. doi:10.7717/peerj.9497.
  • Zyl, I. V., and A. Sabiescu. 2020. “Toward Intersubjective Ethics in Community-Based Research.” Community Development 51 (4): 303–322. Routledge. doi:10.1080/15575330.2020.1777178.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.