References
- Aad, G., et al. 2015. “Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass in Pp Collisions at S√ = 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments.” Physical Review Letters 114:191803.
- Allen, L., J. Scott, A. Brand, M. Hlava, and M. Altman. 2014. “Publishing: Credit Where Credit Is Due.” Nature 508 (7496): 312–313. doi:10.1038/508312a.
- American Psychological Association. 2010. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. 6th ed.
- Bachelet, V. C., F. A. Uribe, R. A. Díaz, A. F. Vergara, F. Bravo‐Córdova, V. A. Carrasco, F. J. Lizana, N. Meza‐Ducaud, and M. S. Navarrete. 2019. “Misrepresentation of Institutional Affiliations: The Results from an Exploratory Case Study of Chilean Authors.” Learned Publishing 32 (4): 335–344. doi:10.1002/leap.1257.
- British Medical Journal Submitting articles to the journal. 2022. Accessed May 7 2022. http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/advice/article_submissions.html
- Cronin, B., D. Shaw, and K. La Barre. 2003. “A Cast of Thousands: Coauthorship and Subauthorship Collaboration in the 20th Century as Manifested in the Scholarly Journal Literature of Psychology and Philosophy.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 (9): 855–871. doi:10.1002/asi.10278.
- Ding, J., C. Liu, Q. Zheng, and W. Cai. 2021. “A New Method of co-author Credit Allocation Based on Contributor Roles Taxonomy: Proof of Concept and Evaluation Using Papers Published in PLOS ONE.” Scientometrics 126 (9): 7561–7581. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04075-x.
- Gasparyan, A., L. Ayvazyan, S. V. Gorin, and G. D. Kitas. 2014. “Upgrading Instructions for Authors of Scholarly Journals.” Croatian Medical Journal 55 (3): 271–280. doi:10.3325/cmj.2014.55.271.
- Hottenrott, H., and C. Lawson. 2017. “A First Look at Multiple Institutional Affiliations: A Study of Authors in Germany, Japan and the UK.” Scientometrics 111 (1): 285–295. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2257-6.
- Houtkoop, B. L., C. Chambers, M. Macleod, D. V. Bishop, T. E. Nichols, and E. J. Wagenmakers. 2018. “Data Sharing in Psychology: A Survey on Barriers and Preconditions.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (1): 70–85. doi:10.1177/2515245917751886.
- McNutt, M. K., M. Bradford, J. M. Drazen, B. Hanson, B. Howard, K. H. Jamieson, V. Kiermer, E. Marcus, B. K. Pope, and R. Schekman. 2018. “Transparency in Authors’ Contributions and Responsibilities to Promote Integrity in Scientific Publication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA 115 (11): 2557–2560. doi:10.1073/pnas.1715374115.
- Moustafa, K. 2020. “Octopus Affiliations.” Scientometrics 124 (3): 2733–2735. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03600-8.
- Polonioli, A. 2017. “New Issues for New Methods: Ethical and Editorial Challenges for an Experimental Philosophy.” Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (4): 1009–1034. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9838-2.
- Polonioli, A., M. Vega-Mendoza, B. Blankinship, and D. Carmel. 2021. “Reporting in Experimental Philosophy: Current Standards and Recommendations for Future Practice.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (1): 49–73. doi:10.1007/s13164-018-0414-3.
- Sauermann, H., and C. Haeussler. 2017. “Authorship and Contribution Disclosures.” Science Advances 3 (11): e1700404. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1700404.
- Springer Nature (2022, June 12). “Editorial and Publishing Policies.”
- Times Higher Education. (2022, 12 June). “World University Rankings 2021 Methodology.” https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/world-university-rankings-2021-methodology
- Way, S. F., A. C. Morgan, D. B. Larremore, and A. Clauset. 2019. “Productivity, Prominence, and the Effects of Academic Environment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (22): 10729–10733. doi:10.1073/pnas.1817431116.