Understanding U.S. secondary computer science teachers’ challenges and needs

References

• Amiel, D., & Blitz, C. (2022). Computer science teacher capacity: The need for expanded understanding. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 5(4), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v5i4.151
   Google Scholar
• Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2021). Arkansas Computer Science Initiative. https://dese.ade.arkansas.gov/Offices/ar-comp-sci-initiative
   Google Scholar
• Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
   Google Scholar
• Bell, T. (2014). Establishing a nationwide CS curriculum in New Zealand high schools. Communications of the ACM, 57(2), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R. (2014). Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 505–518). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5
   Google Scholar
• Black Girls Code. (2022). The future looks like me. https://wearebgc.org/about-us/
   Google Scholar
• Bliksten, P., & Moghadam, S. H. (2019). Computing education: Literature review and voices from the field. In S. A. Fincher & A. V. Robin (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of computing education research (pp. 56–78). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108654555.004
   Google Scholar
• Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Kampylis, P., Dagienė, V., Wastiau, P., Engelhardt, K., Earp, J., Horvath, M. A. Jasutė, E., Malagoli, C., Masiulionytė-Dagienė, V., & Stupurienė, G. (2022). Reviewing computational thinking in compulsory education. https://doi.org/10.2760/126955
   Google Scholar
• Boonk, L. M., Ritzen, H., Gijselaers, H. J., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2021). Stimulating parental involvement in vocational education and training (VET): A case study based on learning histories of teachers, principals, students, and their parents. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, 103279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, P., & Lewis, C. M. (2022). Computer science trends and trade-offs in California high schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 58(3), 386–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211054801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera, L. (2019). Teacher preconceptions of computational thinking: A systematic literature review. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(3), 305–333. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/210234/
   Google Scholar
• Codding, D., Alkhateeb, B., Mouza, C., & Pollock, L. (2021). From professional development to pedagogy: Examining how computer science teachers conceptualize and apply culturally responsive pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 29(4), 497–532. https://learntechlib.org/primary/p/219931/
   Google Scholar
• Code.org. (2022). Inspire students to try computer science. https://code.org/educate/resources/inspire
   Google Scholar
• Code.org. (n.d.). Code.org teacher community. https://teacherblog.code.org
   Google Scholar
• Code.org, CSTA, & ECEP. (2020). 2020 State of computer science education illuminating disparities. https://advocacy.code.org/2020_state_of_cs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Code.org, CSTA, & ECEP. (2021). 2021 State of computer science education accelerating action through advocacy. https://advocacy.code.org/2021_state_of_cs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• College Board. (2020). AP data archive. https://reports.collegeboard.org/ap-program-results/data-archive
   Google Scholar
• College Board. (n.d.). Welcome to the AP computer science: A teacher community. https://apcommunity.collegeboard.org/web/apcompsci/home
   Google Scholar
• Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12(3), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023254226592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• CSTA. (2013). Bugs in the system: Computer science teacher certification in the U.S. https://www.csteachers.org/documents/en-us/3b4a70cd-2a9b-478b-95cd-376530c3e976/1
   Google Scholar
• CSTA. (2020). The CS teacher landscape. https://csteachers.org/page/cs-teacher-landscape
   Google Scholar
• Daigneault, P. -M., & Jacob, S. (2014). Unexpected but most welcome mixed methods for the validation and revision of the participatory evaluation measurement instrument. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813486190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (1999). Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. Q., Allen, M., Campbell, A., & Valair, A. (2018, February). Designing an introductory programming course to improve non-majors’ experiences. Proceedings of the 49thACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 26–31). https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159548
   Google Scholar
• De Neve, D., Devos, G., & Tuytens, M. (2015). The importance of job resources and self-efficacy for beginning teachers’ professional learning in differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettori, L., Greenberg, R. I., McGee, S., Reed, D., Wilkerson, B., & Yanek, D. (2018, February). CS as a graduation requirement: Catalyst for systemic change. Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 406–407). https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159646
   Google Scholar
• Durff, L., & Carter, M. (2019). Overcoming second-order barriers to technology integration in K–5 schools. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 9(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2019.09.1.18
   Google Scholar
• Education Development Center. (2017). Why computer science education? A toolkit for parents. https://www.edc.org/sites/default/files/uploads/CompScienceToolkitForParents.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Elena, P. (2013). A case study on the influence of public advertising campaigns in child education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 686–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.187
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, M., Gray, J., Haynie, K., Qazi, M. A., Rawajfih, Y., McClendon, P., Tucker, D., & Johnson, W. (2021, March). Engaging black female students in a year-long preparatory experience for AP CS principles. Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 706–724). https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432560
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020). Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027). https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/action-plan
   Google Scholar
• Fagerlund, J., Häkkinen, P., Vesisenaho, M., & Viiri, J. (2021). Computational thinking in programming with Scratch in primary schools: A systematic review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, J., & Wilder, J. (2020). Technolochicas: A critical intersectional approach shaping the color of our future. Communications of the ACM, 63(8), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J., & Wallen, R. (2010). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, D., Conrad, P., Boe, B., Nilsen, K., Hill, C., Len, M., Dreschler, G., Aldana, G. Almeida-Tanaka, P., Kiefer, B., Laird, C., Lopez, F., Pham, C., Suarez, J., & Waite, R. (2013). Assessment of computer science learning in a scratch-based outreach program. Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 371–376). https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445304
   Google Scholar
• Gal-Ezer, J., & Stephenson, C. (2009). The current state of computer science is U.S. high schools: A report from two national surveys. Journal for Computing Teachers, 1, 1–5. https://cris.openu.ac.il/en/publications/the-current-state-of-computer-science-in-us-high-schools-a-report
   Google Scholar
• Garvin, M., Neary, M., & Desjardins, M. (2019). State case study of computing education governance. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 19(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3320491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2002). Using SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445. https://doi.org/10.2307/798843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliem, R. R., & Gliem, J. A. (2003, September). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likert-type scales [ Paper Presentation]. Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, Columbus, OH. https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/handle/1805/344
   Google Scholar
• Goode, J. (2008). Increasing diversity in K-12 computer science: Strategies from the field. SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(1), 362–366. https://doi.org/10.1145/1352322.1352259
   Google Scholar
• Goode, J., Ivey, A., Johnson, S. R., Ryoo, J. J., & Ong, C. (2021). Rac(e)ing to computer science for all: How teachers talk and learn about equity in professional development. Computer Science Education, 31(3), 374–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1804772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, J., & Margolis, J. (2011). Exploring computer science: A case study of school reform. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 11(2), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/1993069.1993076
   Google Scholar
• Google, & Gallup. (2015). Images of computer science: Perceptions among students, parents and educators in the U.S. https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/images-ofcomputer-science-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Google, & Gallup. (2016). Trends in the state of computer science in U.S. K-12 schools. http://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/trends-in-the-state-of-computerscience-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Google, & Gallup. (2020). Current perspectives and continuing challenges in computer science education in U.S. K-12 schools. https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/computer-science-education-in-us-k12schools-2020-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gretter, S., Yadav, A., Sands, P., & Hambrusch, S. (2019). Equitable learning environments in K-12 computing: Teachers’ views on barriers to diversity. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 19(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3282939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, S. (2020, February). Designing an assessment for introductory programming concepts in middle school computer science. Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 678–684). https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366896
   Google Scholar
• Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Jr., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2013). Survey methodology. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Guzdial, M. (2014). The danger of requiring computer science in K-12 schools. http://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/173870-the-danger-of-requiring-computer-sciencein-k-12-schools/fulltext
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, D. M. (2006). Instructor’s guide to process-oriented guided-inquiry learning.
   Google Scholar
• Happe, L., Buhnova, B., Koziolek, A., & Wagner, I. (2021). Effective measures to foster girls’ interest in secondary computer science education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2811–2829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10379-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintz, F., Mannila, L., Nygårds, K., Parnes, P., & Regnell, B. (2015). Computing at school in Sweden–experiences from introducing computer science within existing subjects. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Informatics in Schools (pp. 118–130). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25396-1_11
   Google Scholar
• Hodhod, R., Khan, S., Kurt-Peker, Y., & Ray, L. (2016, March). Training teachers to integrate computational thinking into K-12 teaching. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. (pp. 156–157). https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844675
   Google Scholar
• Hollingworth, S., Mansaray, A., Allen, K., & Rose, A. (2011). Parents’ perspectives on technology and children’s learning in the home: Social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(4), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00431.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, I., Garner, B., Chen, I. C., & Frank, K. A. (2020). Seeing colleagues as learning resources: The influence of mathematics teacher meetings on advice-seeking social networks. AERA Open, 6(2), 2332858420914898. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420914898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, A. (2018). Pedagogical content knowledge in computing education: A review of the research literature. Computer Science Education, 28(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1509580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur, J. W., Andrzejewski, C. E., & Marghitu, D. (2017). Girls and computer science: Experiences, perceptions, and career aspirations. Computer Science Education, 27(2), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1376385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISTE. (2011). ISTE Standards Computer Science Educators. https://web.archive.org/web/20180329065657/http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-CSE_PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Janke, S., Nitsche, S., & Dickhäuser, O. (2015). The role of perceived need satisfaction at work for teachers’ work-related learning goal orientation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judson, E., & Glassmeyer, K. (2019). Are teachers and schools ready to accept computer science as a graduation requirement? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(4), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1624661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judson, E., & Glassmeyer, K. (2020). What school administrators think about computer science counting as a math or science graduation requirement. Computers in the Schools, 37(2), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2020.1751528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julian, K. D., & Parrott, D. J. (2017). Makerspaces in the library: Science in a student’s hands. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(2), 13–21. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1152687.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., Baskin, J., Fields, D., Goode, J., Twarek, B., & Yadav, A. (2020). Looking ahead: Professional development needs for experienced CS teachers. Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 1118–1119). https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366977
   Google Scholar
• Ketelhut, D. J., Mills, K., Hestness, E., Cabrera, L., Plane, J., & McGinnis, J. R. (2020). Teacher change following a professional development experience in integrating computational thinking into elementary science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09798-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, S. C., Chiu, M. M., & Lai, M. (2018). A study of primary school students’ interest, collaboration attitude, and programming empowerment in computational thinking education. Computers & Education, 127, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, S. C., & Lai, M. (2022). Effects of a teacher development program on teachers’ knowledge and collaborative engagement, and students’ achievement in computational thinking concepts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(2), 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, S. C., Lai, M., & Sun, D. (2020). Teacher development in computational thinking: Design and learning outcomes of programming concepts, practices and pedagogy. Computers & Education, 151, 103872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korresel, J., Ottenbreit Leftwich, A. T., Jeon, M., Janataraweragul, K., Warner, J., & Brown, M. (2022). Investigating CS teacher licensure in Indiana. TechTrends, 66, 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00726-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, M., Veinot, P., Campbell, J., Craig, M., & Mylopoulos, M. (2019). Computing for medicine: Can we prepare medical students for the future? Academic Medicine, 94(3), 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leake, M., & Lewis, C. M. (2017, March). Recommendations for designing CS resource sharing sites for all teachers. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 357–362). https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017780
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2020). The association between female students’ computer science education and STEM major selection: Multilevel structural equation modeling. Computers in the Schools, 37(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2020.1720553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S., Meng, N., Kafura, D., & Li, W. (2021, June). PDL: Scaffolding problem solving in programming courses. Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 185–191). https://doi.org/10.1145/3430665.3456360
   Google Scholar
• Loyalka, P., Liu, O. L., Li, G., Chirikov, I., Kardanova, E., Gu, L., Ling, G., Yu, N., Guo, F., & Ma, L. (2019). Computer science skills across China, India, Russia, and the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (pp. 6732–6736). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814646116
   Google Scholar
• Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, S. L., & Rich, P. J. (2019). Preparing elementary school teachers to teach computing, coding, and computational thinking. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 19(4), 790–824. https://citejournal.org/volume-19/issue-4-19/general/preparing-elementary-school-teachers-to-teach-computing-coding-and-computational-thinking
   Google Scholar
• Menekse, M. (2015). Computer science teacher professional development in the United States: A review of studies published between 2004 and 2014. Computer Science Education, 25(4), 325–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1111645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitani, H. (2018). Principals’ working conditions, job stress, and turnover behaviors under NCLB accountability pressure. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(5), 822–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18785874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller, F., & Crick, T. (2018). A university-based model for supporting computer science curriculum reform. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(4), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0117-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe County Public Library. (2022). Teens. https://mcpl.info/teens/teens
   Google Scholar
• Moorefield Lang, M. H. (2014). Makers in the library: Case studies of 3D printers and maker spaces in library settings. Library Hi Tech, 32(4), 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-06-2014-0056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouza, C., Codding, D., & Pollock, L. (2022). Investigating the impact of research-based professional development on teacher learning and classroom practice: Findings from computer science education. Computers & Education, 186, 104530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Women & Information Technology. (2021). Pacesetters program. https://ncwit.org/ncwit-program/pacesetters-program/
   Google Scholar
• Ni, L., Bausch, G., & Benjamin, R. (2021). Computer science teacher professional development and professional learning communities: A review of the research literature. Computer Science Education, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1993666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemelä, P., Pears, A., Dagienė, V., & Laanpere, M. (2022). Computational thinking–forces shaping curriculum and policy in Finland, Sweden and the Baltic countries. Proceedings of the IFIP TC 3 Open Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 131–143). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97986-7_11
   Google Scholar
• Ottenbreit Leftwich, A., Childs, J., Fletcher, C., Kim, J., Edwards, K., & Hendrickson, K. (2022). Defining computer science teacher qualification pathways. Policy Futures in Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103221123364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papastergiou, M. (2008). Are computer science and information technology still masculine fields? High school students’ perceptions and career choices. Computers & Education, 51(2), 594–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partovi, H. (2015). A comprehensive effort to expand access and diversity in computer science. ACM Inroads, 6(3), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/2807704
   Google Scholar
• Peng, J., Wang, M., Sampson, D., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2019). Using a visualisation-based and progressive learning environment as a cognitive tool for learning computer programming. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, A. K. (2018). Students’ experience of participation in a discipline: A longitudinal study of computer science and IT engineering students. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 19(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, D. A., Biederman, L. A., Andersen, D., Ditonto, T. M., & Roe, K. (2019). Mitigating gender bias in student evaluations of teaching. PloS One, 14(5), e0216241. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., Whittaker, J. E., Vitiello, V., Ruzek, E., Ansari, A., Hofkens, T., & DeCoster, J. (2020). Children’s school readiness skills across the pre-K year: Associations with teacher-student interactions, teacher practices, and exposure to academic content. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 66, 101084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prey, J. C., & Weaver, A. C. (2013). Fostering gender diversity in computing. Computer, 46(3), 22–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2013.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Project Tomorrow. (2018). Coding in K-8 classrooms: Empowering a new generation of creators. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED600542.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Qian, Y., Hambrusch, S., Yadav, A., & Gretter, S. (2018). Who needs what: Recommendations for designing effective online professional development for computer science teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1433565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Y., Hambrusch, S., Yadav, A., Gretter, S., & Li, Y. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of student misconceptions in introductory programming. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(2), 364–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119845413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Y., & Lehman, J. (2017). Students’ misconceptions and other difficulties in introductory programming: A literature review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 18(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redding, C., Booker, L. N., Smith, T. M., & Desimone, L. M. (2019). School administrators’ direct and indirect influences on middle school math teachers’ turnover. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(6), 708–730. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2018-0190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, S. A. (2007). An examination of the role of teacher perceptions of their professional development needs in the professional development process () [ Doctoral Dissertation]. George Washington University. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C. M., & Karnopp, J. (2019). Vision and action: Reinventing schools through personalized competency-based education. Marzano Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, Y. J. (2019). Computer science in high school: Identifying and addressing common barriers. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 35(1), 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoton, C. (2018, February). Examining the state of CS education in Virginia’s high schools. Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 970–974). https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159492
   Google Scholar
• Rosato, J., Friend, M., & Moallem, M. (2022). Computer science as a fundamental discipline in education. In E. Langran (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2271–2274). San Diego, CA. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/221150/
   Google Scholar
• Ryoo, J. J. (2019). Pedagogy that supports computer science for all. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 19(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadik, O. (2015). Encouraging women to become CS teachers. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on GenderIT (pp. 57–61). https://doi.org/10.1145/2807565.2807715
   Google Scholar
• Sadik, O., Leftwich, A. -O., & Nadiruzzaman, H. (2017). Computational thinking conceptions and misconceptions: Progression of preservice teacher thinking during computer science lesson planning. In P. Rich & C. Hodges (Eds.), Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking (pp. 221–238). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_14
   Google Scholar
• Sadik, O., Ottenbreit Leftwich, A., & Brush, T. (2020). Secondary computer science teachers’ pedagogical needs. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 4(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v4i1.79
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Newhouse, K. N., Goode, J., Skorodinsky, M., Nakajima, T. M., & Sendowski, M. (2020). Does AP CS Principles broaden participation in computing? An analysis of APCSA and APCSP participants. Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 542–548). https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366826
   Google Scholar
• Sentance, S., & Humphreys, S. (2018). Understanding professional learning for Computing teachers from the perspective of situated learning. Computer Science Education, 28(4), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1525233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2016). Computer science for all. https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/01/30/computer-science-all
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, C. (2014). Working together to support computer science education. http://googleforeducation.blogspot.com/2014/09/working-together-to-supportcomputer.html
   Google Scholar
• Technolochicas. (2022). Why TECHNOLOchicas. https://technolochicas.org/about
   Google Scholar
• Trees, F. P., & Clayborn, L. (2014, March). CSTA chapters: Building a CS community. Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 727–728). https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2544233
   Google Scholar
• Tsiotakis, P., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2013). Developing a computer science teacher community in Greece: Design framework and implications from the pilot. Proceedings of the EduLearn13 Conference. (pp. 70–80). https://library.iated.org/view/TSIOTAKIS2013DEV
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, A., Deek, F., Jones, J., McCowan, D., Stephenson, C., & Verno, A. (2003). A model curriculum for K–12 computer science. https://csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/K-12ModelCurr2ndEd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Uzumcu, O., & Bay, E. (2021). The effect of computational thinking skill program design developed according to interest driven creator theory on prospective teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10268-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachovsky, M. E., Wu, G., Chaturapruek, S., Russakovsky, O., Sommer, R., & Fei-Fei, L. (2016). Toward more gender diversity in CS through an artificial intelligence summer program for high school girls. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (pp. 303–308). https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844620
   Google Scholar
• Valstar, S., Sih, C., Krause Levy, S., Porter, L., & Griswold, W. G. (2020, August). A quantitative study of faculty views on the goals of an undergraduate CS program and preparing students for industry. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 113–123). https://doi.org/10.1145/3372782.3406277
   Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G., Beth, B., & Lin, C. (2016, February). CS teacher experiences with educational technology, problem-based learning, and a CS principles curriculum. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (pp. 651–656). <publisher-name/>: https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844645
   Google Scholar
• Venkataraman, R., Agarwal, E., & Brown, D. W. (2019). Engaging K-12 students essential for reducing gender gap in computer science education. International Journal on E-Learning, 18(3), 331–343. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/149070/
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Hong, H., Ravitz, J., & Hejazi Moghadam, S. (2016, February). Landscape of K-12 computer science education in the US: Perceptions, access, and barriers. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (pp. 645–650). https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844628
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. M., Hwang, G. J., Liang, Z. Y., & Wang, H. Y. (2017). Enhancing students’ computer programming performances, critical thinking awareness and attitudes towards programming: An online peer-assessment attempt. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 58–68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26229205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webel, C., & Platt, D. (2015). The role of professional obligations in working to change one’s teaching practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, X., Lin, L., Meng, N., Tan, W., Kong, S. C., (2021). The effectiveness of partial pair programming on elementary school students’ computational thinking skills and self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 160, 104023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. (2014). Hour of code: We can solve the diversity problem in computer science. ACM Inroads, 5(4), 22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2684721.2684725
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C., Sudol, L., Stephenson, C., & Stehlik, M. (2010). Running on empty: Failure to teach K-12 computer science in the digital age. http://runningonempty.acm.org/fullreport2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Burkhart, D., Moix, D., Snow, E., Bandaru, P., & Clayborn, L. (2015). Sowing the Seeds: A landscape study on assessment in secondary computer science education. https://csta.acm.org/Research/sub/Projects/ResearchFiles/AssessmentStudy2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Connolly, C., Berges, M., Chytas, C., Franklin, C., Hijón-Neira, R., Macann, V., Margulieux, L., Ottenbreit Leftwich, A., & Warner, J. R. (2022). A review of international models of computer science teacher education. Proceedings of the 2022 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 65–93). https://doi.org/10.1145/3571785.3574123
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Hambrusch, S., & Sands, P. (2016). Expanding computer science education in schools: Understanding teacher experiences and challenges. Computer Science Education, 26(4), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2016.1257418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagami, J., Boden, M., Keane, T., Moreton, B., & Schulz, K. (2015). Girls and computing: Female participation in computing in schools. Australian Educational Computing, 30(2). http://journal.acce.edu.au/index.php/AEC/article/view/79
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., Parker, J., Koehler, M. J., & Eberhardt, J. (2015). Understanding inservice science teachers’ needs for professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(5), 471–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9433-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar