Prioritising key variables for assessing food system resilience in Finland

References

• Bell W. 1997. Foundations of future studies — human science for a new era, vol. 1. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Béné C, Headey D, Haddad L, von Grebmer K. 2016. Is resilience a useful concept in the context of food security and nutrition programmes? Some conceptual and practical considerations. Food Secur. 8:123–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J. editors. 2000. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D, Bohensky EL, BurnSilver S, Cundill G, Dakos V, Daw TM, Evans LS, Kotschy K, et al. 2012. Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 37:421–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock JM, Dhanjal-Adams KL, Milne A, Oliver TH, Todman LC, Whitmore AP, Pywell RF. 2017. Resilience and food security: rethinking an ecological concept. J Ecol. 105(4):880–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabell JF, Oelofse M. 2012. An indicator framework for assessing agroecosystem resilience. Ecol Soc. 17(1):18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callo-Concha D, Ewert F. 2014. Using the concepts of resilience, vulnerability and adaptability for the assessment and analysis of agricultural systems. Change Adapt Socio-Ecol Syst. 1:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N. 2001. From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems. 4:765–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell RS, Nash KL, Halpern BS, Remenyi TA, Corney SP, Fleming A, Fulton EA, Hornborg S, Johne A, Watson RA, Blanchard JL. 2019. Food production shocks across land and sea. Nat Sustain. 2:130–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnhofer I, Fairweather J, Moller H. 2010. Assessing a farm’s sustainability: insights from resilience thinking. Int J Agric Sustain. 8(3):186–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. 2022a. European Food Security Crisis preparedness and response Mechanism (EFSCM). European Commission [accessed 2023 May 23]. https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/agri-food-supply-chain/ensuring-global-food-supply-and-food-security_en.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2022b. How the EU responds to crises and builds resilience. Council of the European Union [accessed 2023 May 23]. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-crisis-response-resilience/.
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, Pölkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngäs H. 2014. Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open. 4(1):2158244014522633.
   Google Scholar
• Fan S, Teng P, Chew P, Smith G, Copeland L. 2021. Food system resilience and COVID-19–lessons from the Asian experience. Global Food Secur. 28:100501.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flynn DF, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T, Molinari N, Richers BT, Lin BB, Simpson N, Mayfield MM, DeClerck F. 2009. Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol Lett. 12(1):22–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke C. 2006. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change. 16(3):253–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Schefer M, Chapin T, Rockström J. 2010. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adapt ability and transformability. Ecol Soc. 15(4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GFSI. 2022. [accessed 2023 August 23]. https://impact.economist.com/sustainability/project/food-security-index.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon LJ, Bignet V, Crona B, Henriksson PJ, Van Holt T, Jonell M, Lindahl T, Troell M, Barthel S, Deutsch L, et al. 2017. Rewiring food systems to enhance human health and biosphere stewardship. Environ Res Lett. 12(10):100201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson LH, Holling CS. editors. 2002. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson JR, Hanson JD, Tanaka DL, Sassenrath G. 2008. Principles of integrated agricultural systems: introduction to processes and definition. Renew Agric Food Syst. 23(4):265–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himanen SJ, Rikkonen P, Kahiluoto H. 2016. Codesigning a resilient food system. Ecol Soc. 21(4):16. doi:10.5751/ES-08878-210441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling CS. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 4:1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245.
   Google Scholar
• IFPRI. 2023. Food systems [accessed 2023 August 22]. https://www.ifpri.org/topic/food-systems.
   Google Scholar
• Jansik C, Huuskonen H, Karhapää M, Keskitalo M, Leppälä J, Niemi J, Niskanen O, Perttilä S, Rinne M. 2021. Maatalouden tuotantopanosten saatavuuden riskit: Kriiseihin varautuminen ruokahuollon turvaamisessa. Luonnonvara-ja biotalouden tutkimus 76/2021. Luonnonvarakeskus. Helsinki, 98.
   Google Scholar
• Jin AS, Trump BD, Golan M, Hynes W, Young M, Linkov I. 2021. Building resilience will require compromise on efficiency. Nat Energy. 6(11):997–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahiluoto H, Kaseva J, Hakala K, Himanen SJ, Jauhiainen L, Rötter RP, Salo T, Trnka M. 2014. Cultivating resilience by empirically revealing response diversity. Global Environ Change. 25:186–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kike. 2023. Kiertotaloudesta lisää kilpailukykyä elintarvikevientiin KIKE – valtakunnallinen tiedonvälityshanke. [Competitiveness for food exports through circular economy KIKE – national communication project [accessed 2023 May 30]. https://ki-ke.fi/.
   Google Scholar
• Kuusi O. 1999. Expertise in the future use of generic technologies. epistemic and methodological considerations concerning delphi studies. Helsinki: HeSE Print.
   Google Scholar
• Laborde D, Martin W, Swinnen J, Vos R. 2020. COVID-19 risks to global food security. Science. 369(6503):500–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latvala T, Väre M, Niemi J. editors. 2022. Finnish agri-food sector outlook 2022. Helsinki: Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke).
   Google Scholar
• Lehikoinen E, Kinnunen P, Piipponen J, Heslin A, Puma MJ, Kummu M. 2021. Importance of trade dependencies for agricultural inputs: a case study of Finland. Environ Res Commun. 3(6):061003.
   Google Scholar
• Linstone HA, Turoff M. 1975. The delphi method: techniques and applications. http://www.foresight.pl/assets/downloads/publications/Turoff_Linstone.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Meuwissen MP, Feindt PH, Spiegel A, Termeer CJ, Mathijs E, de Mey Y, Finger R, Balmann A, Wauters E, Urquhart J, et al. 2019. A framework to assess the resilience of farming systems. Agr Syst. 176:102656.
   Google Scholar
• Mumby PJ, Chollett I, Bozec Y-M, Wolff NH. 2014. Ecological resilience,robustness and vulnerability: how do these concepts benefit ecosystem management? Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 7:22e27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muru. 2023. Ilmastoviisas ja muutosjoustava ruokajärjestelmä pellolta kuluttajalle MURU – valtakunnallinen tiedonvälityshanke. [Climate-wise and resilient food system from field to consumer MURU – national communication project [accessed 2023 May 30]. https://www.ilmastoviisas.fi/.
   Google Scholar
• NESA. 2023. CER-direktiivin valmistelu [Preparation of the CER Directive] The National Emergency Supply Agency [accessed 2023 May 23]. https://www.huoltovarmuuskeskus.fi/tietoa-huoltovarmuudesta/kansainvalinen-yhteistyo/cer-direktiivin-valmistelu.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi J, Väre M. 2019. Agriculture and food sector in Finland 2019. Natural Resources and Bioeconomy Studies 37/2019. Helsinki: Natural Resources Institute Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Peltonen-Sainio P, Jauhiainen L, Lehtonen H. 2016. Land use, yield and quality changes of minor field crops: Is there superseded potential to be reinvented in Northern Europe? PLoS One. 154:192016.
   Google Scholar
• Peltonen-Sainio P, Jauhiainen L, Sorvali J. 2017. Diversity of high-latitude agricultural landscapes and crop rotations: increased, decreased or back and forth? Agric Syst. 154:25–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltonen-Sainio P, Salo T, Jauhiainen L, Lehtonen H, Sievilainen E. 2015. Static yields and quality issues: Is the agri-environment program the primary driver? Ambio. 44:544–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasi S, Markkanen J, Pyykkönen V, Aro K, Seppänen A-M, Niskanen O, Mönkkönen S, Kahelin M, Luostarinen S. 2022. Kohti biokaasun liikennekäyttöä Pohjois-Savossa: FarmGas-PS 2 -hankkeen raportti hajautetusta biokaasuntuotannosta [Towards the use of biogas for transport in Pohjois Savo: report of the FarmGas-PS 2 project on decentralized biogas production]. Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) 51, Helsinki. [Finnish].
   Google Scholar
• Reganold JP, Wachter JM. 2016. Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century. Nat Plants. 2(2):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rikkonen P, Rimhanen K, Aro K, Aakkula J. 2023. The determinants of a resilient food system for Finland in the 2020s—three opinion polls for improvements based on a Delphi study among food system experts. J Futures Res. 11:2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rikkonen P. 2005. Scenarios for future agriculture in Finland: a Delphi study among agri-food sector stakeholders. Agric Food Sci. 14(3):205–223. doi:10.2137/145960605775013227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rikkonen P, Tapio P. 2009. Future prospects of alternative agro-based bioenergy use in Finland - constructing scenarios with quantitative and qualitative delphi data. Technol Forecast Social Change. 76(7):978–990. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimhanen K, Aakkula J, Aro K, Rikkonen P. 2023. The elements of resilience in the food system and means to enhance the stability of the food supply. Environ Syst Decis. 43(2):143–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shava S, Krasny ME, Tidball KG, Zazu C. 2010. Agricultural knowledge in urban and resettled communities: applications to social–ecological resilience and environmental education. Environ Educ Res. 16(5-6):575–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone J, Rahimifard S. 2018. Resilience in agri-food supply chains: a critical analysis of the literature and synthesis of a novel framework. Supply Chain Manage. 23(3):207–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TEM. 2023. Reserve stocks and preparedness planning secure energy supply. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment of Finland. [accessed 2023 May 23]. https://tem.fi/en/security-of-energy-supply.
   Google Scholar
• Tendall DM, Joerin J, Kopainsky B, Edwards P, Shreck A, Le QB, Kruetli P, Grant M, Six J. 2015. Food system resilience: defining the concept. Glob Food Secur. 6:17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Termonen T. 2022. Sähkön hinta ajaa myös eläintilat ahtaalle – suursikalan pitäjä: “Porsas on kuin pieni lapsi, se tarvitsee hyvät olosuhteet”. [The price of electricity also pushes animal farms to overcrowding - big pig keeper: “A piglet is like a small child, it needs good conditions”], November 10; Yle Agriculture [Maatalous] [accessed 2023 May 23]. https://yle.fi/a/74-20004183.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel C, Moser SC, Kasperson RE, Dabelko GD. 2007. Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: pathways, players, and partnerships. Global Environ Chang. 17:349–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A, et al. 2019. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 393(10170):447–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurek M, Ingram J, Sanderson Bellamy A, Goold C, Lyon C, Alexander P, Barnes A, Bebber DP, Breeze TD, Bruce A, et al. 2022. Food system resilience: concepts, issues, and challenges. Annu Rev Environ Resourc. 47:511–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar