Temporal dynamics of pesticide use in three field vegetable crops with respect to sowing date and degree days

References

• Berim MN. 2009. Laspeyresia nigricana Fabricius - Pea moth. In: Interactive Agricultural Ecological Atlas of Russia and Neighboring Countries. Economic Plants and Their Diseases, Pests and Weeds. http://www.agroatlas.ru/en/content/pests/Laspeyresia_nigricana/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Borgström P, Jasarevic M, Wallenhammar AC, Anderson P, Friberg H, Larsson M, Lundin O. 2019. Växtskydd i raps, åkerbönor och ärter. Kunskapsbehov och forskningsinriktningar [Plant protection in rapeseed, field beans and peas. Knowledge needs and research orientations]. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala. https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/16158/7/borgstrom_p_et_al_190521.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Богуславская НВ. 2009. Фитосанитарный мониторинг энтомофауны гороха овощного - основа технологии защиты от вредителей. Экологически безопасная технология борьбы с гороховой плодожоркой и гороховой тлей [Phytosanitary monitoring of pea entomofauna - the basis of pest control technology. Ecologically safe technology of combating the pea moth and the pea aphid]. Экологическая Безопасность В Апк Реферативный Журнал. 2:507.
   Google Scholar
• Cárcamo HA, Vankosky MA, Wijerathna A, Olfert OO, Meers SB, Evenden ML. 2018. Progress toward integrated pest management of pea leaf. A review. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 111:144–153. doi:10.1093/aesa/say007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier R, Finch S. 2009. A review of research to address carrot fly (Psila rosae) control in the UK. Bull OEPP/EPPO Bull. 39:121–127. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2338.2009.02276.x.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2009. Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides. [accessed 2023 July 3]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = OJ:L:2009:309:0071:0086:en:PDF.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2019. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The European Green Deal. [accessed 2023 October 9]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri = cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_1&format = PDF.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2020. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Farm to Fork Strategy for a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-Friendly Food System. [accessed 2023 July 3]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri = CELEX%3A52020DC0381.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2021. EUROSTAT. Agri-environmental Indicator - Consumption of Pesticides. [accessed 2023 July 3.] https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Agri-environmental_indicator_-_consumption_of_pesticides.
   Google Scholar
• Haapalainen M, Latvala S, Rastas M, Wang J, Hannukkala A, Pirhonen M, Nissinen A. 2018. Carrot pathogen ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ Haplotype C detected in symptomless potato plants in Finland. Potato Res. 61:31–50. doi:10.1007/s11540-017-9350-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havukkala I, Holopainen JK, Virtanen M. 1984. Flying periods and oviposition of cabbage root flies in southern and central Finland. Ann Agric Fenn. 22:1–7. https://jukuri.luke.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/484738/mtt-aaf-v23-n1.pdf?sequence = 1.
   Google Scholar
• Holopainen JK, Raiskio S, Wulfff A, Tiilikkala K. 2001. Blue sticky traps are more efficient for the monitoring of Lygus rugulipennis (Heteroptera, Miridae) than yellow sticky traps. AFSci. 10:277–284. doi:10.23986/afsci.5698.
   Google Scholar
• Huusela-Veistola E, Jauhiainen J. 2006. Expansion of pea cropping increases the risk of pea moth (Cydia nigricana; Lep., Tortricidae) infestation. J Appl Entomol. 130:142–149. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.2006.01047.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaniuczak Z. 2009. Occurrence and harmfulness of pea moth (Laspeyresia nigricana Steph.) on pea. Prog Plant Prot. 49:535–538.
   Google Scholar
• Láska P. 2011. Biology of Trioza apicalis – a review. Plant Protect Sci. 47:68–77. doi:10.17221/1/2011-PPS. https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/pdfs/pps/2011/02/05.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Luke (Natural Resources Institute Finland). 2023a. Agricultural information: pest prediction models. [accessed 2023 July 3]. https://maatalousinfo.luke.fi/fi/cms/kasterveys/ennustepalvelut.
   Google Scholar
• Luke (Natural Resources Institute Finland). 2023b. Statistics database: horticultural Statistics in Finland. [accessed 2023 July 3]. https://www.luke.fi/en/statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Luke (Natural Resources Institute Finland). 2023c. Vihannesten kasvinterveysoppaat [Vegetable plant health guides]. [accessed 2023 July 3]. https://ipm-oppaat.luke.fi.
   Google Scholar
• Macaulay EDM, Etheridge P, Garthwaite DG, Greenway AR, Wall C, Goodchild RE. 1985. Prediction of optimum spraying dates against pea moth, Cydia nigricana (F.), using pheromone traps and temperature measurements. Crop Prot. 4:85–98. doi:10.1016/0261-2194(85)90008-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markkula I, Ojanen H, Tiilikkala K. 1998. Forecasting and monitoring of the carrot fly (Psila rosae) in Finland. In: The 1998 Brighton Conference: Pests and Diseases: Conference Proceedings. Vol. 2; p. 319–705, 657–662.
   Google Scholar
• Markkula M, Laurema S, Tiittanen K. 1976. Systemic damage caused by Trioza apicalis on carrot. Symp Biol Hung. 16:153–155.
   Google Scholar
• Mesmin X, Faloya V, Maret M, Cortesero AM, Le Ralec A. 2019. Carabid predation on Delia radicum: the early bird catches the worm. IOBC-WPRS Bull. 142:65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Nissinen A, Haapalainen M, Ojanen H, Pirhonen M, Jauhiainen L. 2021. Spreading of Trioza apicalis and development of “Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum” infection on carrot in the field conditions. Ann Appl Biol. 178:39–50. doi:10.1111/aab.12644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissinen A, Jauhiainen L. 2016. Searching IPM control measures for cabbage and turnip root flies on swedes. integrated protection in field vegetables. IOBC-WPRS Bull. 118:46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Nissinen A, Lemmetty A, Pihlava J-M, Jauhiainen L, Munyaneza JE, Vanhala P. 2012. Effects of carrot psyllid (Trioza apicalis) feeding on carrot yield and content of sugars and phenolic compounds. Ann Appl Biol. 161:68–80. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2012.00551.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissinen A, Pihlava J-M, Latvala S, Jauhiainen L. 2020. Assessment of the efficiency of different control programs to reduce Trioza apicalis Först. (Triozidae: Hemiptera) feeding damage and the spread of “Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum” on carrots (Daucus carota ssp. sativus L.). Ann Appl Biol. 2020:1–12. doi:10.1111/aab.12603.
   Google Scholar
• Овчаренко ФВ, Николаева ЗВ. 2020. Особенности развития морковной мухи в условиях Тверской области. Вестник Алтайского государственного аграрного университета. 1:31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Räsänen K, Hannukkala A, Kurppa S, Aaltonen M, Rahkonen A, Kukkonen JVK, Vänninen I. 2022. The use of chemical plant protection products in field vegetable farms in a central industrial vegetable growing area in Finland. AFSci. 31:54–69. doi:10.23986/afsci.112827.
   Google Scholar
• Saucke H, Riemer N, Müller U, Clemenz C, Schwabe K, Schieler M, Racca P, Kleinhenz B. 2020. Development of a computerized decision support system to prevent pea moth damage in field peas. Entwicklung eines computergestützten Entscheidungshilfesystems zur Prävention von Erbsenwicklerschäden an Erbsen CYDNIGPRO (Schlussbericht). Universität Kassel, Fachbereich Ökologische Agrarwissenschaften, Fachgebiet Ökologischer Pflanzenschutz, Witzenhausen, DE. p. 68. https://orgprints.org/id/eprint/38503/1/Abschlussbericht_korrigiert.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Swetnam TW, Allen CD, Betancourt JL. 1999. Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage for the future. Ecol Appl. 9:1189–1206. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1189:AHEUTP]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thöming G, Saucke H. 2011. Key factors affecting the spring emergence of pea moth (Cydia nigricana). Bull Entomol Res. 101:127–133. doi:10.1017/S0007485309990642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiilikkala K, Ketola J, Taivalmaa S-L. 1996. Monitoring and threshold values for control of the carrot psyllid. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 19:18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Tiilikkala K, Ojanen H, Widbom T, Rantanen O. 1998. Avomaanvihannesten tuholaisennusteet ja tarkkailutietokannat. Laatuvihannesten hyvät viljelymenetelmät: Tutkimusohjelman loppuraportti [Field vegetable pest predictions and monitoring databases. Good cultivation methods for quality vegetables: Final report of the research program]. Terhi Suojala ja Raili Pessala (Ed.). Publications of the Agricultural Research Center. Series A 43, p. 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Tukes (Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency). 2023. Plant protection products register. [accessed 2023 July 3]. https://www.kemidigi.fi/kasvinsuojeluainerekisteri/haku.
   Google Scholar
• Varis A-L. 1995. Species composition, abundance, and forecasting of Lygus Bugs (Heteroptera: Miridae) on field crops in Finland. J Econ Entomol. 88:855–858. doi:10.1093/jee/88.4.855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varis AL, Tiittanen K. 1982. Insect pests of vegetables in Finland and methods for their control. Acta Ent Fenn. 40:38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Venäläinen A, Tuomenvirta H, Pirinen P, Drebs A. 2005. A basic Finnish climate data set 1961-2000 – Description and illustrations. Finnish Meteorological Institute. Helsinki. 27 p. [accessed 2023 July 3]. https://www.oulu.fi/oulugis/doc/data_description.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Westfall P, Tobias RD, Wolfinger RD. 2011. Multiple comparisons and multiple tests using SAS. Cary (NC): SAS Publishing.
   Google Scholar