The resistance of a trans-critically accelerating ship in shallow water

References

• Andrun M, Blagojević B, Bašić J. 2018. The influence of numerical parameters in the finite-volume method on the Wigley hull resistance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Marit Environ. 233(4):1123–1132. doi:10.1177/1475090218812956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers). 2009. Standard for verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics and heat transfer – ASME V&V 20-2009. ASME International.
   Google Scholar
• Barratt MJ. 1965. The wave drag of a Hovercraft. J Fluid Mech. 22:39–47. doi:10.1017/S0022112065000563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bašić J, Blagojević B, Andrun M. 2020. Improved estimation of ship wave-making resistance. Ocean Eng. 200:107079. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burmester S, Vaz G, el Moctar O. 2020. Towards credible CFD simulations for floating offshore wind turbines. Ocean Eng. 209:107237. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calisal S. 1977. Effect of initial acceleration on ship wave pattern and wake survey methods. J Ship Res. 21:239–247. doi:10.5957/jsr.1977.21.4.239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas C. 2008. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluids Eng. 130:078001. doi:10.1115/1.2960953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day AH, Clelland D, Doctors LJ. 2009. Unsteady finite-depth effects during resistance tests on a ship model in a towing tank. J Mar Sci Technol. 14:387–397. doi:10.1007/s00773-009-0057-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doctors LJ. 1975. The experimental wave resistance of an accelerating two-dimensional pressure distribution. J Fluid Mech. 72:513–527. doi:10.1017/S0022112075003114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doctors LJ. 1993. On the use of pressure distributions to model the hydrodynamics of air-cushion vehicles and surface-effect ships. Nav Eng J. 105:69–89. doi:10.1111/j.1559-3584.1993.tb02264.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doctors LJ, Sharma SD. 1972. Wave resistance of an air-cushion vehicle in steady and accelerated motion. J Ship Res. 16(4):248–260. doi:10.5957/jsr.1972.16.4.248.
   Google Scholar
• Flagg CN, Newman JN. 1971. Sway added-mass coefficients for rectangular profiles in shallow water. J Ship Res. 15:257–265. doi:10.5957/jsr.1971.15.4.257.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas CJ. 2020. Standards and methods for verification, validation, and uncertainty assessments in modeling and simulation. J Verif Valid Uncertain Quantif. 5:1–9. doi:10.1115/1.4047274.
   Google Scholar
• Ghassemi H, Yari E. 2011. The added mass coefficient computation of sphere, ellipsoid and marine propellers using boundary element method. Pol Marit Res. 18(1):17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay T, Tuck EO. 2001. The maximum sinkage of a ship. J Ship Res. 45:50–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grue J. 2017. Ship generated mini-tsunamis. J Fluid Mech. 816:142–166. doi:10.1017/jfm.2017.67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haussling HJ, van Eseltine RT. 1978. Waves and wave resistance for air-cushion vehicles with time-dependent cushion pressures. J Ship Res. 22:170–177. doi:10.5957/jsr.1978.22.3.170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havelock T. 1908. The propagation of groups of waves in dispersive media, with application to waves on water produced by a travelling disturbance. Proc R Soc London Ser A Contain Pap Math Phys Character. 81:389–430. doi:10.1098/rspa.1933.0074.
   Google Scholar
• Havelock TH. 1949. The resistance of a submerged cylinder in accelerated motion. Q J Mech Appl Math. 2:419–427. doi:10.1093/qjmam/2.4.419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2008. Uncertainty analysis in CFD verification and validation methodology and procedures. 25th ITTC 2008, Resistance Committee 12.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2014. ITTC – Recommended procedures and guidelines - practical guidelines for ship CFD applications. 7.5-03-02-03 (Revision 01). 19.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2017. Quality system manual recommended procedures and guidelines procedure uncertainty analysis in CFD verification and validation.
   Google Scholar
• Javanmard E, Mansoorzadeh S, Mehr JA. 2020. A new CFD method for determination of translational added mass coefficients of an underwater vehicle. Ocean Eng. 215:107857. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang T, Henn R, Sharma SD. 2002. Wash waves generated by ships moving on fairways of varying topography. 24th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Fukuoka, Japan, Vol. 2, p. 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson JW. 1957. Ship waves in navigation channels. Coast Eng Proc. 1:40. doi:10.9753/icce.v6.40.
   Google Scholar
• Kevorkian J, Yu J. 1989. Passage through the critical froude number for shallow-water waves over a variable bottom. J Fluid Mech. 204:31–56. doi:10.1017/S0022112089001655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkmaz KB, Werner S, Sakamoto N, Queutey P, Deng G, Yuling G, Guoxiang D, Maki K, Ye H, Akinturk A, et al. 2021. CFD based form factor determination method. Ocean Eng. 220:108451. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lataire E, Vantorre M, Delefortrie G. 2012. A prediction method for squat in restricted and unrestricted rectangular fairways. Ocean Eng. 55:71–80. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea GK, Feldman JP. 1972. Transcritical flow past slender ships. 9th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Washington, DC, p. 1527–1542.
   Google Scholar
• Lee BW, Lee C. 2019. Equation for ship wave crests in the entire range of water depths. Coast Eng. 153:103542. doi:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Yuan Z, Yeung RW. 2019. On unsteady wave-making resistance of an accelerating ship. Proceedings of the ASME 2020 39th International Conference on Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US, p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lunde JK. 1951. On the linearized theory of wave resistance for displacement ships in steady and accelerated motion. Trans Soc Nav Archit Mar Eng. 59:25–76.
   Google Scholar
• Lunde JK. 1957. The linearized theory of wave resistance and Its application to ship-shaped bodies in motion on the surface of a deep, previously undisturbed fluid. Soc Nav Archit Mar Eng. 23:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Molland AF, Turnock SR, Hudson DA. 2017. Components of hull resistance. In: Molland AF, Turnock SR, Hudson DA, editors. Ship resistance and propulsion: practical estimation of ship propulsive power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 12–69. doi:10.1017/9781316494196.005.
   Google Scholar
• Newman JN. 2018. Marine hydrodynamics. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peric M. 2019. White paper: full-scale simulation for marine design. Siemens White Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkster J. 2004. The influence of a free surface on passing ship effects. Int Ship Prog. 51:314–338.
   Google Scholar
• Redekopp LG, You Z. 1995. Passage through resonance for the forced Korteweg-de Vries equation. Phys Rev Lett. 74:5158–5161. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.5158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy CJ, Oberkampf WL. 2002. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci. 38:209–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shebalov AN. 1970. Theory of ship wave resistance for unsteady motion in still water. University of Michigan's Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Song S, Demirel YK, Atlar M. 2019. An investigation into the effect of biofouling on the ship hydrodynamic characteristics using CFD. Ocean Eng. 175:122–137. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.01.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terziev M, Tezdogan T, Demirel YK, Villa D, Mizzi S, Incecik A. 2021a. Exploring the effects of speed and scale on a ship’s form factor using CFD. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng. 13:147–162. doi:10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2020.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terziev M, Tezdogan T, Incecik A. 2019a. Application of eddy-viscosity turbulence models to problems in ship hydrodynamics. Ships Offshore Struct. 1–24. doi:10.1080/17445302.2019.1661625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terziev M, Tezdogan T, Incecik A. 2019b. A geosim analysis of ship resistance decomposition and scale effects with the aid of CFD. Appl Ocean Res. 92:1–17. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2019.101930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terziev M, Tezdogan T, Incecik A. 2020. Modelling the hydrodynamic effect of abrupt water depth changes on a ship travelling in restricted waters using CFD. Ships Offshore Struct. 16(10):1087–1103. doi:10.1080/17445302.2020.1816731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terziev M, Tezdogan T, Incecik A. 2021b. A numerical assessment of the scale effects of a ship advancing through restricted waters. Ocean Eng. 229:108972. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terziev M, Tezdogan T, Incecik A. 2022. Scale effects and full-scale ship hydrodynamics: a review. Ocean Eng. 245:110496. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torsvik T, Dysthe K, Pedersen G. 2006. Influence of variable Froude number on waves generated by ships in shallow water. Phys Fluids. 18:1–18. doi:10.1063/1.2212988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck EO. 1966. Shallow-Water flows past slender bodies. J Fluid Mech. 26:81–95. doi:10.1017/S0022112066001101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck EO. 1967. Sinkage and trim in shallow water of finite width. Schiffstechnik. 14:92–94.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck EO. 1978. Hydrodynamic problems of ships in restricted waters. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 10:33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck EO, Taylor JP. 1970. Shallow wave problems in ship hydrodynamics. 8th Symposium Naval Hydrodynamics. p. 627–659.
   Google Scholar
• Tunaley JKE. 2014. Ship wakes in shallow waters. LRDC Report, p. 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wakaba L, Balachandar S. 2007. On the added mass force at finite reynolds and acceleration numbers. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn. 21:147–153. doi:10.1007/s00162-007-0042-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehausen JV. 1961. Effect of the initial acceleration upon the wave resistance of ship models.
   Google Scholar
• Wehausen JV. 1964. Effect of the initial acceleration upon the wave resistance of ship models. J Ship Res. 8:38–50. doi:10.5957/jsr.1964.8.1.38.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox DC. 2008. Formulation of the k-w turbulence model revisited. AIAA J. 46:2823–2838. doi:10.2514/1.36541.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung RW. 1975. Surface waves due to a maneouvering air-cushion vehicle. J Ship Res. 19:224–242. doi:10.5957/jsr.1975.19.4.224.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan ZM. 2019. Ship hydrodynamics in confined waterways. J Ship Res. 63:1–14. doi:10.5957/JOSR.04170020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan ZM, Incecik A, Jia L. 2014. A new radiation condition for ships travelling with very low forward speed. Ocean Eng. 88:298–309. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan ZM, Li L, Yeung RW. 2019. Free-Surface effects on interaction of multiple ships moving at different speeds. J Ship Res. 63(04)):251–267. doi:10.5957/josr.10180089.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng Q, Hekkenberg R, Thill C. 2019. On the viscous resistance of ships sailing in shallow water. Ocean Eng. 190:106434. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar