Active flow control applied to a ship rudder model

References

• Ahn H-S, Kim H-C, Park J-J, Lee S-H. 1999. An application of coanda effect to a flapped rudder. J Ship Ocean Technol. 3(4):23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn H-S, Yoo J, Kim H. 2004. An advanced study on the development of marine lifting devices enhanced by the blowing techniques. J Ship Ocean Technol. 8(4):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Andino MY, Lin JC, Roman S, Graff EC, Gharib M, Whalen EA, Wygnanski IJ. 2019. Active flow control on vertical tail models. AIAA J. 57(8):3322–3338. doi: 10.2514/1.J057876
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andino MY, Lin JC, Washburn AE, Whalen EA, Graff EC, Wygnanski IJ. 2015. Flow separation control on a full-scale vertical tail model using sweeping jet actuators. In: 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, Florida, AIAA; p. 0785.
   Google Scholar
• Arwatz G, Fono I, Seifert A. 2008. Suction and oscillatory blowing actuator. In: IUTAM Symposium on Flow Control and MEMS. Springer; p. 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Berkooz G, Holmes P, Lumley JL. 1993. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annu Rev of Fluid Mech. 25(1):539–575. doi: 10.1146/fluid.1993.25.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi B-J, Kim H-C. 2004. An experimental evaluation of the coanda jet applied high efficient rudder system for vlcc. J Ship Ocean Technol. 8(2):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gim O. 2017. On flow charactistics around special rudders by piv measurement; flapped and water-blowing rudder. J Korean Soc Mar Environ Saf. 23(2):200–207. doi: 10.7837/kosomes.
   Google Scholar
• Greenblatt D, Wygnanski IJ. 2000. The control of flow separation by periodic excitation. Progress Aerosp Sci. 36(7):487–545. doi: 10.1016/S0376-0421(00)00008-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JC, Andino MY, Alexander MG, Whalen EA, Spoor MA, Tran JT, Wygnanski IJ. 2016. An overview of active flow control enhanced vertical tail technology development. In: 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, California, AIAA; p. 0056.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Hekkenberg R. 2017. Sixty years of research on ship rudders: effects of design choices on rudder performance. Ships Offshore Struct. 12(4):495–512. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2016.1178205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molland AF, Turnock SR (2011). Marine rudders and control surfaces: principles, data, design and applications. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Oh J-K, Ahn H-S, Kim H-C, Lee S-H, Lew J-M. 2003. Application of coanda effects to a ship hydrofoil. J Ship Ocean Technol. 7(2):29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Schloesser P, Soudakov V, Bauer M, Wild J. 2019. Active separation control at the pylon-wing junction of a real-scale model. AIAA J. 57(1):132–141. doi: 10.2514/1.J057345
   Google Scholar
• Scott Collis S, Joslin RD, Seifert A, Theofilis V. 2004. Issues in active flow control: theory, control, simulation, and experiment. Prog Aerosp Sci. 40(4-5):237–289. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seele R, Graff E, Gharib M, Taubert L, Lin J, Wygnanski I. 2012. Improving rudder effectiveness with sweeping jet actuators. In: 6th AIAA Flow Control Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, AIAA; p. 3244.
   Google Scholar
• Seifert A. 2014. Evaluation criteria and performance comparison of actuators for bluff-body flow control. In: 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Atlanta, GA, AIAA; p. 2400.
   Google Scholar
• Seifert A, Bachar T, Koss D, Shepshelovich M, Wygnanski I. 1993. Oscillatory blowing: a tool to delay boundary-layer separation. AIAA J. 31(11):2052–2060. doi: 10.2514/3.49121
   Google Scholar
• Seifert A, Darabi A, Wyganski I. 1996. Delay of airfoil stall by periodic excitation. J Aircr. 33(4):691–698. doi: 10.2514/3.47003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert A, Eliahu S, Greenblatt D, Wygnanski I. 1998. Use of piezoelectric actuators for airfoil separation control. AIAA J. 36(8):1535–1537. doi: 10.2514/2.549
   Google Scholar
• Seifert A, Greenblatt D, Wygnanski IJ. 2004. Active separation control: an overview of reynolds and mach numbers effects. Aerosp Sci Technol. 8(7):569–582. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2004.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert A, Stalnov O, Sperber D, Arwatz G, Palei V, David S, Dayan I, Fono I. 2009. Large trucks drag reduction using active flow control. In: The Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles II: Trucks, Buses, and Trains. Springer; p. 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Seo D-W, Oh J, Jang J. 2017. Performance analysis of a horn-type rudder implementing the coanda effect. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng. 9(2):177–184. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel SG, Seidel J, Fagley C, Luchtenburg DM, Cohen K, McLaughlin T. 2008. Low-dimensional modelling of a transient cylinder wake using double proper orthogonal decomposition. J Fluid Mech. 610:1–42. doi: 10.1017/S0022112008002115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence DA. 1956. The lift coefficient of a thin, jet-flapped wing. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci. 238(1212):46–68.
   Google Scholar
• Spyropoulos CE. 1964. Sonic oscillator. In: Procc. of the Fluid Amplification Symposium, Washington, DC, Army Materiel Command; p. 27–52.
   Google Scholar
• Warren RW. 1962. Fluid oscillator, Jan 9, 1962. US Patent 3,016,066.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen EA, Spoor M, Vijgen PM, Tran J, Shmilovich A, Lin JC, Andino M. 2016. Full-scale flight demonstration of an active flow control enhanced vertical tail. In: 8th AIAA Flow Control Conference, Washington, DC, AIAA; p. 3927.
   Google Scholar
• Zelazny K. 2014. Approximate method of calculating forces on rudder during ship sailing on a shipping route. TransNav,Int J Marine Navigation Safe Sea Transport. 8(3):459–464. doi: 10.12716/1001ISSN 2083-6473.
   Google Scholar