Evaluation of the effect of in-class activity-based practices on scientific reasoning skills of pre-service science teachers

References

• Aslan, O., & Taşar, M. F. (2013). What are science teachers’ views and teachings on the nature of science? An in-class research. Education and Science, 38(167), 65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ateş, S. (2005). Developing pre-service teachers’ ability to identify and control variables. Gazi University, Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 25(1), 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, B. (1994). Research on problem solving: Elementary school. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 248–268). Macmillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bezci, F., & Sungur, S. (2021). How is middle school students’ scientific reasoning ability associated with gender and learning environment? Science Education International, 32(2), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i2.2
   Google Scholar
• Bruckermann, T., Ochsen, F., & Mahler, D. (2018). Learning opportunities in biology teacher education contribute to understanding of nature of science. Education Sciences, 8(3), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyükbayraktar Ersoy, F. N. (2015). The effect of physics teaching with active learning practices on scientific reasoning skills of high school students [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Ataturk University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Erzurum.
   Google Scholar
• Çetin, P. S., Kutluca, A. Y., & Kaya, E. (2013). Examination of students’ argumentation quality. Science Education and Research Association Journal of Science Education, 2(1), 56–66.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research desingn: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Demirel, E. O. (2014). Investigation of the effects of problem-based learning and argumentation-based learning on students’ achievement in chemistry course, scientific process skills and scientific reasoning abilities [Master thesis]. Mustafa Kemal University.
   Google Scholar
• Demirtaş, Z. (2011). The relationship of high school students’ scientific thinking abilities with gender and achievement. International Journal of Human Sciences, 8(1), 1460–1471.
   Google Scholar
• Dökme, İ. (2019). An overview of scientific reasoning skills. In İlbilge Dökme (Ed.), The art of thinking with scientific reasoning skills (pp. 1–6). Anı Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M. L., & Marek, A. E. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690116971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güngörmez, H. G. (2018). The effect of nature of science activities included in process-oriented guided inquiry learning method on 7th grade students’ conceptual changes and scientific reasoning skills [Doctoral thesis]. Adıyaman University, Institute of Science and Technology .
   Google Scholar
• Hacıömeroğlu, G., & Hacıömeroğlu, E. S. (2017). Examining the relationship between gender, spatial ability, logical reasoning ability, and preferred mode of processing. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(1), 116–131.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J. (2013). Scientific reasoning: Research, development and assessment [PhD dissertation]. The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Hilfert-Rüppell, D., Loob, M., Klingenberg, K., Eghtessad, A., Höner, K., Müller, R., Strahl, A., & Pietzner, V. (2013). Scientific reasoning of prospective science teachers in designing a biological experiment. Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand, 6(2), 135–154.
   Google Scholar
• Hrouzková, T., & Richterek, L. (2021). Lawson classroom test of scientific reasoning at entrance university level. In V. Lamanauskas (Ed.), Science and technology education: Developing a global perspective. Proceedings of the 4th international baltic symposium on science and technology education (BalticSTE2021) (pp. 74–85). Scientia Socialis Press.
   Google Scholar
• İnan, C., & Özgen, K. (2008). Evaluation of the opinions of pre-service mathematics teachers about their competence in teaching students thinking skills during the teaching practice process. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 7(25), 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kambeyo, L., & Csapo, B. (2018). Scientific reasoning skills: A theoretical background on science education. Reform Forum, 26(1), 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kara, S., & Kıngır, S. (2021). Implementation of the model-based science writing heuristic approach in elementary school science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10191-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsantık, Y. (2016). Opinions of pre-service teachers on thinking skills and teaching thinking skills [Master thesis]. Marmara University Institute of Educational Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S., & Krell, M. (2021). Patterns of scientific reasoning skills among pre-service science teachers: A latent class analysis. Education Sciences, 11(10), 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kıncal, R. Y., & Yazgan, A. D. (2010). Investigation of formal operational thinking skills of 7th and 8th grade primary school students in terms of some variables. Elementary Education Online, 9(2), 723–733.
   Google Scholar
• Kocagül Sağlam, M. (2019). Developing reasoning skills in science teachers and their effects on the classroom environment [Doctoral thesis]. Dokuz Eylul University Institute of Educational Sciences, İzmir.
   Google Scholar
• Kocagül Sağlam, M., & Ünal Çoban, G. (2020). Determining the needs of science teachers to develop scientific reasoning skills in students. Pamukkale University (PAU) Journal of Education), 50, 399–425.
   Google Scholar
• Larrain, A., Moreno, C., Grau, V., Freire, P., Salvat, I., Lopez, P., & Silva, M. (2017). Curriculum materials support teachers in the promotion of argumentation in science teaching: A case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 522–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. E. (1978). The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660150103
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking (2nd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, E. A., Clark, B., Meldrum- Cramer, E., Falconer, A. K., Sequist, M. J., & Kwon, Y. (2000). Development of scientific reasoning in college biology: Do two levels of general hypothesis-testing skills exist. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(1), 81–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, J. (1999). Students’ understanding of the co-ordination of theory and evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler, D., Bock, D., & Bruckermann, T. (2021). Preservice biology teachers’ scientific reasoning skills and beliefs about nature of science: How do they develop and is there a mutual relationship during the development? Education Sciences, 11, 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MNE [Ministry of National Education]. (2018). Science course curriculum (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th grades). Presidency of the Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
   Google Scholar
• Opitz, A., Heene, M., & Fischer, F. (2017). Measuring scientific reasoning – a review of test instruments. Educational Research and Evaluation, 23(3-4), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2017.1338586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1953). How children form mathematical concepts. Scientific American, 189(5), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1153-74
   Google Scholar
• Remigio, K. R., Yangco, R. T., & Espinosa, A. A. (2014). Analogy-enhanced ınstruction: Effects on reasoning skills in science. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science (MOJES), 2(2), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• She, H. C., & Liao, Y. W. (2010). Bridging scientific reasoning and conceptual change through adaptive web-based learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2003). Students’ achievement in human circulatory system unit: The effect of reasoning ability and gender. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022111728683
   Google Scholar
• Tanrıverdi, B., Öztan Ulusoy, Y., & Turan, H. (2012). Evaluating teacher education curricula’s facilitation of the development of critical thinking skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Tuna, A., Biber, AÇ, & İncekapı, L. (2013). An analysıs of mathematıcs teacher candidates’ logical thinkıng levels: Case of Turkey. Journal of Educatıonal and Instructıonal Studıes in the World, 3(1), 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Turgut, Y., Yenilmez, K., & Balbağ, M. Z. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ logical and spatial thinking skills: The effect of department, gender and academic performance. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Faculty of Education, 41, 265–283.
   Google Scholar
• Valanides, N. (1997). Formal reasoning abilities and school achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(97)00011-4
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Guo, D., & Jou, M. (2015). A study on the effects of model-based inquiry pedagogy on students’ inquiry skills in a virtual physics lab. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 658–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulandari, F. E., & Shofiyah, N. (2018). Problem-based learning: Effects on student’s scientific reasoning skills in science. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1006, 012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012029
   Google Scholar
• Yaman, S., & Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2006). Öğretmen adaylarının mantıksal düşünme becerileri ve kimya dersine yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Yanto, B. E., Subali, B., & Suyanto, S. (2019). Improving students’ scientific reasoning skills through the three levels of inquiry. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 689–704. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12444a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yenilmez, A., Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2005). The effect of gender and grade level on students’ logical thinking abilities. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education, 28, 219–225.
   Google Scholar
• Yeşilpınar, M. (2011). Views of primary school teachers and pre-service teachers on their competencies in teaching critical thinking [Unpublished master thesis]. Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yüzüak, A. V., & Dökme, İ. (2015). Adaptation of the Lawson logical thinking test (multiple choice version). Journal of Gazi University Gazi Education Faculty, 35(3), 443–456.
   Google Scholar
• Yüzüak, A. V., & Dökme, İ. (2019). Science reasoning levels of prospective science and primary teacher. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34, 586–601. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018046314
   Google Scholar
• Zarotiadou, E., & Tsaparlis, G. (2000). Teaching lower-secondary chemistry with a Piagetian constructivist and an Ausbelian meaningful-receptive method: A longitudinal comparison. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1039/A9RP90005E
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20(1), 99–149. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1999.0497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C., Raghavan, K., & Sartoris, M. (2003). The impact of the MARS curriculum on students’ ability to coordinate theory and evidence. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1247–1271. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069022000038303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulkipli, Z. A., Yusof, M. M. M., Ibrahim, N., & Dalim, S. F. (2020). Identifying scientific reasoning skills of science education students. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.1031
   Google Scholar