Photo-cross-linkable hyaluronic acid bioinks for bone and cartilage tissue engineering applications

References

• Madry H. Surgical therapy in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2022;20:1182.
   Google Scholar
• Liu GT, Vanpelt MD, Manchanda K, et al. Arthroscopic findings in refractory symptomatic fourth and fifth tarsometatarsal joints. J Foot Ankle Surg 2022;26:355.
   Google Scholar
• Roddy E, DeBaun MR, Daoud-Gray A, et al. Treatment of critical-sized bone defects: clinical and tissue engineering perspectives. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2018;28:351–362.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baldwin P, Li DJ, Auston DA, et al. Autograft, allograft, and bone graft substitutes: clinical evidence and indications for use in the setting of orthopaedic trauma surgery. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33:203–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdonk PCM, Van Laer MEE, Verdonk R. Meniscus replacement: From allograft to tissue engineering. Sport Orthop Traumatol. 2008;24:78.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan B, Banerjee R. Biopolymer-based hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Chem Rev 2011;111:4453–4474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani F, Ghalandari B, Sahranavard M, et al. Tuning the biomimetic behavior of hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering through surface modifications and drug immobilization. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021;130:112434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y, Yu M, Lu W, et al. Three-dimensional (3D), macroporous, elastic, and biodegradable nanocomposite scaffold for in situ bone regeneration: toward structural, biophysical, and biochemical cues integration. Compos Part B Eng. 2021;225:109270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arab-Ahmadi S, Irani S, Bakhshi H, et al. Immobilization of carboxymethyl chitosan/laponite on polycaprolactone nanofibers as osteoinductive bone scaffolds. Polym Adv Technol 2021;32:755–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran SV, Vairamani M, Selvamurugan N. Osteostimulatory effect of biocomposite scaffold containing phytomolecule diosmin by integrin/FAK/ERK signaling pathway in mouse mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep 2019;9:11900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb P, Deoghare AB, Borah A, et al. Scaffold development using biomaterials: a review. Mater. Today Proc. 2018;5:12909–12919.
   Google Scholar
• Collins MN, Ren G, Young K, et al. Scaffold fabrication technologies and structure/function properties in bone tissue engineering. Adv Funct Mater 2021;31:2010609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtiary N, Pezeshki-Modaress M, Najmoddin N. Wet-electrospinning of nanofibrous magnetic composite 3-D scaffolds for enhanced stem cells neural differentiation. Chem Eng Sci 2022;264:118144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khajehmohammadi M, Azizi Tafti R, Nikukar H. J. Effect of porosity on mechanical and biological properties of bioprinted scaffolds. Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2022;1.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbani F, Sahranavard M, Mousavi Nejad Z, et al. Surface functionalization of three dimensional-printed polycaprolactone-bioactive glass scaffolds by grafting GelMA under UV irradiation. Front Mater. 2020;7:528590. DOI:10.3389/fmats.2020.528590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leucht A, Volz A-C, Rogal J, et al. Advanced gelatin-based vascularization bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting of vascularized bone equivalents. Sci Rep 2020;10:5330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh YP, Bandyopadhyay A, Mandal BB. 3D bioprinting using cross-linker-free silk–gelatin bioink for cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:33684–33696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petta D, Armiento AR, Grijpma D, et al. 3D bioprinting of a hyaluronan bioink through enzymatic-and visible light-crosslinking. Biofabrication. 2018;10:044104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungst T, Smolan W, Schacht K, et al. Strategies and molecular design criteria for 3D printable hydrogels. Chem Rev 2016;116:1496–1539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SCJ, Gillispie G, Prim P, et al. Physical and chemical factors influencing the printability of hydrogel-based extrusion bioinks. Chem Rev 2020;120:10834–10886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davari N, Bakhtiary N, Khajehmohammadi M, et al. Protein-based hydrogels: promising materials for tissue engineering. Polymers. 2022;14:986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani F, Kim M, Monavari M, et al. Mussel-inspired polydopamine decorated alginate dialdehyde-gelatin 3D printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering application. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10; DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2022.940070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazar V, Kashi M, Haghbin Nazarpak M, et al. Gelatin hydrogel reinforced by graphene oxide grafted chitosan for cartilage tissue engineering application. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2022;1:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hulsart-Billström G, Yuen PK, Marsell R, et al. Bisphosphonate-Linked hyaluronic acid hydrogel sequesters and enzymatically releases active bone morphogenetic protein-2 for induction of osteogenic differentiation. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:3055–3063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki T, Watanabe C. Stimulation of osteoinduction in bone wound healing by high-molecular hyaluronic acid. Bone. 1995;16(1):9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Zhu B, Yin P, et al. Integration of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes with hydroxyapatite-embedded hyaluronic acid-alginate hydrogel for bone regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6:1590–1602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SH, Jung SH, Lee JH. Preparation of beta-tricalcium phosphate microsphere-hyaluronic acid-based powder gel composite as a carrier for rhBMP-2 injection and evaluation using long bone segmental defect model. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2019;30:679–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen M, Panitch A. Proteoglycans and proteoglycan mimetics for tissue engineering. Am J Physiol Physiol. 2022;322:C754–C761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eftekhari A, Maleki Dizaj S, Sharifi S, et al. The Use of nanomaterials in tissue engineering for cartilage regeneration; current approaches and future perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Qi Z, Zheng S, et al. The application of hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels in bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2019;2019:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdick JA, Prestwich GD. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Mater 2011;23:H41–H56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iturriaga L, Hernáez-Moya R, Erezuma I, et al. Advances in stem cell therapy for cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018;18:883–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed EM. Hydrogel: preparation, characterization, and applications: a review. J Adv Res 2015;6:105–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi Y-J, Cho D-W, Lee H. Development of silk fibroin scaffolds by using indirect 3D-bioprinting technology. Micromachines. 2021;13:43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie H, Yang K-K, Wang Y-Z. Photo-cross-linking: a powerful and versatile strategy to develop shape-memory polymers. Prog Polym Sci 2019;95:32–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zennifer A, Manivannan S, Sethuraman S, et al. 3D bioprinting and photocrosslinking: emerging strategies & future perspectives. Biomater Adv. 2022;134:112576.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin J, Yan M, Wang Y, et al. 3D bioprinting of low-concentration cell-laden gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) bioinks with a two-step cross-linking strategy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:6849–6857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobaraki M, Ghaffari M, Yazdanpanah A, et al. Bioinks and bioprinting: a focused review. Bioprinting. 2020;18:e00080.
   Google Scholar
• Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Inci I, Zhang YS, et al. Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview. Biomater Sci 2018;6:915–946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decante G, Costa JB, Silva-Correia J, et al. Engineering bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2021;13:032001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ifkovits JL, Burdick JA. Review: photopolymerizable and degradable biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng 2007;13:2369–2385.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hao Y, Fowler EW, Jia X. Chemical synthesis of biomimetic hydrogels for tissue engineering. Polym Int 2017;66:1787–1799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts JJ, Naudiyal P, Lim KS, et al. A comparative study of enzyme initiators for crosslinking phenol-functionalized hydrogels for cell encapsulation. Biomater Res 2016;20:30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lai J, Wang C, Wang M. 3D printing in biomedical engineering: processes, materials, and applications. Appl Phys Rev. 2021;8:021322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn D, Stevens LM, Zhou K, et al. Additives for ambient 3D printing with visible light. Adv Mater 2021;33:2104906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JR, Yong KW, Choi JY, et al. Recent advances in photo-crosslinkable hydrogels for biomedical applications. Biotechniques. 2019;66:40–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim KS, Galarraga JH, Cui X, et al. Fundamentals and applications of photo-cross-linking in bioprinting. Chem Rev 2020;120:10662–10694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiz-Fernández S, Pérez-Álvarez L, Silván U, et al. Photocrosslinkable and self-healable hydrogels of chitosan and hyaluronic acid. Int J Biol Macromol 2022;216:291–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim KS, Schon BS, Mekhileri NV, et al. New visible-light photoinitiating system for improved print fidelity in gelatin-based bioinks. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2:1752–1762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauptstein J, Forster L, Nadernezhad A, et al. Bioink platform utilizing dual-stage crosslinking of hyaluronic acid tailored for chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells. Macromol Biosci 2022;22:2100331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu XZ, Liu Y, Luo Y, et al. Disulfide cross-linked hyaluronan hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2002;3:1304–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei Q, Rao J, Bei HP, et al. 3D bioprinting photo-crosslinkable hydrogels for bone and cartilage repair. Int J Bioprinting. 2021;7:367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri-Felekori M, Nezafati N, Moraveji M, et al. Bioorthogonal hydroxyethyl cellulose-based scaffold crosslinked via click chemistry for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol 2021;183:2030–2043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zhu Z, Gao R, et al. Controlled release of MSC-derived small extracellular vesicles by an injectable diels-alder crosslinked hyaluronic acid/PEG hydrogel for osteoarthritis improvement. Acta Biomater 2021;128:163–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach JB, Bivens KA, Patrick CW, et al. Photocrosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels: natural, biodegradable tissue engineering scaffolds. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003;82:578–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Zhang Y, Zhang H, et al. A gelatin-hyaluronic acid double cross-linked hydrogel for regulating the growth and dual dimensional cartilage differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2021;17:1044–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highley CB, Song KH, Daly AC, et al. Jammed microgel inks for 3D printing applications. Adv Sci 2019;6:1801076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stichler S, Böck T, Paxton N, et al. Double printing of hyaluronic acid/poly(glycidol) hybrid hydrogels with poly(ϵ-caprolactone) for MSC chondrogenesis. Biofabrication. 2017;9:044108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg GCJ, Lim KS, Soliman BG, et al. Biological function following radical photo-polymerization of biomedical polymers and surrounding tissues: design considerations and cellular risk factors. Appl Phys Rev. 2021;8:011301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland BP, Kabra M, Kloxin CJ. Expanding the thiol–X toolbox: photoinitiation and materials application of the acid-catalyzed thiol–ene (ACT) reaction. Polym Chem 2021;12:1562–1570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibbitt MW, Kloxin AM, Sawicki LA, et al. Mechanical properties and degradation of chain and step-polymerized photodegradable hydrogels. Macromolecules. 2013;46:2785–2792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerobin E, Markovic M, Tomášiková Z, et al. Hyaluronic acid vinyl esters: a toolbox toward controlling mechanical properties of hydrogels for 3D microfabrication. J Polym Sci. 2020;58:1288–1298.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts JJ, Bryant SJ. Comparison of photopolymerizable thiol-ene PEG and acrylate-based PEG hydrogels for cartilage development. Biomaterials. 2013;34:9969–9979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira RF, Bártolo PJ. 3D Photo-Fabrication for tissue engineering and drug delivery. Engineering. 2015;1:090–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantani R, Turng L-S. Manufacturing of advanced biodegradable polymeric components. J Appl Polym Sci 2015;132; DOI:10.1002/app.42889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy CA, Lim KS, Woodfield TBF. Next evolution in organ-scale biofabrication: bioresin design for rapid high-resolution Vat polymerization. Adv Mater 2022;34:2107759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spikes JD, Shen HR, Kopecková P, et al. Photodynamic crosslinking of proteins. III. kinetics of the FMN- and rose bengal-sensitized photooxidation and intermolecular crosslinking of model tyrosine-containing N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymers. Photochem Photobiol 1999;70:130–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin T, Liu J, Zhao Z, et al. Redox sensitive hyaluronic acid-decorated graphene oxide for photothermally controlled tumor-cytoplasm-selective rapid drug delivery. Adv Funct Mater 2017;27:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer IS. Hyaluronic acid and controlled release: A review. Molecules. 2020;25:2649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Cao X, Dong H, et al. A hyaluronic acid based injectable hydrogel formed via photo-crosslinking reaction and thermal-induced diels-alder reaction for cartilage tissue engineering. Polymers. 2018;10:949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui X, Soliman BG, Alcala-Orozco CR, et al. Rapid photocrosslinking of silk hydrogels with high cell density and enhanced shape fidelity. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9:1901667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loebel C, Broguiere N, Alini M, et al. Microfabrication of photo-cross-linked hyaluronan hydrogels by single- and Two-photon tyramine oxidation. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16:2624–2630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang R, Gu Y, Wu Y, et al. Lithography-Based 3D bioprinting and bioinks for bone repair and regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021;7:806–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam T, Dehne T, Krüger JP, et al. Photopolymerizable gelatin and hyaluronic acid for stereolithographic 3D bioprinting of tissue-engineered cartilage. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2019;107:2649–2657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shie M-Y, Chang W-C, Wei L-J, et al. 3D printing of cytocompatible water-based light-cured polyurethane with hyaluronic acid for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Materials. 2017;10:136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Abdulla R, Parker B, et al. A simple and high-resolution stereolithography-based 3D bioprinting system using visible light crosslinkable bioinks. Biofabrication. 2015;7:45009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreu A, Su PC, Kim JH, et al. 4D printing materials for vat photopolymerization. Addit Manuf. 2021;44:102024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab A, Levato R, D’Este M, et al. Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Chem Rev 2020;120:11028–11055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker C, Jenkins AD. Kinetic approach of oxygen inhibition in ultraviolet- and laser-induced polymerizations. Macromolecules. 1985;18:1241–1244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim KS, Levato R, Costa PF, et al. Bio-resin for high resolution lithography-based biofabrication of complex cell-laden constructs. Biofabrication. 2018;10:034101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studer K, Decker C, Beck E, et al. Overcoming oxygen inhibition in UV-curing of acrylate coatings by carbon dioxide inerting, part I. Prog Org Coatings. 2003;48:92–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroni L, Boland T, Burdick JA, et al. Biofabrication: A guide to technology and terminology. Trends Biotechnol 2018;36:384–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang L, Highley CB, Sun W, et al. A generalizable strategy for the 3D bioprinting of hydrogels from nonviscous photo-crosslinkable inks. Adv Mater 2017;29:1604983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang L, Highley CB, Rodell CB, et al. 3D printing of shear-thinning hyaluronic acid hydrogels with secondary cross-linking. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2:1743–1751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 2014;32:773–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng J-W, Liu C-Y, Yen Y-K, et al. Screw extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK. Mater Des 2018;140:209–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeykoon C, Sri-Amphorn P, Fernando A. Optimization of fused deposition modeling parameters for improved PLA and ABS 3D printed structure. Int J Light Mater Manuf. 2020;3:284.
   Google Scholar
• Chauvette J-F, Brzeski D, Hia IL, et al. High-speed multinozzle additive manufacturing and extrusion modeling of large-scale microscaffold networks. Addit. Manuf. 2021;47:102294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scordo G, Bertana V, Scaltrito L, et al. A novel highly electrically conductive composite resin for stereolithography. Mater Today Commun. 2019;19:12–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni R, Qian B, Liu C, et al. A cross-linking strategy with moderated pre-polymerization of resin for stereolithography. RSC Adv 2018;8:29583–29588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Zou B, Xing H, et al. Preparation of Mn–Zn ferrite ceramic using stereolithography 3D printing technology. Ceram Int 2022;48:6923–6932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestler N, Wesemann C, Spies BC, et al. Dimensional accuracy of extrusion- and photopolymerization-based 3D printers: In vitro study comparing printed casts. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:103–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Placone JK, Engler AJ. Recent advances in extrusion-based 3D printing for biomedical applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7:1701161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choong YYC, Maleksaeedi S, Eng H, et al. 4D printing of high performance shape memory polymer using stereolithography. Mater Des 2017;126:219–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi Bazaz S, Rouhi O, Raoufi MA, et al. 3D printing of inertial microfluidic devices. Sci Rep 2020;10:5929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Lee H, Weisgraber TH, et al. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science. 2014;344:1373–1377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyotake EA, Douglas AW, Thomas EE, et al. Development and quantitative characterization of the precursor rheology of hyaluronic acid hydrogels for bioprinting. Acta Biomater 2019;95:176–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo TB, Spearman BS, Hlavac N, et al. Three-Dimensional bioprinted hyaluronic acid hydrogel test beds for assessing neural cell responses to competitive growth stimuli. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6:6819–6830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears NA, Seshadri DR, Dhavalikar PS, et al. A review of three-dimensional printing in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2016;22:298–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirdamadi E, Muselimyan N, Koti P, et al. Agarose slurry as a support medium for bioprinting and culturing freestanding cell-laden hydrogel constructs. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2019;6:158–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kunwar P, Jannini AVS, Xiong Z, et al. High-Resolution 3D printing of stretchable hydrogel structures using optical projection lithography. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:1640–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T, et al. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials. 2014;35:49–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Su X, Xu Y, et al. Ultrastructural characterization of the lower motor system in a mouse model of krabbe disease. Sci Rep 2016;6:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolesky DB, Homan KA, Skylar-Scott MA, et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2016;113:3179–3184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertlein S, Brown G, Lim KS, et al. Thiol-Ene clickable gelatin: a platform bioink for multiple 3D biofabrication technologies. Adv Mater 2017;29:1703404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CC, Boland ED, Williams SK, et al. Direct-write bioprinting three-dimensional biohybrid systems for future regenerative therapies. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2011;98:160–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüller-Ravoo S, Teixeira SM, Feijen J, et al. Flexible and elastic scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering prepared by stereolithography using poly(trimethylene carbonate)-based resins. Macromol Biosci 2013;13:1711–1719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Y-W, Zhang X-W, Mi C-H, et al. Recent advances in hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels for 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering applications. Smart Mater Med. 2023;4:59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Pescosolido L, Schuurman W, Malda J, et al. Hyaluronic acid and dextran-based semi-IPN hydrogels as biomaterials for bioprinting. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12:1831–1838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller M, Becher J, Schnabelrauch M, et al. Nanostructured pluronic hydrogels as bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2015;7:035006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini M, Idaszek J, Szöke K, et al. 3D bioprinting of BM-MSCs-loaded ECM biomimetic hydrogels forin vitroneocartilage formation. Biofabrication. 2016;8:035002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouser VHM, Abbadessa A, Levato R, et al. Development of a thermosensitive HAMA-containing bio-ink for the fabrication of composite cartilage repair constructs. Biofabrication. 2017;9:015026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C, Schimelman J, Wang P, et al. Photopolymerizable biomaterials and light-based 3D printing strategies for biomedical applications. Chem Rev 2020;120:10695–10743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Patel M, Patel R. Hyaluronic acid-based materials for bone regeneration: A review. React Funct Polym 2022;171:105151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang S, Wang J. Photo-crosslinkable hydrogel and its biological applications. Chinese Chem. Lett. 2021;32:1603–1614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poldervaart MT, Goversen B, de Ruijter M, et al. 3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0177628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong BM, Park SA, Park WH. Effect of photoinitiator on chain degradation of hyaluronic acid. Biomater Res 2019;23:19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ligon-Auer SC, Schwentenwein M, Gorsche C, et al. Toughening of photo-curable polymer networks: a review. Polym Chem 2016;7:257–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razaviye MK, Tafti RA, Khajehmohammadi M. An investigation on mechanical properties of PA12 parts produced by a SLS 3D printer: An experimental approach. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 2022;38:760–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauptstein J, Böck T, Bartolf-Kopp M, et al. Hyaluronic acid-based bioink composition enabling 3D bioprinting and improving quality of deposited cartilaginous extracellular matrix. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Gu Z, Liu J, et al. Arginine based poly (ester amide)/ hyaluronic acid hybrid hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym 2020;230:115640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee AK-X, Lin Y-H, Tsai C-H, et al. Digital light processing bioprinted human chondrocyte-laden poly (γ-glutamic acid)/hyaluronic acid Bio-Ink towards cartilage tissue engineering. Biomedicines. 2021;9:714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauptstein J, Forster L, Nadernezhad A, et al. Tethered TGF-β1 in a hyaluronic acid-based bioink for bioprinting cartilaginous tissues. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani F, Zamanian A, Behnamghader A, et al. Bioactive and biostable hyaluronic acid-pullulan dermal hydrogels incorporated with biomimetic hydroxyapatite spheres. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;112:110906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbadessa A, Mouser VHM, Blokzijl MM, et al. A synthetic thermosensitive hydrogel for cartilage bioprinting and its biofunctionalization with polysaccharides. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17:2137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Eglin D, Alini M, et al. Visible light-induced 3D bioprinting technologies and corresponding bioink materials for tissue engineering: a review. Engineering. 2021;7:966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedell ML, Navara AM, Du Y, et al. Chem Rev 2020;120:10744–10792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain Rakin R, Kumar H, Rajeev A, et al. Tunable metacrylated hyaluronic acid-based hybrid bioinks for stereolithography 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2021;13:044109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauptstein J, Forster L, Nadernezhad A, et al. Bioink platform utilizing dual-stage crosslinking of hyaluronic acid tailored for chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells. Macromol Biosci 2021;2100331.
   Google Scholar
• Wan T, Fan P, Zhang M, et al. Multiple crosslinking hyaluronic acid hydrogels with improved strength and 3D printability. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2022;5:334–343.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao G, Kim BS, Jang J, et al. Recent strategies in extrusion-based three-dimensional cell printing toward organ biofabrication. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5:1150–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan B, Kapetanovic E, Hockaday LAA, et al. Three-dimensional printed trileaflet valve conduits using biological hydrogels and human valve interstitial cells. Acta Biomater 2014;10:1836–1846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesti M, Müller M, Becher J, et al. A versatile bioink for three-dimensional printing of cellular scaffolds based on thermally and photo-triggered tandem gelation. Acta Biomater 2015;11:162–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Wang M, Yang S, et al. Bioprinting of an osteocyte network for biomimetic mineralization. Biofabrication. 2020;12:045013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Yue Z, Lucarelli E, et al. Comparative evaluation of the photodegradation of stearic acid by TiO2-modified cement under UV irradiation through water contact angle and absorbance studies. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9:1.
   Google Scholar
• van der Valk D, van der Ven C, Blaser M, et al. Engineering a 3D-bioprinted model of human heart valve disease using nanoindentation-based biomechanics. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Orellano I, Lam T, et al. Vascular bioprinting with enzymatically degradable bioinks via multi-material projection-based stereolithography. Acta Biomater 2020;117:121–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell CDO, Konate S, Onofrillo C, Free-form co-axial bioprinting of a gelatin methacryloyl bio-ink by direct in situ photo-crosslinking during extrusion. et al. Bioprinting. 2020;19:e00087.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell CD, Di Bella C, Thompson F, et al. Development of the biopen: a handheld device for surgical printing of adipose stem cells at a chondral wound site. Biofabrication. 2016;8:015019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchi S, Onofrillo C, O’Connell CD, et al. Handheld co-axial bioprinting: application to in situ surgical cartilage repair. Sci Rep 2017;7:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Bella C, Duchi S, O’Connell CD, et al. In situhandheld three-dimensional bioprinting for cartilage regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2018;12:611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petta D, Grijpma DW, Alini M, et al. Three-dimensional printing of a tyramine hyaluronan derivative with double gelation mechanism for independent tuning of shear thinning and postprinting curing. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018;4:3088–3098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai S, Ohi H, Taya M. Gelatin/hyaluronic acid content in hydrogels obtained through blue light-induced gelation affects hydrogel properties and adipose stem cell behaviors. Biomolecules. 2019;9:342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai S, Ohi H, Hotta T, et al. Differentiation potential of human adipose stem cells bioprinted with hyaluronic acid/gelatin-based bioink through microextrusion and visible light-initiated crosslinking. Biopolymers. 2018;109:e23080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park TY, Yang YJ, Ha D-H, et al. Marine-derived natural polymer-based bioprinting ink for biocompatible, durable, and controllable 3D constructs. Biofabrication. 2019;11:035001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eibel A, Fast DE, Gescheidt G. Choosing the ideal photoinitiator for free radical photopolymerizations: predictions based on simulations using established data. Polym Chem 2018;9:5107–5115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaastrup K, Sikes HD. Using photo-initiated polymerization reactions to detect molecular recognition. Chem Soc Rev 2016;45:532–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomal W, Ortyl J. Water-soluble photoinitiators in biomedical applications. Polymers. 2020;12:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C, O’Connell CD, Onofrillo C, et al. Human articular cartilage repair: sources and detection of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in photo-crosslinkable hydrogel bioscaffolds. Stem Cells Transl Med 2020;9:302–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazir F, Ashraf I, Iqbal M, et al. 6-deoxy-aminocellulose derivatives embedded soft gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels for improved wound healing applications: In vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Biol Macromol 2021;185:419–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petta D, D’Amora U, Ambrosio L, et al. Hyaluronic acid as a bioink for extrusion-based 3D printing. Biofabrication. 2020;12:032001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Jin X, Dai R, et al. An ultrafast hydrogel photocrosslinking method for direct laser bioprinting. RSC Adv 2016;6:21099–21104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark CC, Aleman J, Mutkus L, et al. A mechanically robust thixotropic collagen and hyaluronic acid bioink supplemented with gelatin nanoparticles. Bioprinting. 2019;16:e00058.
   Google Scholar
• Yang KH, Lindberg G, Soliman B, et al. Effect of photoinitiator on precursory stability and curing depth of thiol-ene clickable gelatin. Polymers. 2021;13:1877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unal DB, Caliari SR, Lampe KJ. 3D hyaluronic acid hydrogels for modeling oligodendrocyte progenitor cell behavior as a function of matrix stiffness. Biomacromolecules. 2020;21:4962–4971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahoff S, Meinert C, Bas O, et al. Effect of gelatin source and photoinitiator type on chondrocyte redifferentiation in gelatin methacryloyl-based tissue-engineered cartilage constructs. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7:1761–1772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han WT, Jang T, Chen S, et al. Improved cell viability for large-scale biofabrication with photo-crosslinkable hydrogel systems through a dual-photoinitiator approach. Biomater Sci 2020;8:450–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar H, Keekyoung K. Stereolithography 3D bioprinting. In: 3D Bioprinting. New York: Humana; 2020, p. 93–108.
   Google Scholar
• Cosola A, Chiappone A, Martinengo C, et al. Gelatin type A from porcine skin used as Co-initiator in a radical photo-initiating system. Polymers. 2019;11:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Hou Y, Park H, et al. Visible light crosslinkable chitosan hydrogels for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2012;8:1730–1738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun A, He X, Ji X, et al. Current research progress of photopolymerized hydrogels in tissue engineering. Chinese Chem Lett. 2021;32:2117–2126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamoun EA, Winkel A, Eisenburger M, et al. Carboxylated camphorquinone as visible-light photoinitiator for biomedical application: synthesis, characterization, and application. Arab J Chem. 2016;9:745–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang X, Yu Y, Bao Y, et al. Real time quantification of the chemical cross-link density of a hydrogel by in situ UV-vis spectroscopy. Polym Chem 2015;6:4252–4257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato T, Aoyagi T, Ebara M, et al. Catechol-modified hyaluronic acid: in situ-forming hydrogels by auto-oxidation of catechol or photo-oxidation using visible light. Polym Bull 2017;74:4069–4085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Kumar H, Tian Z, et al. Visible light photoinitiation of cell-adhesive gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for stereolithography 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:26859–26869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim KS, Klotz BJ, Lindberg GCJ, et al. Visible light cross-linking of gelatin hydrogels offers an enhanced cell microenvironment with improved light penetration depth. Macromol Biosci 2019;19:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih H, Greene T, Korc M, et al. Modular and adaptable tumor niche prepared from visible light initiated thiol-norbornene photopolymerization. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17:3872–3882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell BP, Elser JA, Mu A, et al. Synergistic effects of SDF-1α chemokine and hyaluronic acid release from degradable hydrogels on directing bone marrow derived cell homing to the myocardium. Biomaterials. 2012;33:7849–7857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi G, Cha HJ. Comparative studies on thin polycaprolactone-tricalcium phosphate composite scaffolds and its interaction with mesenchymal stem cells. Biomater Res 2019;23:1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alcala-Orozco CR, Mutreja I, Cui X, et al. Design and characterisation of multi-functional strontium-gelatin nanocomposite bioinks with improved print fidelity and osteogenic capacity. Bioprinting. 2020;18:e00073.
   Google Scholar
• Hidaka M, Kojima M, Nakahata M, et al. Visible light-curable chitosan Ink for extrusion-based and Vat polymerization-based 3D bioprintings. Polymers. 2021;13:1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjar A, McFarland B, Mecham K, et al. Engineering of tissue constructs using coaxial bioprinting. Bioact Mater. 2021;6:460–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M, Rizzo R, Surman F, et al. Guiding lights: tissue bioprinting using photoactivated materials. Chem Rev 2020;120:10950–11027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galarraga JH, Kwon MY, Burdick JA. 3D bioprinting via an in situ crosslinking technique towards engineering cartilage tissue. Sci Rep 2019;9:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawko SA, Suri S, Truong Q, et al. Photopatterned anisotropic swelling of dual-crosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels. Acta Biomater 2009;5:14–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun M, Cheng J, Zhang J, et al. Stepwise cross-linking of fibroin and hyaluronic for 3D printing flexible scaffolds with tunable mechanical properties. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021;7:916–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning L, Sun H, Lelong T, et al. 3D bioprinting of scaffolds with living Schwann cells for potential nerve tissue engineering applications. Biofabrication. 2018;10:035014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highley CB, Rodell CB, Burdick JA. Direct 3D printing of shear-thinning hydrogels into self-healing hydrogels. Adv Mater 2015;27:5075–5079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shopperly LK, Spinnen J, Krüger J, et al. Blends of gelatin and hyaluronic acid stratified by stereolithographic bioprinting approximate cartilaginous matrix gradients. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2022;110:2310–2322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim DG, Kang E, Jeong SH. pH-dependent nanodiamonds enhance the mechanical properties of 3D-printed hyaluronic acid nanocomposite hydrogels. J. Nanobiotechnology. 2020;18:88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai X, Ruan C, Ma Y, et al. 3D-Bioprinted osteoblast-laden nanocomposite hydrogel constructs with induced microenvironments promote cell viability, differentiation, and osteogenesis both in vitro and In vivo. Adv Sci 2018;5:1700550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh S, Harrysson OLA, Rao PK, et al. Extrusion bioprinting: recent progress, challenges, and future opportunities. Bioprinting. 2021;21:e00116.
   Google Scholar
• Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al. Vat polymerization-based bioprinting—process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges. Biofabrication. 2020;12:022001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez Caballero SS, Saiz E, Montembault A, et al. 3-D printing of chitosan-calcium phosphate inks: rheology, interactions and characterization. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2019;30:6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu HHK, Wang P, Wang L, et al. Calcium phosphate cements for bone engineering and their biological properties. Bone Res 2017;5:17056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezger T. The rheology handbook: for users of rotational and oscillatory rheometers. In: European Coatings. Hannover: Vincentz Network Publisher; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Oyen ML. Mechanical characterisation of hydrogel materials. Int Mater Rev 2014;59:44–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton N, Smolan W, Böck T, et al. Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability. Biofabrication. 2017;9:044107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao T, Gillispie GJ, Copus JS, et al. Optimization of gelatin–alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach. Biofabrication. 2018;10:034106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend JM, Beck EC, Gehrke SH, et al. Flow behavior prior to crosslinking: the need for precursor rheology for placement of hydrogels in medical applications and for 3D bioprinting. Prog Polym Sci 2019;91:126–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenz A, Borchers K, Tovar GEM, et al. Bone matrix production in hydroxyapatite-modified hydrogels suitable for bone bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2017;9:044103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Wu J, Liu M, et al. 3D bioprinting of self-standing silk-based bioink. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018;7:1701026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Yang F, Zhao H, et al. Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting. Sci Rep 2016;6:29977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantides N, Wang L, Pruiksma T, et al. Correlating rheological properties and printability of collagen bioinks: the effects of riboflavin photocrosslinking and pH. Biofabrication. 2017;9:034102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro A, Blokzijl MM, Levato R, et al. Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2017;10:014102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman R, Bhaduri B, Mir M, et al. High-Resolution projection microstereolithography for patterning of neovasculature. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5:610–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Yeon YK, Lee JM, et al. Structural absorption by barbule microstructures of super black bird of paradise feathers. Nat Commun 2018;9:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du X, Dubin PL, Hoagland DA, et al. Protein-Selective coacervation with hyaluronic acid. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:726–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann J, Möhle K, Hofmann H-J, et al. Molecular dynamics study of hyaluronic acid in water. J. Mol. Struct. Theochem. 1998;422:109–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkari S, Khajehmohammadi M, Davari N, et al. The effects of process parameters on polydopamine coatings employed in tissue engineering applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10;1005413. DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2022.1005413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo HS, Lee EA, Yoon JJ, et al. Hyaluronic acid modified biodegradable scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawasaki K, Ochi M, Uchio Y, et al. Hyaluronic acid enhances proliferation and chondroitin sulfate synthesis in cultured chondrocytes embedded in collagen gels. J Cell Physiol 1999;179:142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmonde-White KA, Mandair GS, Raaii F, et al. Raman spectroscopy of dried synovial fluid droplets as a rapid diagnostic for knee joint damage. In: Biomedical optical spectroscopy, Vol. 6853. Bellingham: SPIE; 2008, p. 203–211.
   Google Scholar
• Uzieliene I, Bironaite D, Bernotas P, et al. Mechanotransducive biomimetic systems for chondrogenic differentiation in vitro. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:9690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan H, Hu Y, Qin L, et al. Porous gelatin–chondroitin–hyaluronate tri-copolymer scaffold containing microspheres loaded with TGF-β1 induces differentiation of mesenchymal stem cellsin vivo for enhancing cartilage repair. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2006;77A:785–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minsky BB, Antoni CH, Boehm H. Controlled immobilization strategies to probe short hyaluronan-protein interactions. Sci Rep 2016;6:21608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freed LE, Marquis JC, Nohria A, et al. Neocartilage formationin vitro andin vivo using cells cultured on synthetic biodegradable polymers. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:11–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra S, Hascall VC, Markwald RR, et al. Interactions between hyaluronan and its receptors (CD44, RHAMM) regulate the activities of inflammation and cancer. Front Immunol 2015;6:201. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toole BP. Hyaluronan: from extracellular glue to pericellular cue. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:528–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naor D. Editorial: interaction between hyaluronic acid and Its receptors (CD44, RHAMM) regulates the activity of inflammation and cancer. Front Immunol 2016;7:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa RR, Reis RL, Pashkuleva I. Glycosaminoglycans as polyelectrolytes: implications in bioactivity and assembly of biomedical devices. Int Mater Rev 2022;2013:1.
   Google Scholar
• Waheed A, Abu M, Mazumder J, et al. Functional biopolymers. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Booth C, Inusa B, Obaro SK. Infection in sickle cell disease: a review. Int J Infect Dis 2010;14:e2–e12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balyura M, Gelfgat E, Ehrhart-Bornstein M, et al. Transplantation of bovine adrenocortical cells encapsulated in alginate. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112:2527–2532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol E. Photopolymerized porous hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2021;22:1325–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Ren J, Bai Y, et al. Exosomes from hypoxia-treated human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells enhance angiogenesis through VEGF/VEGF-R. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2019;109:59–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Wyant T, Anaya-Bergman C, et al. The capsule of porphyromonas gingivalis leads to a reduction in the host inflammatory response, evasion of phagocytosis, and increase in virulence. Infect Immun 2011;79:4533–4542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtiary N, Liu C, Ghorbani F. Bioactive inks development for osteochondral tissue engineering: a mini-review. Gels. 2021;7:274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokeshwar VB, Rubinowicz D, Schroeder GL, et al. Stromal and epithelial expression of tumor markers hyaluronic acid and HYAL1 hyaluronidase in prostate cancer. J Biol Chem 2001;276:11922–11932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugahara KN, Murai T, Nishinakamura H, et al. Hyaluronan oligosaccharides induce CD44 cleavage and promote cell migration in CD44-expressing tumor cells. J Biol Chem 2003;278:32259–32265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano Cardona L, Muñoz Mata E. Paraninfo digital. Early Hum Dev 2013;83(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Patel M, Koh W-G. Composite hydrogel of methacrylated hyaluronic acid and fragmented polycaprolactone nanofiber for osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamanlar S, Sant S, Boudou T, et al. Surface functionalization of hyaluronic acid hydrogels by polyelectrolyte multilayer films. Biomaterials. 2011;32:5590–5599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri S, Bagher Z, Hassanzadeh S, et al. Control of cellular adhesiveness in hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel through varying degrees of phenol moiety cross-linking. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. - Part A. 2021;109:649–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen AC, Bae WC, Schinagl RM, et al. Depth- and strain-dependent mechanical and electromechanical properties of full-thickness bovine articular cartilage in confined compression. J Biomech 2001;34:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae KH, Yoon JJ, Park TG. Fabrication of hyaluronic acid hydrogel beads for cell encapsulation. Biotechnol Prog 2006;22:297–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noh I, Kim N, Tran HN, et al. 3D printable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel for its potential application as a bioink in tissue engineering. Biomater Res 2019;23:3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang LL, Highley CB, Yeh Y, et al. Three-dimensional extrusion bioprinting of single- and double-network hydrogels containing dynamic covalent crosslinks. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2018;106:865–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Choi B, Hu J, et al. Injectable chitosan hyaluronic acid hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2013;9:4779–4786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh RH, Jin Y, Kang BJ, et al. Chondrogenically primed tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells encapsulated in riboflavin-induced photocrosslinking collagen-hyaluronic acid hydrogel for meniscus tissue repairs. Acta Biomater 2017;53:318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozari N, Biazar E, Kamalvand M, et al. Photo cross-linkable biopolymers for cornea tissue healing. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2022;17:58–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansary TM, Hossain MR, Kamiya K, et al. Inflammatory molecules associated with ultraviolet radiation-mediated skin aging. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:3974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenn SL, Oldinski RA. Visible light crosslinking of methacrylated hyaluronan hydrogels for injectable tissue repair. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2016;104:1229–1236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirillova A, Maxson R, Stoychev G, et al. 4D biofabrication using shape-morphing hydrogels. Adv Mater 2017;29:1703443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamoun EA, El-Betany A, Menzel H, et al. Influence of photoinitiator concentration and irradiation time on the crosslinking performance of visible-light activated pullulan-HEMA hydrogels. Int J Biol Macromol 2018;120:1884–1892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skardal A, Zhang J, McCoard L, et al. Photocrosslinkable hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels for two-step bioprinting. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16:2675–2685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levett PA, Hutmacher DW, Malda J, et al. Hyaluronic acid enhances the mechanical properties of tissue-engineered cartilage constructs. PLoS One. 2014;9:e113216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng X, Huang B, Hu R, et al. 3D printing of robust and biocompatible poly(ethylene glycol)diacrylate/nano-hydroxyapatite compositesviacontinuous liquid interface production. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9:1315–1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwon K, Kim E, Tae G. Heparin-hyaluronic acid hydrogel in support of cellular activities of 3D encapsulated adipose derived stem cells. Acta Biomater 2017;49:284–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashok A, Andrabi SS, Mansoor S, et al. Antioxidant therapy in oxidative stress-induced neurodegenerative diseases: role of nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems in clinical translation. Antioxidants. 2022;11:408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colosi C, Shin SR, Manoharan V, et al. Microfluidic bioprinting of heterogeneous 3D tissue constructs using Low-viscosity bioink. Adv Mater 2016;28:677–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeinzadeh S, Khorasani SN, Ma J, et al. Synthesis and gelation characteristics of photo-crosslinkable star poly(ethylene oxide-co-lactide-glycolide acrylate) macromonomers. Polymer. 2011;52:3887–3896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy SV, Skardal A, Atala A. Evaluation of hydrogels for bio-printing applications. J Biomed Mater Res. - Part A. 2013;101 A:272–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari A, Amirsadeghi A, Hassanajili S, et al. Bioactive antibacterial bilayer PCL/gelatin nanofibrous scaffold promotes full-thickness wound healing. Int J Pharm 2020;583:119413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pacelli S, Paolicelli P, Petralito S, et al. Investigating the role of polydopamine to modulate stem cell adhesion and proliferation on gellan Gum-based hydrogels. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020;3:945–951.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kankala RK, Wang S-B, Chen A-Z, et al. Handbook of nanomaterials for cancer theranostics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2018, pp. 33–62.
   Google Scholar
• Saarai A, Kasparkova V, Sedlacek T, et al. On the development and characterisation of crosslinked sodium alginate/gelatine hydrogels. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013;18:152–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park AG, Guo H, Temenoff X, et al. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:16.
   Google Scholar
• Nagaraj A, Etxeberria AE, Naffa R, et al. 3D-Printed hybrid collagen/GelMA hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Biology (Basel). 2022;11:1561.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma X, Liu S, Tang H, et al. In situ photocrosslinked hyaluronic acid and poly (γ-glutamic acid) hydrogels as injectable drug carriers for load-bearing tissue application. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2018;29:2252–2266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurak M, Wiącek AE, Ładniak A, et al. What affects the biocompatibility of polymers? Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2021;294:102451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Kerns DG. Mechanisms of guided bone regeneration: a review. Open Dent. J. 2014;8:56–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoshikawa A, Nakayama Y, Matsuda T, et al. Encapsulation of chondrocytes in photopolymerizable styrenated gelatin for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2006;12:2333–2341.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nam SY, Park SH. ECM based bioink for tissue mimetic 3D bioprinting. In: Noh I, editor, Biomimetic medical materials. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, Vol 1064. Singapore: Springer; 2018. Doi:10.1007/978-981-13-0445-3_20.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Zou Q, Wei J, et al. The degradation regulation of 3D printed scaffolds for promotion of osteogenesis and in vivo tracking. Compos Part B Eng. 2021;222:109084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuai C, Yang W, Feng P, et al. Accelerated degradation of HAP/PLLA bone scaffold by PGA blending facilitates bioactivity and osteoconductivity. Bioact Mater. 2021;6:490–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Xia X, Zou Q, et al. The long-term behaviors and differences in bone reconstruction of three polymer-based scaffolds with different degradability. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7:7690–7703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah SS, Liang H, Pandit S, et al. Optimization of degradation profile for New scaffold in cartilage repair. Cartilage. 2018;9:438–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khetan S, Guvendiren M, Legant WR, et al. Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat Mater 2013;12:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahraminasab M. Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds. Biomed Eng Online. 2020;19:69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ. Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Cell Adh Migr. 2010;4:377–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lien S-M, Ko L-Y, Huang T-J. Effect of pore size on ECM secretion and cell growth in gelatin scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2009;5:670–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong K, Chua C, Sudarmadji N, et al. Engineering functionally graded tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2008;1:140–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagde AD, Kuthe AM, Nagdeve SR, et al. Geometric modeling and finite element simulation for architecture design of 3D printed Bio-ceramic scaffold used in bone tissue engineering. J Indian Inst Sci 2019;99:361–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provaggi E, Capelli C, Rahmani B, et al. 3D printing assisted finite element analysis for optimising the manufacturing parameters of a lumbar fusion cage. Mater Des 2019;163:107540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu S, Albertino F, Omidinia Anarkoli A, et al. Controlling structure with injectable biomaterials to better mimic tissue heterogeneity and anisotropy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10:2002221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill S, Lohfeld S, McHugh PE. Finite element predictions compared to experimental results for the effective modulus of bone tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by selective laser sintering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009;20:1255–1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae MS, Ohe J-Y, Lee JB, et al. Photo-cured hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels containing growth and differentiation factor 5 (GDF-5) for bone tissue regeneration. Bone. 2014;59:189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae MS, Yang DH, Lee JB, et al. Photo-cured hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels containing simvastatin as a bone tissue regeneration scaffold. Biomaterials. 2011;32:8161–8171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh Y-H, Shen B-Y, Wang Y-H, et al. Healing of osteochondral defects implanted with biomimetic scaffolds of poly(ϵ-caprolactone)/hydroxyapatite and glycidyl-methacrylate-modified hyaluronic acid in a minipig. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19:1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma K, Zhao T, Yang L, et al. Application of robotic-assisted in situ 3D printing in cartilage regeneration with HAMA hydrogel: An in vivo study. J Adv Res 2020;23:123–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia H, Zhao D, Zhu H, et al. Lyophilized scaffolds fabricated from 3D-printed photocurable natural hydrogel for cartilage regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:31704–31715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Später T, Mariyanats AO, Syachina MA, et al. In vitroandin VivoAnalysis of adhesive, anti-inflammatory, and proangiogenic properties of novel 3D printed hyaluronic acid glycidyl methacrylate hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6:5744–5757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar