Multiphysics multi-scale computational framework for linking process–structure–property relationships in metal additive manufacturing: a critical review

References

• Frazier WE. Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform. 2014;23:1917–1928. doi:10.1007/S11665-014-0958-Z/FIGURES/9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sames WJ, List FA, Pannala S, et al. The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Int Mater Rev. 2016;61:315–360. doi:10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisario A, Kazarian M, Martina F, et al. Metal additive manufacturing in the commercial aviation industry: a review. J Manuf Syst. 2019;53:124–149. doi:10.1016/J.JMSY.2019.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho YH, Joshi SS, Wu TC, et al. In-vitro bio-corrosion behavior of friction stir additively manufactured AZ31B magnesium alloy-hydroxyapatite composites. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;109:110632. doi:10.1016/J.MSEC.2020.110632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho YH, Man K, Joshi SS, et al. In-vitro biomineralization and biocompatibility of friction stir additively manufactured AZ31B magnesium alloy-hydroxyapatite composites. Bioact Mater. 2020;5:891–901. doi:10.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2020.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Lu C, Peng S, et al. Laser additive manufacturing of Mg-based composite with improved degradation behaviour. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2020;15:278–293. doi:10.1080/17452759.2020.1748381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh GL, Zhang H, Chong TH, et al. 3D printing of multilayered and multimaterial electronics: a review. Adv Electron Mater. 2021;7:2100445. doi:10.1002/AELM.202100445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, et al. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos B Eng. 2017;110:442–458. doi:10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2016.11.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakhdar Y, Tuck C, Binner J, et al. Additive manufacturing of advanced ceramic materials. Prog Mater Sci. 2021;116:100736. doi:10.1016/J.PMATSCI.2020.100736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Chen F, Huang Z, et al. Additive manufacturing of functionally graded materials: a review. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;764:138209. doi:10.1016/J.MSEA.2019.138209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichardt A, Shapiro AA, Otis R, et al. Advances in additive manufacturing of metal-based functionally graded materials. Int Mater Rev. 2020;66:1–29. doi:10.1080/09506608.2019.1709354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima DD, Mantri SA, Mikler CV, et al. Laser additive processing of a functionally graded internal fracture fixation plate. Mater Des. 2017;130:8–15. doi:10.1016/J.MATDES.2017.05.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazir A, Abate KM, Kumar A, et al. A state-of-the-art review on types, design, optimization, and additive manufacturing of cellular structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;104:3489–3510. doi:10.1007/S00170-019-04085-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagesha BK, Dhinakaran V, Varsha Shree M, et al. Review on characterization and impacts of the lattice structure in additive manufacturing. Mater Today Proc. 2020;21:916–919. doi:10.1016/J.MATPR.2019.08.158
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoud D, Elbestawi MA. Lattice structures and functionally graded materials applications in additive manufacturing of orthopedic implants: a review. J Manuf Mater Process. 2017;1:13. doi:10.3390/JMMP1020013
   Google Scholar
• Yu WH, Sing SL, Chua CK, et al. Particle-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites fabricated by selective laser melting: a state of the art review. Prog Mater Sci. 2019;104:330–379. doi:10.1016/J.PMATSCI.2019.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galati M, Iuliano L. A literature review of powder-based electron beam melting focusing on numerical simulations. Addit Manuf. 2018;19:1–20. doi:10.1016/J.ADDMA.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu HZ, Mishra RS. Additive friction stir deposition: a deformation processing route to metal additive manufacturing. Mater Res Lett. 2021;9:71–83. doi:10.1080/21663831.2020.1847211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayat M, Mohanty S, Hattel JH. A systematic investigation of the effects of process parameters on heat and fluid flow and metallurgical conditions during laser-based powder bed fusion of Ti6Al4V alloy. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;139:213–230. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Lee SH. CMT-based wire arc additive manufacturing using 316L stainless steel (2): solidification Map of the multilayer deposit. Metals (Basel). 2021;11:1725. doi:10.3390/met11111725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J, Zhou Y, Liu C, et al. Wire arc additive manufacturing of AZ31 magnesium alloy: grain refinement by adjusting pulse frequency. Materials (Basel). 2016;9:823. doi:10.3390/MA9100823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukhotskiy V. Computational analysis of liquid metal drop-on-demand jetting and solidification using a contactless magnetohydrodynamic actuator. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Palanivel S, Sidhar H, Mishra RS. Friction stir additive manufacturing: route to high structural performance. JOM. 2015;67:616–621. doi:10.1007/S11837-014-1271-X/FIGURES/6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palanivel S, Mishra RS. Building without melting: a short review of friction-based additive manufacturing techniques. Int J Addit Subtract Mater Manuf. 2017;1:82. doi:10.1504/IJASMM.2017.082991
   Google Scholar
• Friction stir additive manufacturing for high structural performance through microstructural control in an Mg based WE43 alloy. Elsevier Enhanced Reader. n.d. https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0261306914007857?token=FBB16201113973307AF3245BF8D33DBCD27597D0764ADB8C82CDE57D4F0C20FB33AF0425ED4614C5670A1AB3C3BA8D1A&originRegion=us-east-1&originCreation=20211212052332 (accessed December 10, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Li D. A review of microstructure evolution during ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2021;113:1–19. doi:10.1007/S00170-020-06439-8/FIGURES/18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friel RJ, Harris RA. Ultrasonic additive manufacturing – a hybrid production process for novel functional products. Procedia CIRP. 2013;6:35–40. doi:10.1016/J.PROCIR.2013.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Hehr A, Norfolk M. A comprehensive review of ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J. 2020;26:445–458. doi:10.1108/RPJ-03-2019-0056/FULL/XML
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Monaghan T, Nguyen TT, et al. Multifunctional metal matrix composites with embedded printed electrical materials fabricated by ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Compos B Eng. 2017;113:342–354. doi:10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2017.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin S, Cavaliere P, Aldwell B, et al. Cold spray additive manufacturing and repair: fundamentals and applications. Addit Manuf. 2018;21:628–650. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafaei A, Elliott AM, Barnes JE, et al. Binder jet 3D printing—process parameters, materials, properties, modeling, and challenges. Prog Mater Sci. 2021;119:100707. doi:10.1016/J.PMATSCI.2020.100707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziaee M, Crane NB. Binder jetting: a review of process, materials, and methods. Addit Manuf. 2019;28:781–801. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülcan O, Günaydın K, Tamer A. The state of the art of material jetting—a critical review. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13:2829. doi:10.3390/POLYM13162829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B, et al. Material jetting. In: Additive manufacturing technologies. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 203–235. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56127-7_7
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Huang Y, Rani Kasinathan A, et al. 3-Dimensional heat transfer modeling for laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing with volumetric heat sources based on varied thermal conductivity and absorptivity. Opt Laser Technol. 2019;109:297–312. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollamahmutoglu M, Yilmaz O. Volumetric heat source model for laser-based powder bed fusion process in additive manufacturing. Therm Sci Eng Prog. 2021;25:101021. doi:10.1016/j.tsep.2021.101021
   Google Scholar
• Wei HL, Mukherjee T, Zhang W, et al. Mechanistic models for additive manufacturing of metallic components. Prog Mater. Sci. 2021;116. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sih SS, Barlow JW. Measurement and prediction of the thermal conductivity of powders at high temperatures. Solid Freeform 400 Fabrication Symposium Proceedings. 1992, p. 321–329.
   Google Scholar
• Cook PS, Murphy AB. Simulation of melt pool behaviour during additive manufacturing: underlying physics and progress. Addit Manuf. 2020;31:100909. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.100909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee T, Wei HL, De A, et al. Heat and fluid flow in additive manufacturing—part I: modeling of powder bed fusion. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;150:304–313. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Zhu H, Peng G, et al. Microstructure prediction of selective laser melting AlSi10Mg using finite element analysis. Mater Des. 2018;142:319–328. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladani L, Romano J, Brindley W, et al. Effective liquid conductivity for improved simulation of thermal transport in laser beam melting powder bed technology. Addit Manuf. 2017;14:13–23. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldak J, Chakravarti A, Bibby M. A new finite element model for welding heat sources. Metall Trans B. 1984;15:299–305. doi:10.1007/BF02667333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagade P, Gautham BP, De A, et al. Analytical estimation of fusion zone dimensions and cooling rates in part scale laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. 2021;46:102222. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foroozmehr A, Badrossamay M, Foroozmehr E, et al. Finite element simulation of selective laser melting process considering optical penetration depth of laser in powder bed. Mater Des. 2016;89:255–263. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin J, Zhu H, Ke L, et al. A finite element model of thermal evolution in laser micro sintering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;83:1847–1859. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7609-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Gu D. Thermal behavior during selective laser melting of commercially pure titanium powder: numerical simulation and experimental study. Addit Manuf. 2014;1-4:99–109. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2014.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Zhang DQ, Cai QZ, Liu JH, et al. Select laser melting of W-Ni-Fe powders: simulation and experimental study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2010;51:649–658. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2641-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criales LE, Arısoy YM, Özel T. Sensitivity analysis of material and process parameters in finite element modeling of selective laser melting of Inconel 625. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;86:2653–2666. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-8329-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Q, Gu D, Xia M, et al. Effects of laser processing parameters on thermal behavior and melting/solidification mechanism during selective laser melting of TiC/Inconel 718 composites. Opt Laser Technol. 2016;84:9–22. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antony K, Arivazhagan N, Senthilkumaran K. Numerical and experimental investigations on laser melting of stainless steel 316L metal powders. J Manuf Process. 2014;16:345–355. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhang J, Pang Z. Numerical and experimental investigation into the subsequent thermal cycling during selective laser melting of multi-layer 316L stainless steel. Opt Laser Technol. 2018;98:23–32. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.07.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumder S, Pantawane MV, Ho Y-H, et al. Spatial response of laser powder bed additively manufactured Ti6Al4V to temperature variation of aqueous electrolyte. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process. 2020;126; doi:10.1007/s00339-020-04082-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantawane MV, Ho Y-H, Joshi SS, et al. Computational assessment of thermokinetics and associated microstructural evolution in laser powder bed fusion manufacturing of Ti6Al4V alloy. Sci Rep. 2020;10. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63281-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho YH, Mazumder S, Pantawane MV, et al. Effect of spatially varying thermokinetics on the electrochemical response of laser additively manufactured Ti6Al4V. Adv Eng Mater. 2022:2100938. doi:10.1002/ADEM.202100938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi SS, Sharma S, Mazumder S, et al. Solidification and microstructure evolution in additively manufactured H13 steel via directed energy deposition: integrated experimental and computational approach. J Manuf Process. 2021;68:852–866. doi:10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2021.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan Z, Liu W, Tang Z, et al. Review on thermal analysis in laser-based additive manufacturing. Opt Laser Technol. 2018;106:427–441. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.04.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Ramakrishna SA, Ramkumar J. Numerical simulation of melt hydrodynamics in laser micro processing of metals. Procedia CIRP. 2020;95:944–949. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.186
   Google Scholar
• Mayi YA, Dal M, Peyre P, et al. Erratum: transient dynamics and stability of keyhole at threshold in laser powder bed fusion regime investigated by finite element modeling. J Laser Appl. 2021;33:029902. doi:10.2351/7.0000371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan Z, Yu G, He X, et al. Numerical simulation of thermal behavior and multicomponent mass transfer in direct laser deposition of Co-base alloy on steel. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;104:28–38. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.08.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queva A, Guillemot G, Moriconi C, et al. Numerical study of the impact of vaporisation on melt pool dynamics in laser powder bed fusion - application to IN718 and Ti–6Al–4V. Addit Manuf. 2020;35:101249. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtois M, Carin M, le Masson P, et al. A new approach to compute multi-reflections of laser beam in a keyhole for heat transfer and fluid flow modelling in laser welding. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2013;46:505305. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/46/50/505305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan JL, Tang C, Wong CH. A computational study on porosity evolution in parts produced by selective laser melting. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2018;49:3663–3673. doi:10.1007/s11661-018-4697-x
   Google Scholar
• Liu FQ, Wei L, Shi SQ, et al. On the varieties of build features during multi-layer laser directed energy deposition. Addit Manuf. 2020;36:101491. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khairallah SA, Anderson A. Mesoscopic simulation model of selective laser melting of stainless steel powder. J Mater Process Technol. 2014;214:2627–2636. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khairallah SA, Anderson AT, Rubenchik A, et al. Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones. Acta Mater. 2016;108:36–45. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakirov A, Belousov S, Bogdanova M, et al. Predictive modeling of laser and electron beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals at the mesoscale. Addit Manuf. 2020;35:101236. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng M, Wei L, Chen J, et al. A novel method for the molten pool and porosity formation modelling in selective laser melting. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;140:1091–1105. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.06.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu D, Xia M, Dai D. On the role of powder flow behavior in fluid thermodynamics and laser processability of Ni-based composites by selective laser melting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2019;137:67–78. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cundall PA, Strack ODL. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique. 1979;29:47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuben JC, Iliopoulos AP, Michopoulos JG. Discrete element modeling of particle-based additive manufacturing processes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2016;305:537–561. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2016.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Yan W, Liu WK, et al. Powder-scale multi-physics modeling of multi-layer multi-track selective laser melting with sharp interface capturing method. Comput Mech. 2019;63:649–661. doi:10.1007/s00466-018-1614-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Yang L, Zhao D, et al. Numerical analysis of powder bed generation and single track forming for selective laser melting of SS316L stainless steel. J Manuf Process. 2020;58:964–974. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Wei Q, Wen S, et al. Flow behavior of powder particles in layering process of selective laser melting: numerical modeling and experimental verification based on discrete element method. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2017;123:146–159. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Yu A, Li E, et al. Effects of spreader geometry on powder spreading process in powder bed additive manufacturing. Powder Technol. 2021;384:211–222. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2021.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu H, Wei C, Li L, et al. Multi-physics modelling of molten pool development and track formation in multi-track, multi-layer and multi-material selective laser melting. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2020;151:119458. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao D, An X, Fu H, et al. Dynamic investigation on the powder spreading during selective laser melting additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2021;37:101707. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mindt HW, Megahed M, Lavery NP, et al. Powder bed layer characteristics: the overseen first-order process input. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2016;47:3811–3822. doi:10.1007/s11661-016-3470-2
   Google Scholar
• Körner C, Attar E, Heinl P. Mesoscopic simulation of selective beam melting processes. J Mater Process Technol. 2011;211:978–987. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DebRoy T, Wei HL, Zuback JS, et al. Additive manufacturing of metallic components – process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci. 2018;92:112–224. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauereiß A, Scharowsky T, Körner C. Defect generation and propagation mechanism during additive manufacturing by selective beam melting. J Mater Process Technol. 2014;214:2522–2528. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markl M, Ammer R, Rüde U, et al. Numerical investigations on hatching process strategies for powder-bed-based additive manufacturing using an electron beam. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2015;78:239–247. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6594-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia M, Gu D, Yu G, et al. Influence of hatch spacing on heat and mass transfer, thermodynamics and laser processability during additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2016;109:147–157. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panwisawas C, Qiu CL, Sovani Y, et al. On the role of thermal fluid dynamics into the evolution of porosity during selective laser melting. Scr Mater. 2015;105:14–17. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panwisawas C, Qiu C, Anderson MJ, et al. Mesoscale modelling of selective laser melting: thermal fluid dynamics and microstructural evolution. Comput Mater Sci. 2017;126:479–490. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan W, Qian Y, Ge W, et al. Meso-scale modeling of multiple-layer fabrication process in selective electron beam melting: inter-layer/track voids formation. Mater Des. 2018;141:210–219. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.12.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan W, Ge W, Qian Y, et al. Multi-physics modeling of single/multiple-track defect mechanisms in electron beam selective melting. Acta Mater. 2017;134:324–333. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal A, Patel S, Kumar A. Selective laser melting of 316L stainless steel: physics of melting mode transition and its influence on microstructural and mechanical behavior. JOM. 2019;71:1105–1116. doi:10.1007/s11837-018-3271-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YS, Zhang W. Modeling of heat transfer, fluid flow and solidification microstructure of nickel-base superalloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. 2016;12:178–188. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitz KH, Grohs C, Singer P, et al. Fundamental analysis of the influence of powder characteristics in selective laser melting of molybdenum based on a multi-physical simulation model. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater. 2018;72:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2017.11.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Liu J, Chen J, et al. Influence of surface tension on the molten pool morphology in laser melting. Int J Therm Sci. 2019;146:106075. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2019.106075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Guillemot G, Gandin CA, et al. Numerical modelling of the impact of energy distribution and Marangoni surface tension on track shape in selective laser melting of ceramic material. Addit Manuf. 2018;21:713–723. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Roy S. Effect of three-dimensional melt pool convection on process characteristics during laser cladding. Comput Mater Sci. 2009;46:495–506. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan Z, Liu H, Li S, et al. Modeling of thermal behavior and mass transport in multi-layer laser additive manufacturing of Ni-based alloy on cast iron. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;111:709–722. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.04.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan Z, Yu G, He X, et al. Surface-active element transport and its effect on liquid metal flow in laser-assisted additive manufacturing. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer. 2017;86:206–214. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou W, Knapp GL, Mukherjee T, et al. An improved heat transfer and fluid flow model of wire-arc additive manufacturing. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2021;167:120835. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou W, Wei Y, Liu R, et al. Determination of the control points for circle and triangle route in wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM). J Manuf Process. 2020;53:84–98. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang C, Tan JL, Wong CH. A numerical investigation on the physical mechanisms of single track defects in selective laser melting. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;126:957–968. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.06.073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King WE, Barth HD, Castillo VM, et al. Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol. 2014;214:2915–2925. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusarov AV, Smurov I. Two-dimensional numerical modelling of radiation transfer in powder beds at selective laser melting. Appl Surf. Sci. 2009;255:5595–5599. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.07.202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusarov AV, Yadroitsev I, Bertrand P, et al. Model of radiation and heat transfer in laser-powder interaction zone at selective laser melting. J Heat Transfer. 2009;131:1–10. doi:10.1115/1.3109245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto A, Vázquez RG, Hartel U, et al. Numerical analysis of process dynamics in laser welding of Al and Cu. Procedia CIRP. 2018;74:691–695. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.040
   Google Scholar
• Deng C, Kim J, Oh S, et al. Electrodynamic simulation of energy absorption in laser keyhole welding of zinc-coated and uncoated steel sheets. J Mater Process Technol. 2016;231:412–421. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Ge P, Li T, et al. Electromagnetic wave-based analysis of laser–particle interactions in directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020;34:101284. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khairallah SA, Martin AA, Lee JRI, et al. Controlling interdependent meso-nanosecond dynamics and defect generation in metal 3D printing. Science (1979). 2020;368:660–665. doi:10.1126/science.aay7830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha S, Kevin Chou Y. A numerical study on the keyhole formation during laser powder bed fusion process. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2019;141:1–9. doi:10.1115/1.4044100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Fang G, Lei L, et al. A new ray tracing heat source model for mesoscale CFD simulation of selective laser melting (SLM). Appl Math Model. 2020;79:506–520. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2019.10.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le KQ, Tang C, Wong CH. On the study of keyhole-mode melting in selective laser melting process. Int J Therm Sci. 2019;145:105992. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2019.105992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang C, Le KQ, Wong CH. Physics of humping formation in laser powder bed fusion. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2020;149:119172. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayat M, Thanki A, Mohanty S, et al. Keyhole-induced porosities in laser-based powder bed fusion (LPBF) of Ti6Al4V: high-fidelity modelling and experimental validation. Addit Manuf. 2019;30:100835. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.100835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouraytem N, Li X, Cunningham R, et al. Effect of laser-matter interaction on molten pool flow and keyhole dynamics. Phys Rev Appl. 2019;11:1. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.064054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham R, Narra SP, Montgomery C, et al. Synchrotron-Based X-ray microtomography characterization of the effect of processing variables on porosity formation in laser power-bed additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V. JOM. 2017;69:479–484. doi:10.1007/s11837-016-2234-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham R, Zhao C, Parab N, et al. Keyhole threshold and morphology in laser melting revealed by ultrahigh-speed x-ray imaging. Science (1979). 2019;363:849–852. doi:10.1126/science.aav4687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forien J, Calta N, DePond P, et al. Detecting keyhole porosity and monitoring process signatures in additive manufacturing: an in situ pyrometry and ex situ X-ray radiography correlation. Addit Manuf. 2020;35:1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forien JB, Calta NP, DePond PJ, et al. Detecting keyhole pore defects and monitoring process signatures during laser powder bed fusion: a correlation between in situ pyrometry and ex situ X-ray radiography. Addit Manuf. 2020;35:101336. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao L. Mesoscopic-scale numerical investigation including the influence of scanning strategy on selective laser melting process. Comput Mater Sci. 2021;189:110263. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao L. Mesoscopic-Scale numerical simulation including the influence of process parameters on SLM single-layer multi-pass formation. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2020;51:4130–4145. doi:10.1007/s11661-020-05831-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao L, Guan W. Simulation and analysis of LPBF multi-layer single-track forming process under different particle size distributions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2021;114:2141–2157. doi:10.1007/s00170-021-06987-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayat M, Mohanty S, Hattel JH. Multiphysics modelling of lack-of-fusion voids formation and evolution in IN718 made by multi-track/multi-layer LPBF. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;139:95–114. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katinas C, Shang W, Shin YC, et al. Modeling particle spray and capture efficiency for direct laser deposition using a four nozzle powder injection system. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2018;140:1–10. doi:10.1115/1.4038997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin J. Numerical simulation of the focused powder streams in coaxial laser cladding. J Mater Process Technol. 2000;105:17–23. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00584-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang A, Li D, Zhou Z, et al. Numerical simulation of powder flow field on coaxial powder nozzle in laser metal direct manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2010;49:853–859. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2657-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen SY, Shin YC, Murthy JY, et al. Modeling of coaxial powder flow for the laser direct deposition process. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2009;52:5867–5877. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dušek J, Chrust M, Bouchet G. Transitional dynamics of freely falling discs. In: Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design. Vol. 133; 2016. p. 105–116. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27386-0_7
   Google Scholar
• Li L, Huang Y, Zou C, et al. Numerical study on powder stream characteristics of coaxial laser metal deposition nozzle. Crystals (Basel). 2021;11:282. doi:10.3390/cryst11030282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkerton AJ. An analytical model of beam attenuation and powder heating during coaxial laser direct metal deposition. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2007;40:7323–7334. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/40/23/012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkerton AJ. Advances in the modeling of laser direct metal deposition. J Laser Appl. 2015;27:S15001. doi:10.2351/1.4815992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkerton AJ, Li L. A verified model of the behaviour of the axial powder stream concentration from a coaxial laser cladding nozzle. ICALEO 2002 - 21st International Congress on Applications of Laser and Electro-Optics, Congress Proceedings 2002;165528. doi:10.2351/1.5066174
   Google Scholar
• Guan X, Zhao YF. Numerical modeling of coaxial powder stream in laser-powder-based directed energy deposition process. Addit Manuf. 2020;34:101226. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei HL, Liu FQ, Liao WH, et al. Prediction of spatiotemporal variations of deposit profiles and inter-track voids during laser directed energy deposition. Addit Manuf. 2020;34:101219. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei HL, Liu FQ, Wei L, et al. Multiscale and multiphysics explorations of the transient deposition processes and additive characteristics during laser 3D printing. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021;77:196–208. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2020.11.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Guo W, Li L. Numerical modelling of heat transfer, mass transport and microstructure formation in a high deposition rate laser directed energy deposition process. Addit Manuf. 2020;33:101175. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayat M, Nadimpalli VK, Biondani FG, et al. On the role of the powder stream on the heat and fluid flow conditions during directed energy deposition of maraging steel—multiphysics modeling and experimental validation. Addit Manuf. 2021;43:102021. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke WC, Oliveira JP, Cong BQ, et al. Multi-layer deposition mechanism in ultra high-frequency pulsed wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) of NiTi shape memory alloys. Addit Manuf. 2022;50:102513. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Wei Y, Long J, et al. Modeling and simulation of heat transfer, fluid flow and geometry morphology in GMAW-based wire arc additive manufacturing. Weld World. 2021;65:1571–1590. doi:10.1007/s40194-021-01123-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadiou S, Courtois M, Carin M, et al. 3D heat transfer, fluid flow and electromagnetic model for cold metal transfer wire arc additive manufacturing (Cmt-Waam). Addit Manuf. 2020;36:101541. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadiou S, Courtois M, Carin M, et al. Heat transfer, fluid flow and electromagnetic model of droplets generation and melt pool behaviour for wire arc additive manufacturing. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2020;148:119102. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra AK, Kumar A. Numerical and experimental analysis of the effect of volumetric energy absorption in powder layer on thermal-fluidic transport in selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V. Opt Laser Technol. 2019;111:227–239. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.09.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee T, Zhang W, DebRoy T. An improved prediction of residual stresses and distortion in additive manufacturing. Comput Mater Sci. 2017;126:360–372. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manvatkar V, De A, Debroy T. Heat transfer and material flow during laser assisted multi-layer additive manufacturing. J Appl Phys. 2014;116:1–8. doi:10.1063/1.4896751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manvatkar V, De A, DebRoy T. Spatial variation of melt pool geometry, peak temperature and solidification parameters during laser assisted additive manufacturing process. Mater Sci Technol. 2015;31:924–930. doi:10.1179/1743284714Y.0000000701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee T, Wei HL, De A, et al. Heat and fluid flow in additive manufacturing – part II: powder bed fusion of stainless steel, and titanium, nickel and aluminium base alloys. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;150:369–380. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou W, Mukherjee T, Knapp GL, et al. Fusion zone geometries, cooling rates and solidification parameters during wire arc additive manufacturing. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;127:1084–1094. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.08.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng B, Li X, Tuffile C, et al. Multi-physics modeling of single track scanning in selective laser melting: powder compaction effect. Solid Freeform Fabrication 2018: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium - An Additive Manufacturing Conference, SFF 2018, 2020, p. 1887–902.
   Google Scholar
• Fang ZC, Wu ZL, Huang CG, et al. Review on residual stress in selective laser melting additive manufacturing of alloy parts. Opt Laser Technol. 2020;129:106283. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Jalalahmadi B, Guo YB, et al. A review of computational modeling in powder-based additive manufacturing for metallic part qualification. Rapid Prototyp J. 2018;24:1245–1264. doi:10.1108/RPJ-04-2017-0058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Liu ZY, Fang XY, et al. Residual stress in metal additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. 2018;71:348–353. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.05.039
   Google Scholar
• Withers PJ, Bhadeshia HKDH. Residual stress. Part 2 – nature and origins. Mater Sci Technol. 2001;17:366–375. doi:10.1179/026708301101510087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercelis P, Kruth JP. Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp J. 2006;12:254–265. doi:10.1108/13552540610707013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertini L, Bucchi F, Frendo F, et al. Residual stress prediction in selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;105:609–636. doi:10.1007/s00170-019-04091-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Fu CH, Guo YB, et al. A multiscale modeling approach for fast prediction of part distortion in selective laser melting. J Mater Process Technol. 2016;229:703–712. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantawane MV, Sharma S, Sharma A, et al. Coarsening of martensite with multiple generations of twins in laser additively manufactured Ti6Al4V. Acta Mater. 2021;213:116954. doi:10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2021.116954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto M, Shiomi M, Osakada K, et al. Finite element analysis of single layer forming on metallic powder bed in rapid prototyping by selective laser processing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2002;42:61–67. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00093-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Choi J. Modeling and experimental verification of transient/residual stresses and microstructure formation of multi-layer laser aided DMD process. J Heat Transfer. 2006;128:662–679. doi:10.1115/1.2194037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge NE, Ferencz RM, Solberg JM. Implementation of a thermomechanical model for the simulation of selective laser melting. Comput Mech. 2014;54:33–51. doi:10.1007/s00466-014-1024-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadakis L, Loizou A, Risse J, et al. Numerical computation of component shape distortion manufactured by selective laser melting. Procedia CIRP. 2014;18:90–95. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.113
   Google Scholar
• Papadakis L, Loizou A, Risse J, et al. A computational reduction model for appraising structural effects in selective laser melting manufacturing: a methodical model reduction proposed for time-efficient finite element analysis of larger components in selective laser melting. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2014;9:17–25. doi:10.1080/17452759.2013.868005
   Google Scholar
• Heigel JC, Michaleris P, Reutzel EW. Thermo-mechanical model development and validation of directed energy deposition additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V. Addit Manuf. 2015;5:9–19. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2014.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Zhang P, Cheng L, et al. Finite element modeling and validation of thermomechanical behavior of Ti-6Al-4V in directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2016;12:169–177. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denlinger ER, Gouge M, Irwin J, et al. Thermomechanical model development and in situ experimental validation of the laser powder-bed fusion process. Addit Manuf. 2017;16:73–80. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Liu JF, Fang XY, et al. Efficient predictive model of part distortion and residual stress in selective laser melting. Addit Manuf. 2017;17:157–168. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RJ, Davies CM, Hooper PA. A pragmatic part scale model for residual stress and distortion prediction in powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. 2018;22:416–425. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stender ME, Beghini LL, Sugar JD, et al. A thermal-mechanical finite element workflow for directed energy deposition additive manufacturing process modeling. Addit Manuf. 2018;21:556–566. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song J, Wu W, Zhang L, et al. Role of scanning strategy on residual stress distribution in Ti-6Al-4V alloy prepared by selective laser melting. Optik (Stuttg). 2018;170:342–352. doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.05.128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Liang X, Hayduke D, et al. An inherent strain based multiscale modeling framework for simulating part-scale residual deformation for direct metal laser sintering. Addit Manuf. 2019;28:406–418. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Allen M, London T, et al. Residual strain predictions for a powder bed fusion Inconel 625 single cantilever part. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. 2019;8:294–304. doi:10.1007/s40192-019-00144-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganeriwala RK, Strantza M, King WE, et al. Evaluation of a thermomechanical model for prediction of residual stress during laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V. Addit Manuf. 2019;27:489–502. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Yin J, Zhu H, et al. Effect of overlap rate and pattern on residual stress in selective laser melting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2019;145:103433. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.103433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou S, Xiao H, Ye F, et al. Numerical analysis of the effect of the scan strategy on the residual stress in the multi-laser selective laser melting. Results Phys. 2020;16:103005. doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Yan L, Zeng C, et al. An efficient predictive modeling for simulating part-scale residual stress in laser metal deposition process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2021;114:1819–1832. doi:10.1007/s00170-021-07005-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Promoppatum P, Uthaisangsuk V. Part scale estimation of residual stress development in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of Inconel 718. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2021;189:103528. doi:10.1016/j.finel.2021.103528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Promoppatum P, Rollett AD. Influence of material constitutive models on thermomechanical behaviors in the laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V. Addit Manuf. 2021;37:101680. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Promoppatum P, Rollett AD. Physics-based and phenomenological plasticity models for thermomechanical simulation in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: a comprehensive numerical comparison. Mater Des. 2021;204:109658. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez X, Dong W, Paul S, et al. Residual stress modeling with phase transformation for wire arc additive manufacturing of B91 steel. JOM. 2020;72:4178–4186. doi:10.1007/s11837-020-04424-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Investigation on thermal stress evolution induced by wire and arc additive manufacturing for circular thin-walled parts. Elsevier Enhanced Reader. n.d. [cited 2021 Dec 19]. Available from: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1526612518307072?token=A8EA62D7752AF540BB8DDFAB119BF03038286EA32FBBE059261F7EE2375B650AC6AB459A7A03D7E715CE2C7DB0E067B3&originRegion=us-east-1&originCreation=20211220175314
   Google Scholar
• Li R, Xiong J. Influence of interlayer dwell time on stress field of thin-walled components in WAAM via numerical simulation and experimental tests. Rapid Prototyp J. 2019;25:1433–1441. doi:10.1108/RPJ-03-2019-0067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf M, Hälsig A, Höfer K, et al. Thermo-mechanical modelling of wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) of semi-finished products. Metals (Basel). 2018;8:1009. doi:10.3390/met8121009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding J, Colegrove P, Mehnen J, et al. A computationally efficient finite element model of wire and arc additive manufacture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2014;70:227–236. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5261-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaître J, Chaboche J-L. Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Gouge M. Chapter 3 - convection boundary losses during laser cladding. In: Gouge M Michaleris P, editors. Thermo-mechanical modeling of additive manufacturing. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2017. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-811820-7.00005-7
   Google Scholar
• Ahn J, He E, Chen L, et al. Prediction and measurement of residual stresses and distortions in fibre laser welded Ti-6Al-4V considering phase transformation. Mater Des. 2017;115:441–457. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein A, Hao L, Yan C, et al. Finite element simulation of the temperature and stress fields in single layers built without-support in selective laser melting. Mater Des. 2013;52:638–647. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu D, He B. Finite element simulation and experimental investigation of residual stresses in selective laser melted Ti-Ni shape memory alloy. Comput Mater Sci. 2016;117:221–232. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.01.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahmand P, Kovacevic R. An experimental-numerical investigation of heat distribution and stress field in single- and multi-track laser cladding by a high-power direct diode laser. Opt Laser Technol. 2014;63:154–168. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2014.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhou K, Tan P, et al. Modeling temperature and residual stress fields in selective laser melting. Int J Mech Sci. 2018;136:24–35. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan P, Shen F, Li B, et al. A thermo-metallurgical-mechanical model for selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V. Mater Des. 2019;168:107642. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry L, Ashcroft IA, Wildman RD. Understanding the effect of laser scan strategy on residual stress in selective laser melting through thermo-mechanical simulation. Addit Manuf. 2016;12:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry LA, Ashcroft IA, Wildman RD. Geometrical effects on residual stress in selective laser melting. Addit Manuf. 2019;25:166–175. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng B, Shrestha S, Chou K. Stress and deformation evaluations of scanning strategy effect in selective laser melting. Addit Manuf. 2016;12:240–251. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos D, Belblidia F, Sienz J. New scanning strategy to reduce warpage in additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2019;28:554–564. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Ren X, He J, et al. Numerical investigation of a novel pattern for reducing residual stress in metal additive manufacturing. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021;67:11–22. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2020.05.080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Tong M, Harrison NM. Scanning strategies effect on temperature, residual stress and deformation by multi-laser beam powder bed fusion manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020;36:101507. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Liu ZY, Fang XY, et al. On the simulation scalability of predicting residual stress and distortion in selective laser melting. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2018;140:1–10. doi:10.1115/1.4038893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Fu CH, Guo YB, et al. Fast prediction and validation of part distortion in selective laser melting. Procedia Manuf. 2015;1:355–365. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.042
   Google Scholar
• Ren K, Chew Y, Fuh JYH, et al. Thermo-mechanical analyses for optimized path planning in laser aided additive manufacturing processes. Mater Des. 2019;162:80–93. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugwagwa L, Dimitrov D, Matope S, et al. Evaluation of the impact of scanning strategies on residual stresses in selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;102:2441–2450. doi:10.1007/s00170-019-03396-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu AS, Brown DW, Kumar M, et al. An experimental investigation into additive manufacturing-induced residual stresses in 316L stainless steel. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2014;45:6260–6270. doi:10.1007/s11661-014-2549-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schajer GS. Advances in hole-drilling residual stress measurements. Exp Mech. 2010;50:159–168. doi:10.1007/s11340-009-9228-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schajer GS. Hole-drilling residual stress measurements at 75: origins, advances, opportunities. Exp Mech. 2010;50:245–253. doi:10.1007/s11340-009-9285-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrancken B, Cain V, Knutsen R, et al. Residual stress via the contour method in compact tension specimens produced via selective laser melting. Scr Mater. 2014;87:29–32. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrancken B. Study of residual stresses in selective laser melting. PhD Thesis; KU Leuven Arenberg Doctoral School Faculty of Engineering Science. 2016; p. 1–253.
   Google Scholar
• Kruth JP, Deckers J, Yasa E, et al. Assessing and comparing influencing factors of residual stresses in selective laser melting using a novel analysis method. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf. 2012;226:980–991. doi:10.1177/0954405412437085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acevedo R, Sedlak P, Kolman R, et al. Residual stress analysis of additive manufacturing of metallic parts using ultrasonic waves: state of the art review. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9:9457–9477. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.092
   Google Scholar
• Acevedo RBO, Kantarowska K, Santos EC, et al. Residual stress measurement techniques for Ti6Al4V parts fabricated using selective laser melting: state of the art review. Rapid Prototyp J. 2020. doi:10.1108/RPJ-04-2019-0097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett JL, Croom BP, Burdick J, et al. Revealing mechanisms of residual stress development in additive manufacturing via digital image correlation. Addit Manuf. 2018;22:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsunsky AM, Sebastiani M, Bemporad E. Residual stress evaluation at the micrometer scale: analysis of thin coatings by FIB milling and digital image correlation. Surf Coat Technol. 2010;205:2393–2403. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.09.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denlinger ER, Heigel JC, Michaleris P, et al. Effect of inter-layer dwell time on distortion and residual stress in additive manufacturing of titanium and nickel alloys. J Mater Process Technol. 2015;215:123–131. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marimuthu S, Clark D, Allen J, et al. Finite element modelling of substrate thermal distortion in direct laser additive manufacture of an aeroengine component. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci. 2013;227:1987–1999. doi:10.1177/0954406212470363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safronov VA, Khmyrov RS, Kotoban DV, et al. Distortions and residual stresses at layer-by-layer additive manufacturing by fusion. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2017;139:3–8. doi:10.1115/1.4034714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaeh MF, Branner G. Investigations on residual stresses and deformations in selective laser melting. Prod Eng. 2010;4:35–45. doi:10.1007/s11740-009-0192-y
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Ning J, Liang SY. In-situ distortion prediction in metal additive manufacturing considering boundary conditions. Int J Prec Eng Manuf . 2021;22:909–917. doi:10.1007/s12541-021-00496-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Denlinger ER, Gouge MF, et al. Numerical verification of an octree mesh coarsening strategy for simulating additive manufacturing processes. Addit Manuf. 2019;30. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.100903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilp J, Seidel C, Krauss H, et al. Investigations on temperature fields during laser beam melting by means of process monitoring and multiscale process modelling. Adv Mech Eng. 2014;6:217584. doi:10.1155/2014/217584
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Tong M, Harrison NM. Resolution, energy and time dependence on layer scaling in finite element modelling of laser beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2019;28:610–620. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setien I, Chiumenti M, van der Veen S, et al. Empirical methodology to determine inherent strains in additive manufacturing. Comput Math Appl. 2019;78:2282–2295. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2018.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Nagaraja KM, Zhang X, et al. Multi-physics modeling of powder bed fusion process and thermal stress near porosity. Manuf Lett. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2021.07.012
   Google Scholar
• Sagar VR, Lorin S, Göhl J, et al. A simulation study on the effect of particle size distribution on the printed geometry in selective laser melting. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2022;144:1–10. doi:10.1115/1.4052705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F, Yan W. High-fidelity modelling of thermal stress for additive manufacturing by linking thermal-fluid and mechanical models. Mater Des. 2020;196:109185. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Lin X, Kang N, et al. A novel high-efficient finite element analysis method of powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2021;46:102187. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Multiscale deformation and fracture in materials and structures. n.d.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft T, Riedel H. Numerical simulation of solid state sintering; model and application. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2004;24:345–361. doi:10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00222-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuncer N, Bose A. Solid-state metal additive manufacturing: a review. JOM. 2020;72:3090–3111. doi:10.1007/s11837-020-04260-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Zhang W, Brune R, et al. Numerical simulation and experimental measurement of pressureless sintering of stainless steel part printed by binder jetting additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2021;47:102330. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan H. Three-dimensional simulation of micrometer-sized droplet impact and penetration into the powder bed. Chem Eng Sci. 2016;153:93–107. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2016.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Feng F, Klecka MA, et al. Characterization and modeling of the bonding process in cold spray additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2015;8:149–162. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2015.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan Z, Li J, Zhang Z. Experimental and numerical studies on fabrication of nanoparticle reinforced aluminium matrix composites by friction stir additive manufacturing. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;12:1898–1912. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Stubblefield GG, Fraser K, Phillips BJ, et al. A meshfree computational framework for the numerical simulation of the solid-state additive manufacturing process, additive friction stir-deposition (AFS-D). Mater Des. 2021;202:109514. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dini F, Ghaffari SA, Jafar J, et al. A review of binder jet process parameters; powder, binder, printing and sintering condition. Met Powder Rep. 2020;75:95–100. doi:10.1016/j.mprp.2019.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Li M, Du W, Elwany A, et al. Metal binder jetting additive manufacturing: a literature review. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2020;142:1–17. doi:10.1115/1.4047430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lores A, Azurmendi N, Agote I, et al. A review on recent developments in binder jetting metal additive manufacturing: materials and process characteristics. Powder Metall. 2019;62:267–296. doi:10.1080/00325899.2019.1669299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maximenko AL, Olumor ID, Maidaniuk AP, et al. Modeling of effect of powder spreading on green body dimensional accuracy in additive manufacturing by binder jetting. Powder Technol. 2021;385:60–68. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2021.02.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parab ND, Barnes JE, Zhao C, et al. Real time observation of binder jetting printing process using high-speed X-ray imaging. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–10. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38862-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Nandwana P, Simunovic S. Powder spreading, densification, and part deformation in binder jetting additive manufacturing. Prog Addit Manuf. 2022;7:111–125. doi:10.1007/s40964-021-00214-1
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Yang K, Yin S, et al. Solid-state additive manufacturing and repairing by cold spraying: a review. J Mater Sci Technol. 2018;34:440–457. doi:10.1016/J.JMST.2017.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prashar G, Vasudev H. A comprehensive review on sustainable cold spray additive manufacturing: state of the art, challenges and future challenges. J Clean Prod. 2021;310:127606. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garmeh S, Jadidi M, Dolatabadi A. Three-Dimensional modeling of cold spray for additive manufacturing. J Therm Spray Technol. 2020;29:38–50. doi:10.1007/s11666-019-00928-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song X, Everaerts J, Zhai W, et al. Residual stresses in single particle splat of metal cold spray process – numerical simulation and direct measurement. Mater Lett. 2018;230:152–156. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2018.07.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song X, Ng KL, Chea JMK, et al. Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) simulation of multiple particle impact during metal cold spray process for coating porosity prediction. Surf Coat Technol. 2020;385:125433. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Xie X, Liu M, et al. Stable layer-building strategy to enhance cold-spray-based additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020;35:101356. doi:10.1016/J.ADDMA.2020.101356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Tan ZJ, Li JY, et al. Integrated modeling of process–microstructure–property relations in friction stir additive manufacturing. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett). 2020;33:75–87. doi:10.1007/s40195-019-00945-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Tan ZJ, Li JY, et al. Experimental and numerical studies of re-stirring and re-heating effects on mechanical properties in friction stir additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;104:767–784. doi:10.1007/s00170-019-03917-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiq A, Ghassemieh E. Fibre embedding in aluminium alloy 3003 using ultrasonic consolidation process—thermo-mechanical analyses. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2011;54:997–1009. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-3007-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiq AM, Ghassemieh E. Modelling and characterization of ultrasonic consolidation process of aluminium alloys. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc. 2008;1079:125–132. doi:10.1557/proc-1079-n09-05
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Li L. A friction-based finite element analysis of ultrasonic consolidation. Weld J. 2008; 87(7):187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperovich G, Hausmann J. Improvement of fatigue resistance and ductility of TiAl6V4 processed by selective laser melting. J Mater Process Technol. 2015;220:202–214. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günther J, Krewerth D, Lippmann T, et al. Fatigue life of additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V in the very high cycle fatigue regime. Int J Fatigue. 2017;94:236–245. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifi M, Salem A, Satko D, et al. Defect distribution and microstructure heterogeneity effects on fracture resistance and fatigue behavior of EBPBF Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Fatigue. 2017;94:263–287. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustillos J, Kim J, Moridi A. Lack of fusion in additive manufacturing: defect or asset? ArXiv Preprint. 2021;2104.07014.
   Google Scholar
• Soltani-Tehrani A, Shrestha R, Phan N, et al. Establishing specimen property to part performance relationships for laser beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Int J Fatigue. 2021;151:106384. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laleh M, Hughes AE, Yang S, et al. A critical insight into lack-of-fusion pore structures in additively manufactured stainless steel. Addit Manuf. 2021;38:101762. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon JV, Narra SP, Cunningham RW, et al. Defect structure process maps for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020;36:101552. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulson NH, Gould B, Wolff SJ, et al. Correlations between thermal history and keyhole porosity in laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. 2020;34:101213. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan Z, Kafka OL, Parab N, et al. Universal scaling laws of keyhole stability and porosity in 3D printing of metals. Nat Commun. 2021;12; doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22704-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reijonen J, Revuelta A, Riipinen T, et al. On the effect of shielding gas flow on porosity and melt pool geometry in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020;32:101030. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.101030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro P, Meneghello R, Savio G, et al. A modified volumetric energy density–based approach for porosity assessment in additive manufacturing process design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;110:1911–1921. doi:10.1007/s00170-020-05949-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Wang Z, Zhao J, et al. Comparison of substrate preheating on mechanical and microstructural properties of hybrid specimens fabricated by laser metal deposition 316 l with different wrought steel substrate. Crystals (Basel). 2020;10:1–15. doi:10.3390/cryst10100891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao C, Parab ND, Li X, et al. Critical instability at moving keyhole tip generates porosity in laser melting. Science (1979). 2020;370:1080–1086. doi:10.1126/science.abd1587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Clark SJ, Leung CLA, et al. In-situ synchrotron imaging of keyhole mode multi-layer laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Appl Mater Today. 2020;20:100650. doi:10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utyaganova VR, Filippov AV, Shamarin NN, et al. Controlling the porosity using exponential decay heat input regimes during electron beam wire-feed additive manufacturing of Al-Mg alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;108:2823–2838. doi:10.1007/s00170-020-05539-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu R, Tang S, Lu J, et al. Hot-wire arc additive manufacturing of aluminium alloy with reduced porosity and high deposition rate. Mater Des. 2021;199:109370. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• el Moghazi SN, Wolfe T, Ivey DG, et al. Plasma transfer arc additive manufacturing of 17-4 PH: assessment of defects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;108:2301–2313. doi:10.1007/s00170-020-05540-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu T, Liu C, Li Z, et al. Hot-wire arc additive manufacturing Ti–6.5Al–2Zr–1Mo–1V titanium alloy: pore characterization, microstructural evolution, and mechanical properties. J Alloys Compd. 2020;817:153334. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everton SK, Hirsch M, Stavroulakis PI, et al. Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing. Mater Des. 2016;95:431–445. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Lu F, Zhang K, et al. Dendritic microstructure and hot cracking of laser additive manufactured Inconel 718 under improved base cooling. J Alloys Compd. 2016;670:312–321. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovgyy B, Simonelli M, Pham MS. Alloy design against the solidification cracking in fusion additive manufacturing: an application to a FeCrAl alloy. Mater Res Lett. 2021;9:350–357. doi:10.1080/21663831.2021.1922945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin SZ, Murr LE, Terrazas CA, et al. Processing and characterization of crack-free aluminium 6061 using high-temperature heating in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2018;22:405–415. doi:10.1016/J.ADDMA.2018.05.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidare P, Jiménez A, Hassanin H, et al. Porosity, cracks, and mechanical properties of additively manufactured tooling alloys: a review. Adv Manuf. 2022;10:175–204. doi:10.1007/s40436-021-00365-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seow CE, Zhang J, Coules HE, et al. Effect of crack-like defects on the fracture behaviour of wire + arc additively manufactured nickel-base alloy 718. Addit Manuf. 2020;36:101578. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei HL, Cao Y, Liao WH, et al. Mechanisms on inter-track void formation and phase transformation during laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V. Addit Manuf. 2020;34:101221. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinwiddie RB, Dehoff RR, Lloyd PD, et al. Thermographic in-situ process monitoring of the electron-beam melting technology used in additive manufacturing. SPIE Proc. 2013;8705:156–164. doi:10.1117/12.2018412
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee T, Manvatkar V, De A, et al. Mitigation of thermal distortion during additive manufacturing. Scr Mater. 2017;127:79–83. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alimardani M, Toyserkani E, Huissoon JP, et al. On the delamination and crack formation in a thin wall fabricated using laser solid freeform fabrication process: an experimental-numerical investigation. Opt Lasers Eng. 2009;47:1160–1168. doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2009.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul R, Anand S, Gerner F. Effect of thermal deformation on part errors in metal powder based additive manufacturing processes. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2014;136:1–12. doi:10.1115/1.4026524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee T, Zuback JS, De A, et al. Printability of alloys for additive manufacturing. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–8. doi:10.1038/srep19717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girelli L, Tocci M, Montesano L, et al. Investigation of cavitation erosion resistance of AlSi10Mg alloy for additive manufacturing. Wear. 2018;402-403:124–136. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2018.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Y, Muñiz-Lerma JA, Trask M, et al. Microstructure and mechanical property considerations in additive manufacturing of aluminium alloys. MRS Bull. 2016;41:745–751. doi:10.1557/mrs.2016.214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuback JS, Palmer TA, DebRoy T. Additive manufacturing of functionally graded transition joints between ferritic and austenitic alloys. J Alloys Compd. 2019;770:995–1003. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan T, Yu Z, Chen S, et al. Loss of elemental Mg during wire + arc additive manufacturing of Al-Mg alloy and its effect on mechanical properties. J Manuf Process. 2020;49:456–462. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.10.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinjo J, Panwisawas C. Digital materials design by thermal-fluid science for multi-metal additive manufacturing. Acta Mater. 2021;210:116825. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens AI, Delahaye J, Lecomte-Beckers J. Fusion-based additive manufacturing for processing aluminum alloys: state-of-the-art and challenges. Adv Eng Mater. 2017;19:1700003. doi:10.1002/adem.201700003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philo AM, Butcher D, Sillars S, et al. A multiphase CFD model for the prediction of particulate accumulation in a laser powder bed fusion process. Minerals, Metals and Materials Series. 2018; Part F3:65–76. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72059-3_7
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist J, Samarjy RSM. High-speed imaging of droplet behaviour during the CYCLAM drop-deposition technique. Procedia Manuf. 2019;36:208–215. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.08.027
   Google Scholar
• Samarjy RSM, Kaplan AFH. Using laser cutting as a source of molten droplets for additive manufacturing: a new recycling technique. Mater Des. 2017;125:76–84. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siva Prasad H, Brueckner F, Kaplan AFH. Powder incorporation and spatter formation in high deposition rate blown powder directed energy deposition. Addit Manuf. 2020;35:101413. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin J, Wang D, Yang L, et al. Correlation between forming quality and spatter dynamics in laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. 2020;31:100958. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.100958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ly S, Rubenchik AM, Khairallah SA, et al. Metal vapor micro-jet controls material redistribution in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–12. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04237-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young ZA, Guo Q, Parab ND, et al. Types of spatter and their features and formation mechanisms in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process. Addit Manuf. 2020;36:101438. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Li H, Lang L, et al. Effects of scan speed on vapor plume behavior and spatter generation in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Manuf Process. 2018;36:60–67. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glukhov V, Turichin G, Klimova-Korsmik O, et al. Quality management of metal products prepared by high-speed direct laser deposition technology. Key Eng Mater. 2016;684:461–467. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.684.461
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadian N, Turenne S, Brailovski V. Surface finish control of additively-manufactured Inconel 625 components using combined chemical-abrasive flow polishing. J Mater Process Technol. 2018;252:728–738. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triantaphyllou A, Giusca CL, Macaulay GD, et al. Surface texture measurement for additive manufacturing. Surf Topogr. 2015;3; doi:10.1088/2051-672X/3/2/024002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali U, Fayazfar H, Ahmed F, et al. Internal surface roughness enhancement of parts made by laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. Vacuum. 2020;177:109314. doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder JC, Stimpson CK, Thole KA, et al. Build direction effects on additively manufactured channels. J Turbomach. 2016;138:1–8. doi:10.1115/1.4032168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan MC, Keist JS, Palmer TA. Defects in metal additive manufacturing processes. J Mater Eng Perform. 2021;30:4808–4818. doi:10.1007/s11665-021-05919-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanaei N, Fatemi A. Defects in additive manufactured metals and their effect on fatigue performance: a state-of-the-art review. Prog Mater Sci. 2021;117:100724. doi:10.1016/J.PMATSCI.2020.100724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee T, DebRoy T. A digital twin for rapid qualification of 3D printed metallic components. Appl Mater Today. 2019;14:59–65. doi:10.1016/j.apmt.2018.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Li X, Guo C, et al. Investigation into the effect of energy density on densification, surface roughness and loss of alloying elements of 7075 aluminium alloy processed by laser powder bed fusion. Opt Laser Technol. 2022;147:107621. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Zhao C, Sun T, et al. Revealing transient powder-gas interaction in laser powder bed fusion process through multi-physics modeling and high-speed synchrotron x-ray imaging. Addit Manuf. 2020;35:101362. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Guo Q, Chen L, et al. Quantitative investigation of gas flow, powder-gas interaction, and powder behavior under different ambient pressure levels in laser powder bed fusion. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2021;170:103797. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.103797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Zafar MQ, Wang Y, et al. Multi-physics modeling of side roughness generation mechanisms in powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. 2021;47:102274. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou S. Predicting susceptibility to solidification cracking and liquation cracking by calphad. Metals (Basel). 2021;11:1442. doi:10.3390/met11091442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai X, Yuan T, Kou S. Liquation and liquation cracking in partially melted zones of magnesium welds. Weld J. 2016;95:57S–67S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou S. A simple index for predicting the susceptibility to solidification cracking. Weld J. 2015;94:374s–388s.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JH, Yahata BD, Hundley JM, et al. 3D printing of high-strength aluminium alloys. Nature. 2017;549:365–369. doi:10.1038/nature23894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clyne T, Davies G. The influence of composition on solidification cracking susceptibility in binary alloy systems. the influence of composition on solidification cracking susceptibility in binary alloy systems. Br Foundrym. 1981;74:65–73.
   Google Scholar
• Mondal B, Mukherjee T, DebRoy T. Crack free metal printing using physics informed machine learning. Acta Mater. 2022;226:117612. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaz M, Drezet JM, Gremaud M. A new hot-tearing criterion. Metall Mater Trans A. 1999;30:449–455. doi:10.1007/S11661-999-0334-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cracking mechanism and its sensitivity to processing conditions during laser powder bed fusion of a structural aluminium alloy. Enhanced Reader n.d.
   Google Scholar
• Cao G, Kou S. Predicting and reducing liquation-cracking susceptibility based on temperature vs. fraction solid. Weld J. 2006;85(1):9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoussoub JN, Tang YT, Dick-Cleland WJB, et al. On the influence of alloy composition on the additive manufacturability of Ni-based superalloys. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2022;53:962–983. doi:10.1007/s11661-021-06568-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestler B, Choudhury A. Phase-field modeling of multi-component systems. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2011;15:93–105. doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourret D, Liu H, LLorca J. Phase-field modeling of microstructure evolution: recent applications, perspectives and challenges. Prog Mater Sci. 2022;123:100810. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbach I. Phase-field models in materials science. Model Simul Mat Sci Eng. 2009;17:073001. doi:10.1088/0965-0393/17/7/073001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahn JW, Hilliard JE. Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. interfacial free energy. J Chem Phys. 1958;28:258–267. doi:10.1063/1.1744102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahn JW, Hilliard JE. Free energy of a nonuniform system. III. nucleation in a two-component incompressible fluid. J Chem Phys. 1959;31:688–699. doi:10.1063/1.1730447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahn JW. On spinodal decomposition. Acta Metall. 1961;9:795–801. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(61)90182-1
   Google Scholar
• Cahn JW, Allen SM. Microscopic theory for domain wall motion and its experimental verification in Fe-al alloy domain growth kinetics. J Phys (Paris) Colloq. 1977;38:C7-51–C7-54. doi:10.1051/jphyscol:1977709
   Google Scholar
• Allen SM, Cahn JW. A microscopic theory for antiphase boundary motion and its application to antiphase domain coarsening. Acta Metall. 1979;27:1085–1095. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(79)90196-2
   Google Scholar
• Echebarria B, Folch R, Karma A, et al. Quantitative phase-field model of alloy solidification. Physical Review E. 2004;70:22. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.70.061604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragard J, Karma A, Lee YH, et al. Linking phase-field and atomistic simulations to model dendritic solidification in highly undercooled melts. Interface Sci. 2002;10:121–136. doi:10.1023/A:1015815928191
   Google Scholar
• Fallah V, Amoorezaei M, Provatas N, et al. Phase-field simulation of solidification morphology in laser powder deposition of Ti-Nb alloys. Acta Mater. 2012;60:1633–1646. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner C, Markl M, Koepf JA. Modeling and simulation of microstructure evolution for additive manufacturing of metals: a critical review. Metall Mater Trans A. 2020;51:4970–4983. doi:10.1007/S11661-020-05946-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan JHK, Sing SL, Yeong WY. Microstructure modelling for metallic additive manufacturing: a review. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2020;15:87–105. doi:10.1080/17452759.2019.1677345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandin CA, Rappaz M. A coupled finite element-cellular automaton model for the prediction of dendritic grain structures in solidification processes. Acta Metall Mater. 1994;42:2233–2246. doi:10.1016/0956-7151(94)90302-6
   Google Scholar
• Guillemot G, Gandin CA, Combeau H, et al. A new cellular automaton—finite element coupling scheme for alloy solidification. Model Simul Mat Sci Eng. 2004;12:545–556. doi:10.1088/0965-0393/12/3/013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raabe D. Cellular automata in materials science with particular reference to recrystallization simulation. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2002;32:53–76. doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.32.090601.152855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azarbarmas M. Modeling the dynamic recrystallization by using cellular automaton: the current status, challenges and future prospects. Iran J Mater Sci Eng. 2020;17:103–129. doi:10.22068/IJMSE.17.4.103
   Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Tan X, Tor SB, et al. Simultaneously enhanced strength and ductility for 3D-printed stainless steel 316L by selective laser melting. NPG Asia Mater. 2018;10:127–136. doi:10.1038/s41427-018-0018-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers TM, Madison JD, Tikare V. Simulation of metal additive manufacturing microstructures using kinetic monte carlo. Comput Mater Sci. 2017;135:78–89. doi:10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2017.03.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantawane MV, Sharma S, Dasari S, et al. Spatial variation of thermokinetics and associated microstructural evolution in laser surface engineered IN718: precursor to additive manufacturing. Metall Mater Trans A. 2021;52:2344–2360. doi:10.1007/s11661-021-06227-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantawane MV, Dasari S, Mantri SA, et al. Rapid thermokinetics driven nanoscale vanadium clustering within martensite laths in laser powder bed fused additively manufactured Ti6Al4V. Mater Res Lett. 2020;8:383–389. doi:10.1080/21663831.2020.1772396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantawane MV, Yang T, Jin Y, et al. Thermomechanically influenced dynamic elastic constants of laser powder bed fusion additively manufactured Ti6Al4V. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;811:140990. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2021.140990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantawane MV, Yang T, Jin Y, et al. Crystallographic texture dependent bulk anisotropic elastic response of additively manufactured Ti6Al4V. Sci Rep. 2021;11:633. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-80710-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou S. Welding metallurgy. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2003. https://doi.org/10.1557/MRS2003.197
   Google Scholar
• Liu W, Dupont JN. Effects of substrate crystallographic orientations on crystal growth and microstructure development in laser surface-melted superalloy single crystals. Mathematical modeling of single-crystal growth in a melt pool (part II). Acta Mater. 2005;53:1545–1558. doi:10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2004.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, DuPont JN. Effects of melt-pool geometry on crystal growth and microstructure development in laser surface-melted superalloy single crystals: mathematical modeling of single-crystal growth in a melt pool (part I). Acta Mater. 2004;52:4833–4847. doi:10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2004.06.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Wang N, Yao WJ, et al. Effect of substrate orientation on the columnar-to-equiaxed transition in laser surface remelted single crystal superalloys. Acta Mater. 2015;88:283–292. doi:10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2015.01.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Wang N. Effect of substrate orientation on the formation of equiaxed stray grains in laser surface remelted single crystal superalloys: experimental investigation. Acta Mater. 2016;104:250–258. doi:10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2015.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gäumann M, Henry S, Cléton F, et al. Epitaxial laser metal forming: analysis of microstructure formation. Mater Sci Eng A. 1999;271:232–241. doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00202-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermingham MJ, StJohn DH, Krynen J, et al. Promoting the columnar to equiaxed transition and grain refinement of titanium alloys during additive manufacturing. Acta Mater. 2019;168:261–274. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gäumann M, Bezençon C, Canalis P, et al. Single-crystal laser deposition of superalloys: processing–microstructure maps. Acta Mater. 2001;49:1051–1062. doi:10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00367-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Koizumi Y, Aoyagi K, et al. Molten pool behavior and effect of fluid flow on solidification conditions in selective electron beam melting (SEBPBF) of a biomedical Co-Cr-Mo alloy. Addit Manuf. 2019;26:202–214. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontha S, Klingbeil NW, Kobryn PA, et al. Effects of process variables and size-scale on solidification microstructure in beam-based fabrication of bulky 3D structures. Mater Sci Eng A. 2009;513-514:311–318. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2009.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Promoppatum P, Yao SC, Pistorius PC, et al. A comprehensive comparison of the analytical and numerical prediction of the thermal history and solidification microstructure of Inconel 718 products made by laser powder-bed fusion. Engineering. 2017;3:685–694. doi:10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistor J, Körner C. A novel mechanism to generate metallic single crystals. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–8. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-04235-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Zelaia P, Ledford C, Ellis EAI, et al. Crystallographic texture evolution in electron beam melting additive manufacturing of pure molybdenum. Mater Des. 2021;207:109809. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo S, Chou K. Phase-field simulation of microstructure evolution of Ti-6Al-4V in electron beam additive manufacturing process. Addit Manuf. 2016;9:14–24. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2015.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu LX, Sridhar N, Zhang YW. Phase field simulation of powder bed-based additive manufacturing. Acta Mater. 2018;144:801–809. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundin J, Mushongera L, Emmerich H. Phase-field modeling of microstructure formation during rapid solidification in Inconel 718 superalloy. Acta Mater. 2015;95:343–356. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya R, Sharon JA, Staroselsky A. Prediction of microstructure in laser powder bed fusion process. Acta Mater. 2017;124:360–371. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller T, Lindwall G, Ghosh S, et al. Application of finite element, phase-field, and CALPHAD-based methods to additive manufacturing of Ni-based superalloys. Acta Mater. 2017;139:244–253. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumara C, Segerstark A, Hanning F, et al. Microstructure modelling of laser metal powder directed energy deposition of alloy 718. Addit Manuf. 2019;25:357–364. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song B, Yu T, Jiang X, et al. Development of the molten pool and solidification characterization in single bead multilayer direct energy deposition. Addit Manuf. 2022:102479. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartney DG, Hunt JD. Measurements of cell and primary dendrite arm spacings in directionally solidified aluminium alloys. Acta Metall. 1981;29:1851–1863. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(81)90111-5
   Google Scholar
• Liu S, Shin YC. Thermodynamically consistent phase-field modeling of competitive polycrystalline growth of beta grains during additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V. J Cryst Growth. 2021;564:126112. doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2021.126112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry J, Perron A, Fattebert JL, et al. Toward multiscale simulations of tailored microstructure formation in metal additive manufacturing. Mater Today. 2021;51:65–86. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2021.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu PW, Ji YZ, Wang Z, et al. Investigation on evolution mechanisms of site-specific grain structures during metal additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol. 2018;257:191–202. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallah V, Alimardani M, Corbin SF, et al. Temporal development of melt-pool morphology and clad geometry in laser powder deposition. Comput Mater Sci. 2011;50:2124–2134. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabavizadeh SA, Eshraghi M, Felicelli SD. Three-dimensional phase field modeling of columnar to equiaxed transition in directional solidification of Inconel 718 alloy. J Cryst Growth. 2020;549:125879. doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.125879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Wang Z, Xiao Y, et al. Insight into the mechanisms of columnar to equiaxed grain transition during metallic additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2019;26:22–29. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurz W, Giovanola B, Trivedi R. Theory of microstructural development during rapid solidification. Acta Metall. 1986;34:823–830. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(86)90056-8
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Chou K. Microstructure simulations of Inconel 718 during selective laser melting using a phase field model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;100:2147–2162. doi:10.1007/s00170-018-2814-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai A, Markl M, Körner C. A coupled cellular automaton–lattice boltzmann model for grain structure simulation during additive manufacturing. Comput Mater Sci. 2016;124:37–48. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai A, Helmer H, Körner C. Simulation of grain structure evolution during powder bed based additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2017;13:124–134. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinoviev A, Zinovieva O, Ploshikhin V, et al. Evolution of grain structure during laser additive manufacturing. Simulation by a cellular automata method. Mater Des. 2016;106:321–329. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinovieva O, Zinoviev A, Ploshikhin V. Three-dimensional modeling of the microstructure evolution during metal additive manufacturing. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;141:207–220. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandin CA, Rappaz M. A 3D cellular automaton algorithm for the prediction of dendritic grain growth. Acta Mater. 1997;45:2187–2195. doi:10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00303-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koepf JA, Gotterbarm MR, Markl M, et al. 3D multi-layer grain structure simulation of powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Acta Mater. 2018;152:119–126. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koepf JA, Soldner D, Ramsperger M, et al. Numerical microstructure prediction by a coupled finite element cellular automaton model for selective electron beam melting. Comput Mater Sci. 2019;162:148–155. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liou F, Seufzer W, et al. A coupled finite element cellular automaton model to predict thermal history and grain morphology of Ti-6Al-4V during direct metal deposition (DMD). Addit Manuf. 2016;11:32–39. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang J. Modeling of solidification microstructure evolution in laser powder bed fusion fabricated 316L stainless steel using combined computational fluid dynamics and cellular automata. Addit Manuf. 2019;28:750–765. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Tan W. Numerical investigation of effects of nucleation mechanisms on grain structure in metal additive manufacturing. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;153:159–169. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohebbi MS, Ploshikhin V. Implementation of nucleation in cellular automaton simulation of microstructural evolution during additive manufacturing of Al alloys. Addit Manuf. 2020;36:101726. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Song B, Wei Q, et al. A review of selective laser melting of aluminium alloys: processing, microstructure, property and developing trends. J Mater Sci Technol. 2019;35:270–284. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei HL, Knapp GL, Mukherjee T, et al. Three-dimensional grain growth during multi-layer printing of a nickel-based alloy Inconel 718. Addit Manuf. 2019;25:448–459. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YP, Jamshidinia M, Boulware P, et al. Prediction of microstructure, residual stress, and deformation in laser powder bed fusion process. Comput Mech. 2018;61:599–615. doi:10.1007/s00466-017-1528-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauza JG, Tayon WA, Rollett AD. Computer simulation of microstructure development in powder-bed additive manufacturing with crystallographic texture. Model Simul Mat Sci Eng. 2021;29:055019. doi:10.1088/1361-651X/ac03a6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers TM, Moser D, Abdeljawad F, et al. Simulation of powder bed metal additive manufacturing microstructures with coupled finite difference-Monte Carlo method. Addit Manuf. 2021;41:101953. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.101953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys FJ, Hatherly M. Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena. Netherlands: Elsevier; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sakai T. Dynamic recrystallization microstructures under hot working conditions. J Mater Process Technol. 1995;53:349–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty RD, Hughes DA, Humphreys FJ, et al. Current issues in recrystallization: a review. Mater Sci Eng A. 1997;238:219–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang K, Logé RE. A review of dynamic recrystallization phenomena in metallic materials. Mater Des. 2016;111:548–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad Y, Ravichandran N. Effect of stacking fault energy on the dynamic recrystallization during hot working of FCC metals: a study using processing maps. Bull Mater Sci. 1991;14:1241–1248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQueen HJ, Blum W. Dynamic recovery: sufficient mechanism in the hot deformation of Al (99.99). Mater Sci Eng A. 2000;290:95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galiyev A, Kaibyshev R, Gottstein G. Correlation of plastic deformation and dynamic recrystallization in magnesium alloy ZK60. Acta Mater. 2001;49:1199–1207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zener C, Hollomon JH. Effect of strain rate upon plastic flow of steel. J Appl Phys. 1944;15:22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Montheillet F, Le Coze J. Influence of purity on the dynamic recrystallization of metals and alloys. Phys Status Solidi (a). 2002;189:51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M-S, Yuan W-Q, Li H-B, et al. New insights on the relationship between flow stress softening and dynamic recrystallization behavior of magnesium alloy AZ31B. Mater Charact. 2019;147:173–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponge D, Gottstein G. Necklace formation during dynamic recrystallization: mechanisms and impact on flow behavior. Acta Mater. 1998;46:69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabzi HE, Aboulkhair NT, Liang X, et al. Grain refinement in laser powder bed fusion: the influence of dynamic recrystallization and recovery. Mater Des. 2020;196:109181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriraman MR, Babu SS, Short M. Bonding characteristics during very high power ultrasonic additive manufacturing of copper. Scr Mater. 2010;62:560–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridharan N, Wolcott P, Dapino M, et al. Microstructure and texture evolution in aluminium and commercially pure titanium dissimilar welds fabricated using ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Scr Mater. 2016;117:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridharan N, Wolcott P, Dapino M, et al. Microstructure and mechanical property characterisation of aluminium–steel joints fabricated using ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Sci Technol Weld Joining. 2017;22:373–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridharan N, Gussev MN, Parish CM, et al. Evaluation of microstructure stability at the interfaces of Al-6061 welds fabricated using ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Mater Charact. 2018;139:249–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehoff RR, Babu SS. Characterization of interfacial microstructures in 3003 aluminium alloy blocks fabricated by ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Acta Mater. 2010;58:4305–4315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Wang Z, Diao M, et al. Dynamic recrystallization and recovery in very high-power ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Adv Eng Mater. 2021;23:2000958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths RJ, Garcia D, Song J, et al. Solid-state additive manufacturing of aluminium and copper using additive friction stir deposition: process-microstructure linkages. Materialia (Oxf). 2021;15:100967.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Bandari V, Ito K, et al. A new process for design and manufacture of tailor-made functionally graded composites through friction stir additive manufacturing. J Manuf Process. 2017;26:122–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason CJT, Rodriguez RI, Avery DZ, et al. Process-structure-property relations for as-deposited solid-state additively manufactured high-strength aluminium alloy. Addit Manuf. 2021;40:101879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuqing M, Liming K, Chunping H, et al. Formation characteristic, microstructure, and mechanical performances of aluminium-based components by friction stir additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;83:1637–1647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia D, Hartley WD, Rauch HA, et al. In situ investigation into temperature evolution and heat generation during additive friction stir deposition: a comparative study of Cu and Al-Mg-Si. Addit Manuf. 2020;34:101386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Wu C, Li H, et al. Review on cellular automata simulations of microstructure evolution during metal forming process: grain coarsening, recrystallization and phase transformation. Sci China Technol Sci. 2011;54:2107–2118. doi:10.1007/s11431-011-4464-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdipour N, Davies CHJ, Hodgson PD. Microstructural modeling of dynamic recrystallization using irregular cellular automata. Comput Mater Sci. 2008;44:566–576. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosgolitis CG, Lambrakos SG, Zervaki AD. Phase-Field modeling of nugget zone for a AZ31-Mg-alloy friction stir weld. J Mater Eng Perform. 2018;27:5102–5113. doi:10.1007/s11665-018-3471-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi M, Bagheri B, Sharifi F. Simulation and experimental study of dynamic recrystallization process during friction stir vibration welding of magnesium alloys. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China (Engl Ed). 2021;31:2626–2650. doi:10.1016/S1003-6326(21)65681-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Zheng L, Zhang H. Microstructure evolution and bond formation at the contact interface during ultrasonic consolidation process. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE), vol. 14, 2014. doi:10.1115/IMECE2014-37203
   Google Scholar
• Biswas S, Schwen D, Wang H, et al. Phase field modeling of sintering: role of grain orientation and anisotropic properties. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;148:307–319. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.02.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas S, Schwen D, Singh J, et al. A study of the evolution of microstructure and consolidation kinetics during sintering using a phase field modeling based approach. Vol. 7. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.eml.2016.02.017
   Google Scholar
• Park J, Kang JH, Oh CS. Phase-field simulations and microstructural analysis of epitaxial growth during rapid solidification of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy. Mater Des. 2020;195:108985. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108985
   Google Scholar
• Yang M, Wang L, Yan W. Phase-field modeling of grain evolution in additive manufacturing with addition of reinforcing particles. Addit Manuf. 2021;47:102286. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termuhlen R, Chatzistavrou X, Nicholas JD, et al. Three-dimensional phase field sintering simulations accounting for the rigid-body motion of individual grains. Comput Mater Sci. 2021;186:109963. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng R, Du J, Wei Z, et al. Modelling and experimental observation of the deposition geometry and microstructure evolution of aluminium alloy fabricated by wire-arc additive manufacturing. J Manuf Process. 2021;64:369–378. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.01.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumard A, Ayrault D, Fandeur O, et al. Numerical prediction of grain structure formation during laser powder bed fusion of 316 L stainless steel. Mater Des. 2021;199:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolchigo M, Stump B, Belak J, et al. Sparse thermal data for cellular automata modeling of grain structure in additive manufacturing. Model Simul Mat Sci Eng. 2020;28:065003. doi:10.1088/1361-651X/ab9734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teferra K, Rowenhorst DJ. Optimizing the cellular automata finite element model for additive manufacturing to simulate large microstructures. Acta Mater. 2021;213:116930. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun W, Shan F, Zong N, et al. Simulation of solidified β grain for Ti-6Al-4V during wire laser additive manufacturing by three-dimensional cellular automaton method. Model Simul Mat Sci Eng. 2021;29:065006. doi:10.1088/1361-651X/ac0c23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi P, Givi MKB, Akbari M. Simulation of dynamic recrystallization process during friction stir welding of AZ91 magnesium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;83:301–311. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7595-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunny S, Yu H, Mathews R, et al. Improved grain structure prediction in metal additive manufacturing using a dynamic kinetic Monte Carlo framework. Addit Manuf. 2021;37:101649. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Xiao X, Zhang J. Kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of sintering behavior of additively manufactured stainless steel powder particles using reconstructed microstructures from synchrotron X-ray microtomography. Results Phys. 2019;13:102336. doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisz-Patrault D. Fast simulation of temperature and phase transitions in directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020;31:100990. doi:10.1016/J.ADDMA.2019.100990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain V, Thijs L, van Humbeeck J, et al. Crack propagation and fracture toughness of Ti6Al4V alloy produced by selective laser melting. Addit Manuf. 2015;5:68–76. doi:10.1016/J.ADDMA.2014.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facchini L, Magalini E, Robotti P, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V produced by electron beam melting of pre-alloyed powders. Rapid Prototyp J. 2009;15:171–178. doi:10.1108/13552540910960262/FULL/PDF
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todaro CJ, Easton MA, Qiu D, et al. Grain structure control during metal 3D printing by high-intensity ultrasound. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–9. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13874-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh AK, Kumar B, Jha K, et al. Friction stir welding of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V: microstructure and mechanical properties. J Mater Process Technol. 2020;277:116433. doi:10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2019.116433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polozov I, Sufiiarov V, Popovich A, et al. Synthesis of Ti-5Al, Ti-6Al-7Nb, and Ti-22Al-25Nb alloys from elemental powders using powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Alloys Compd. 2018;763:436–445. doi:10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2018.05.325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murr LE, Gaytan SM, Ceylan A, et al. Google Scholar. n.d. [cited 2021 Dec 12]. Available from: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%0AL.+E.+Murr%2C+%0AS.+M.+Gaytan%2C+%0AA.+Ceylan%2C+%0AE.+Martinez%2C+%0AJ.+L.+Martinez%2C+%0AD.+H.+Hernandez%2C+%0AB.+I.+Machado%2C+%0AD.+A.+Ramirez%2C+%0AF.+Medina%2C+%0AS.+Collins%2C+%0AActa+Mater.+%0A2010%2C+%0A58%2C+1887.%0A
   Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Yang M, Clare AT, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-2Al alloyed with Mo formed in laser additive manufacture. J Alloys Compd. 2017;727:821–831. doi:10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2017.07.324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlton HD, Klein KD, Elmer JW. Evolution of microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr after heat treatments. Sci Technol Weld Joining. 2019;24:465–473. doi:10.1080/13621718.2019.1594589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng H, Chen L, Qiu W, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of as-deposited and heat treated Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–3Cr–1Zr (Ti-55531) alloy fabricated by laser melting deposition. J Alloys Compd. 2019;810:151792. doi:10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2019.151792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Han C, Choma T, et al. Effect of Nb content on microstructure, property and in vitro apatite-forming capability of Ti-Nb alloys fabricated via selective laser melting. Mater Des. 2017;126:268–277. doi:10.1016/J.MATDES.2017.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitzler L, Alifui-Segbaya F, Williams P, et al. Additive manufacturing of cobalt-based dental alloys: analysis of microstructure and physicomechanical properties. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2018;2018:1–12. doi:10.1155/2018/8213023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kircher RS, Christensen AM, Wurth KW. Electron Beam Melted (EBPBF) Co-Cr-Mo Alloy for Orthopaedic Implant Applications. n.d.
   Google Scholar
• Mantrala KM, Rao CS, Kesava Rao VVS, et al. Effect of process parameters on the tensile properties of LENS deposited Co-Cr-Mo alloy. Int J Manuf Technol Manage. 2018;32:509–516. doi:10.1504/IJMTM.2018.095039
   Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Chen J, Lin X, et al. Study on microstructure and mechanical properties of laser rapid forming Inconel 718. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;478:119–124. doi:10.1016/J.MSEA.2007.05.079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith ML, Ensz MT, Puskar JD, et al. Understanding the microstructure and properties of components fabricated by laser engineered net shaping (LENS). MRS Online Proc Lib (OPL). 2000;625:9. doi:10.1557/PROC-625-9
   Google Scholar
• Yadroitsev I, Thivillon L, Bertrand P, et al. Strategy of manufacturing components with designed internal structure by selective laser melting of metallic powder. Appl Surf Sci. 2007;254:980–983. doi:10.1016/J.APSUSC.2007.08.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato K, Hernandez J, Murr LE, et al. Comparison of microstructures and properties for a Ni-base superalloy (alloy 625) fabricated by electron beam melting. J Mater Sci Res. 2012;1:3. doi:10.5539/JMSR.V1N2P3
   Google Scholar
• Sert E, Hitzler L, Hafenstein S, et al. Tensile and compressive behaviour of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg samples. Prog Addit Manuf. 2020;5:305–313. doi:10.1007/S40964-020-00131-9
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Li L, Qu J, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of laser metal deposited AlSi10Mg alloys. Mater Sci Technol. 2019;35:2284–2293. doi:10.1080/02670836.2019.1674022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prashanth KG, Debalina B, Wang Z, et al. Tribological and corrosion properties of Al–12Si produced by selective laser melting. J Mater Res. 2014;29:2044–2054. doi:10.1557/JMR.2014.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu T, Chen B, Tan C, et al. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of laser additive manufacturing of high strength Al-Cu-Mg alloy. Opt Laser Technol. 2019;112:140–150. doi:10.1016/J.OPTLASTEC.2018.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenevisi MS, Lin F. Selective electron beam melting of high strength Al2024 alloy; microstructural characterization and mechanical properties. J Alloys Compd. 2020;843:155866. doi:10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2020.155866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zhu H, Qi T, et al. Selective laser melting of high strength Al–Cu–Mg alloys: processing, microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016;656:47–54. doi:10.1016/J.MSEA.2015.12.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford RL, Cao L, Klosterman D, et al. A metal–metal powder formulation approach for laser additive manufacturing of difficult-to-print high-strength aluminium alloys. Mater Lett. 2021;300:130113. doi:10.1016/J.MATLET.2021.130113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reschetnik W, Brüggemann JP, Aydinöz ME, et al. Fatigue crack growth behavior and mechanical properties of additively processed EN AW-7075 aluminium alloy. Procedia Struct Integrity. 2016;2:3040–3048. doi:10.1016/J.PROSTR.2016.06.380
   Google Scholar
• Spierings AB, Dawson K, Kern K, et al. SLM-processed Sc- and Zr- modified Al-Mg alloy: mechanical properties and microstructural effects of heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A. 2017;701:264–273. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2017.06.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia Q, Rometsch P, Kürnsteiner P, et al. Selective laser melting of a high strength Al[sbnd]Mn[sbnd]Sc alloy: alloy design and strengthening mechanisms. Acta Mater. 2019;171:108–118. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Ding Q, Zhong Y, et al. Dislocation network in additive manufactured steel breaks strength–ductility trade-off. Mater Today. 2018;21:354–361. doi:10.1016/J.MATTOD.2017.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Rombouts M, Maes G. Cracking behavior and mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steel parts produced by laser metal deposition. Mater Des. 2013;45:228–235. doi:10.1016/J.MATDES.2012.08.078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan K, Wang Z, Gao M, et al. Effects of processing parameters on tensile properties of selective laser melted 304 stainless steel. Mater Des. 2013;50:581–586. doi:10.1016/J.MATDES.2013.03.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue L, Chen J, Wang S-H. Freeform laser consolidated H13 and CPM 9V tool steels. Metall Microstruct and Anal. 2013;2:67–78. doi:10.1007/S13632-013-0061-0
   Google Scholar
• Mazur M, Brincat P, Leary M, et al. Numerical and experimental evaluation of a conformally cooled H13 steel injection mould manufactured with selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017;93:881–900. doi:10.1007/S00170-017-0426-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadollahi A, Shamsaei N, Thompson SM, et al. Mechanical and microstructural properties of selective laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE). 2016. 2A-2015. doi:10.1115/IMECE2015-52362
   Google Scholar
• Roters F, Eisenlohr P, Hantcherli L, et al. Overview of constitutive laws, kinematics, homogenization and multiscale methods in crystal plasticity finite-element modeling: theory, experiments, applications. Acta Mater. 2010;58:1152–1211. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fressengeas C, Acharya A, Beaudoin AJ. Dislocation mediated continuum plasticity: case studies on modeling scale dependence, scale-invariance, and directionality of sharp yield-point. In: Ghosh S, Dimiduk D, editors. Computational methods for microstructure-property relationships. Boston (MA): Springer; 2011. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0643-4_8
   Google Scholar
• Raabe D, Roters F. Using texture components in crystal plasticity finite element simulations. Int J Plast. 2004;20:339–361. doi:10.1016/S0749-6419(03)00092-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roters F, Eisenlohr P, Bieler TR, et al. Crystal plasticity finite element methods: in materials science and engineering. Germany: Wiley; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kapoor K, Suk Y, Yoo J, et al. Incorporating grain-level residual stresses and validating a crystal plasticity model of a two-phase Ti-6Al-4 V alloy produced via additive manufacturing. J Mech Phys Solids. 2018;121:447–462. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2018.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindroos M, Pinomaa T, Antikainen A, et al. Micromechanical modeling approach to single track deformation, phase transformation and residual stress evolution during selective laser melting using crystal plasticity. Addit Manuf. 2021;38:101819. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond DM, Zikry MA. Effects of electron beam manufacturing induced defects on fracture in Inconel 718. Addit Manuf. 2020;32:101059. doi:10.1016/J.ADDMA.2020.101059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl M, Groeber M, Haase C, et al. Identifying structure–property relationships through DREAM.3D representative volume elements and DAMASK crystal plasticity simulations: an integrated computational materials engineering approach. JOM. 2017;69:848–855. doi:10.1007/s11837-017-2303-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nammalvar Raja Rajan A, Krochmal M, Wegener T, et al. Micromechanical modeling of AlSi10Mg processed by laser-based additive manufacturing: from as-built to heat-treated microstructures. Materials (Basel). 2022;15:5562. doi:10.3390/ma15165562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedighiani K, Diehl M, Traka K, et al. An efficient and robust approach to determine material parameters of crystal plasticity constitutive laws from macro-scale stress-strain curves. Int J Plast. 2020;134:102779. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith M, Guan Z, Cantwell WJ. Finite element modelling of the compressive response of lattice structures manufactured using the selective laser melting technique. Int J Mech Sci. 2013;67:28–41. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedayati R, Hosseini-Toudeshky H, Sadighi M, et al. Computational prediction of the fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials. Int J Fatigue. 2016;84:67–79. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taheri Andani M, Haberland C, Walker JM, et al. Achieving biocompatible stiffness in NiTi through additive manufacturing. J Intell Mater Syst Struct. 2016;27:2661–2671. doi:10.1177/1045389X16641199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer SLB, Jones A, Mostafa A, et al. The third Sandia fracture challenge: predictions of ductile fracture in additively manufactured metal. Int J Fract. 2019; 218: 5–61. doi:10.1007/s10704-019-00361-1
   Google Scholar
• Antou G, Montavon G, Hlawka F, et al. Characterizations of the pore-crack network architecture of thermal-sprayed coatings. Mater Charact. 2004;53:361–372. doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2004.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk T, Rollett AD. Effect of microstructure on the elasto-viscoplastic deformation of dual phase titanium structures. Comput Mech. 2018;61:55–70. doi:10.1007/s00466-017-1467-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi A, Mirzaeifar R, Moghaddam NS, et al. Effect of manufacturing parameters on mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel parts fabricated by selective laser melting: a computational framework. Mater Des. 2016;112:328–338. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taheri Andani M, Karamooz-Ravari MR, Mirzaeifar R, et al. Micromechanics modeling of metallic alloys 3D printed by selective laser melting. Mater Des. 2018;137:204–213. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocke CK, Rollett AD, Lebensohn RA, et al. The AFRL additive manufacturing modeling challenge: predicting micromechanical fields in AM IN625 using an FFT-based method with direct input from a 3D microstructural image. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. 2021;10:157–176. doi:10.1007/s40192-021-00211-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu PW, Wang Z, Xiao YH, et al. Integration of phase-field model and crystal plasticity for the prediction of process-structure-property relation of additively manufactured metallic materials. Int J Plast. 2020;128:102670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers TM, Bishop JE, Madison JD. Direct numerical simulation of mechanical response in synthetic additively manufactured microstructures. Model Simul Mat Sci Eng. 2018;26:055010. doi:10.1088/1361-651X/aac616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herriott C, Li X, Kouraytem N, et al. A multi-scale, multi-physics modeling framework to predict spatial variation of properties in additive-manufactured metals. Model Simul Mat Sci Eng. 2019;27:025009. doi:10.1088/1361-651X/aaf753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan W, Lian Y, Yu C, et al. An integrated process–structure–property modeling framework for additive manufacturing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2018;339:184–204. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2018.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi R, Khairallah S, Heo TW, et al. Integrated simulation framework for additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V: melt pool dynamics, microstructure, solid-state phase transformation, and microelastic response. JOM. 2019;71:3640–3655. doi:10.1007/s11837-019-03618-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao F, Member S, Zhang H, et al. Digital twin in industry: state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Industr Inform 2018; p. 1. doi:10.1109/TII.2018.2873186
   Google Scholar
• Tabaste O, Lacan F, Liu C, et al. Digital twin-enabled collaborative data management for metal additive manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst. 2022;62:857–874. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasegaram DR, Murphy AB, Barnard A, et al. Towards developing multiscale-multiphysics models and their surrogates for digital twins of metal additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2021;46:102089. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo S, Agarwal M, Cooper C, et al. Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing: towards a physics-informed data-driven paradigm. J Manuf Syst. 2022;62:145–163. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasegaram DR, Murphy AB, Matthews MJ, et al. The case for digital twins in metal additive manufacturing. J Phys Mater. 2021;4:040401. doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ac09fb
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Tan XP, Tor SB, et al. Machine learning in additive manufacturing: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Addit Manuf. 2020;36:101538. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Z, Zhang Z, Demir K, et al. Machine learning for advanced additive manufacturing. Matter. 2020;3:1541–1556. doi:10.1016/j.matt.2020.08.023
   Google Scholar
• Johnson NS, Vulimiri PS, To AC, et al. Invited review: machine learning for materials developments in metals additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020;36:101641. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang J, Xiong Y, Zhang Z, et al. Machine learning integrated design for additive manufacturing. J Intell Manuf. 2022;33:1073–1086. doi:10.1007/s10845-020-01715-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park HS, Nguyen DS, Le-Hong T, et al. Machine learning-based optimization of process parameters in selective laser melting for biomedical applications. J Intell Manuf. 2022;33:1843–1858. doi:10.1007/s10845-021-01773-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DebRoy T, Mukherjee T, Wei HL, et al. Metallurgy, mechanistic models and machine learning in metal printing. Nat Rev Mater. 2021;6:48–68. doi:10.1038/s41578-020-00236-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baturynska I, Martinsen K. Prediction of geometry deviations in additive manufactured parts: comparison of linear regression with machine learning algorithms. J Intell Manuf. 2021;32:179–200. doi:10.1007/s10845-020-01567-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrionuevo GO, Ramos-Grez JA, Walczak M, et al. Comparative evaluation of supervised machine learning algorithms in the prediction of the relative density of 316L stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2021;113:419–433. doi:10.1007/s00170-021-06596-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caggiano A, Zhang J, Alfieri V, et al. Machine learning-based image processing for on-line defect recognition in additive manufacturing. CIRP Ann. 2019;68:451–454. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2019.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli U, Chang S. Automated process monitoring in 3D printing using supervised machine learning. Procedia Manuf. 2018;26:865–870. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.111
   Google Scholar
• Scime L, Beuth J. Using machine learning to identify in-situ melt pool signatures indicative of flaw formation in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process. Addit Manuf. 2019;25:151–165. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng L, Zhang J. Process design of laser powder bed fusion of stainless steel using a Gaussian process-based machine learning model. JOM. 2020;72:420–428. doi:10.1007/s11837-019-03792-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng L, McWilliams B, Jarosinski W, et al. Machine learning in additive manufacturing: a review. JOM. 2020;72:2363–2377. doi:10.1007/s11837-020-04155-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapia G, Elwany AH, Sang H. Prediction of porosity in metal-based additive manufacturing using spatial Gaussian process models. Addit Manuf. 2016;12:282–290. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapia G, Khairallah S, Matthews M, et al. Gaussian process-based surrogate modeling framework for process planning in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;94:3591–3603. doi:10.1007/s00170-017-1045-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace W, Tian Q, Guo S, et al. CIRP Annals - manufacturing technology A physics-driven deep learning model for process-porosity causal relationship and porosity prediction with interpretability in laser metal deposition. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 2020;69:205–208. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2020.04.049
   Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Wang Q, Michaleris PP. A physics-informed two-level machine-learning model for predicting melt-pool size in laser powder bed fusion. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2021;143; doi:10.1115/1.4052245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai PS, Fred Higgs C. Spreading process maps for powder-bed additive manufacturing derived from physics model-based machine learning. Metals (Basel). 2019;9:1–15. doi:10.3390/met9111176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y, Mukherjee T, DebRoy T. Physics-informed machine learning and mechanistic modeling of additive manufacturing to reduce defects. Appl Mater Today. 2021;24:101123. doi:10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y, Mukherjee T, Mitra P, et al. Machine learning based hierarchy of causative variables for tool failure in friction stir welding. Acta Mater. 2020;192:67–77. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2020.03.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zobeiry N, Humfeld KD. Engineering applications of artificial intelligence A physics-informed machine learning approach for solving heat transfer equation in advanced manufacturing and engineering applications. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2021;101:104232. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Liu Z, Yan J. Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing: predicting temperature and melt pool fluid dynamics using physics-informed neural networks. Comput Mech. 2021;67:619–635. doi:10.1007/s00466-020-01952-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kats D, Wang Z, Gan Z, et al. A physics-informed machine learning method for predicting grain structure characteristics in directed energy deposition. Comput Mater Sci. 2022;202:110958. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herriott C, Spear AD. Predicting microstructure-dependent mechanical properties in additively manufactured metals with machine- and deep-learning methods. Comput Mater Sci. 2020;175:109599. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Liu P, Ji Y, et al. Uncertainty quantification in metallic additive manufacturing through physics-informed data-driven modeling. JOM. 2019;71:2625–2634. doi:10.1007/s11837-019-03555-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang WY, Tang B, Lin D, et al. A brief review of data-driven ICME for intelligently discovering advanced structural metal materials: insight into atomic and electronic building blocks. J Mater Res. 2020;35:872–889. doi:10.1557/jmr.2020.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimiduk DM, Holm EA, Niezgoda SR. Perspectives on the impact of machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence on materials, processes, and structures engineering. Integr Mater Manuf Innovation. 2018;7:157–172. doi:10.1007/s40192-018-0117-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouraytem N, Li X, Tan W, et al. Modeling process-structure-property relationships in metal additive manufacturing: a review on physics-driven versus data-driven approaches. J Phys Mater. 2021;4:032002. doi:10.1088/2515-7639/abca7b
   Google Scholar
• Mies D, Marsden W, Warde S. Overview of additive manufacturing informatics: “a digital thread”. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. 2016;5:114–142. doi:10.1186/s40192-016-0050-7
   Google Scholar