7,363
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

The use of Artificial intelligence in school science: a systematic literature review

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 125-150 | Received 29 May 2023, Accepted 17 Sep 2023, Published online: 04 Oct 2023

References

  • Bosch, N. & D'Mello, S. K. (2021). Automatic Detection of Mind Wandering from Video in the Lab and in the Classroom. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 12(4), 974–988. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2019.2908837
  • Bozkurt, A., Karadeniz, A., Baneres, D., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Rodríguez, M. E. (2021). Artificial intelligence and reflections from educational landscape: A review of ai studies in half a century. Sustainability, 13(2), 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020800
  • Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence trends in education: A narrative overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233
  • Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 54(1), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.023
  • Dolenc, K., Abersek, B., & Abersek, M. K. (2015). Online functional literacy, intelligent tutoring systems and science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(2), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/15.14.162
  • European Commission. (2020, 19 February). White paper on Artificial intelligence – a European approach to excellence and trust. Author European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/white-paper-artificial-intelligence-european-approach-excellence-and-trust_en
  • Feng, S., & Law, N. (2021). Mapping artificial intelligence in education research: A network‐based keyword analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31(2), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00244-4
  • Gaudioso, E., Montero, M., & Hernandez-Del-Olmo, F. (2012). Supporting teachers in adaptive educational systems through predictive models: A proof of concept. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 621–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.052
  • Gerard, L., Matuk, C., McElhaney, K., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Automated, adaptive guidance for k-12 education. Educational Research Review, 15, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.001
  • Gonzalez, A. J., Hollister, J. R., DeMara, R. F., Leigh, J., Lanman, B., Lee, S.-Y., Parker, S., Walls, C., Parker, J., Wong, J., Barham, C., & Wilder, B. (2017). AI in informal science education: Bringing turing back to life to perform the turing test. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Official Journal of the International AIED Society, 27(2), 353–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0144-1
  • Guan, C., Mou, J., & Jiang, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence innovation in education: A twenty-year data-driven historical analysis. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 4(4), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2020.09.001
  • Huang, C.-J., Wang, Y.-W., Huang, T.-H., Chen, Y.-C., Chen, H.-M., & Chang, S.-C. (2011). Performance evaluation of an online argumentation learning assistance agent. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1270–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.013
  • Hutt, S., Krasich, K., Mills, C., Bosch, N., White, S., Brockmole, J. R., & D’Mello, S. K. (2019). Automated gaze-based mind wandering detection during computerized learning in classrooms. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction: The Journal of Personalization Research, 29(4), 821–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-019-09228-5
  • Lee, H.-S., Gweon, G.-H., Lord, T., Paessel, N., Pallant, A., & Pryputniewicz, S. (2021). Machine learning-enabled automated feedback: Supporting students’ revision of scientific arguments based on data drawn from simulation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(2), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09889-7
  • Lee, H.-S., Pallant, A., Pryputniewicz, S., Lord, T., Mulholland, M., & Liu, O. L. (2019). Automated text scoring and real-time adjustable feedback: Supporting revision of scientific arguments involving uncertainty. Science Education, 103(3), 590–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21504
  • Maestrales, S., Zhai, X., Touitou, I., Baker, Q., Schneider, B., & Krajcik, J. (2021). Using machine learning to score multi-dimensional assessments of chemistry and physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09895-9
  • Mao, L., Liu, O. L., Roohr, K., Belur, V., Mulholland, M., Lee, H.-S., & Pallant, A. (2018). Validation of automated scoring for a formative assessment that employs scientific argumentation. Educational Assessment, 23(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2018.1427570
  • Mead, C., Buxner, S., Bruce, G., Taylor, W., Semken, S., & Anbar, A. D. (2019). Immersive, interactive virtual field trips promote science learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1565285
  • Miao, F., Holmes, W., Ronghuai, H., & Zhang H. (2021). AI end education: Guidance for policy-makers (UNESCO), 45. https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The prisma statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
  • Ntemngwa, C., & Steve, O. J. (2018). The implementation of Integrated Science Technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) instruction using robotics in the middle school Science classroom. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12–40. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.380617
  • Nye, B. D., Davis, D. M., Rizvi, S. Z., Carr, K., Swartout, W., Thacker, R., & Shaw, K. (2020). Feasibility and usability of MentorPal, a framework for rapid development of virtual mentors. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1771640
  • Nye, B. D., Davis, D. M., Rizvi, S. Z., Carr, K., Swartout, W., Thacker, R., & Shaw, K. (2021). Feasibility and usability of MentorPal, a framework for rapid development of virtual mentors. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1771640
  • OECD. (2021). OECD digital education outlook 2021 : Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en
  • Parsia, J., Leo, B., Al-Emari, U., Sattler, S., & Al-Emari, S. (2020). A systematic review of automatic question generation for educational purposes. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(1), 121–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00186-y
  • Ponticorvo, M., Rubinacci, F., Marocco, D., Truglio, F. & Miglino, O. (2020). Educational Robotics to Foster and Assess Social Relations in Students' Groups. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00078
  • Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 22–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
  • San Pedro, M. O., Baker, R. S. & Rodrigo, M. M. (2014). Carelessness and Affect in an Intelligent Tutoring System for Mathematics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(2), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0015-y
  • Sung, S. H., Li, C., Chen, G., Huang, X., Xie, C., Massicotte, J., & Shen, J. (2021). How does augmented observation facilitate multimodal representational thinking? applying deep learning to decode complex student construct. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(2), 210–226. sung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09856-2
  • Topal, A. D., Eren, C. D., & Geçer, A. K. (2021). Chatbot application in a 5th grade science course. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6241–6265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10627-8
  • Udandarao, V., Gupta, T., Agarwal, A., & Chakraborty, A. (2021). Inphynet: Leveraging attention-based multitask recurrent networks for multi-label physics text classification. Knowledge-Based Systems, 211, 211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106487
  • Van Griethuijsen, R. A. L. F., van Eijck, M. W., Haste, H., den Brok, P. J., Skinner, N. C., Mansour, N., Gencer, A. S., & BouJaoude, S. (2015). Global patterns in students’ views of science and interest in science. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9438-6
  • Ward, W., Cole, R., Bolaños, D., Buchenroth-Martin, C., Svirsky, E., & Weston, T. (2013). My science tutor: A conversational multimedia virtual tutor. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031589
  • Wen, C.-T., Chang, C.-J., Chang, M.-H., Fan Chiang, S.-H., Liu, C.-C., Hwang, F.-K., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). The learning analytics of model-based learning facilitated by a problem-solving simulation game. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 46(6), 847–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9461-5
  • Wu, P.-H., Hwang, G.-J., & Tsai, W.-H. (2013). An expert system-based context-aware ubiquitous learning approach for conducting science learning activities. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 217–230.
  • Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
  • Yağci, A., & Çevik, M. (2019). Prediction of academic achievements of vocational and technical high school (VTS) students in science courses through artificial neural networks (comparison of Turkey and Malaysia). Education and Information Technologies: The Official Journal of the IFIP Technical Committee on Education, 24(5), 2741–2761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09885-4
  • Yağci, A., & Çevik, M. (2019). Prediction of academic achievements of vocational and technical high school (VTS) students in science courses through artificial neural networks (comparison of Turkey and Malaysia). Educ Inf Technol, 24(5), 2741–2761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09885-4
  • Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, I. V., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education - where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  • Zhai, X., Yin, Y., Pellegrino, J. W., Haudek, K. C., & Shi, L. (2020). Applying machine learning in science assessment: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 56(1), 111–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1735757
  • Zhu, M., Lee, H.-S., Wang, T., Liu, O. L., Belur, V., & Pallant, A. (2017). Investigating the impact of automated feedback on students’ scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 39(12), 1648–1668. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1347303
  • Zulfiani, Z., Suwarna, I. P., & Miranto, S. (2018). Science education adaptive learning system as a computer-based science learning with learning style variations. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(4), 711–727. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.711
  • Zulfiani, Z., Suwarna, I. P., & Miranto, S. (2021). Improving students’ academic achievement using the ScEd-ALS Android-based. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 735–756. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14241a