Citizens united and state environmental policy, regulations, and outcomes

References

• Abdul-Razzak, N., Prato, C., and Wolton, S., 2020. After Citizens United: how outside spending shapes American democracy. Electoral Studies, 67. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, E. and Mandler, B., 2018. Petroleum and the environment. American Geosciences Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., Figueiredo, J.M.D., and Snyder Jr, J.M.S., 2003. Why is there so little money in U.S. politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 105–130. doi:10.1257/089533003321164976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, M.J., 2015. Ideological donors, contribution limits, and the polarization of American legislatures. The Journal of Politics, 78, 296–310. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/683453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beland, L.P. and Boucher, V., 2015. Polluting politics. Economics Letters, 137, 176–181. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2015.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergquist, P. (2018). Controlling the regulators: how party control of government shapes environmental regulation in the 21st century. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Boehmke, F.J., 2018. Subverting administrative oversight: campaign contributions and nursing home inspections. State Politics Policy Quarterly, 18, 441–466. doi:10.1177/1532440018789608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonica, A., 2016. Avenues of influence: on the political expenditures of corporations and their directors and executives. Business and Politics, 18, 367–394. doi:10.1515/bap-2016-0004
   Google Scholar
• Bromley-Trujillo, R., et al., 2016. The spreading of innovation: state adoptions of energy and climate change policy. The Review of Policy Research, 33 (5), 544–565. doi:10.1111/ropr.12189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulle, R.J., 2018. The climate lobby: a sectoral analysis of lobbying spending on climate change in the USA, 2000 to 2016. Climatic Change, 149, 289–303. doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2241-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughey, D. and Warshaw, C., 2017. Policy preferences and policy change: dynamic responsiveness in the American States, 1936–2014. The American Political Science Review, 112 (2), 249–266. doi:10.1017/S0003055417000533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, A. and Urpelainen, J., 2013. How do competing interest groups influence environmental policy? The case of renewable electricity in industrialized democracies, 1989 – 2007. Political Studies, 61, 874–897. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., et al. (2015). Political influences on greenhouse gas emissions from US states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the US. 8254–8259. https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1417806112?doi=10.1073%2Fpnas.1417806112
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R.E. and McCright, A.M. (2011). Organized climate change denial. In: John, S., Dryzek, R.B.N., D. Schlosberg, ed. The Oxford handbook of climate change and society, Chapter 10. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 144–164.
   Google Scholar
• Flavin, P., 2015. Campaign finance laws, policy outcomes, and political equality in the American states. Political Research Quarterly, 68, 77–88. doi:10.1177/1065912914554041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouirnaies, A. and Hall, A.B., 2018. How do interest groups seek access to committees? American Journal of Political Science, 62, 132–147. doi:10.1111/ajps.12323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, L. and Kettler, J.J., 2021. Are republicans bad for the environment? State Politics Policy Quarterly, 21, 195–219. doi:10.1177/1532440020941794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franta, B., 2021. Weaponizing economics: big oil, economic consultants, and climate policy delay. Environmental Politics, 31, 555–575. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1947636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A., 1998. Estimating the effect of campaign spending on senate election outcomes using instrumental variables. The American Political Science Review, 92, 401–411. doi:10.2307/2585672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilens, M., Patterson, S., and Haines, P., 2021. Campaign finance regulations and public policy. The American Political Science Review, 115, 1074–1081. doi:10.1017/S0003055421000149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, M.H., et al., 2020. Oil and gas companies invest in legislators that vote against the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117, 5111–5112. doi:10.1073/pnas.1922175117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grumbach, J.M., 2015. Polluting industries as climate protagonists: cap and trade and the problem of business preferences. Business and Politics, 17, 633–659. doi:10.1515/bap-2015-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A.B., 2015. Systemic effects of campaign spending: evidence from corporate contribution bans in us state legislatures. Political Science Research and Methods, 4, 1–17. doi:10.1017/psrm.2015.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W.L., Rocca, M.S., and Ortiz, B.L., 2015. The effect of Citizens United on corporate spending in the 2012 presidential election. The Journal of Politics, 77, 535–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, A. and Mattia, T., 2019. Does money have a conservative bias? Estimating the causal impact of citizens united on state legislative preferences. Public Choice, 191, 417–441. doi:10.1007/s11127-019-00721-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, S.P., et al., 2015. Some inconvenient truths about climate change policy: the distributional impacts of transportation policies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 97, 1052–1069. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, C.R., et al., 2020. Assessing group incentives, independent spending, and campaign finance law by comparing the states. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 19, 374–391. doi:10.1089/elj.2019.0570
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, G.C., 1978. The effects of campaign spending in congressional elections. The American Political Science Review, 72, 469–491. doi:10.2307/1954105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennard, A., 2020. The enemy of my enemy: when firms support climate change regulation. International Organization, 74, 187–221. doi:10.1017/S0020818320000107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.E.U.N., Urpelainen, J., and Yang, J., 2016. Electric utilities and American climate policy: lobbying by expected winners and losers. Journal of Public Policy, 36, 251–275. doi:10.1017/S0143814X15000033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klarner, C. (2018). State legislative election returns 1967-2016.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N., 2015. This changes everything: capitalism vs. the climate. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Klumpp, T., Mialon, H.M., and Williams, M.A., 2016. The business of American democracy: Citizens United, independent spending, and elections. Journal of Law & Economics, 59, 1–43. doi:10.1086/685691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konisky, D.M., 2007. Regulatory competition and environmental enforcement: is there a race to the bottom? American Journal of Political Science, 51, 853–872. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00285.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konisky, D.M. and Woods, N.D., 2010. Exporting air pollution? Regulatory enforcement and environmental free riding in the United States. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 771–782. doi:10.1177/1065912909334429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konisky, D.M. and Woods, N.D., 2012. Measuring state environmental policy. The Review of Policy Research, 29, 544–569. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00570.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konisky, N.D. and Woods, D.M., 2018. Environmental federalism and the Trump presidency: a preliminary assessment. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 38, 345–371. doi:10.1093/publius/pjy009
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J., 2017. Dark money: the hidden history of the billionaires behind the rise of the radical right. New York, NY: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Mildenberger, M., 2020. Carbon captured: how business and labor control climate politics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newmark, A.J. and Witko, C., 2007. Pollution, politics, and preferences for environmental spending in the states. The Review of Policy Research, 24, 291–308. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00284.x
   Google Scholar
• Parinandi, S., 2023. Following in footsteps or marching alone? Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potoski, M., 2001. Clean air federalism: do states race to the bottom? Public Administration Review, 61, 335–343. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, E.N. and Grimmer, J., 2016. Money in exile: campaign contributions and committee access. The Journal of Politics, 78, 974–988. doi:10.1086/686615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe, B., 2018. Contested federalism and American climate policy. Publius, 41, 494–521. doi:10.1093/publius/pjr017
   Google Scholar
• Raja, R.J.L. and Schaffner, B.F., 2014. The effects of campaign finance spending bans on electoral outcomes: evidence from the states about the potential impact of citizens united v. fec. Electoral Studies, 33, 102–114. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2013.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscoe, D.D. and Jenkins, S., 2005. A meta-analysis of campaign contributions’ impact on roll call voting. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 52–68. doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, D. and Wood, A., 2014. Citizens United, States divided: an empirical analysis of independent political spending. Indiana Law Journal, 89, 316–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, L.C., 2020. Short circuiting policy: interest groups and the battle over clean energy and climate policy in the American States. USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, T. and Coleman, J.J. (2012). Assessing the potential effects of citizens united: evidence from the states. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, T. and Coleman, J.J., 2014. citizens united, independent expenditures, and agency costs: reexamining the political economy of state antitakeover statutes. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 31, 127–159. doi:10.1093/jleo/ewu009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witko, C., 2013. Party government and variation in corporate influence on agency decision making: Osha regulation, 1981–2006. Social Science Quarterly, 94, 894–911. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, N.D., Konisky, D.M., and Bowman, A.O., 2009. You get what you pay for: environmental policy and public health. Publius, 39, 95–116. doi:10.1093/publius/pjn024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar