Which Amazon problem? Problem-constructions and transnationalism in Brazilian presidential discourse since 1985

References

• Acker, A., 2021. Amazon development. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American history. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.013.837.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, P.D., 2009. Fixed effects regression models. SAGE publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781412993869.
   Google Scholar
• Andonova, L.B., 2014. Boomerangs to partnerships? Explaining state participation in transnational partnerships for sustainability. Comparative Political Studies, 47 (3), 481–515. DOI: 10.1177/0010414013509579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arima, E.Y., et al., 2014. Public policies can reduce tropical deforestation: lessons and challenges from Brazil. Land Use Policy, 41 (November), 465–473. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.026.
   Google Scholar
• A Silva, José Bacelar, A., and Robb Larkins, E., 2019. The Bolsonaro Election, Antiblackness, and Changing Race Relations in Brazil. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 24 (4), 893–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assunção, J., Gandour, C., and Rocha, R., 2015. Deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon: prices or policies? Environment and Development Economics, 20 (6), 697–722. DOI: 10.1017/s1355770x15000078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C.L., 1999. Women, policy and politics: the construction of policy problems. DOI: 10.4135/9781446217887
   Google Scholar
• Becker, B.K., 2005. Geopolítica da Amazônia. Estudos Avançados, 19 (April), 71–86. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-40142005000100005.
   Google Scholar
• Calderwood, K.J., 2020. Going global: climate change discourse in presidential communications. Environmental Communication, 14 (1), 52–67. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2019.1592005.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J.M., 2015. Conjuring property: speculation and environmental futures in the Brazilian Amazon. Illustrated ed. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capelari, M.G.M., et al., 2023. Radical reorganization of environmental policy: contemporaneous evidence from Brazil. Latin American Perspectives. DOI: 10.1177/0094582X221148714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capobianco, J.P., 2019 January. Avances y retrocesos de la sostenibilidad en la Amazonia: un análisis de la gobernanza socioambiental en la Amazonia. Available from: https://gredos.usal.es/handle/10366/139311.
   Google Scholar
• Capobianco, J.P., 2021. Amazônia: Uma Década de Esperança. 1ª edição ed. São Paulo: Estação Liberdade.
   Google Scholar
• Carlos, P., Power, T.J., and Rennó, L.R., 2008. Agenda power, executive decree authority, and the mixed results of reform in the Brazilian congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 33 (1), 5–33. DOI: 10.3162/036298008783743309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cezar, R.F., 2020. Brazilian presidential speeches from 1985 to July 2020. Available from: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/M9UU09.
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, S., 1999. ’issue-systems’,’multi-level games’ and the analysis of the EU’s external commercial and associated policies: a research Agenda. Journal of European Public Policy, 6 (2), 206–224. DOI: 10.1080/135017699343685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couto, L., Soares, A., and Livramento, B., 2021. Presidencialismo de Coalizão: conceito e aplicação. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 34. doi:10.1590/0103-3352.2021.34.241841
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, J. and Flavia Barros-Platiau, A., 2006. Brazilian environmental laws and policies, 1934-2002: a critical overview. Law and Policy, 28 (1), 83–108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2005.00218.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fairfield, T. and Garay, C., 2017. Redistribution under the right in Latin America: electoral competition and organized actors in policymaking. Comparative Political Studies, 50 (14), 1871–1906. DOI: 10.1177/0010414017695331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchini, M.A. and Viola, E., 2019. Myths and images in global climate governance, conceptualization and the case of Brazil (1989 - 2019). Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 62 (September). DOI: 10.1590/0034-7329201900205.
   Google Scholar
• Grangeia, M.L., 2017. Desigualdade e Política Social No Discurso Dos Governos Vargas e Entre 1985 e 2016. Revista Brasileira de Sociologia - RBS, 5 (10). DOI: 10.20336/rbs.210.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, S. and Cockburn, A., 1990. The fate of the forest: developers, destroyers, and defenders of the Amazon. Updated Edition. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo10387801.html
   Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, K., 2021. Climate institutions in Brazil: three decades of building and dismantling climate capacity. Environmental Politics, 30 (sup1), 49–70. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2021.1957614.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, K., and Keck, M.E., 2007. Greening Brazil: environmental activism in state and society. DOI: 10.1215/9780822390596
   Google Scholar
• Horochovski, R.R., et al., 2016. As Mudanças No código Florestal Brasileiro: Uma análise de gênero, Ideologia Partidária e Financiamento de Campanha Das Bancadas Parlamentares. Guaju, 2 (2), 3–25. DOI: 10.5380/guaju.v2i2.49758.
   Google Scholar
• Justin, G., Roberts, M.E., and Stewart, B.M., 2022. Text as data: a new framework for machine learning and the social sciences. Princeton, New Jersey Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K., 1998. Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. 1st ed. Ithaca (N.Y): Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• López, M., 2023. Unlikely expropriators: why right-wing parties implemented Agrarian reform in democratic Brazil. Journal of Latin American Studies, 55 (1), 129–156. DOI: 10.1017/S0022216X23000044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay, F., 2017. Presidents, producers and politics: law-and-order policy in Brazil from cardoso to dilma. Policy Studies, 38 (3), 248–261. DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2017.1290231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquardt, J., Oliveira, M.C., and Lederer, M., 2022 April. Same, same but different? How democratically elected right-wing populists shape climate change policymaking. Environmental Politics, 31 (5), 777–800. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2022.2053423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes Motta, F. and Hauber, G., 2022. Anti-environmentalism and proto-authoritarian populism in Brazil: bolsonaro and the defence of global agri-business. Environmental Politics, 32 (4), 642–662. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2022.2123993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D., et al., 2021. E1071: misc functions of the department of statistics, probability theory group (formerly: e1071). TU Wien. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=e1071
   Google Scholar
• Noble, W.S., 2006. What is a support vector machine? Nature Biotechnology, 24 (12), 1565–1567. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1206-1565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J.S. and Keohane, R.O., 1971. Transnational relations and world politics: an introduction. International Organization, 25 (3), 329–349. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pádua, J.A., 2012. Environmentalism in Brazil: a historical perspective. A Companion to Global Environmental History, 1, 455–473.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, J.C. and Viola, E., 2021. Climate change and biodiversity governance in the amazon: at the edge of ecological collapse?. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ponce de Leon, Z., 2021. Healthcare reform out of nowhere? Policy reform and the lack of programmatic commitment in Peru. Journal of Latin American Studies, 53 (3), 493–519. DOI: 10.1017/s0022216x21000493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.D., 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42 (3), 427–460. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajão, R., et al., 2020. The rotten apples of Brazil’s agribusiness. Science, 369 (6501), 246–248. DOI: 10.1126/science.aba6646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sant’anna, A.A. and Costa, L., 2021. Environmental regulation and bail outs under weak state capacity: deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Economics, 186, 107071. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva-Muller, L., 2022. Payment for ecosystem services and the practices of environmental fieldworkers in policy implementation: the case of bolsa floresta in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy, 120 (September), 106251. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106251.
   Google Scholar
• Silva-Muller, L., and Faul, M., 2022. Protecting the Amazon and its people: the role of civil society in local effectiveness of trasnational partnerships. In: Partnerships for sustainability in contemporary global governance. Routledge, 83–103. DOI: 10.4324/9781003148371-6.
   Google Scholar
• Sposito, H., 2021. Poldis: Tools for Analyzing Political Discourse. Available from: https://github.com/henriquesposito/poldis.
   Google Scholar
• Villoria, N., et al., 2022. Leakage does not fully offset soy supply-chain efforts to reduce deforestation in Brazil. Nature Communications, 13 (1). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33213-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viola, E.J., 1987. O Movimento Ecológico No Brasil, 1974-1986: Do Ambientalismo à Ecopolítica. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais, 3 (93), 5–26. http://anpocs.com/images/stories/RBCS/03/rbcs03_01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zarefsky, D., 2004. Presidential rhetoric and the power of definition. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34 (3), 607–619. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27552615
   Google Scholar