Towards more sustainable global supply chains? Company compliance with new human rights and environmental due diligence laws

References

• Baars, G., 2016. “It’s not me, it’s the corporation”: the value of corporate accountability in the global political economy. London Review of International Law, 4 (1), 127–163. doi: 10.1093/lril/lrw008.
   Google Scholar
• Barreto, P., et al., 2017. Will meat-packing plants help halt deforestation in the Amazon? Belém, Imazon and Instituto Centro de Vida. Available from: https://imazon.org.br/en/publicacoes/will-meat-packing-plants-help-halt-deforestation-in-the-amazon/ [Accessed 20 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Bartley, T., 2018. Rules without rights: land, labor, and private authority in the global economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, D., 2022a. Environmental justice “light”? Transnational tort litigation in the corporate anthropocene. German Law Journal, 23 (5), 738–755. doi: 10.1017/glj.2022.45.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, D., 2022b. Judicializing environmental governance? The case of transnational corporate accountability. Global Environmental Politics, 22 (2), 117–135. doi: 10.1162/glep_a_00651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., 2010. Two concepts of accountability: accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West European Politics, 33 (5), 946–967. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2010.486119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno, N. and Bright, C., 2020. Implementing human rights due diligence through corporate civil liability. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 69 (4), 789–818. doi: 10.1017/S0020589320000305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrefour, 2018. Forests 2020 and beyond. Carrefour Group CSR department. Massy: Carrefour.
   Google Scholar
• Carrefour, 2022. Universal registration document: 2021 annual financial report. Massy: Carrefour.
   Google Scholar
• Casino Group, 2018. Document de référence 2017. Paris: Casino Group.
   Google Scholar
• Casino Group, 2020a. Document d’enregistrement universel 2019. Paris: Casino Group.
   Google Scholar
• Casino Group, 2020b. Letter from Casino Group to Envol Vert. Available from: http://envol-vert.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Reponse-courrier-envol-vert-juin-2020.doc-Copie.pdf [Accessed 20 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Casino Group, 2021. Document d’enregistrement universel 2020. Paris: Casino Group.
   Google Scholar
• CCFD Solidaire & Sherpa, 2021. Le radar du devoir de vigilance. Identifier les enterprises soumises à la loi. Available from: https://plan-vigilance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/2021-07-05-Radar-DDV-Rapport-2021.pdf [Accessed 20 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, J., 2020. Food. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dauvergne, P. and Lister, J., 2012. Big brand sustainability: governance prospects and environmental limits. Global Environmental Change, 22 (1), 36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, L.B., et al., 1991. Legal ambiguity and the politics of compliance: affirmative action officers’ dilemma. Law & Policy, 13 (1), 73–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1991.tb00058.x.
   Google Scholar
• Envol Vert, 2020. Groupe Casino eco responsible de la deforestation. Paris: Envol Vert.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, T., et al., 2019. Transparency and sustainability in global commodity supply chains. World Development, 121, 163–177. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R.W. and Keohane, R.O., 2005. Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review, 99 (1), 29–43. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, M.T., 2018. Private politics and peasant mobilization. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-60756-6.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, M.T., Schilling-Vacaflor, A., and Lenshow, A., 2022. Foreign corporate accountability: the contested institutionalization of mandatory due diligence in France and Germany. Regulation & Governance. doi: 10.1111/rego.12498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, M.T., Schilling-Vacaflor, A., and Lenshow, A., 2023. The politics of supply chain regulations. Regulation & Governance. doi: 10.1111/rego.12526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keohane, R.O., 2003. Global governance and democratic accountability. In: D. Held and M. Koenig-Archibugi, eds. Taming globalization: frontiers of governance. Oxford: Blackwell, xi, 196.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig‐Archibugi, M. and Macdonald, K., 2013. Accountability‐by‐proxy in transnational non‐state governance. Governance, 26 (3), 499–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01609.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig-Archibugi, M., 2010. Accountability in transnational relations: how distinctive is it? West European Politics, 33 (5), 1142–1164. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2010.486142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramarz, T., Mason, M., and Partzsch, L., 2022. Proxy-led accountability for natural resource extraction in rentier states. Environmental Politics, 32, 113–134. doi:10.1080/09644016.2022.2044219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramarz, T. and Park, S., 2016. Accountability in global environmental governance: a meaningful tool for action? Global Environmental Politics, 16 (2), 1–21. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krisch, N., 2006. The pluralism of global administrative law. The European Journal of International Law, 17 (1), 247–278. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chi163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBaron, G., Lister, J., and Dauvergne, P., 2017. Governing global supply chain sustainability through the ethical audit regime. Globalizations, 14 (6), 958–975. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2017.1304008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBaron, G. and Rühmkorf, A., 2017. Steering CSR through home state regulation: a comparison of the impact of the UK bribery act and modern slavery act on global supply chain governance. Global Policy, 8, 15–28. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A., Newig, J., and Challies, E., 2016. Globalization’s limits to the environmental state? Integrating telecoupling into global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 25 (1), 136–159. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1074384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, K., 2014. The meaning and purposes of transnational accountability. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73 (4), 426–436. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.12107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M., 2020. Transparency, accountability and empowerment in sustainability governance: a conceptual review. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22 (1), 98–111. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2019.1661231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monciardini, D., Bernaz, N., and Andhov, A., 2021. The organizational dynamics of compliance with the UK Modern Slavery Act in the food and tobacco sector. Business & Society, 60 (2), 288–340. doi: 10.1177/0007650319898195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, C. and Leipold, S., 2021. Toward “hardened” accountability? Analyzing the European Union’s hybrid transnational governance in timber and biofuel supply chains. Regulation & Governance, 15 (1), 115–132. doi: 10.1111/rego.12268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P., 2008. Civil society, corporate accountability and the politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 8 (3), 122–153. doi: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., et al., 2020. Governing global telecoupling toward environmental sustainability. Ecology and Society, 25 (4), 21. doi: 10.5751/ES-11844-250421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), 2018. OECD Due diligence guidance for responsible business conduct. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Partzsch, L., 2021. European Union’s proxy accountability for tropical deforestation. Environmental Politics, 30 (4), 600–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendrill, F., et al., 2019. Agricultural and forestry trade drives large share of tropical deforestation emissions. Global Environmental Change, 56, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, R., et al., 2020. Extensive production practices and incomplete implementation hinder Brazil’s zero-deforestation cattle agreements in Para. Tropical Conservation Science, 13, 1940082920942014. doi: 10.1177/1940082920942014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, J., 2007. Accountability in an unequal world. The Journal of Politics, 69 (3), 616–632. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00563.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J.G., 2018. Multinationals as global institution: power, authority and relative autonomy. Regulation & Governance, 12 (3), 317–333. doi: 10.1111/rego.12154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savencia, 2018. Rapport financier annuel 2017. Versailles: Savencia Sa.
   Google Scholar
• Savencia, 2020. Rapport fnancier annuel 2019. Versailles: Savencia Sa.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling-Vacaflor, A., 2021. Putting the French Duty of Vigilance law in context: towards corporate accountability for human rights violations in the global south? Human Rights Review, 22 (1), 109–127. doi: 10.1007/s12142-020-00607-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling-Vacaflor, A. and Lenschow, A., 2021. Hardening foreign corporate accountability through mandatory due diligence in the European Union? New trends and persisting challenges. Regulation & Governance. doi: 10.1111/rego.12402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherpa, 2019. Vigilance plans reference guidance. Paris: Sherpa.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, L., et al., 2020. Study on due diligence requirements through the supply chain. Final Report. Brussel: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Steinweg, T., Rijk, G., and Piotrowski, M., 2019. Carrefour may face financial risks from deforestation-linked beef sourcing in Brazil. Washington DC: Chain Reaction Research.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J., 2002. Paths to compliance: enforcement, management, and the European Union. International Organization, 56 (3), 609–643. doi: 10.1162/002081802760199908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR), 2011. Guiding principles on business and human rights. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 2006. Responsibility and global justice: a social connection model. Social Philosophy and Policy, 23 (1), 102–130. doi: 10.1017/S0265052506060043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar