Green Republicanism and the ‘crises of democracy’

References

• Abizadeh, A., 2021. Representation, bicameralism, political equality, and sortition: reconstituting the second chamber as a randomly selected assembly. Perspectives on Politics, 19 (3), 791–806. doi:10.1017/S1537592719004626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achen, C.H. and Bartels, L.M., 2016. Democracy for realists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H., 1958. The human condition. 2nd ed Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baccelli, L., 2017. Political Imagination, Conflict, and Democracy: Machiavelli’s Republican Realism. In: D. Johnston, N. Urbinati, and C. Vergara, eds. Machiavelli on Liberty & Conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 352–371.
   Google Scholar
• Bagg, S., 2018. The power of the multitude: answering epistemic challenges to democracy. American Political Science Review, 112 (4), 891–904. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, J., 2012. The politics of actually existing unsustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J., 2021. Green republicanism and a ‘Just Transition’ from the tyranny of economic growth. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 24 (5), 725–742. doi:10.1080/13698230.2019.1698134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, E., 2017. The Necessity to Be Not-Good: Machiavelli’s Two Realisms. In: D. Johnston, N. Urbinati, and C. Vergara, eds. Machiavelli on Liberty and Conflict. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 164–185.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E., 2005[1999]. The new spirit of capitalism. , G. Elliott. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W., 2004. Renaissance Italy: Machiavelli. In: M.J. Falco, ed. Feminist Interpretations of Niccolò Machiavelli. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 117–172.
   Google Scholar
• Brulle, R.J. and Dunlap, R.E., 2021. A sociological view of the effort to obstruct action on climate change. Footnotes: A Magazine of the American Sociological Association, 49 (3), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, M., 2019. Mercy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cannavò, P., 2010. To the thousandth generation: timelessness, Jeffersonian republicanism and environmentalism. Environmental Politics, 19 (3), 356–373. doi:10.1080/09644011003690781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannavò, P. 2016. Environmental Political Theory and Republicanism. In: T. Gabrielson, C. Hall, J.M. Meyer, and D. Schlosberg, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. 72–88.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199685271.013.20.
   Google Scholar
• Cannavò, P., 2021. Vulnerability and non-domination: a republican perspective on natural limits. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 24 (5), 1–19. doi:10.1080/13698230.2019.1698155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, L., 2017. How can the people be restricted? the mont pèlerin society and the problem of democracy, 1947-1988. History of European Ideas, 43 (5), 507–524. doi:10.1080/01916599.2017.1365745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, P., 2000. Redefining community: towards an ecological republicanism. Biodiversity and Conservation, 9 (8), 1059–1071. doi:10.1023/A:1008970518564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagger, R., 2006. Freedom and Rights. In: A. Dobson and R. Eckersley, eds. Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 200–215.
   Google Scholar
• de Dijn, A. 2020. Freedom: an unruly history. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/9780674245617.
   Google Scholar
• Del Lucchese, F. 2015. The political philosophy of Niccolò Machiavelli. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. doi:10.1515/9781474404297.
   Google Scholar
• Dodsworth, A., 2021. Republican Environmental Rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 24 (5), 1–16. doi:10.1080/13698230.2019.1698154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S. and Pickering, J. 2019. The Politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198809616.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Elazar, Y. and Rousselière, G., eds, 2019. Republicanism and the future of democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, E., 2018. Democracy as Constraint and Possibility for Environmental Action. In: T. Gabrielson, C. Hall, J.M. Meyer, and D. Schlosberg, eds. Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 505–519.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G., 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J.S., 2009. When the people speak. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, S. and Gerstle, G., eds., 1989. The rise and fall of the new deal order, 1930–1980. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9780691216256.
   Google Scholar
• Freese, B., 2020. Industrial-strength denial. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fremaux, A. 2019. After the anthropocence: green republicanism in a post-capitalist world. Cham, CH: Palgrave. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11120-5.
   Google Scholar
• Garside, J. 2017. “Paradise papers leak reveails secrets of the world Elite’s hidden wealth.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/nov/05/paradise-papers-leak-reveals-secrets-of-world-elites-hidden-wealth
   Google Scholar
• Geoghegan, P., 2020. Democracy for Sale. London: Apollo.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstle, G., 2022. The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order: America and the World in the Free Market Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, R., 2005. Forcing the Spring. 2nd ed Washington DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. and Pierson, P., 2010. Winner-take-all politics: public policy, political organization, and the precipitous rise of top incomes in the United States. Politics & Society, 38 (2), 152–204. doi:10.1177/0032329210365042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., 2014. Freedom is power: liberty through political representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, B., 2016. Capital without Borders. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780199283262.003.0010.
   Google Scholar
• Jelin, E., 2000. Towards global environmental citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 4 (1), 47–62. doi:10.1080/136210200110021.
   Google Scholar
• Kapust, D., 2019. Of Demagogues and Populists: on the Relevance of Roman Republicanism to Democracy. In: Y. Elazar and G. Rousselière, eds. Republicanism and the Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• Lafont, C., 2019. Democracy without Shortcuts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, H., 2020. Open democracy: reinventing popular rule for the 21st century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leipold, B., Nabulsi, K., and White, S., eds., 2020. Radical republicanism: recovering the tradition’s popular heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F. 2010. A general theory of domination and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579419.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F., 2019. Republicanism and Democracy Revisited. In: Y. Elazar and G. Rousselière, eds. Republicanism and the Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 117–129.
   Google Scholar
• Machiavelli, N., 1988. The Prince. Russell Price, Translated by. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machiavelli, N., 2003. The discourses. Leslie J. Walker, Translated by. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P., 2014. Ruling the void: the hollowing of western democracy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, A., 2021. How to blow up a pipeline. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Manin, B., 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, J.P., 2003. 'Machiavelli Against Republicanism: On the Cambridge School’s ‘Guicciardinian Moments’'. Political Theory, 31, 615–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, J.P., 2011. Machiavellian democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, J.P. 2019a. The new ochlophobia? Populism, Majority Rule and Prospects for Democratic Republicanism. In: Y. Elazar and G. Rousselière, eds. Republican Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 130–151. doi:10.1017/9781108630153.008.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, J.P., 2019b. On Josiah Ober’s demopolis: basic democracy, economic inequality and political punishment. Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought, 36 (3), 535–542. doi:10.1163/20512996-12340250.
   Google Scholar
• McQueen, A. 2018. Political realism in apocalyptic times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316588307.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., 2019. The eighteenth Brumaire of James Buchanan: review of Nancy MacLean, Democracy in Chains. Boundary2, 46 (1), 197–219. doi:10.1215/01903659-7271411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mounk, Y., 2018. The People versus Democracy: Why Our Freedom is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W., 2021. Democracy Rules. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Ober, J., 2017. Demopolis: democracy before liberalism, in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. and Conway, E.M., 2011. Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Paehlke, R., 1989. Environmentalism and the future of progressive politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page, B.I. and Gilens, M., 2012. Democracy in America?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedullà, G., 2018. Machiavelli in Tumult. Patricia Gaborik and Richard Nybakken, Translated by. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni, L., 2021. Reconfiguring non-domination: green politics from pre-emption to inoperosity. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 24 (5), 1–19. doi:10.1080/13698230.2019.1698149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 1997. Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. 2012. On the people’s terms: a republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139017428.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, J., 2021. Freedom and ecological limits. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 24 (5), 1–18. doi:10.1080/13698230.2019.1698147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. 1986. Capitalism and social democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139171830.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., 2019. Crises of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, K.S. 2016. Democracy against domination. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190468538.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Raimondi, F., 2018[2013]. Constituting freedom: Machiavelli and florence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198815457.003.0005.
   Google Scholar
• Sagar, P., 2019. Liberty, nondomination, markets. The Review of Politics, 81 (3), 409–434. doi:10.1017/S0034670519000226.
   Google Scholar
• Scerri, A. 2012. Greening citizenship: sustainable development, the state and ideology. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9781137010315.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., 2008. The republican state and global environmental governance. The Good Society, 17 (2), 25–31. doi:10.2307/20711295.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., 2005. Ecological citizenship and ethical responsibility; Arendt, Benjamin and political activism. Environments, 33 (3), 51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, M., 2022. Democratizing citizenship: how neoliberalism used market justice to move from welfare queening to authoritarianism in 25 short years. Citizenship Studies, 1–15. doi:10.1080/13621025.2022.2091250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., 2014. Buying time: the delayed crisis of democratic capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, H., 2022. Disorder: hard Times in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B.S., 2001. The erosion of citizenship. The British Journal of Sociology, 52 (2), 189–209. doi:10.1080/00071310120044944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. and Zampaglione, A. 2016. The antiegalitarian mutation. New York: Columbia University Press. doi:10.7312/urbi16984.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara, C., 2020. Systemic corruption. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verret-Hamelin, A. and Vandamme, P.-É., 2022. The green case for a randomly selected chamber. Contemporary Political Theory, 21 (1), 24–45. doi:10.1057/s41296-021-00491-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viroli, M., 2002. Republicanism. Anthony Shugaar, Translated by. New York: Hill & Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, Y. 2013. Necessity and Fortune: Machiavelli’s Politics of Nature. In: C. Archer, L. Ephraim, and L. Maxwell, eds. Second Nature: rethinking the Natural Through Politics. New York: Fordham University Press. 26–45.10.5422/fordham/9780823251414.003.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, Y., 2018. Machiavelli and the orders of violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, J.A., 2011. Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, J.A. and Page, B.I., 2009. Oligarchy in the United States? Perspectives on Politics, 7 (4), 731–751. doi:10.1017/S1537592709991770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, J.C. 2020. “‘Mind bogglingly irresponsible’: meet the republican donors helping QAnon reach congress.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/aug/24/mind-bogglingly-irresponsible-meet-the-republican-donors-helping-qanon-reach-congress
   Google Scholar