“The crisis justified the urgency, but now we have to go back to the rule of law”: Urban mobility governance during Covid-19

References

• Barbarossa, L., 2020. The post pandemic city: challenges and opportunities for a non-motorized urban environment. An overview of Italian cases. Sustainability, 12 (17), 7172. Article 17. doi:10.3390/su12177172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S., et al., 2022. Pop-up cycling infrastructure as a niche innovation for sustainable transportation in European cities: an inter- and transdisciplinary case study of Berlin. Sustainable Cities and Society, 87, 104168. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2022.104168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., 2020. From “streets for traffic” to “streets for people”: can street experiments transform urban mobility? Transport Reviews, 40 (6), 734–753. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2020.1761907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., et al., 2016. Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 13–17. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. and Betsill, M.M., 2013. Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 22 (1), 136–154. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.755797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. and Castán Broto, V., 2013. Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38 (3), 361–375. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F. and Cowley, R., 2017. Interrogating urban experiments. Urban Geography, 38 (9), 1441–1450. doi:10.1080/02723638.2016.1265870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., Karvonen, A., and Raven, R., 2016. The experimental city: new modes and prospects of urban transformation, 1–12. doi:10.4324/9781315719825-1.
   Google Scholar
• Feser, D., et al. (2021). Institutional conditions for the up-take of governance experiments—A comparative case study (Working Paper No. 28/2021). ifh Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, S., Furszyfer Del Rio, D., and Sovacool, B., 2021. Policy mixes to achieve sustainable mobility after the COVID-19 crisis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110919. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. and Kesselring, S., 1999. Democracy in the risk society? Learning from the new politics of mobility in Munich. Environmental Politics, 8 (3), 1–23. doi:10.1080/09644019908414477.
   Google Scholar
• Hysing, E., Olsson, J., and Dahl, V., 2016. A radical public administration? Green radicalism and policy influence among local environmental officials in Sweden. Environmental Politics, 25 (3), 535–552. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1116679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamalipour, H. and Peimani, N., 2021. Informal urbanism in the state of uncertainty: forms of informality and urban health emergencies. Urban Design International, 26 (2), 122–134. doi: 10.1057/s41289-020-00145-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karner, A., et al., 2020. From transportation equity to transportation justice: within, through, and beyond the state. Journal of Planning Literature, 35 (4), 440–459. doi:10.1177/0885412220927691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, K., 2019. Cities as leaders in EU multilevel climate governance: embedded upscaling of local experiments in Europe. Environmental Politics, 28 (1), 125–145. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1521979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P. and Rogge, K.S., 2022. Interplay of policy experimentation and institutional change in sustainability transitions: The case of mobility as a service in Finland. Research Policy, 51 (1), 104412. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, S. and Koch, N., 2021. Provisional COVID-19 infrastructure induces large, rapid increases in cycling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118 (15), e2024399118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2024399118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lydon, M. and Garcia, A., 2015. Tactical Urbanism: short-term action for long-term change. Island Press. doi:10.5822/978-1-61091-567-0.
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J. and Rosenbloom, D., 2020. A tale of two crises: COVID-19 and climate. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 17 (S1), 53–60. doi:10.1080/15487733.2020.1765679.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, G., et al., 2020. Studying disruptive events: innovations in behaviour, opportunities for lower carbon transport policy? Transport Policy, 94, 89–101. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, G. and Docherty, I., 2013. Insights on disruptions as opportunities for transport policy change. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 51, 46–55. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matschoss, K. and Repo, P., 2018. Governance experiments in climate action: empirical findings from the 28 European Union countries. Environmental Politics, 27 (4), 598–620. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2018.1443743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P., et al., 2021. Urban governance innovation and COVID-19. Geographical Research, 59 (2), 188–195. doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinherz, F. and Fritz, L., 2021. ‘Ecological concerns weren’t the main reason why I took the bus, that association only came afterwards’: on shifts in meanings of everyday mobility. Mobilities, 16 (6), 825–842. doi:10.1080/17450101.2021.1919491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell, L.S., et al., 2017. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16 (1), 160940691773384. doi: 10.1177/1609406917733847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OCSTAT. 2019. La mobilité des habitants du Canton de Genève: Récensements des microrecensements mobilité et transports (MRMT) 2000 à 2015. Geneva: Office cantonal de la statistique.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, J., et al., 2021. The political effects of emergency frames in sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 4 (10), 841–850. Article. doi:10.1038/s41893-021-00749-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., Wieczorek, A.J., and Raven, R., 2019. Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 153–164. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, P., 2016. Tactical urbanism: Towards an evolutionary cities’ approach? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43 (6), 1040–1051. doi:10.1177/0265813516657340.
   Google Scholar
• SYTRAL, 2018. Enquête Déplacements 2015 de l’aire métropolitaine lyonnaise. Lyon: Agence d’urbanisme.
   Google Scholar
• VanHoose, K., et al., 2022. From temporary arrangements to permanent change: Assessing the transitional capacity of city street experiments. Journal of Urban Mobility, 2, 100015. doi:10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100015.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, D., 2018. Tactical urbanism: delineating a critical praxis. Planning Theory & Practice, 19 (1), 58–73. doi:10.1080/14649357.2017.1406130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentland, A. and Jung, M., 2021. Der asynchrone Weg zur urbanen Mobilitätswende. Zeitlichkeit und verantwortungsvolle Intervention in öffentlichen Räumen. TATuP Zeitschrift Für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie Und Praxis, 30 (1), 23–28. doi:10.14512/tatup.30.1.23.
   Google Scholar
• Wohl, S., 2018. Tactical urbanism as a means of testing relational processes in space: A complex systems perspective. Planning Theory, 17 (4), 472–493. doi:10.1177/1473095217722809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar