An Awkward Signal: The ‘Petroleum and Minerals’ Imprint on the First Conference on Accounting, Governance and Sustainability

References

• Agrizzi, D., T. Soobaroyen, and A. Alsalloom. 2021. Spatiality and accounting: The case of female segregation in audit firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society 93: 101238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canning, M., Y. Gendron, and B. O’Dwyer. 2018. Auditing in a changing environment and the constitution of cross-paradigmatic communication channels. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 37, no. 2: 165–174. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, C.H. 2020. CSR accounting ‘new wave’ researchers: ‘Step up to the plate’ … or ‘stay out of the game’. Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems 19, no. 4: 626–650. http://doi.org/10.24818/jamis.2020.04001.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1989. Necessary illusions: Thought control in democratic societies. Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, R. 2017. The Rana Plaza disaster and the complicit behavior of elite NGOs. Organization 24, no. 6: 938–949. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417699023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwastiak, M., and J.J. Young. 2003. Silences in annual reports. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 14, no. 5: 533–552.
   Google Scholar
• Delbridge, R., R. Suddaby, and B. Harley. 2016. Introducing JMSSays. Journal of Management Studies 53, no. 2: 238–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demski, J.S. 2007. Is accounting an academic discipline? Accounting Horizons 21, no. 2: 153–157.
   Google Scholar
• Duval, A.-M., Y. Gendron, and C. Roux-Dufort. 2015. Exhibiting nongovernmental organizations: Reifying the performance discourse through framing power. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 29: 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endenich, C., and R. Trapp. 2018. Signaling effects of scholarly profiles – The editorial teams of North American accounting association journals. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 51: 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. 1978. Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, Y. 2016. The essay as an endangered species: Should we care? Journal of Management Studies 53, no. 2: 244–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y. 2018. On the elusive nature of critical (accounting) research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 50: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y., and J. Martel. 2021. On the fragility of cultural markers within scholarly communities: Physical distancing and the blurring of group referents. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças 32, no. 85: 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057(202090340.
   Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y., L. Paugam, and H. Stolowy. 2023. Breaking incommensurability boundaries? On the production and publication of interparadigmatic research. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 20, no. 5: 675–694. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-09-2022-0147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y., and M. Rodrigue. 2021. On the centrality of peripheral research and the dangers of tight boundary gatekeeping. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 76: 102076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gephart, R.P. 2004. Qualitative research and the academy of management journal. Academy of Management Journal 47, no. 4: 454–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giola, D. 2024. Collective stupidity. Journal of Management Inquiry 33, no. 1: 92–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926231203846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, U.C.V. 2023. Triviality and the search for scholarly impact. Organization Studies 44, no. 9: 1547–1550. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231175292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1997. Introduction. In Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices, ed. S. Hall, 1–11. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S., and M. Brivot. 2023. Quo vadis? The future of interdisciplinary accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 93: 102604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knechel, W.R. 2023, September. Interview with W. Robert Knechel. EAA Newsletter Interview Series, EAA Newsletter. Accessed September 29, 2023, https://mcusercontent.com/ffab1869b934ebf881c40649e/files/57a00c82-34db-35c3-6215-be030d0f6637/EAA_Newsletter_September_Interview_with_Robert_Knechel_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kudłak, R., and K.Y.J. Low. 2015. Special issues dedicated to CSR and corporate sustainability: A review and commentary. Long Range Planning 48, no. 3: 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T.S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laasonen, S., M. Fougère, and A. Kourula. 2012. Dominant articulations in academic business and society discourse on NGO–business relations: A critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics 109: 521–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1143-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. 2005. Power: A radical view. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Malsch, B., and S.E. Salterio. 2016. “Doing good field research”: Assessing the quality of audit field research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 35, no. 1: 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. 2019. Why trust science? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patten, D.M. 2019. Seeking legitimacy. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 11, no. 6: 1009–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. 2004. The risk management of everything: Rethinking the politics of uncertainty. London: Demos. https://demos.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/riskmanagementofeverything.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Riopel, A. 2023. Deep Sky cherche où enfouir du CO₂ dans le sous-sol québécois. Le Devoir, September 5, https://www.ledevoir.com/environnement/797402/environnement-deep-sky-cherche-ou-enfouir-du-co2-dans-le-sous-sol-quebecois.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, R.W. 2018. We can do so much better: reflections on Reading “signaling effects of scholarly profiles—The editorial teams of north American accounting association journals”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 51: 70–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, M., D. Diouf, and Y. Gendron. 2023. On the use of framing strategies by the Big Four accounting firms: Bringing sustainability risks into the mainstream. Accounting Forum 47, no. 3: 416–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2022.2066403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roslender, R., and J.F. Dillard. 2003. Reflections on the interdisciplinary perspectives on accounting project. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 14, no. 3: 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2002.0526.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E.W. 1994. Representations of the intellectual: The Reith lectures. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, A. 2023. Relancer la lutte contre la crise du climat après un été des extrêmes. Le Devoir, September 16/17. https://www.ledevoir.com/environnement/798172/environnement-relancer-lutte-contre-crise-climat-apres-ete-extremes.
   Google Scholar
• Sikka, P., H. Willmott, and T. Puxty. 1995. The mountains are still there: Accounting academics and the bearings of intellectuals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8, no. 3: 113–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sobkowiak, M., J. Senn, and H. Vollmer. 2023. Rethinking planetary boundaries: Accounting for ecological limits. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal 43, no. 3: 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2023.2283019.
   Google Scholar
• Vinnari, E., W.F. Chua, and J. Baxter. 2022. Accounting, accountability and animals. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 84: 102412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinnari, E., and M. Vinnari. 2022. Making the invisibles visible: Including animals in sustainability (and) accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 82: 102324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R.L., and J.L. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive accounting theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar