Potential impact of future land use/cover dynamics on the habitat quality of the Yayo Coffee Forest Biosphere Reserve, southwestern Ethiopia

References

• Abera W, Tamene L, Kassawmar T, Mulatu K, Kassa H, Verchot L, Quintero M. 2021. Impacts of land use and land cover dynamics on ecosystem services in the Yayo coffee forest biosphere reserve, southwestern Ethiopia. Ecosyst Serv. 50:101338. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aneseyee AB, Noszczyk T, Soromessa T, Elias E. 2020. The InVEST Habitat Quality Model associated with land use/cover changes: a qualitative case study of the winike watershed in the Omo-Gibe Basin, Southwest Ethiopia. Remote Sens. 12(7):1103.
   Google Scholar
• Ao Y, Jiang L, Bai Z, Yang X, Zhang L. 2022. Comprehensive evaluation of land ecological quality in the Yellow River Basin based on Grid-GIS. Arid Land Geogr. 45:164–175.
   Google Scholar
• Asadolahi Z, Salmanmahiny A, Sakieh Y, Mirkarimi SH, Baral H, Azimi M. 2018. Dynamic trade-off analysis of multiple ecosystem services under land use change scenarios: towards putting ecosystem services into planning in Iran. Ecol. Complex. 36:250–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atullley JA, Kwaku AA, Owusu-Ansah ED, Ampofo S, Jacob A, Nii OS. 2022. Modeling the impact of land cover changes on water balance in the Vea catchment of Ghana, 1985–2040. Sustain Water Resour Manag. 8(5):148. doi: 10.1007/s40899-022-00727-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai L, Xiu C, Feng X, Liu D. 2019. Influence of urbanization on regional habitat quality: a case study of Changchun City. Habitat Int. 93:102042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartczak A, Metelska-Szaniawska K. 2015. Should we pay, and to whom, for biodiversity enhancement in private forests? An empirical study of attitudes towards payments for forest ecosystem services in Poland. Land Use Policy. 48:261–269. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyene DL. 2014. Assessing the impact of UNESCO biosphere reserves on forest cover change: the case of Yayu coffee forest biosphere reserve in Ethiopia [Unpublished thesis]. UNESCO, Wageningen, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs KB, Mainwaring MC. 2017. Habitat geology influences intraspecific variation in the speckling patterns of blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus and great tit Parus major eggs. Acta Ornithol. 52(1):11–20. doi: 10.3161/00016454AO2017.52.1.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• César E, Ekbom A. 2013. Ethiopia environmental and climate change policy brief. Sida’s helpdesk for environment and climate change, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Chen L, Nuo W. 2013. Dynamic simulation of land use changes in Port city: a case study of Dalian, China. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. 96:981–992. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.112.
   Google Scholar
• Chu L, Sun T, Wang T, Li Z, Cai C. 2018. Evolution and prediction of landscape pattern and habitat quality based on CA-Markov and InVEST model in Hubei section of Three Gorges Reservoir Area (T GRA). Sustainability. 10(11):3854. doi: 10.3390/su10113854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlan M, Nelson D, Lonneman M, Block A. 2017. Historical land use dynamics in the highly degraded landscape of the calhoun critical Zone Observatory. Land. 6(2):32. doi: 10.3390/land6020032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daba MH, You S. 2022. Quantitatively assessing the future land-use/land-cover changes and their driving factors in the upper stream of the Awash River based on the CA–markov model and their implications for water resources management. Sustainability. 14(3):1538. doi: 10.3390/su14031538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai L, Li S, Lewis BJ, Wu J, Yu D, Zhou W, Zhou L, Wu S. 2019. The influence of land use change on the spatial–temporal variability of habitat quality between 1990 and 2010 in Northeast China. J for Res. 30(6):2227–2236.
   Google Scholar
• Desa UN. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2018. In Proceedings of the Regional Training Course on SDG Indicator, Daejeon, Korea, p. 15–19. October 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Dohong A, Aziz AA, Dargusch P. 2017. A review of the drivers of tropical peatland degradation in South-East Asia. Land Use Policy. 69:349–360. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF. 2001. Agricultural intensification, and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc R Soc Lond B. 268(1462):25–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethiopia environmental and climate change policy brief. Sida’s helpdesk for environment and climate change, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Fan X, Gu X, Yu H, Long A, Tiando DS, Ou S, Li J, Rong Y, Tang G, Zheng Y, et al. 2021. The spatial and temporal evolution and drivers of habitat quality in the Hung River Valley. Land. 10(12):1369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang C, Liu H, Wang S. 2021. The coupling curve between urbanization and the eco-environment: china’s urban agglomeration as a case study. Ecol Indic. 130:108107. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fida GT, Baatuuwie BN, Issifu H. 2023. Simulation of land use/cover dynamics in the Yayo coffee Forest biosphere reserve, southwestern Ethiopia. Geocarto Int. 38(1):303. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2023.2256303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaglio M, Aschonitis VG, Gissi E, Castaldelli G, Fano EA. 2017. Land use change effects on ecosystem services of river deltas and coastal wetlands: case study in Volano–Mesola–Goro in Po River delta (Italy). Wetlands Ecol Manage. 25(1):67–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X, Yang L, Li C, Song Z, Wang J. 2021. Land use change and ecosystem service value measurement in Baiyangdian Basin under the simulated multiple scenarios. Acta Ecol. Sin. 41:7974–7988.
   Google Scholar
• Gashaw T, Tulu T, Argaw M, Worqlul AW. 2017. Evaluation and prediction of land use/land cover changes in the Andassa watershed, Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Environ Syst Res. 6(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s40068-016-0078-x.
   Google Scholar
• Gebeyehu ZH, Woldegiorgis SB, Belete AD, Abza TG, Desta BT. 2017, March. Ethiopia’s move to a national integrated land use policy and land use plan. In Proceedings of the 2017 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty. Washington DC, p. 28.
   Google Scholar
• Gedefaw AA, Atzberger C, Bauer T, Agegnehu SK, Mansberger R. 2020. Analysis of land cover change detection in Gozamin District, Ethiopia: from remote sensing and DP SIR perspectives. Sustainability. 12(11):4534. doi: 10.3390/su12114534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getahun K, Van Rompaey A, Van Turnhout P, Poesen J. 2013. Factors controlling patterns of deforestation in moist evergreen Afromontane forests of Southwest Ethiopia. For Ecol Manag. 304:171–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gole TW, Senbeta F, Tesfaye K, Getaneh F. 2009. Yayo coffee forest biosphere reserve nomination form. Addis Ababa: government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia.
   Google Scholar
• Green DB, Bestley S, Corney SP, Trebilco R, Lehodey P, Hindell MA. 2021. Modeling antarctic krill circumpolar spawning habitat quality to identify regions with potential to support high larval production. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48(12):e2020GL091206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güneralp B, Seto KC. 2013. Futures of global urban expansion: uncertainties and implications for biodiversity conservation. Environ Res Lett. 8(1):014025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillem EE, Murray-Rust D, Robinson DT, Barnes A, Rounsevell MDA. 2015. Modelling farmer decision-making to anticipate tradeoffs between provisioning ecosystem services and biodiversity. Agric Syst. 137:12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hack J, Molewijk D, Beißler MR. 2020. A conceptual approach to modeling the geospatial impact of typical urban threats on the habitat quality of river corridors. Remote Sens. 12(8):1345.
   Google Scholar
• Han Y, Zhang Q, Zhang S, Yin L. 2021. Optimizing the Habitat quality of the east lake scenic area in Wuhan. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 37:95–100.
   Google Scholar
• He J, Huang J, Li C. 2017. The evaluation for the impact of land use change on habitat quality: a joint contribution of cellular automata scenario simulation and habitat quality assessment model. Ecol. Model. 366:58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himlal B, Rodney JK, Sunil KS, Nigel ES, Sabine K. 2014. Spatial assessment and mapping of biodiversity and conservation priorities in a heavily modified and fragmented production landscape in North-Central Victoria, Australia. Ecol Indic. 36:552–562. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang MY, Yue WZ, Feng SR, Zhang JH. 2020. Spatial-temporal evolution of habitat quality and analysis of landscape patterns in Dabie Mountain area of west Anhui province based on InVEST model. Acta Ecol. Sin. 40:2895–2906.
   Google Scholar
• Huluka AT, Wondimagegnhu BA. 2019. Determinants of household dietary diversity in the Yayo biosphere reserve of Ethiopia: an empirical analysis using sustainable livelihood framework. Cogent Food Agric. 5(1):1690829. doi: 10.1080/23311932.2019.1690829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyandye C, Martz LW. 2017. A Markovian and cellular automata land-use change predictive model of the Usangu Catchment. Int J Remote Sens. 38(1):64–81. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2016.1259675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji X, Sun Y, Guo W, Zhao C, Li K. 2023. Land use and habitat quality change in the yellow river basin: a perspective with different CMIP6-based scenarios and multiple scales. J Environ Manage. 345:118729. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joa B, Winkel G, Primmer E. 2018. The unknown known – a review of local ecological knowledge in relation to forest biodiversity conservation. Land Use Policy. 79:520–530. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalacska M, Arroyo-Mora JP, Lucanus O, Kishe-Machumu MA. 2017. Land cover, land use, and climate change impacts on endemic cichlid habitats in northern Tanzania. Remote Sens. 9(6):623. doi: 10.3390/rs9060623.
   Google Scholar
• Kleemann J, Baysal G, Bulley HN, Fürst C. 2017. Assessing driving forces of land use and land cover change by a mixed-method approach in north-eastern Ghana, West Africa. J Environ Manage. 196:411–442. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei JC, Liu JX, Yong F, Liu HM, Wu J, Ding H, Wang JM, Wu SQ, Cheng S, Cui P, et al. 2017. Scenario ecosystem service assessment of woman river valley based on CLUE- S and InVEST Models. J Ecol Rural Environ. 33:1084–1093.
   Google Scholar
• Leung MY, Liang Q. 2019. Developing structural facilities management–quality of life models for the elderly in the common areas of public and subsidized housings. Habitat Int. 94:102067. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis SL, Maslin MA. 2015. A transparent framework for defining the Anthropocene Epoch. Anthr Rev. 2(2):128–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Zhou Y, Xiao P, Tian Y, Huang H, Xiao L. 2021. Evolution of habitat quality and its topographic gradient effect in Northwest Hubei Province from 2000 to 2020 based on the InVEST Model. Land. 10(8):857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Duo L, Zhang M, Wu Z, Guan Y. 2021. Assessment and estimation of the spatial and temporal evolution of landscape patterns and their impact on habitat quality in Nanchang, China. Land. 10(10):1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Huang X, Yang H, Zhong T. 2014. Environmental effects of land-use/cover change caused by urbanization and policies in Southwest China Karst area – a case study of Guiyang. Habitat Int. 44:339–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhou Y, Du Y. 2019. Study on the Spatio-Temporal patterns of habitat quality, and its terrain gradient effects of the middle of the yangtze river economic belt based on InVEST Model. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin. 28:2429–2440.
   Google Scholar
• Lung T, Schaab G. 2010. A comparative assessment of land cover dynamics of three protected forest areas in tropical eastern Africa. Environ Monit Assess. 161(1-4):531–548. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-0766-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memarian H, Balasundram SK, Talib JB, Sung CB, Sood AM, Abbaspour K. 2012. Validation of CA-markov for simulation of land Use and cover change in the Langat basin, Malaysia. JGIS. 04(06):542–554. doi: 10.4236/jgis.2012.46059.
   Google Scholar
• Mattos ID, Zimbres B, Marinho-Filho J. 2021. Habitat specificity modulates the response of small mammals to habitat fragmentation, loss, and quality in a Neotropical savanna. Front Ecol Evol. 9:751315. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.751315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengist W, Soromessa T, Feyisa GL. 2021. Landscape change effects on habitat quality in a forest BR: implications for the conservation of native habitats. J. Clean. Prod. 329:129778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoARD and World Bank. 2007. Ethiopia: thematic Papers on Land degradation in Ethiopia; Addis Ababa Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Munro RN, Deckers J, Haile M, Grove AT, Poesen J, Nyssen J. 2008. Soil landscapes, land cover change and erosion features of the Central Plateau region of Tigrai, Ethiopia: photo-monitoring with an interval of 30 years. Catena. 75(1):55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2008.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadoushan MA, Soffianian A, Alebrahim A. 2015. Modeling land use/cover changes by the combination of Markov chain and cellular automata Markov (CA-Markov) models. J Earth Environ Health Sci. 1(1):16. doi: 10.4103/2423-7752.159922.
   Google Scholar
• Noszczyk T. 2018. A review of approaches to land use changes modeling. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 25(6):1377–1405. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2018.1468994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, Börger L, Bennett DJ, Choimes A, Collen B, et al. 2015. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature. 520(7545):45–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyssen J, Poesen J, Moeyersons J, Deckers J, Haile M, Lang A. 2004. Human impact on the environment in the Ethiopian and Eritrean highlands—a state of the art. Earth-Sci Rev. 64(3-4):273–320. doi: 10.1016/S0012-8252(03)00078-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polasky S, Nelson E, Pennington D, Johnson KA. 2011. The impact of land-use changes on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the state of Minnesota. Environ Resource Econ. 48(2):219–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontius RG. Jr 2000. Comparison of categorical maps. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 66(20)
   Google Scholar
• Risma P, Dewi T, Oktarina Y, Wijanarko Y. 2019. Neural network controller application on a visual based object tracking and following robot. ComEngApp. 8(1):31–40. doi: 10.18495/comengapp.v8i1.280.
   Google Scholar
• Sfa FE, Nemiche M, Rayd H. 2020. A generic macroscopic cellular automata model for land use change: the case of the Drâa valley. Ecol Complexity. 43:100851. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2020.100851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahumyan H, Williams B, Petrov L, Foley W. 2014. Regional development Scenario evaluation through land use modelling and opportunity mapping. Land. 3(3):1180–1213. Sept Crossref doi: 10.3390/land3031180.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma K, Acharya BK, Sharma G, Valente D, Pasimeni MR, Petrosillo I, Selvan T. 2020. Land use effect on butterfly alpha and beta diversity in the Eastern Himalaya, India. Ecol Indic. 110:105605. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp R, Chaplin-Kramer R, Wood S, Guerry A, Tallis H, Ricketts T. 2016. InVEST + VERSION + User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project. Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy; [accessed 2019 Jun 3]. http://data.naturalcapitalproject.org/nightly-build/invest-users-guide/html/.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp R, Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry AD, Wood SA, Chaplin-Kramer R, Nelson E, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, Olwero N, et al. 2018. InVEST 3.6.0 User’s Guide; Collaborative Publication by The Natural Capital Project. Stanford University, the University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and the World Wildlife Fund; Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA; [accessed 2020 Jan 3]. https://naturalcapitalproject.stanford.edu/software/invest.
   Google Scholar
• Singh SK, Basommi BP, Mustak SK, Srivastava PK, Szabo S. 2017. Modelling of land use land cover change using earth observation data-sets of Tons River Basin, Madhya Pradesh, India. Geocarto Int. 33(11):1202–1222. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2017.1343390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SK, Mustak S, Srivastava PK, Szabó S, Islam T. 2015. Predicting spatial and decadal LULC changes through cellular automata Markov chain models using earth observation datasets and geo-information. Environ Process. 2(1):61–78. doi: 10.1007/s40710-015-0062-x.
   Google Scholar
• Song Y, Xue D, Dai L, Wang P, Huang X, Xia S. 2020. Land cover change and eco-environmental quality response of different geomorphic units on the Chinese Loess Plateau. J Arid Land. 12(1):29–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subedi P, Subedi K, Thapa B. 2013. Application of a hybrid cellular automaton–Markov (CA-Markov) Model in land-use change prediction: a case study of saddle creek drainage Basin, Florida. AEES. 1(6):126–132. doi: 10.12691/aees-1-6-5.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS, Dolman PM, Knight TM. 2004. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 19(6):305–308. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadesse G, Zavaleta E, Shennan C, Fitzsimmons M. 2014. Local ecosystem service use and assessment vary with socio-ecological conditions: a case of native coffee-forests in southwestern Ethiopia. Hum Ecol. 42(6):873–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallis H, Ricketts T. 2013. InVEST User’s Guide: integrated valuation of environmental services and Tradeoffs. Stanford, CA: The Natural Capital Project.
   Google Scholar
• Tang X, Woodcock CE, Olofsson P, Hutyra LR. 2021. Spatiotemporal assessment of land use/land cover change and associated carbon emissions and uptake in the Mekong River Basin. Remote Sens Environ. 256:112336. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teka K, Van Rompaey A, Poesen J. 2013. Assessing the role of policies on land use change and agricultural development since 1960s in northern Ethiopia. Land Use Policy. 30(1):944–951. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilahun B, Abie K, Feyisa A, Amare A. 2017. Attitude, and perceptions of local communities towards the conservation value of gibe Sheleko national park, Southwestern Ethiopia. Agric Resour Econ. 3(2):65–77. doi: 10.51599/are.2017.03.02.06.
   Google Scholar
• Tyagi A, Tiwari RK, James N. 2022. Mapping the landslide susceptibility considering future land-use land-cover Scenario. Landslides. 20(1):65–76. doi: 10.1007/s10346-022-01968-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walcott JJ. 2019. Multiple and sequential land use: a national policy for Australia? Land Use Policy. 88:104160. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Oguchi T, Liang X. 2023. Evaluating future habitat quality responding to land use change under different city compaction scenarios in Southern China. Cities. 140:104410. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Tang L, Qiu Q, Chen H. 2020. Assessing the impacts of urban expansion on habitat quality by combining the concepts of land use, landscape, and habitat in Two Urban Agglomerations in China. Sustainability. 12(11):4346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Wang J, Lei Q, Zhao Y, Wang L, Wang X, Zhang W. 2021. Microplastic pollution in sophisticated urban river systems: combined influence of land-use types and physicochemical characteristics. Environ Pollut. 287:117604. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Ma BW, Li D, Kun-Lun C, Hua-Song Y. 2020. Multi-scenario simulation and prediction of ecological space in Hubei province based on FLUS model. J Nat Resour. 35:230–242.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Lan T, Deng S, Zang Z, Zhao Z, Xie Z, Xu W, Shen G. 2022. Forest-cover change rather than climate change determined giant panda’s population persistence. Biol. Conserv. 265:109436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woldetsadik K, Gertsson U, Ascard J. 2003. Shallot yield, quality and storability as affected by irrigation and nitrogen. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 78(4):549–553. doi: 10.1080/14620316.2003.11511661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J-S, Cao Q-W, Shi S-Q, Huang X-L, Lu Z-Q. 2015. Spatio-temporal variability of habitat quality in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area based on land use change. Chin J Appl Ecol. 26:3457–3466.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Wang L, Zhu R, Yang Y, Jin H. 2016. Nesting habitat suitability analysis of red-crowned crane in Zhalong Nature Reserve based on MAXENT modeling. Acta Ecol Sin. 36:3758–3764.
   Google Scholar
• Wubie MA, Assen M, Nicolau MD. 2016. Patterns, causes and consequences of land use/cover dynamics in the Gumara watershed of lake Tana basin, Northwestern Ethiopia. Environ Syst Res. 5(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s40068-016-0058-1.
   Google Scholar
• Xu L, Chen S, Xu Y, Li G, Su W. 2019. Impacts of land-use change on Habitat Quality during 1985–2015 in the Taihu Lake Basin. Sustainability. 11(13):3513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang G, Zhang H, L, J, Guo D, Zhang X. 2021. Spatial-temporal evolution and its influencing factors of habitat quality in Pingshuo mining area based on RFFLUS-InVEST-Geodetector coupling model. J Shaanxi Norm Univ Nat Sci Ed. 49:106–115.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Li S, Liu Y, Xu M. 2022. Assessment of the Habitat Quality of Offshore Area in Tongzhou Bay, China: using Benthic Habitat Suitability and the InVEST Model. Water. 14(10):1574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Liao L, Xu Z, Zhang J, Chi M, Lan S, Gan Q. 2022. Interactive Effects on Habitat quality using InVEST and GeoDetector Models in Wenzhou, China. Land. 11(5):630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Lyu C, Fan X, Bi R, Xia L, Xu C, Sun B, Li T, Jiang C. 2022. Spatiotemporal variation and influence factors of habitat quality in loess hilly and gully area of yellow River Basin: a case study of Liulin County, China. Land. 11(1):127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zhou J, Li G, Chen C, Li M, Luo J. 2020. Spatial pattern reconstruction of regional habitat quality based on the simulation of land use changes from 1975 to 2010. J Geogr Sci. 30(4):601–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Chen R, Wang Y. 2020. Tendency of land reclamation in coastal areas of Shanghai from 1998 to 2015. Land Use Policy. 91:104370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong LN, Wang J. 2017. Evaluation on effect of land consolidation on habitat quality based on InVEST model. Trans. CSAE. 33:250–255.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu C, Zhang X, Zhou M, He S, Gan M, Yang L, Wang K. 2020. Impacts of urbanization and landscape pattern on habitat quality using OLS and GWR models in Hangzhou, China. Ecolog Indicators. 117:106654. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Ding N, Li D, Sun W, Xie Y, Wang X. 2022. Spatiotemporal analysis of the nonlinear negative relationship between urbanization and Habitat Quality in Metropolitan Areas. Sustainability. 12(2):669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar