Soil erosion and sediment yield estimation in a tropical monsoon dominated river basin using GIS-based models

References

• Aher PD, Adinarayana J, Gorantiwar SD. 2014. Quantification of morphometric characterization and prioritization for management planning in semi-arid tropics of India: a remote sensing and GIS approach. J Hydrol. 511:850–860. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altaf S, Meraj G, Romshoo SA. 2014. Morphometry and land cover based multi-criteria analysis for assessing the soil erosion susceptibility of the western Himalayan watershed. Environ Monit Assess. 186(12):8391–8412. doi:10.1007/s10661-014-4012-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameri AA, Pourghasemi HR, Cerda A. 2018. Erodibility prioritization of sub-watersheds using morphometric parameters analysis and its mapping: a comparison among TOPSIS, VIKOR, SAW, and CF multi-criteria decision making models. Sci Total Environ. 613–614:1385–1400. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aneseyee AB, Elias E, Soromessa T, Feyisa GL. 2020. Land use/land cover change effect on SE and sediment delivery in the Winike watershed, Omo Gibe Basin, Ethiopia. Sci Total Environ. 728:138776. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnoldus HMJ. 1980. An approximation of the rainfall factor in the Universal Soil Loss Equation. In: De Boodt M, Gabriels D, editors. Assessment of erosion. New York: John Wiley and Sons; p.127–132.
   Google Scholar
• Bag R,Mondal I,Dehbozorgi M,Bank SP,Das DN,Bandyopadhyay J,Pham QB,Fadhil Al-Quraishi AM,Nguyen XC. 2022. Modelling and mapping of soil erosion susceptibility using machine learning in a tropical hot sub-humid environment. J. Cleaner Prod. 364:132428 doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balthazar V,Vanacker V,Girma A,Poesen J,Golla S. 2013. Human impact on sediment fluxes within the Blue Nile and Atbara River basins. Geomorphology. 180–181:231–241. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley DB, Huggins LF, Monke A. 1980. ANSWERS: a model for watershed planning. Trans ASAE. 23(4):938–944.
   Google Scholar
• Behera M, Sena DR, Mandal U, Kashyap PS, Dash SS. 2020. Integrated GIS-based RUSLE approach for quantification of potential SE under future climate change scenarios. Environ Monit Assess. 192(11):733. doi:10.1007/s10661-020-08688-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beusen AHW, Dekkers ALM, Bouwman AF, Ludwig W, Harrison J. 2005. Estimation of global river transport of sediments and associated particulate C, N, and P. Global Biogeochem Cycle. 19(4). doi:10.1029/2005GB002453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya RK, Chatterjee ND, Das K. 2020. Sub-basin prioritization for assessment of SE susceptibility in Kangsabati, a plateau basin: a comparison between MCDM and SWAT models. Sci Total Environ. 734:139474. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya R, Ghosh B, Mishra P, Mandal B, Rao C, Sarkar D, Das K, Anil K, Lalitha M, Hati K, et al. 2015. Soil degradation in India: challenges and potential solutions. Sustainability. 7(4):3528–3570. doi:10.3390/su7043528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks A, Spencer J, Borombovits D, Pietsch T, Olley J. 2014. Measured hillslope erosion rates in the wet-dry tropics of Cape York, northern Australia: part 2, RUSLE-based modeling significantly over-predicts hillslope sediment production. Catena. 122:1–17. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2014.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Krishna AP, Sharma AP. 2014. Geospatial assessment of SE vulnerability at watershed level in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha river basin, Jharkhand, India. Environ Earth Sci. 71(1):357–374. doi:10.1007/s12665-013-2439-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitsaz N, Banihabib ME. 2015. Comparison of different multi criteria decision-making models in prioritizing flood management alternatives. Water Resour Manage. 29(8):2503–2525. doi:10.1007/s11269-015-0954-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorley RJ. 1969. The drainage basin as the fundamental geomorphic unit. In: Chorley RJ, editor. Water, earth and man, London: Methuen; p. 77–100.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhary RS, Sharma PD. 1998. Erosion hazard assessment and treatment prioritization of Giri River catchment, North Western Himalayas. Indian J Soil Conserv. 26(1):6–11.
   Google Scholar
• CRU. 2022. CRU TS v4.06 Data Variables: PRE. University of East Anglia. [accessed 15 Jul 2022]. https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/hrg/cru_ts_4.06/cruts.2205201912.v4.06/pre/.
   Google Scholar
• Das A, Remesan R, Chakraborty S, Gupta AK. 2022. Investigation of human-induced land use dynamics in a representative catchment on the Chota Nagpur Plateau, India: a spatiotemporal application of SE modeling with connectivity index studies. CATENA. 217:106524. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2022.106524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das D. 2014. Identification of erosion prone areas by morphometric analysis using GIS. J Inst Eng India Ser A. 95(1):61–74. doi:10.1007/s40030-014-0069-8.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong SM, Paracchini ML, Bertolo F, Folving S, Megier J, De Roo APJ. 1999. Regional assessment of soil erosion using the distributed model SEMMED and remotely sensed data. Catena. 37(3-4):291–308. doi:10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00038-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir Y, Meral A, Demir AD. 2022. Estimation of soil losses in Çapakcur watershed (Bingol, Turkey) using RUSLE method and comparison of predicted soil losses with sediment yield. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi. 25(Ek Sayı 2):523–537. doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1059631.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet PJJ, Govers G. 1996. A GIS procedure for automatically calculating the USLE LS factor on topographically complex landscape units. J Soil Water Conserv. 51(5):427–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diodato N, Bellocchi G. 2007. EstimaIg monthly (R) USLE climate input in a Mediterranean region using limited data. J Hydrol. 345(3-4):224–236. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta D, Das S, Kundu A, Taj A. 2015. SE risk assessment in Sanjal watershed, Jharkhand (India) using geo-informatics, RUSLE model and TRMM data. Model Earth Syst Environ. 1(4):1–9. doi:10.1007/s40808-015-0034-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elnashar A, Zeng H, Wu B, Fenta AA, Nabil M, Duerler R. 2021. SE assessment in the Blue Nile Basin driven by a novel RUSLE-GEE framework. Sci Total Environ. 793:148466. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2022. FAO Soils Portal, FAO/UNESCO Soil Map of the World. Accessed 20 Aug 2022. https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/data-hub/soil-maps-and-databases/faounesco-soil-map-of-the-world/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Farhan Y, Nawaiseh S. 2015. Spatial assessment of soil erosion risk using RUSLE and GIS techniques. Environ Earth Sci. 74(6):4649–4669. doi:10.1007/s12665-015-4430-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujaco MAG, Leite MGP, Neves AHCJ. 2016. A GIS-based tool for estimating soil loss in agricultural river basins. REM Int Eng J. 69(4):417–424. doi:10.1590/0370-44672015690197.
   Google Scholar
• Ganasri BP, Ramesh H. 2016. Assessment of soil erosion by RUSLE model using remote sensing and GIS-A case study of Nethravathi Basin. Geosci Front. 7(6):953–961. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2015.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Ruiz JM, Beguería S, Nadal-Romero E, González-Hidalgo JC, Lana-Renault N, Sanjuán Y. 2015. A meta-analysis of soil erosion rates across the world. Geomorphology. 239:160–173. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Soriano D, Quesada-Román A, Zamorano-Orozco JJ. 2020. Geomorphological hazards susceptibility in high-density urban areas: a case study of Mexico City. J South Am Earth Sci. 102:102667. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayen A, Pourghasemi HR, Saha S, Keesstra S, Bai S. 2019. Gully erosion susceptibility assessment and management of hazard-prone areas in India using different machine learning algorithms. Sci Total Environ. 668:124–138. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gessesse B, Bewket W, Bräuning A. 2015. Model‐based characterization and monitoring of runoff and SE in response to land use/land cover changes in the Modjo watershed, Ethiopia. Land Degrad Dev. 26(7):711–724. doi:10.1002/ldr.2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravelius H. 1914. Grundriß der gesamten Gewässerkunde, Band 1: Flußkunde, Göschen Verlag. 1, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Garde RJ, Kothari UC. 1987. Sediment yield estimation. J Irrig Power (India). 44(3):97–123.
   Google Scholar
• Horton RE. 1932. Drainage-basin characteristics. Trans Am Geophys Union. 13:350–361.
   Google Scholar
• Horton RE. 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol Soc America Bull. 56(3):275–370. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson NW. 1981. Soil conservation. London: Batsford.
   Google Scholar
• Jain MK, Das D. 2010. Estimation of sediment yield and areas of soil erosion and deposition for watershed prioritization using GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manage. 24(10):2091–2112. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9540-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John J, Rosamma CN, Thampi SG. 2022. Assessment and prediction of SE and its impact on the storage capacity of reservoirs in the Bharathapuzha River Basin, India. Environ Model Assess. 27(1):77–103. doi:10.1007/s10666-021-09786-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jose CS, Das DC. 1982. Geomorphic prediction models for sediment production rate and intensive priorities of watersheds in Mayurakshi catchment. In: Proc. of International Symp. On Hydrological Aspects of Mountainous Watersheds, School of Hydrology, UOR, Roorkee (Vol. 1, p. 15–23).
   Google Scholar
• Kadam AK, Jaweed TH, Kale SS, Umrikar BN, Sankhua RN. 2019. Identification of erosion-prone areas using modified morphometric prioritization method and sediment production rate: a remote sensing and GIS approach. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 10(1):986–1006. doi:10.1080/19475705.2018.1555189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkby MJ. 1987. Modelling some influences of SE, landslides and valley gradient on drainage density and hollow development. Catena. Supp (Giessen) (10):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Knisel WG. 1980. CREAMS: a field scale model for chemicals, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management systems (No. 26). United States: Department of Agriculture, Science and Education Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Kouli M, Soupios P, Vallianatos F. 2009. Soil erosion prediction using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) in a GIS framework, Chania, Northwestern Crete, Greece. Environ Geol. 57(3):483–497. doi:10.1007/s00254-008-1318-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulimushi LC,Choudhari P,Mubalama LK,Banswe GT. 2021. GIS and remote sensing-based assessment of soil erosion risk using RUSLE model in South-Kivu province, eastern, Democratic Republic of Congo. Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk. 12(1):961–987. doi:10.1080/19475705.2021.1906759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal R. 2015. Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability. 7(5):5875–5895. doi:10.3390/su7055875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin J, Guan Q, Tian J, Wang Q, Tan Z, Li Z, Wang N. 2020. Assessing temporal trends of SE and sediment redistribution in the Hexi Corridor region using the integrated RUSLE-TLSD model. Catena. 195:104756. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2020.104756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu XX, Ashmore P, Wang J. 2003. Sediment yield mapping in a large river basin: the Upper Yangtze, China. Environ Model Softw. 18(4):339–353. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(02)00107-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magesh NS,Chandrasekar N. 2016. Assessment of soil erosion and sediment yield in the Tamiraparani sub-basin, South India, using an automated RUSLE-SY model. Environ Earth Sci. 75(16). doi:10.1007/s12665-016-6010-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahala A. 2018. SE estimation using RUSLE and GIS techniques—a study of a plateau fringe region of tropical environment. Arab J Geosci. 11(13):1–18. doi:10.1007/s12517-018-3703-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majhi A, Shaw R, Mallick K, Patel PP. 2021. Towards improved USLE-based SE modelling in India: a review of prevalent pitfalls and implementation of exemplar methods. Earth Sci Rev. 221:103786. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCool DK, Brown LC, Foster GR, Mutchler CK, Meyer LD. 1987. Revised slope steepness factor for the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Trans ASAE. 30(5):1387–1396.
   Google Scholar
• Miller VC. 1953. A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the clinch mountain area virginia and tennessee, Defense Technical Information Center. 1, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Mondal A, Khare D, Kundu S, Mukherjee S, Mukhopadhyay A, Mondal S. 2017. Uncertainty of soil erosion modelling using open source high resolution and aggregated DEMs. Geosci Front. 8(3):425–436. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2016.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RPC, Quinton JN, Rickson RJ. 1990. Structure of the SE prediction model for the European community. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Water Erosion, Sedimentation and Resource Conservation (Vol. 913).
   Google Scholar
• Mukanov Y, Chen Y, Baisholanov S, Amanambu AC, Issanova G, Abenova A, Fang G, Abayev N. 2019. Estimation of annual average soil loss using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) integrated in a Geographical Information System (GIS) of the Esil River basin (ERB), Kazakhstan. Acta Geophys. 67(3):921–938. doi:10.1007/s11600-019-00288-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli M, Cecchi S, Orlandini S, Mugnai G, Zanchi CA. 2016. Simulation of field-measured soil loss in Mediterranean hilly areas (Chianti, Italy) with RUSLE. Catena. 145:246–256. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyesheja EM, Chen X, El-Tantawi AM, Karamage F, Mupenzi C, Nsengiyumva JB. 2019. Soil erosion assessment using RUSLE model in the Congo Nile Ridge region of Rwanda. Phys Geogr. 40(4):339–360. doi:10.1080/02723646.2018.1541706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S. 2016. Identification of SE vulnerable areas in Chandrabhaga river basin: a multi-criteria decision approach. Model Earth Syst Environ. 2(5):1–11. doi:10.1007/s40808-015-0052-z.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey A, Gautam AK, Chowdary VM, Jha CS, Cerdà A. 2021. Uncertainty assessment in soil erosion modelling using RUSLE, multisource and multiresolution DEMs. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 49(7):1689–1707. doi:10.1007/s12524-021-01351-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasannakumar V, Vijith H, Abinod S, Geetha NJGF. 2012. Estimation of soil erosion risk within a small mountainous sub-watershed in Kerala, India, using Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and geo-information technology. Geosci Front. 3(2):209–215. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2011.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesada-Román A, Campos-Durán D. 2022. Natural disaster risk inequalities in Central America. Papers Appl Geogr. 9(1):36–48. doi:10.1080/23754931.2022.2081814.
   Google Scholar
• Quesada-Román A, Mata-Cambronero E. 2021. The geomorphic landscape of the Barva volcano, Costa Rica. Phys Geogr. 42(3):265–282. doi:10.1080/02723646.2020.1759762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesada-Román A, Castro-Chacón JP, Boraschi SF. 2021. Geomorphology, land use, and environmental impacts in a densely populated urban catchment of Costa Rica. J South Am Earth Sci. 112:103560. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman MR, Shi ZH, Chongfa C. 2009. SE hazard evaluation—an integrated use of remote sensing, GIS and statistical approaches with biophysical parameters towards management strategies. Ecol Modell. 220(13–14):1724–1734. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajbanshi J, Bhattacharya S. 2020. Assessment of soil erosion, sediment yield and basin specific controlling factors using RUSLE-SDR and PLSR approach in Konar river basin, India. J Hydrol. 587:124935. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renard KG. 1997. Predicting SE by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Washington, DC: United States Government Printing.
   Google Scholar
• Renschler CS, Harbor J. 2002. Soil erosion assessment tools from point to regional scales—the role of geomorphologists in land management research and implementation. Geomorphology. 47(2-4):189–209. doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00082-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samanta RK, Bhunia GS, Shit PK. 2016. Spatial modelling of SE susceptibility mapping in lower basin of Subarnarekha river (India) based on geospatial techniques. Model Earth Syst Environ. 2(99):1–13. doi:10.1007/s40808-016-0170-2.
   Google Scholar
• Schumm SA. 1956. Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in Badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc America Bull. 67(5):597. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:EODSAS]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senanayake S, Pradhan B, Huete A, Brennan J. 2022. Spatial modeling of SE hazards and crop diversity change with rainfall variation in the Central Highlands of Sri Lanka. Sci Total Environ. 806(Pt 2):150405. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150405.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shamshad A, Azhari MN, Isa MA, Hussin WW, Parida BP. 2008. Development of an appropriate procedure for estimation of RUSLE EI30 index and preparation of erosivity maps for Pulau Penang in Peninsular Malaysia. Catena. 72(3):423–432. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2007.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivhare N, Rahul AK, Omar PJ, Chauhan MS, Gaur S, Dikshit PKS, Dwivedi SB. 2018. Identification of critical SE prone areas and prioritization of micro-watersheds using geoinformatics techniques. Ecol Eng. 121:26–34. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh G, Panda RK. 2017. Grid-cell based assessment of SE potential for identification of critical erosion prone areas using USLE, GIS and remote sensing: a case study in the Kapgari watershed, India. Int Soil Water Conserv Res. 5(3):202–211. doi:10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh G, Chandra S, Babu R. 1981. Soil loss and prediction research in India. New York: Central Soil and Water Conservation Research Training Institute
   Google Scholar
• Smith KG. 1950. Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. Am J Sci. 248(9):655–668. doi:10.2475/ajs.248.9.655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofi MS, Rautela KS, Bhat SU, Rashid I, Kuniyal JC. 2021. Application of geomorphometric approach for the estimation of hydro-sedimentological flows and cation weathering rate: towards understanding the sustainable land use policy for the Sindh Basin, Kashmir Himalaya. Water Air Soil Pollut. 232(7):280. doi:10.1007/s11270-021-05217-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler A. 1952. Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geol Soc America Bull. 63(11):1117–1142. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[1117:HAAOET]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Joseph S, Thrivikramji KP. 2018. Estimation of SE in a rain shadow river basin in the southern Western Ghats, India using RUSLE and transport limited sediment delivery function. Int Soil Water Conserv Res. 6(2):111–122. doi:10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGS. 2022. Earth Explorer, Science for a Changing World, United States Department of the Interior, USA. [accessed 10 Jun 2022]. https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Knijff JM, Jones RJA, Montanarella L. 2000. SE risk: assessment in Europe. Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Van Pelt RS, Hushmurodov SX, Baumhardt RL, Chappell A, Nearing MA, Polyakov VO, Strack JE. 2017. The reduction of partitioned wind and water erosion by conservation agriculture. Catena. 148:160–167. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2016.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigiak O, Borselli L, Newham LTH, McInnes J, Roberts AM. 2012. Comparison of conceptual landscape metrics to define hillslope-scale sediment delivery ratio. Geomorphology. 138(1):74–88. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.08.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wischmeier WH, Smith DD. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning (No. 537). Maryland: United States Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Zerihun M, Mohammedyasin MS, Sewnet D, Adem AA, Lakew M. 2018. Assessment of SE using RUSLE, GIS and remote sensing in NW Ethiopia. Geoderma Regional. 12:83–90. doi:10.1016/j.geodrs.2018.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Fan W, Li Y, Yi Y. 2017. The influence of changes in land use and landscape patterns on SE in a watershed. Sci Total Environ. 574:34–45. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Lu XX, Sun H, Han J. 2011. Modeling catchment controls on organic carbon fluxes in a meso-scale mountainous river (Luodingjiang), China. Quat Int. 244(2):296–303. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2010.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Deng J, Lin Y, Belete M, Wang K, Comber A, Huang L, Gan M. 2019. Identifying the effects of land use change on sediment export: integrating sediment source and sediment delivery in the Qiantang River Basin, China. Sci Total Environ. 686:38–49. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou P, Luukkanen O, Tokola T, Nieminen J. 2008. Effect of vegetation cover on soil erosion in a mountainous watershed. Catena. 75(3):319–325. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2008.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar