Modeling of landslides susceptibility prediction using deep belief networks with optimized learning rate control

References

• Azarafza M, Azarafza M, Akgün H, Atkinson PM, Derakhshani R. 2021. Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Sci Rep. 11(1):24112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03585-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogun A-L, Rezaie F, Pham QB, Gigović L, Drobnjak S, Aina YA, Panahi M, Yekeen ST, Lee S. 2021. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility in western Serbia using hybrid support vector regression (SVR) with with GWO, BAT and COA algorithms. Geosci Front. 12(3):101104. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bien TX, Iqbal M, Jamal A, Nguyen DD, Van Phong T, Costache R, Ho LS, Van Le H, Nguyen HBT, Prakash I, et al. 2023. Integration of rotation forest and multiboost ensemble methods with forest by penalizing attributes for spatial prediction of landslide susceptible areas. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 37(12):4641–4660. doi: 10.1007/s00477-023-02521-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DT, Tsangaratos P, Nguyen VT, Liem NV, Trinh PT. 2020. Comparing the prediction performance of a deep learning neural network model with conventional machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment. Catena. 188(2020):104426. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104426.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang J-L, Kuo C-M, Fazeldehkordi L. 2022. Using deep learning to formulate the landslide rainfall threshold of the potential large-scale landslide. Water. 14(20):3320–3341. doi: 10.3390/w14203320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahal A, Lombardo L. 2023. Explainable artificial intelligence in geoscience: a glimpse into the future of landslide susceptibility modeling. Comput Geosci. 176:105364. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2023.105364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devara M, Maurya V, Tiwari A, Dwivedi R. 2021. A multi-criteria landslide susceptibility mapping using deep multi-layer perceptron network: a case study of Srinagar-Rudraprayag region (India). Adv Space Res. 69(4):1883–1893. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2021.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimililer K, Dindar H, Al-Turjman F. 2021. Deep learning, machine learning and internet of things in geophysical engineering applications: an overview. Microprocess Microsyst. 80(15):103613. doi: 10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103613.
   Google Scholar
• Dou J, Yunus AP, Merghadi A, Shirzadi A, Nguyen H, Hussain Y, Avtar R, Chen Y, Pham BT, Yamagishi H. 2020. Different sampling strategies for predicting landslide susceptibilities are deemed less consequential with deep learning. Sci Total Environ. 720:137320. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge Y, Liu G, Tang H, Zhao B, Xiong C. 2023. Comparative analysis of five convolutional neural networks for landslide susceptibility assessment. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 82(10):377–396. doi: 10.1007/s10064-023-03408-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorsevski PV. 2023. A free web-based approach for rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility modeling: case study of clearwater national forest, Idaho, USA. Environ Model Softw. 161:105632. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government ZCPS. 2023. The basic information of Zhidan County [online]. https://zhidan.gov.cn.
   Google Scholar
• Grabowski D, Laskowicz I, Małka A, Rubinkiewicz J. 2022. Geoenvironmental conditioning of landsliding in river valleys of lowland regions and its significance in landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study in the Lower Vistula Valley, Northern Poland. Geomorphology. 419:108490. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu T, Li J, Wang M, Duan P. 2022. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Zhenxiong county of China based on geographically weighted logistic regression model. Geocarto Int. 37(17):4952–4973. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2021.1903571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Tsangaratos P, Ilia I, Loupasakis C, Wang Y. 2020. Introducing a novel multi-layer perceptron network based on stochastic gradient descent optimized by a meta heuristic algorithm for landslide susceptibility mapping. Sci Total Environ. 2020(742):140549. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140549.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Wang W, Chen G, Han Z. 2022. Spatiotemporal assessment of landslide susceptibility in Southern Sichuan, China using SA-DBN, PSO-DBN and SSA-DBN models compared with DBN model. Adv Space Res. 69(8):3071–3087. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2022.01.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Zhang Y. 2017. GIS-supported certainty factor (CF) models for assessment of geothermal potential: a case study of Tengchong County, southwest China. Energy. 140(1):552–565. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.012.
   Google Scholar
• Lima P, Steger S, Glade T, Mergili M. 2023. Conventional data-driven landslide susceptibility models may only tell us half of the story: potential underestimation of landslide impact areas depending on the modeling design. Geomorphology. 430:108638. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moragues S, Lenzano MG, Lanfri M, Moreiras SM, Lannutti E, Lenzano LE. 2021. Analytic hierarchy process applied to landslide susceptibility mapping of the North Branch of Argentino Lake, Argentina. Nat Hazards. 105(1):915–941. doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-04343-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikoobakht S, Azarafza M, Akgün H, Derakhshani R. 2022. Landslide susceptibility assessment by using convolutional neural network. Appl Sci. 12(12):5992. doi: 10.3390/app12125992.
   Google Scholar
• Norsakinah S, Majid NA, Taha MR, Osman AS. 2022. Landslide susceptibility model using artificial neural network (ANN) approach in Langat River Basin, Selangor, Malaysia. Land. 11(6):833–850. doi: 10.3390/land11060833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okalp K, Akgün H. 2022. Landslide susceptibility assessment in medium-scale: case studies from the major drainage basins of Turkey. Environ Earth Sci. 81(8):81–88. (doi: 10.1007/s12665-022-10355-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Hamm S-Y, Kim J. 2019. Performance evaluation of the GIS-based data-mining techniques decision tree, random forest, and rotation forest for landslide susceptibility modeling. Sustainability. 11(20):5659–5702. doi: 10.3390/su11205659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham QB, Achour Y, Ali SA, Parvin F, Vojtek M, Vojteková J, Al-Ansari N, Achu AL, Costache R, Khedher KM, et al. 2021. A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 12(1):1741–1777. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2021.1944330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Som SK, Saibal G, Soumitra D, Thrideep KN, Hindayar JN, Murali M, Dasarwar P, Snehasis B. 2023. Utility of common variance of equally-weighted variables for GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping at the Eastern Himalaya. J Earth Syst Sci. 132(1):1–17. doi: 10.1007/s12040-022-02017-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H, Li W, Scaioni M, Fu J, Guo X, Gao J. 2023. Influence of spatial heterogeneity on landslide susceptibility in the transboundary area of the Himalayas. Geomorphology. 433:108723. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tingyu Z, Ling H, Heng Z, Yong-Hua Z, Xi-An LI, Lei Z. 2019. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid integration approaches of fractal dimension with index of entropy and support vector machine. J Mt Sci.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao L, Zhang Y, Peng G. 2018. Landslide susceptibility assessment using integrated deep learning algorithm along the China-Nepal highway. Sensors. 18(12):4436. doi: 10.3390/s18124436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Dikshit A, Al-Katheri MM, Matar SS, Mahdi AM. 2022. Landslide susceptibility mapping using CNN-1D and 2D deep learning algorithms: comparison of their performance at Asir Region, KSA. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 81(4):110–135. doi: 10.1007/s10064-022-02657-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Fu Q, Li C, Liu F, Wang H, Han L, Quevedo RP, Chen T, Lei N. 2023. Modeling landslide susceptibility using data mining techniques of kernel logistic regression, fuzzy unordered rule induction algorithm, SysFor and random forest. Nat Hazards. 115(2):1873–1873. doi: 10.1007/s11069-022-05756-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Li Y, Wang T, Wang H, Chen T, Sun Z, Luo D, Li C, Han L. 2022. Evaluation of different machine learning models and novel deep learning-based algorithm for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geosci Lett. 9(1):107–133. doi: 10.1186/s40562-022-00236-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao S, Zhao Z. 2021. A comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping using SVM and PSO-SVM models based on grid and slope units. Math Prob Eng. 2021(3):1–15. doi: 10.1155/2021/8854606.
   Google Scholar