229
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Delineation of environmentally sustainable urban settlement using GIS-based MIF and AHP techniques

, , , , ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Article: 2335249 | Received 19 Jun 2023, Accepted 21 Mar 2024, Published online: 09 Apr 2024

References

  • Abdo HG, Aljohani THD, Almohamad H, Al-Dughairi AA, Al-Mutiry M. 2023. Sanitary municipal landfill site selection by integration of GIS and multi-criteria techniques for environmental sustainability in Safita area, Tartous governorate, Syria. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 30(11):30834–30854. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24287-9.
  • Al. Fanatseh A. 2022. Land suitability analysis of urban development in the Aqaba area, Jordan, using a GIS-based analytic hierarchy process. GeoJournal. 87(5):4143–4159.
  • AMC. 2021. Ambernath city clean air action plan, city air action plan for control of air pollution in Ambernath city: one of the non-attainment city of Maharashtra. [assessed 2022 Jun 5]. https://ambarnathcouncil.net/EIPPROD/NCAP.pdf.
  • Arabameri A, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR, Rezaei K. 2018. Identification of erosion-prone areas using different multi-criteria decision-making techniques and GIS. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 9(1):1129–1155. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2018.1513084.
  • Asadzadeh A, Sikder SK, Mahmoudi F, Kötter T. 2014. Assessing site selection of new towns using topsis method under entropy logic: a case study: new towns of Tehran metropolitan region (TMR). EMSD. 3(1):123. doi: 10.5296/emsd.v3i1.4874.
  • Bandira PNA, Mahamud MA, Samat N, Tan ML, Chan NW. 2021. GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for potential inland aquaculture site selection in the George Town Conurbation, Malaysia. Land. 10(11):1174. doi: 10.3390/land10111174.
  • Bose A, Chowdhury IR. 2020. Monitoring and modeling of spatio-temporal urban expansion and land-use/land-cover change using Markov chain model: a case study in Siliguri Metropolitan area, West Bengal, India. Model Earth Syst Environ. 6(4):2235–2249. doi: 10.1007/s40808-020-00842-6.
  • Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB. 2012. Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): a comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models. Catena. 96:28–40. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2012.04.001.
  • Census: District Census Handbook Thane, Directorate of Census Operations Maharashtra, Census of India. 2011. [assessed 2022 Jul 3]. https://thane.nic.in/document/census-2011.
  • Chadchan J, Shankar R. 2012. An analysis of urban growth trends in the post-economic reforms period in India. Int J Sustainable Built Environ. 1(1):36–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2012.05.001.
  • Chandio IA, Matori AN, Lawal DU, Sabri S. 2011. GIS-based land suitability analysis using AHP for public parks planning in Larkana City. MAS. 5(4):177. https://. doi: 10.5539/mas.v5n4p177.
  • Chaturvedi V, Kuffer M, Kohli D. 2020. Analysing urban development patterns in a conflict zone: a case study of Kabul. Remote Sensing. 12(21):3662. doi: 10.3390/rs12213662.
  • Chen Z, Chen L, Zhou X, Huang L, Sandanayake M, Yap P. 2024. Recent technological advancements in BIM and LCA integration for sustainable construction: a review. Sustainability. 16(3):1340. doi: 10.3390/su16031340.
  • Dadhich PN, Hanaoka S. 2011. Spatio-temporal urban growth modeling of Jaipur, India. Journal of Urban Technology. 18(3):45–65. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2011.615567.
  • Dincer NG, Akkuş Ö. 2018. A new fuzzy time series model based on robust clustering for forecasting of air pollution. Ecol Inf. 43:157–164. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.12.001.
  • El Asmar JP, Ebohon JO, Taki A. 2012. Bottom-up approach to sustainable urban development in Lebanon: the case of Zouk Mosbeh. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2(1):37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2011.10.002.
  • Gelan E. 2021. GIS-based multi‐criteria analysis for sustainable urban green spaces planning in emerging towns of Ethiopia: the case of Sululta town. Environ Syst Res. 10(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s40068-021-00220-w.
  • Ghosh D, Mandal M, Karmakar M, Banerjee M, Mandal D. 2020. Application of geospatial technology for delineating groundwater potential zones in the Gandheswari watershed, West Bengal. Sustain Water Resour Manag. 6(1):1–14. doi: 10.1007/s40899-020-00372-0.
  • Gontara M, Allouche N, Jmal I, Bouri S. 2016. Sensitivity analysis for the GALDIT method based on the assessment of vulnerability to pollution in the northern Sfax coastal aquifer, Tunisia. Arab J Geosci. 9(5):1–15. doi: 10.1007/s12517-016-2437-3.
  • Greene R, Devillers R, Luther JE, Eddy BG. 2011. GIS‐based multiple‐criteria decision analysis. Geography Compass. 5(6):412–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00431.x.
  • Guan H, Huang J, Li L, Li X, Miao S, Su W, Ma Y, Niu Q, Huang H. 2023. Improved Gaussian mixture model to map the flooded crops of VV and VH polarization data. Remote Sens Environ. 295:113714. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113714.
  • Haile MM, Abebe AK. 2022. GIS and fuzzy logic integration in land suitability assessment for surface irrigation: the case of Guder watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Appl Water Sci. 12(10):240. doi: 10.1007/s13201-022-01761-w.
  • Hassan MM, Nazem MNI. 2016. Examination of land use/land cover changes, urban growth dynamics, and environmental sustainability in Chittagong city, Bangladesh. Environ Dev Sustain. 18(3):697–716. doi: 10.1007/s10668-015-9672-8.
  • Hoque I, Rohatgi S. 2022. Identification of Potential Urban Residential Area by Integrating AHP and WCL in RS and GIS Environment: a Case Study of Siliguri Municipal Corporation and Its Buffer of 7 km, West Bengal. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 50(8):1437–1456. doi: 10.1007/s12524-022-01534-7.
  • Hu Q, Zhao Y, Hu X, Qi J, Suo L, Pan Y, Song B, Chen X. 2022. Effect of saline land reclamation by constructing the “Raised Field-Shallow Trench” pattern on agroecosystems in Yellow River Delta. Agric Water Manag. 261:107345. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107345.
  • Huang H, Huang J, Wu Y, Zhuo W, Song J, Li X, Li L, Su W, Ma H, Liang S. 2023. The improved winter wheat yield estimation by assimilating GLASS LAI into a crop growth model with the proposed Bayesian posterior-based ensemble Kalman filter. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 61:1–18. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3259742.
  • Ibrahim L, Vogiatzakis IN, Incerti G, Feoli E. 2015. The use of fuzzy plant species density to indicate the effects of land-cover changes on biodiversity. Ecol Indic. 57:149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.036.
  • Ifatimehin OO, Musa SD, Adeyemi JO. 2009. An analysis of the changing land use and its impact on the environment of Anyigba town, Nigeria. J Sustain Develop Africa. 10(4):357–364.
  • Jozaghi A, Alizadeh B, Hatami M, Flood I, Khorrami M, Khodaei N, Ghasemi Tousi E. 2018. A comparative study of the AHP and TOPSIS techniques for dam site selection using GIS: a case study of Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran. Geosciences. 8(12):494. doi: 10.3390/geosciences8120494.
  • Karimi H, Amiri S, Huang J, Karimi A. 2019. Integrating GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis for landfill site selection, case study: Javanrood County in Iran. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 16(11):7305–7318. doi: 10.1007/s13762-018-2151-7.
  • Kasinja C, Tilley E. 2018. Formalization of informal waste pickers’ cooperatives in Blantyre, Malawi: a feasibility assessment. Sustainability. 10(4):1149. doi: 10.3390/su10041149.
  • Kaushik PS, Patel J, Patel CR, Tailor RM. 2020. Assessing land suitability for managing urban growth: an application of GIS and RS. In IGARSS 2020. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Waikoloa, Hawaii. p. 4243–4246.
  • Kılıc D, Yagci C, Iscan F. 2022. A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis approach using AHP for rural settlement site selection and eco-village design in Erzincan, Turkey. Socio-Econ Plan Sci. 86:101478. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101478.
  • Kilicoglu C, Cetin M, Aricak B, Sevik H. 2020. Site selection by using the multi-criteria technique—a case study of Bafra, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess. 192(9):608. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08562-1.
  • Kim JI, Senaratna DM, Ruza J, Kam C, Ng S. 2015. Feasibility study on an evidence-based decision-support system for hospital site selection for an aging population. Sustainability. 7(3):2730–2744. doi: 10.3390/su7032730.
  • Kumari S, Poddar A, Kumar N, Shankar V. 2022. Delineation of groundwater recharge potential zones using the modeling based on remote sensing, GIS and MIF techniques: a study of Hamirpur District, Himachal Pradesh, India. Model Earth Syst Environ. 8(2):1759–1770. doi: 10.1007/s40808-021-01181-w.
  • Li X, Gong P. 2016. Urban growth models: progress and perspective. Science Bullet. 61(21):1637–1650. doi: 10.1007/s11434-016-1111-1.
  • Li R, Zhu G, Lu S, Sang L, Meng G, Chen L, Jiao Y, Wang Q. 2023. Effects of urbanization on the water cycle in the Shiyang River basin: based on a stable isotope method. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 27(24):4437–4452. doi: 10.5194/hess-27-4437-2023.
  • Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Soundranayagam JP. 2012. Delineation of groundwater potential zones in Theni district, Tamil Nadu, using remote sensing, GIS and MIF techniques. Geosci Front. 3(2):189–196. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2011.10.007.
  • Mallick J, Ibnatiq AA, Kahla NB, Alqadhi S, Singh VP, Hoa PV, Hang HT, Hong NV, Le HA. 2022. GIS-based decision support system for safe and sustainable building construction site in a mountainous region. Sustainability. 14(2):888. doi: 10.3390/su14020888.
  • Mallick SK, Rudra S, Maity B. 2024. Land suitability assessment for urban built-up development of a city in the Eastern Himalayan foothills: a study towards urban sustainability. Environ Develop Sustain. 26:3767–3792. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02857-8.
  • Manap MA, Nampak H, Pradhan B, Lee S, Sulaiman WNA, Ramli MF. 2014. Application of probabilistic-based frequency ratio model in groundwater potential mapping using remote sensing data and GIS. Arab J Geosci. 7(2):711–724. doi: 10.1007/s12517-012-0795-z.
  • Martellozzo F, Amato F, Murgante B, Clarke KC. 2018. Modelling the impact of urban growth on agriculture and natural land in Italy to 2030. Appl Geogr. 91:156–167. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.12.004.
  • McNeil BJ, Hanley JA. 1984. Statistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Med Decis Making. 4(2):137–150. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8400400203.
  • Miguez MG, Veról AP, De Sousa MM, Rezende OM. 2015. Urban floods in lowlands—levee systems, unplanned urban growth and river restoration alternative: a case study in Brazil. Sustainability. 7(8):11068–11097. doi: 10.3390/su70811068.
  • Mishra AP, Khali H, Singh S, Pande CB, Singh R, Chaurasia SK. 2023. An assessment of in-situ water quality parameters and its variation with Landsat 8 level 1 surface reflectance datasets. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 103(18):1–23.
  • Mishra. 2024. Assessment of water quality index using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and GIS: a case study of a struggling Asan River. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 104(5):1–13.
  • Moharir KN, Pande CB, Gautam VK, Singh SK, Rane NL. 2023. Integration of hydrogeological data, GIS and AHP techniques applied to delineate groundwater potential zones in sandstone, limestone and shales rocks of the Damoh district,(MP) central India. Environ Res. 228:115832. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115832.
  • Moore M, Gould P, Keary BS. 2003. Global urbanization and impact on health. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 206(4–5):269–278. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00223.
  • Musakwa W, Tshesane RM, Kangethe M. 2017. The strategically located land index support system for human settlements land reform in South Africa. Cities. 60:91–101. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.08.007.
  • Nasir MJ, Khan S, Zahid H, Khan A. 2018. Delineation of groundwater potential zones using GIS and multi influence factor (MIF) techniques: a study of district Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Environ Earth Sci. 77(10):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s12665-018-7522-3.
  • Nengroo ZA, Bhat MS, Kuchay NA. 2017. Measuring urban sprawl of Srinagar city, Jammu and Kashmir, India. Journal of Urban Management. 6(2):45–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jum.2017.08.001.
  • Nikolakaki P. 2004. A GIS site-selection process for habitat creation: estimating connectivity of habitat patches. Landscape Urban Plann. 68(1):77–94. (03)00167-1 doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046.
  • Nikuze A, Flacke J, Sliuzas R, van Maarseveen M. 2022. Urban induced-displacement of informal settlement dwellers: a comparison of affected households’ and planning officials’ preferences for resettlement site attributes in Kigali, Rwanda. Habitat Int. 119:102489. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102489.
  • Onüt S, Soner S. 2008. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Manag. 28(9):1552–1559. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.019.
  • Pande CB. 2020. Sustainable watershed development planning. In: Sustainable watershed development. SpringerBriefs in water science and technology. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-47244-3_4.
  • Pande CB, Moharir KN, Varade AM, Abdo HG, Mulla S, Yaseen ZM. 2023. Intertwined impacts of urbanization and land cover change on urban climate and agriculture in Aurangabad city (MS), India using google earth engine platform. J Clean Prod. 422:138541. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138541.
  • Patil M, Kumar S, Pandey A, Pentayya P, Kazi F. 2022. Real-time detailed dynamic model of the Mumbai system in HYPERSIM. In 4th International Conference on Energy, Power and Environment (ICEPE), Shillong, India. p. 1–6.
  • Pawe CK, Saikia A. 2018. Unplanned urban growth: land use/land cover change in the Guwahati Metropolitan Area, India. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish J Geogr. 118(1):88–100. doi: 10.1080/00167223.2017.1405357.
  • Peptenatu D, Pintilii RD, Draghici C. 2011. Environmental risk management of urban growth poles regarding national importance. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 8(4):737–746. doi: 10.1007/BF03326258.
  • Pontius RG, Schneider LC. 2001. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 85(1–3):239–248. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809.
  • Qiu S, Yang H, Zhang S, Huang S, Zhao S, Xu X, He P, Zhou W, Zhao Y, Yan N, et al. 2023. Carbon storage in an arable soil combining field measurements, aggregate turnover modeling and climate scenarios. CATENA. 220:106708. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106708.
  • Rajesh J, Pande CB, Kadam SA, Gorantiwar SD, Shinde MG. 2021. Exploration of groundwater potential zones using analytical hierarchical process (AHP) approach in the Godavari river basin of Maharashtra in India. Appl Water Sci. 11(12):182. doi: 10.1007/s13201-021-01518-x.
  • Raju RS, Raju GS, Rajasekhar M. 2019. Identification of groundwater potential zones in Mandavi River basin, Andhra Pradesh, India using remote sensing, GIS and MIF techniques. HydroResearch. 2:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.hydres.2019.09.001.
  • Rane N, Jayaraj GK. 2021. Stratigraphic modeling and hydraulic characterization of a typical basaltic aquifer system in the Kadva river basin, Nashik, India. Model Earth Syst Environ. 7(1):293–306. doi: 10.1007/s40808-020-01008-0.
  • Rane NL, Jayaraj GK. 2022. Comparison of multi-influence factor, weight of evidence and frequency ratio techniques to evaluate groundwater potential zones of basaltic aquifer systems. Environ Dev Sustain. 24(2):2315–2344. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01535-5.
  • Rane NL, Achari A, Choudhary SP, Mallick SK, Pande CB, Srivastava A, Moharir KN. 2023. A decision framework for potential dam site selection using GIS, MIF and TOPSIS in Ulhas river basin, India. J Cleaner Prod. 423:138890. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138890.
  • Saaty TL. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Mathemat Psychol. 15(3):234–281. (77)90033-5 doi: 10.1016/0022-2496.
  • Saaty TL. 2000. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
  • Saaty TL. 2004. Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). J Syst Sci Syst Eng. 13(1):1–35. doi: 10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5.
  • Saha A, Roy R. 2021. An integrated approach to identify suitable areas for built-up development using GIS-based multi-criteria analysis and AHP in Siliguri planning area, India. SN Appl Sci. 3(4):1–17. doi: 10.1007/s42452-021-04354-5.
  • Saha S, Gayen A, Pourghasemi HR, Tiefenbacher JP. 2019. Identification of soil erosion-susceptible areas using fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process modeling in an agricultural watershed of Burdwan district, India. Environ Earth Sci. 78(23):1–18. doi: 10.1007/s12665-019-8658-5.
  • Shaban A, Khawlie M, Abdallah C. 2006. Use of remote sensing and GIS to determine recharge potential zones: the case of Occidental Lebanon. Hydrogeol J. 14(4):433–443. doi: 10.1007/s10040-005-0437-6.
  • Shaikh SA, Memon MA, Prokop M, Kim KS. 2020. An AHP/TOPSIS-based approach for an optimal site selection of a commercial opening utilizing geospatial data. In IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp), Busan, Korea. p. 295–302.
  • Shang M, Luo J. 2021. The Tapio decoupling principle and key strategies for changing factors of Chinese urban carbon footprint based on cloud computing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(4):2101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042101.
  • Shang Y, Song K, Lai F, Lyu L, Liu G, Fang C, Hou J, Qiang S, Yu X, Wen Z. 2023. Remote sensing of fluorescent humification levels and its potential environmental linkages in lakes across China. Water Res. 230:119540. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119540.
  • Shelar RS, Shinde SP, Pande CB, Moharir KN, Orimoloye IR, Mishra AP, Varade AM. 2022. Sub-watershed prioritization of Koyna river basin in India using multi criteria analytical hierarchical process, remote sensing and GIS techniques. Phys Chem Earth. 128:103219. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2022.103219.
  • Singh L, Saravanan S, Jennifer JJ, Abijith D. 2021. Application of multi-influence factor (MIF) technique for the identification of suitable sites for urban settlement in Tiruchirappalli City, Tamil Nadu, India. Asia-Pac J Reg Sci. 5(3):797–823. doi: 10.1007/s41685-021-00194-8.
  • Singha C, Swain KC. 2016. Land suitability evaluation criteria for agricultural crop selection: a review. AR. 37(2):125–132. doi: 10.18805/ar.v37i2.10737.
  • Srivastava A, Chinnasamy P. 2023. Watershed development interventions for rural water safety, security, and sustainability in semi-arid region of Western-India. Environ Dev Sustain. :1–35. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03387-7.
  • Stojčić M, Zavadskas EK, Pamučar D, Stević Ž, Mardani A. 2019. Application of MCDM methods in sustainability engineering: a literature review 2008–2018. Symmetry. 11(3):350. doi: 10.3390/sym11030350.
  • Tien Bui D, Shirzadi A, Chapi K, Shahabi H, Pradhan B, Pham B, Singh V, Chen W, Khosravi K, Bin Ahmad B, et al. 2019. A hybrid computational intelligence approach to groundwater spring potential mapping. Water. 11(10):2013. doi: 10.3390/w11102013.
  • Tomer T, Katyal D, Joshi V. 2019. Sensitivity analysis of groundwater vulnerability using DRASTIC method: a case study of National Capital Territory, Delhi, India. Groundwater Sustainable Dev. 9:100271. doi: 10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100271.
  • Türk E, Çelik HM. 2013. Impacts of planners’ different viewpoints on optimum land-use allocation. European Planning Studies. 21(12):1937–1957. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722967.
  • Wang Z, Zhang F, Zhang X, Chan NW, Kung HT, Zhou X, Wang Y. 2020. Quantitative evaluation of spatial and temporal variation of soil salinization risk using GIS-based geostatistical method. Remote Sensing. 12(15):2405. doi: 10.3390/rs12152405.
  • Weldu WG, Deribew IA. 2016. Identification of potential sites for housing development using GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation in Dire Dawa city, Ethiopia. Int J Sci Basic Appl Res. 28(3):34–49.
  • Wen Z, Wang Q, Ma Y, Jacinthe PA, Liu G, Li S, Shang Y, Tao H, Fang C, Lyu L, et al. 2024. Remote estimates of suspended particulate matter in global lakes using machine learning models. Int Soil Water Conserv Res. 12(1):200–216. doi: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.07.002.
  • Xie X, Xie B, Cheng J, Chu Q, Dooling T. 2021. A simple Monte Carlo method for estimating the chance of a cyclone impact. Nat Hazards. 107(3):2573–2582. doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-04505-2.
  • Yin Z, Liu Z, Liu X, Zheng W, Yin L. 2023. Urban heat islands and their effects on thermal comfort in the US: new York and New Jersey. Ecol Indic. 154:110765. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110765.
  • Zhao R, Huang X, Xue J, Guan X. 2023. A practical simulation of carbon sink calculation for urban buildings: a case study of Zhengzhou in China. Sustain Cities Soc. 99:104980. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104980.
  • Zhu G, Yong L, Zhao X, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Xu Y, Sun Z, Sang L, Wang L. 2022. Evaporation, infiltration and storage of soil water in different vegetation zones in the Qilian Mountains: a stable isotope perspective. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 26(14):3771–3784. doi: 10.5194/hess-26-3771-2022.
  • Zucca A, Sharifi AM, Fabbri AG. 2008. Application of spatial multi-criteria analysis to site selection for a local park: a case study in the Bergamo Province, Italy. J Environ Manage. 88(4):752–769. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.04.026.