Prospects of Deterrence: Deterrence Theory, Representation and Evidence

References

• Berejikian, J. D. 1997. “The Gains Debate: Framing State Choice.” American Political Science Review 91 (4): 789–805. doi:10.2307/2952164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berejikian, J. D. 2002. “A Cognitive Theory of Deterrence.” Journal of Peace Research 39 (2): 165–183. doi:10.1177/0022343302039002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brams, S., and M. Kilgour. 1988. Game Theory and National Security. New York, USA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, C. K. 2007. “Prospect Theory and Coercive Bargaining.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (2): 227–250. doi:10.1177/0022002706297703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. New Jersey USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, L., and R. Dacey. 2006. “Sequential Analysis of Deterrence Games with a Declining Status Quo.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 23 (2): 181–198. doi:10.1080/07388940600666022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, S. 1979. “The Intelligence of Stupidity: Understanding Failures in Strategic Warning.” The American Political Science Review 73 (1): 171–180. doi:10.2307/1954739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, V. P. 2003. “Lying for Strategic Advantage: Rational and Boundedly Rational Misrepresentation of Intentions.” American Economic Review 93 (1): 133–149. doi:10.1257/000282803321455197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalsjö, R., M. Jonsson, and J. Norberg. 2022. “A Brutal Examination: Russian Military Capability in Light of the Ukraine War.” Survival 64 (3): 7–28. doi:10.1080/00396338.2022.2078044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, K., J. L. Knetsch, and H. Thaler Richard. 1991. “The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion and the Status Quo Bias.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 193–206. doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. J. 2014. “Schelling, von Neumann, and the Event that Didn’t Occur.” Games 5 (1): 53–89. doi:10.3390/g5010053.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, D., and D. Rucker. 2018. “The Loss of Loss Aversion: Will It Loom Larger than Its Gain?” Journal of Consumer Psychology 28 (3): 497–516. doi:10.1002/jcpy.1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giere, R. N. 2004. “How Models are Used to Represent Reality.” Philosophy of Science 71 (5): 742–752. doi:10.1086/425063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. 2002. “The Adaptive Toolbox.” In Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Tool Box, edited by R. Selten and G. Gigerenzer, 37–50, Cambridge, Massachusets, USA.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grüne-Yanoff, T. 2007. “Bounded Rationality”.” Philosophy Compass 2 (3): 534–563.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, M. L. 2001. “Prospect Theory and the Cuban Missile Crisis.” International Studies Quarterly 45 (2): 241–270. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E. M., H. Stephen, D. A. Lake, and D. G. Victor. 2017. “The Behavioural Revolution and International Relations.” International Organisation 71 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1017/S0020818316000400.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. W., and R. Don. 2017. “The Empirical Adequacy of Cumulative Prospect Theory and Its Implications for Normative Assessment.” Journal of Economic Methodology 24 (2): 150–165. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2017.1309753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haruvy, E., and D. O. Stahl. 2005. “Equilibrium Selection and Bounded Rationality in Symmetric Normal-form Games.” Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 62 (1): 98–119. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huth, P., and B. Russett. 1984. “What Makes Deterrence Work? Cases from 1900 to 1980.” World Politics 36 (4): 496–526. doi:10.2307/2010184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huth, P., and B. Russett. 1988. “Deterrence Failure and Crisis Escalation.” International Studies Quarterly 32 (1): 29–45. doi:10.2307/2600411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, R. 1983. The Logic of Decision. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. 2010. Why Intelligence Fails - Lessons Form the Iranian Revolution and the Iraq War. Ithaca, New York USA: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, H. 1960. On Thermonuclear War. New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press, reprinted by Transaction Publishers 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (, 2): 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1992. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (4): 297–323. doi:10.1007/BF00122574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krepinevich, A. J. F. 2019. “The Eroding Balance of Terror.” Foreign Affairs, no. 98: 62–74.
   Google Scholar
• Landes, W. M. 1978. “An Economic Study of U. S. Aircraft Hijacking, 1961-1976.” The Journal of Law and Economics 21 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1086/466909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, F. 2013. “Back to the Future in the Study of Deterrence.” St Anthony’s International Review 9 (1): 144–156.
   Google Scholar
• Lebow, R., and J. Gross Stein. 1990a. When Does Deterrence Succeed and How Do We Know? Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security.
   Google Scholar
• Lebow, R., and J. Gross Stein. 1990b. “Deterrence: The Elusive Dependent Variable.” World Politics 42 (3): 336–369. doi:10.2307/2010415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, J. S. 1996. “Loss Aversion, Framing and Bargaining: The Implication of Prospect Theory for International Conflict.” International Political Science Review 17 (2): 179–195. doi:10.1177/019251296017002004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, J. S. 1997. “Prospect Theory, Rational Choice and International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 41 (1): 87–112. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, J. S. 2002. “Application of Prospect Theory to Political Science.” Synthese 135 (2): 215–241. doi:10.1023/A:1023413007698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, E. 1994. “The Rational Deterrence Theory Debate: Is the Dependent Variable Elusive?” Security Studies 3 (3): 384–427. doi:10.1080/09636419409347556.
   Google Scholar
• Massimi, M. 2018. “Perspectival Modelling.” Philosophy of Science 85 (3): 335–359. doi:10.1086/697745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazicioglu, D., and M. J. R. W. 2018. “Behavioural Modelling of Adversaries with Multiple Objectives in Counterterrorism.” Risk Analysis 38 (5): 962–977. doi:10.1111/risa.12898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, R. 1998. Risk-Taking in International Politics: Prospect Theory in American Foreign Politics. Michigan, USA: University of Michigan Press. Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, L. P., and M. O. Rieger. 2009. “Equilibria in Games with Prospect Theory Preferences.” National Centre of Competence in Research Financial Valuation and for Risk Management, no. 598.
   Google Scholar
• Morrissette, J. J. 2010. “Rationality and Risk-Taking in Russia’s First Chechen War: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Realism.” European Political Science Review 2 (2): 187–210. doi:10.1017/S1755773910000081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, R. 1990. Nuclear Deterrence – The Search for Credibility. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prelec, D. 1998. “The Probability Weigthing Function”.” Econometrica 66 (3): 497–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quackenbush, S. L. 2010. “General Deterrence and International Conflict: Testing Perfect Deterrence Theory.” International Interactions 36 (1): 60–85. doi:10.1080/03050620903554069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quackenbush, S. L. 2011a. “Deterrence Theory: Where Do We Stand?” Review of International Studies 37 (2): 741–762. doi:10.1017/S0260210510000896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quackenbush, S. L. 2011b. Understanding General Deterrence: Theory and Application. New York, USA: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Radner, R., and R. Rosenthal. 1982. “Private Information and Pure Strategy Equilibria.” Mathematics of Operations Research 7 (3): 401–409. doi:10.1287/moor.7.3.401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, A. 2006. “Dilemmas of an Economics Theorist.” Econometrica 74 (4): 865–883. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00689.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, B. 1959. Common Sense and Nuclear Warfare. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, W., and R. Zeckhauser. 1988. “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1 (1): 7–59. doi:10.1007/BF00055564.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Massachusets, USA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selten, R. 1978. “The Chain Store Paradox.” Theory and Decision 9 (2): 127–159. doi:10.1007/BF00131770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalev, J. 2000. “Loss Aversion Equilibrium.” International Journal of Game Theory 29: 269–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, J. 1976. “Rationality on the Brink – The Role of Cognitive Processes in Failures of Deterrence”, RAND Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Sörenson, K. 2017. “Comparable Deterrence: Target, Criteria and Purpose.” Defence Studies 17 (2): 198–213. doi:10.1080/14702436.2017.1321468.
   Google Scholar
• Sörenson, K. 2022. “A Misfit Model: Irrational Deterrence and Bounded Rationality”, Theory and Decision, ( online – forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, D. O. 1993. “Evolution of Smartn Players.” Games and Economic Behavior 5 (4): 604–617. doi:10.1006/game.1993.1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. 2000. “Credible Worlds: The Status of Theoretical Models in Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 77 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1080/135017800362220.
   Google Scholar
• Veit, W. 2020. “Model Pluralism.” Philosphy of the Social Sciences 50 (2): 91–114. doi:10.1177/0048393119894897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walt, S. 1999. “Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies.” International Security 23 (4): 5–48. doi:10.1162/isec.23.4.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U., and E. J. Johnson. 2009. “Decisions under Uncertainty: Psychological, Economic, and Neuroeconomic Explanations of Risk Preference.” In Neuroeconomics, edited by W. Glimcher Paul, C. F. Camerer, and Fehr. Russell A: Ernst and Poldrack.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, M. 2013. Simulation and Similarity – Using Models to Understand the World. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 127–144.
   Google Scholar
• Zagare, F. 1999. “All Rigor, No Mortis.” International Security 24 (2): 107–114. doi:10.1162/016228899560185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagare, F. 2013. “Deterrence Theory Then and Now: There Is No Going Back.” St Anthony’s International Review 9 (1): 157–167.
   Google Scholar
• Zagare, F. 2018. “Explaining the Long Peace: Why von Neumann (And Schelling) Got It Wrong.” International Studies Review 20 (3): 422–437. doi:10.1093/isr/vix057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagare, F., and M. Kilgour. 1993. “Asymmetric Deterrence.” International Studies Quarterly 37 (1): 1–27. doi:10.2307/2600829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagare, F., and M. Kilgour. 2000. Perfect Deterrence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar