Prediction of asphalt concrete flexibility index and rut depth utilising deep learning and Monte Carlo Dropout simulation

References

• Agarap, A. F., 2018. Deep learning using rectified linear units (relu). ArXiv preprint arXi, 1803.08375.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I. L., et al., 2015. Testing protocols to ensure performance of high asphalt binder replacement mixes using RAP and RAS. Rantoul, IL: Illinois Center for Transportation/Illinois Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I. L., et al., 2019. Development of long-term aging protocol for implementation of the Illinois flexibility index test (I-FIT). Rantoul, IL: Illinois Center for Transportation/Illinois Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I. L., et al., 2021. Cracking prediction of asphalt concrete using fracture and strength tests. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23 (10), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branco, P., Ribeiro, R. P., and Torgo, L., 2016. UBL: an R package for utility-based learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.08079.
   Google Scholar
• Branco, P., Torgo, L., and Ribeiro, R. P., 2017. SMOGN: a pre-processing approach for imbalanced regression. In First international workshop on learning with imbalanced domains: theory and applications, PMLR, 36–50.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45 (1), 5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, T., and Draxler, R. R., 2014. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE). Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 7 (1), 1525–1534.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrashekar, G. and Sahin, F., 2014. A survey on feature selection methods. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 40 (1), 16–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cominsky, R. J., et al., 1997. Field procedures and equipment to implement SHRP asphalt specifications. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project, 9-7.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. B. III, et al., 2014. Balanced asphalt mixture design through specification modification. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2447, 92–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes, C., Mohri, M., and Rostamizadeh, A., 2012. L2 regularization for learning kernels. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.2653.
   Google Scholar
• Dobra, A., 2002. Classification and regression tree construction. Retrieved September, 18, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, H., et al., 1996. Support vector regression machines. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Emmert-Streib, F., et al., 2020. An introductory review of deep learning for prediction models with big data. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3, 4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fang, M., et al., 2019. Aggregate gradation theory, design and its impact on asphalt pavement performance: a review. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (12), 1408–1424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, Y., and Ghahramani, Z., 2016. Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 48, 1050–1059.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, H., et al., 2020. Improved estimation of dynamic modulus for hot mix asphalt using deep learning. Construction and Building Materials, 263, 119912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, G., et al., 2003. KNN model-based approach in classification. In: OTM confederated international conferences" On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems". 986–996.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, P. J., 1992. Robust estimation of a location parameter. In: S. Kotz and N. L. Johnson, eds. In breakthroughs in statistics. New York, NY: Springer, 492–518.
   Google Scholar
• Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), 2016. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. https://idot.illinois.gov/Assets/uploads/files/Doing-Business/Manuals-Guides-&-Handbooks/Highways/Construction/Standard-Specifications/Standard%20Specifications%20for%20Road%20and%20Bridge%20Construction%202016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, A. K., Mao, J, and Mohiuddin, KM, 1996. Artificial neural networks: a tutorial. Computer, 29 (3), 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingma, D. P., and Ba, J., 2015. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: 3rd international conference on learning representations, ICLR 2015 – conference track proceedings, 7–9, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Leys, C., et al., 2013. Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49 (4), 764–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., et al., 2021. Social media rumor refutation effectiveness: evaluation, modelling and enhancement. Information Processing & Management, 58 (1), 102420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, C., et al., 2017. Sensitivity of the Illinois flexibility index test to mixture design factors. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2631 (1), 153–159.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., et al., 2017. Prediction models of mixtures’ dynamic modulus using gene expression programming. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (11), 971–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., et al., 2007. Feature selection using principal feature analysis. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Multimedia, 301–304.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, S. M., and Lee, S. I., 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.
   Google Scholar
• Maalouf, M., Khoury, N., and Trafalis, T. B., 2008. Support vector regression to predict asphalt mix performance. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 32 (16), 1989–1996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousa, M., Elseifi, M. A. and Abdel-Khalek, A., 2019. Development of tree-based algorithm for prediction of field performance of asphalt concrete overlays. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 145 (2). https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000112
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh, F., 1991. Multilayer perceptrons for classification and regression. Neurocomputing, 2 (5-6), 183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Okte, E., and Al-Qadi, I. L, 2022. Prediction of flexible pavement 3-D finite element responses using Bayesian neural networks. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23 (14), m5066–5076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozer, H., et al., 2016. Development of the fracture-based flexibility index for asphalt concrete cracking potential using modified semi-circle bending test parameters. Construction and Building Materials, 115, 390–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozer, H., et al., 2018. Prediction of pavement fatigue cracking at an accelerated testing section using asphalt mixture performance tests. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (3), 264–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk, H. I., and Kutay, M. E., 2014. An artificial neural network model for virtual Superpave asphalt mixture design. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (2), 151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedregosa, F., et al., 2011. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera-Perez, J. J., et al., 2022a. Statistical analysis of hot-mix asphalt pay for performance versus quality control for performance. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 148 (2), 04022016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera-Perez, J., and Al-Qadi, I. L., 2022b. Development of an Illinois Flexibility Index (I-FIT) and Hamburg Wheel Tracking Test (HWTT) Databases. [Manuscript submitted for publication].
   Google Scholar
• Rivera-Perez, J., Huang, J., and Al-Qadi, I. L, 2022c. Field factors impacting incentives of quality control for performance (QCP) and pay for performance (PFP) specifications for hot-mix asphalt in Illinois. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 148 (2), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Sebaaly, H., Varma, S., and Maina, J. W., 2018. Optimizing asphalt mix design process using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Construction and Building Materials, 168, 660–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgo, L., et al., 2013. Smote for regression. In: L. Correia, L. P. Reis, and J. Cascalho, eds. Progress in artificial intelligence. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 378–389.
   Google Scholar
• Vinutha, H. P., Poornima, B., and Sagar, B. M., 2018. Detection of outliers using interquartile range technique from intrusion dataset. In: S. Satapathy et al., eds. Information and decision sciences, Singapore: Springer. 511–518.
   Google Scholar
• West, R., et al., 2018. Development of a framework for balanced mix design. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), Project 20-07.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. C., and Prowell, B. D., 1999. Comparison of laboratory wheel-tracking test results with Wes track performance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1681 (1), 121–128.
   Google Scholar
• Witten, I. H., Frank, E., and Hall, M., 2005. Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, I. K., and Johnson, R. A, 2000. A new family of power transformations to improve normality or symmetry. Biometrika, 87 (4), 954–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar