Analysis of performance parameters based on surface free energy to evaluate moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures modified with calcined marl dust

References

• AASHTO M320, 2010. Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder. Washington, D.C: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T 283, 2007. Standard method of test for resisitance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture-induced damage. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T 315, 2010. Determining the Rheological properties of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). Washington, D.C: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T 324, 2011. Standard method of test for Hamburg wheel-track test of compacted hot mix asphalt(HMA). Washington, DC: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T 324, 2014. Hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted hot mix asphalt (HMA). Wasgington, DC, USA: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T 1313, 2022. Standard method of test for determining the flexural creep stiffness of asphalt binder using the Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR). Washington D.C: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D., 1996. Influence of fines on performance of asphalt concrete mixtures. Proc., Annual Aggregates Symp., Aggregates Foundation for Technology, Research, and Education,. Alexandria, VA.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C127. 2016. American society for testing and materials, standard test method for relative density and absorption of coarse aggregate. PA, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C131, 2010. American society for testing and materials, standard test method for resistance to degradation of small-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles machine. PA, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C204, 2004. American society for testing and materials, standard test method for fineness of hydraulic cement by air permeability apparartus. PA, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C618, 2022. American standard testing method for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. West Conshohocken, Pennyslvania, USA.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C854, 2002. American society for testing and materials, standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. PA, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C88, 2018. American society for testing and materials, standard test method for soundness of aggregates. PA, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D36, 2006. American society for testing and materials, standard test methods for softening point of bitumen (Fing and ball apparatus). PA, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D4402, 2022. American society for testing and materials, standard test method for viscosity determination of asphalt at elevated temperatures using rotational viscometer. PA, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D 4791, 2010. American society for testing and materials, standard test method for flat particles, elongated particles. PA, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D5, 2006. American society for testing and materials, standard test methods for penetration of bituminous materials. PA, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D546, 2017. American society for testing and materials, standard test method for sieve analysis of mineral filler for asphalt paving mixtures. PA, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D 5821, 2017. American society for testing and materials, standard test method for determing the percentage of fractured particles in coarse aggregate. PA, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D 70, 2003. American society for testing and materials, standard test method for density of semi solid bituminous materials (Pycnometer method). PA, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D 92, 2020. American society for testing and materials, standard test method for determination of flash point using a Prensky-martens closed-up apparatus. PA, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Bahhou, A., et al., 2021. Using calcined marls as non- common supplementary cementitious materials. Materials, 11 (5), 512–539. doi:10.3390/min110050517
   Google Scholar
• Bahia, U., et al., 2011. Test methods and specification criteria for mineral filler used in HMA. Washington: NCHRP Research Results Diggest, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Bhasin, A., et al., 2007. Surface free energy to identify moisture sensitivity of materials for asphalt mixes. Transportation Research Record, 2001, 37–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhasin, A., and Little, D., 2007. Characteriszation of aggregate surface energy using the universal sorption device. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19 (8), 634–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, E., and Kandhal, P. a., 2001. Performance testing for hot mix asphalt. Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT).
   Google Scholar
• Dalhat, M. A., Waahhab, Al-Abdul, and I, H., 2017. Performance of recycled plastic waste modified asphalt binder in Saudi Arabia. International journal of pavement engineering, 18 (4), 349–357. doi:10.1080/10298436.2015.1088150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danner, T., et al., 2015. Feasibility of Calcined Marl as an alternative pozzolanic material. In K. Scrivener and A. Favier, eds. Calcined clays for sustainable concrete. Dordrecht: Springer, 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Danner, T., et al., 2016. Feasibilty of Calcined Marl as an alternative pozzolanic material. 1st international Conference on Calcined Clays for Sustainable Concrete. Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, G., et al., 2021. Effects of additional antistrip additives on durability and moisture susceptibility of granite based open-graded friction course. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 33 (9), 04021245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghabchi, R., Singh, D., and Zaman, M., 2014. Evaluation of moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixes containing RAP and different types of aggregates and asphalt binders using the surface free energy method. Construction and Building Materials, 73, 479–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hengji, Z., et al., 2020. Investigation on surface free energy and moisture damage of asphalt mortar with fine solid waste. Construction and Building Materials. 231, 117140. ISSN 0950-0618. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, B., et al., 2010. Laboratory evaluation of moisture susceptibility of hot mix asphalt containing cementitious fillers. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 22 (7), 667–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantar, Z. N., Karim, M. R., and Mahrez, A., 2012. A review of using waste and virgin polymer in pavement. Construction and building materials, 33, 55–62. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mana, M., Ghohomali, S., and Muhammed, A., 2021. Evaluation of Fatigue and rutting properties of asphalt binder and mastic modified by synthesized polyurethane. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 8 (2095), 1036–1048.
   Google Scholar
• Mansourian, A., and Gholamzadeh, S., 2017. Moisture susceptibility of hot mix asphalt containing asphalt binder. Road materials and pavement design, 18 (6), 1434–1447. doi:10.1080/14680629.2016.1211961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin-Garcia, B., Jimenez-Jimenez, O., and Rondon-Quintana, H., 2019. Behavior of thermally treated Kaolin filler in an asphalt concrete mixture. Revista Logos, Ciencia and Tecnologia, 11 (3), 10–17. doi:10.22335/rlct.v11i3.861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirhosseinic, F., et al., 2016. Applying surface free energy method for evaluation of moisture damage in asphalt mixtures containing date seed ash. Construction and Building Materials, 125, 408–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazirizad, M., Kavussi, A., and Abdi, A., 2015. Evaluation of the effects of antistripping agents on the performance of asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 84, 348–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ODOT (Oklahoma DOT), 2012. Material and testing e-guide, aggregate and stone test data. Oklahoma City: ODOT.
   Google Scholar
• Ostnor, T., and Justness, H., 2014. Durability of mortar with Calcined Marl as supplementary cementing material. Advances in Cement Research, 26 (6), 344–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polacco, G., et al., 2015. A review of the fundamentals of polymer-modified asphalts: asphalt/polymer interactions and principles of compatibility. Advances in colloid and interface science, 224, 72–112. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2015.07.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radelczuk, H., Holysz, L., and Chibowski, E., 2002. Comparison of the Lifshitz–van der Waals/acid–base and contact angle hysteresis approaches for determination of solid surface free energy. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 16, 1547–1568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakhimov, R. Z., et al., 2017. Properties of Portland cement pastes enriched with addition of calcined marl. Journal of Building Engineering, 11, 30–36. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2017.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondon-Quintana, H., et al., 2020. Use of thermally treated bentonite as filler in hot mix asphalt. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 32, 04020070. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usanga, I.N, et al., 2023. Predictive modelling of modified asphalt mixture rutting potentials: machine learning approach. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 47, 4087–4101. doi:10.1007/s40996-023-01192-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usanga, I., Okafor, F., and Ikeagwuani, C., 2023. Investigation of the performance of hot mix asphalt enhanced with Calcined Marl dust used as fillers. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology. doi:10.1007/s42947-023-00323-w
   Google Scholar
• Van Oss, C. J., Good, R., and Chaudhury, M., 1988. Additive and nonadditive surface tension components and the interpretation of contact angles. Langmuir, 4 (4), 884–891. doi:10.1021/la00082a018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasiuddin, N., et al., 2007. Effect of anti-strip additives on surface free energy characteristics of asphalt binders for moisture-induced damage potential. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 35, 36–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasiuddin, N., Zaman, M., and O'Rear, E., 2008. Effect of Sasobit and aspha-min on wettability and adhesion between asphalt binders and aggregates. Transportation Research Records, 2051, 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• West, R., et al., 2018. Development of a framework for balanced mix design. Washington, D.C: NCHRP Project 20-07(406).
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, F., and Amirkhanian, S., 2009. Laboratory investigation of moisture damage in ruberised asphalt mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10 (5), 319–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusoff, N., et al., 2014. The effects of moisture susceptibility and ageing conditions on nano-silica/polymer modified asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 72, 139–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahid, H., et al., 2015. Evaluation of moisture susceptibility of nanoclay-modified asphalt binders through the surface science approach. Journal of Materials in Civil Enginnering, 27 (10), 04014261-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zghair, H., Joni, H., and Mohammed, A., 2019. Assessment of the Influence of Nano Metakaolin filler on asphalt binder rheological properties. 3rd international Conference on Engineering Science. Kerbala.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., et al., 2022. Prediction and evaluation of rutting and moisture susceptibility in rejuvenated asphalt mixtures. Journal of cleaner production, 33, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129980.
   Google Scholar