The determinants of corporate political activity in Australia

References

• AEC Transparency Register. 2019. Australian Electoral Commission. https://transparency.aec.gov.au/.
   Google Scholar
• Aizenberg, E., and M. Hanegraaff. 2020. “Is Politics under Increasing Corporate Sway? A Longitudinal Study on the Drivers of Corporate Access.” West European Politics 43: 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1603849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, G. 2011. “Business, Government and Politics: The Changing Game.” Corporate Public Affairs 21: 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, G. 2012. “The Role of In-House Corporate Government Relations.” In The Influence Seekers, edited by M. Sheehan and P. Sekuluss, 148–161. Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, G. 2020. “Public Affairs in Australia: Evolving and Enhancing Corporate Performance.” Journal of Public Affairs 20 (1). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, A. M. 2020. “Corporate Political Strategies in Europe; The Determinants of Firm Access to the European Commission.” Business and Politics 22: 307–338. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2019.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AusTender. 2020. Australian Government. https://www.tenders.gov.au.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Register of Lobbyists. 2020. Australian Government Attorney-General’s Department. https://lobbyists.ag.gov.au/register.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtiari, S. 2019. Trends in Market Concentration of Australian Industries. s.l.: Office of the Chief Economist.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, R. A., I. d. S. Pool, and L. Dexter. 1972. American Business and Public Policy. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F., and B. Leech. 2001. “Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics.” The Journal of Politics 63: 1191–1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. 2008. “Rethinking the Role of the State: Explaining Business Collective Action at the Business Council of Australia.” Polity 40: 464–487. https://doi.org/10.1057/pol.2008.21.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. 2011. “Do We Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change?” British Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 883–906. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. 2022. “Large Firms in Australian Politics: The Institutional Dynamics of the Government Relations Function.” Australian Journal of Political Science, forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S., and H. Feng. 2014. “How Proximate and 'Meta-Institutional' Contexts Shape Institutional Change: Explaining the Rise of the People's Bank of China.” Political Studies 62 (1): 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S., and A. Hindmoor. 2014. “The Structural Power of Business and the Power of Ideas: The Strange Case of the Australian Mining Tax.” New Political Economy 19 (3): 470–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S., and J. Warhurst. 1993. “Business Political Activism and Government Relations in Large Companies in Australia.” Australian Journal of Political Science 28: 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00323269308402237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhagen, P., and N. J. Mitchell. 2009. “The Determinants of Direct Corporate Lobbying in the European Union.” European Union Politics 10: 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116509103366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boies, J. L. 1989. “Money, Business and the State: Material Interests, Fortune 500 companies, and the Size of Political Action Committees.” American Sociological Review 54: 821–833. https://doi.org/10.2307/2117756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwen, P. 2002. “Corporate Lobbying in the European Union: The Logic of Access.” Journal of European Public Policy 9 (3): 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760210138796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCPA (Centre for Corporate Public Affairs). 2019. 2019 State of Australian Public Affairs. Sydney: CCPA.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D. 1997. “The Evolution of the Large Firm as a Political Actor in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 4: 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017697344253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D., W. Grant, and G. Wilson. 2010. Political Science Perspectives on Business and Government. APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1644313.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D., A. Katsaitis, and M. Vannoni. 2021. Business Lobbying in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D., and M. Vannoni. 2020. “The Strategic Management of Government Affairs in Brussels.” Business & Society 59: 612–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318755083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Company360. 2020. Database. Illion Australia. https://www.illion.com.au/company-360/.
   Google Scholar
• Drutman, L. 2015. The Business of America Is Lobbying. Oxford.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, L. 2022. “The Core of Corporate Power in Australia.” Journal of Australian Political Economy 90: 92–104.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, S. D., and E. Jones. 2016. “Whom Do Corporations Lobby? The Domestic Institutional Determinants of Interest Group Activity in the EU.” Business and Politics 18: 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2015-0039.
   Google Scholar
• Grier, K. B., M. C. Munger, and B. E. Roberts. 1994. “The Determinants of Industry Political Activity.” American Political Science Review 88: 911–926. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanegraaff, M., and A. Poletti. 2021. “The Rise of Corporate Lobbying in the European Union: An Agenda for Future Research.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (4): 839–855. http://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.v59.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W., and N. Mitchell. 2000. “Disaggregating and Explaining Corporate Political Activity: Domestic and Foreign Corporations in National Politics.” American Political Science Review 94: 891–903. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W., N. Mitchell, and J. M. Drope. 2004. “Collective Action, Pluralism, and the Legitimacy Tariff: Corporate Activity or Inactivity in Politics.” Political Research Quarterly 57: 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290405700307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, D. M. 2004. “‘Business’ Is Not an Interest Group: On the Study of Companies in American National Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.090803.161829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A., and M. A. Hitt. 1999. “Corporate Political Strategy Formulation: A Model of Approach, Participation, and Strategy Decisions.” The Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 825–842. https://doi.org/10.2307/259357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., G. D. Keim, and D. Schuler. 2004. “Corporate Political Activity: A Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Management 30: 837–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.00.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IbisWorld. 2020. IbisWorld Industry Reports. https://www.ibisworld.com/au/list-of-industries.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., and M. Roberts. 2013. Why Institutions Matter: The New Institutionalism in Political Science. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Lux, S., T. R. Crook, and D. J. Woehr. 2011. “Mixing Businees with Politics; A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents and Outcomes of Corporate Political Activity.” Journal of Management 37: 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310392233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, I. 2003. “Interest Groups and Social Movements.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Social Sciences in Australia, edited by I. McAllister et al.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. J. 1995. “Nature or Nurture? Sources of Firm Preference for National Health Reform.” American Political Science Review 89: 898–913. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, N. J., W. L. Hansen, and E. M. Jepsen. 1997. “The Determinants of Domestic and Foreign Corporate Political Activity.” The Journal of Politics 59: 1096–1113. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizruchi, M. 2013. The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G., and C. L. Ibsen. 2021. “Quiet Politics and the Power of Business: New Perspectives in an Era of noisy Politics.” Politics & Society 49: 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329220985749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. Indicators of Product Market Regulation. https://www.oecd.org/economy/reform/indicators-of-product-market-regulation/.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OSIRIS. 2020. Database. Bureau van Dijk. https://osiris.bvdinfo.com.
   Google Scholar
• Ozer, M., and S. Lee. 2009. “When Do Firms Prefer Individual Action to Collective Action in The Pursuit of Corporate Political Strategy? A New Perspective on Industry Concentration.” Business and Politics 11 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1234.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, R. 1974. “Theories of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics 5 (2): 335–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003113.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, D., and K. Rehbein. 1997. “The Filtering Role of the Firm in Corporate Political Involvement.” Business & Society 36 (2): 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600202.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, D. S., K. Rehbein, and R. Cramer. 2002. “Pursuing Strategic Advantage through Political Means: A Multivariate Approach.” Academy of Management Journal 45: 659–672. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, M., and P. Sekuless. 2012. The Influence Seekers: Political Lobbying in Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Scholarly Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sims, R. 2016. Keynote address to the RBB Economics Conference. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. https://www.accc.gov.au/about-us/media/speeches/keynote-address-to-the-rbb-economics-conference-0.
   Google Scholar
• S&P Dow Jones Indices: Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) Methodology. 2019. S&P Global. https://www2.asx.com.au/content/dam/asx/markets/trade-our-cash-market/methodology-gics.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmo, S., and K. Thelen. 1992. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” In Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, edited by K. Thelen, S. H. Steinmo, and F. Longstreth, 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stutcbury, M. 1983. “Business Rabble Rethinks.” Australian Financial Review, April 13.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, G. K. 1990. “Corporate Political Strategies.” British Journal of Political Science 20 (2): 281–288. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400005822.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., and K. Griffiths. 2018. Who’s in the room? Access and influence in Australian politics. Carlton, Victoria: Grattan Institute.
   Google Scholar